Outline
Comptes Rendus

Biochemistry/Biochimie
Lipid components of olive oil from Tunisian Cv. Sayali: Characterization and authenticity
Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 333 (2010) no. 9, pp. 642-648.

Abstract

The analysis of the total lipid fraction from the Sayali variety of olive oil was accomplished in the present investigation. Glyceridic, unsaponifiable and flavour fractions of the oil were isolated and identified using several analytical methods. Chromatographic techniques have proven to be suitable for these determinations, especially capillary gas chromatography. Gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry was successfully used to identify sterols, triterpenes alcohols, 4-monomethylsterols, aliphatic alcohols and aroma compounds in our samples. Furthermore, solid phase microextraction was used to isolate volatiles from the total lipid fraction. Results from the quantitative characterization of Sayali olive oil showed that oleic acid (77.4%) and triolein (47.4%) were the dominant glyceridic components. However, the main compounds of the unsaponifiable fraction were β-sitosterol (147.5 mg/100 g oil), 24-methylene cycloartenol (146.4 mg/100 g oil) and hexacosanol (49.3 mg/100 g oil). Moreover, results showed that the aldehydic compounds were the major flavours present in Sayali olive oil.

Metadata
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.05.001
Mots clés : Analysis, Glyceridic, Unsaponifiable, Flavour, Components, Olea europaea L. lipids

Faouzi Sakouhi 1; Christelle Absalon 2; Guido Flamini 3; Pier Luigi Cioni 3; Habib Kallel 1; Sadok Boukhchina 1

1 Laboratoire de biochimie des lipides, département de biologie, faculté des sciences de Tunis, 2092 El Manar II, Tunis, Tunisia
2 Centre d’étude structurale et d’analyse des molécules organiques, institut des sciences moléculaires, université de Bordeaux 1, Bordeaux, France
3 Dipartimento di Chimica Bioorganica e Biofarmacia, Universita di Pisa, Via Bonanno 33, 56126, Pisa, Italy
@article{CRBIOL_2010__333_9_642_0,
     author = {Faouzi Sakouhi and Christelle Absalon and Guido Flamini and Pier Luigi Cioni and Habib Kallel and Sadok Boukhchina},
     title = {Lipid components of olive oil from {Tunisian} {Cv.} {Sayali:} {Characterization} and authenticity},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Biologies},
     pages = {642--648},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {333},
     number = {9},
     year = {2010},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crvi.2010.05.001},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Faouzi Sakouhi
AU  - Christelle Absalon
AU  - Guido Flamini
AU  - Pier Luigi Cioni
AU  - Habib Kallel
AU  - Sadok Boukhchina
TI  - Lipid components of olive oil from Tunisian Cv. Sayali: Characterization and authenticity
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Biologies
PY  - 2010
SP  - 642
EP  - 648
VL  - 333
IS  - 9
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.05.001
LA  - en
ID  - CRBIOL_2010__333_9_642_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Faouzi Sakouhi
%A Christelle Absalon
%A Guido Flamini
%A Pier Luigi Cioni
%A Habib Kallel
%A Sadok Boukhchina
%T Lipid components of olive oil from Tunisian Cv. Sayali: Characterization and authenticity
%J Comptes Rendus. Biologies
%D 2010
%P 642-648
%V 333
%N 9
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.05.001
%G en
%F CRBIOL_2010__333_9_642_0
Faouzi Sakouhi; Christelle Absalon; Guido Flamini; Pier Luigi Cioni; Habib Kallel; Sadok Boukhchina. Lipid components of olive oil from Tunisian Cv. Sayali: Characterization and authenticity. Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 333 (2010) no. 9, pp. 642-648. doi : 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.05.001. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/biologies/articles/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.05.001/

Version originale du texte intégral

1 Introduction

Traceability and authenticity of oils from vegetable seeds and fruits are of great importance, due to the expanding demand for oils, as well as for their nutritional and medical applications [1–3]. Olive oil is one of the food products that are limited by regulations established by the European Union and the International Olive Oil Council, to control fraud [4]. Determination of adulteration and characterization of oils are based on the analysis of minor [5–7] and major [8,9] compounds. The major components of oil, called also the glyceredic fraction, are triacylglycerols. These are present as 95–98% of total lipid compounds [10]. Moreover, monoacylglycerols, diacylglycerols and free fatty acids can be also present [11]. In addition to these molecules, other minor compounds, called unsaponifiables, can be mentioned [12]. The unsaponifiables are the delicate and the interesting fraction of the lipid matter [13]. They really represent the credible maker to characterize [8] and to detect the admixture of vegetable oils [14]. The unsaponifiable fraction of vegetable oils consists of various classes of molecules, such as sterols (4-desmethylsterols), triterpene alcohols, 4-monomethylsterols, aliphatic alcohols, vitamins and hydrocarbons compounds. Moreover, olive oil has a special flavour that distinguishes it from other edible vegetable oils. The flavour fraction of olive oil is generated from a number of volatile molecules that are present at extremely low concentrations [15,16], in which sesquiterpenes and aldehydes compounds were the major chemical classes [17].

In the last decades, a suite of analytical methods (chromatographic and spectrometric techniques) have been developed to identity and quantify the individual component of these lipid factions. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) [18], high-temperature gas-liquid (GLC) [19] and atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry (APCI–MS) [20] were used to characterize triacylglycerol composition of vegetable oils. In addition, GC-MS is considered to be the suitable method to analyse the different unsaponifiable subfractions after further isolation of each class using TLC [12]. Nevertheless, little research on the analysis of 4-desmethylsterols (unsaponifiable subfraction) using LC-MS is available [21]. Furthermore, with the advent of high-resolution capillary GC using fused-silica columns, GC-MS was the suitable technique to identify the flavour components of vegetable oils [22]. The isolation of aroma compounds from the lipid matter was generally carried out using SPME or Hydrodistillation as extraction methods [23].

The aim of the present work is to carry out a simultaneous analysis of glyceridic, unsaponifiable and flavour fractions of Tunisia Sayali olive cultivar using different chromatographic methods. The knowledge of the lipid fraction compositions of olive is of a great importance in the detection of olive oil adulteration as well as in the evaluation of the nutritional value of these phytomolecules. It is known that because of their similarities in fatty acid and triacylglycerol compositions, hazelnut oil is used to adulterate olive oil.

2 Experimental

2.1 Oil sample extractions

Virgin olive oil samples were obtained from the Tunisia Sayali Olea europaea L. cultivar. The olive trees (10 plants) were grown on the Agronomy farm of the Office Terres Domaniales Ghzala (OTDG, Bizerte) in the north of Tunisia. Only healthy fruits, without any sign of infection or physical damage, were selected. In this study, two kinds of method were used to extract the oil: the first one was achieved with a hammer crusher. Briefly, olives from the Sayali cultivar were washed and crashed, and the paste was mixed at 25 °C for 30 min. After centrifugation, the oil was transferred into dark glass bottles. This method extracts oil without the intervention of solvent and temperature, but it gives a lower quantity of oil. This method preserves both the typical aroma of olive oil and the chemical structure of some fragile molecules, such as triacylglycerols.

The second method was performed using a Soxhlet apparatus, with petroleum ether as the extraction solvent. The extraction remained 4 hours at 40 °C and was repeated three times for each sample. The extract was dried in a rotary evaporator at 32 °C. Oil was weighed and stored at −10 °C. The oil obtained was used to carry out the unsaponifiable analyses. The advantage of this method is to produce a higher quantity of oil.

2.2 Gas chromatography–flame ionization detection (GC–FID) analysis of fatty acids

For the determination of fatty acids (FA) composition, the methyl-esters were prepared by vigorous handshaking of a solution of oil in hexane (0.2 g in 3 ml) with 0.4 ml of methanolic potassium hydroxide 2N, and then 1 μl of the solution was injected into GC with a FID detector. A fused silica column (50 m length × 0.25 mm I.D.), coated with SGL-1000 phase (0.25 μm thickness; Sugerlabor, Spain), was used. The carrier gas was helium, at a flow through the column of 1 ml/min. The temperatures of the injector and detector were set at 250 °C and the oven temperature at 210 °C. The identification of FA components was performed by comparison of their retention times with authentic standards. The fatty acid content (expressed in % of total fatty acids) was calculated using the following formula; content (%) = PAi/TPA, where PAi = FA's peak area, TPA = total FA peak areas. Three independent replicates have been done for each sample.

2.3 High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of triacylglycerols

The analysis of TAG was achieved using RP-HPLC. An amount of 0.5 g of oil was dissolved in 10 ml of acetone; 10 μl of the mixture was hand-injected into the RP-HPLC (HP 1100 Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) on a silica gel column (particle size 5 μm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm I.D.). Sensitivity of the detector was adjusted to RI = 0.9 units. TAG separation was achieved with an isocratic elution of acetone/acetonitrile (50:50; v/v) at the flow rate of 1.5 ml/min at 24 °C. Identification of TAG peaks was made by comparison of their retention times with authentic standards. The concept of the equivalent carbon number (ECN) has been used to rationalize the retention time of triacylglycerols. The ECN is defined as the total number of carbon atoms (CN) in the fatty acid acyl chains minus twice the number of double bonds (N) per molecule: ECN = CN–2N. The TAG content (expressed in % of total TAGs) was calculated using the following formula; content (%) = PAi/TPA, where PAi = TAG's peak area, TPA = total TAGs peak areas. Three independent replicates have been made for each sample.

2.4 Saponification

Unsaponifable fraction of lipids were determined by saponifying 5 g of oil with 50 mL of ethanolic KOH 12% (w/v) solution; the mixture was heated at 60 °C for 1.30 h. After cooling, 50 ml of H2O was added. The unsaponifiable matter was extracted four times with 50 ml of petroleum ether. The combined ether extract was washed 50 ml of ethanol-water (1:1). The extracted ether was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness using N2. The dry specimens were dissolved in chloroform for TLC analysis.

2.5 Thin layer chromatography separation

The unsaponifiable matter was separated into subfractions on preparative silica gel thin-layer plates (silica gel 60 G F254) using 1-dimensional TLC with hexane-diethyl ether (6:4, v/v) as the developing solvent. The unsaponifiable fraction diluted in chloroform was applied on the silica gel plates. So as to correctly identify the different unsaponifiable subfractions, reference samples of purified molecules (5-α-cholestanol, lanosterol and 1-eicosanol standards of sterols, triterpene alcohols and aliphatic alcohols, respectively) were applied on the left and the right sides of the TLC plates. After development, the plate was sprayed with 2,7-dichlorofluorescein and viewed under UV light. The band corresponding to each unsaponifiable subfraction was scraped, extracted three times with chloroform-diethyl ether (1:1, v/v), filtered to remove the residual silica, dried in a rotary evaporator and stored at −10 °C for GC-MS/GC-FID analyses.

2.6 Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry detection of the unsaponifiables

GC–MS analyses of the unsaponifiable subfractions were performed using a DB-5MS fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 m film thickness; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) in an Varian SAR 3400Cx gas chromatograph coupled directly to the mass detector (MS Varian SATURN). Helium was used as carrier gas, with a constant flow rate of 1 ml min−1. The injector and detector temperatures were 250 °C. The oven temperature was programmed from 150 to 300 °C at 4 °C min−1. The final temperature was held constant for 10 min and the transfer line temperature was 250 °C. Electron impact mass spectra were measured at acceleration energy of 70 eV. Manual injection of 1 μl of the solution of sterol was performed in the split mode at a 60:1 split ratio. The sterols, triterpene alcohols, 4-monomethylsterols and aliphatic alcohols compounds were identified by comparing their retention times and mass spectra with those of their pure molecules. The peaks were also confirmed with NIST Mass Spectral Library.

2.7 Gas chromatography–flame ionization detection (GC–FID) quantification

Due to the higher sensibility of the GC–FID detector compared to the GC-MS one [12,13], the quantification of the unsaponifiable components was performed using GC-FID apparatus. The GC system used was a HP 4890A gas chromatograph (Hewlett-Packard, Avondale, PA) equipped with a split-splitless injector, a FID and a DB-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 m film thickness; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) column was used. The initial column temperature was 150 °C and programmed to increase at a rate of 4 °C min−1 to 300 °C and then held for 25 min. The injector and detector temperatures were 280 °C and 310 °C, respectively, and helium was used as carrier gas at an inlet pressure of 12 psi, giving a column flow of 1 ml/min. The individual unsaponifiable component was calculated as milligrams per 100 g of oil using the following formula; amount = 100 − (PAs)(mis)/(PAis)(m), where PAs = compound peak area, PAis = internal standard area, mis = weight (mg) of the internal standard and m = weight (g) of oil taken for analysis.

2.8 Solid phase microextraction (SPME) of flavour compounds

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) was used as a technique for headspace sampling of samples. Supelo SPME devices coated with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, 100 μm) were used to sample the headspace of 3 ml of virgin olive oil inserted into a 5 ml glass vial and allowed to equilibrate for 30 min. After the equilibration time, the fiber was exposed to the headspace for 50 min at room temperature. Once sampling was finished, the fiber was withdrawn into the needle and transferred to the injection port of the GC and GC-MS system.

2.9 Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry detection of flavour compounds

GC analyses were accomplished with an HP-5890 series II instrument equipped with HP-Wax and HP-5 capillary columns (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm film thikness), working with the following temperature program: 60 °C for 10 min, ramp of 5 °C/min to 220 °C; injector and detector temperatures, 250 °C; carrier gas, nitrogen (2 ml/min); detector, dual FID; split ratio, 1:30; injection 0.5 μl. The identification of the components was performed, for both columns, by comparison of their retention times with those of pure authentic samples and by means of their linear retention indices (LRI) relative to the series of n-hydrocarbons.

The relative proportions of the constituents were obtained by FID peak area normalization. GC-EIMS analyses were performed with a DB-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm; coating thickness = 0.25 μm) and a Varian Saturn 2000 ion trap mass detector. Analytical conditions: injector and transfer line temperatures, 220 and 240 °C, respectively; oven temperature programmed from 60 to 240 °C at 3 °C/min; carrier gas, helium at 1 ml/min; injection, 0.2 μl (10% hexane solution); split ratio, 1:30. Identification of the constituents was determined by comparing their retention times and mass spectra with those of their pure molecules.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Analyze of fatty acids

Esterified fatty acids prepared from the lipid fraction of Sayali olive oil were injected into the gas chromatograph. The elution of the compounds from the capillary column is dependent on both the molecular weight and the degree of unsaturation of their carbon chain. Identification of fatty acid components was realized by the comparison of their retention times with authentic standards. The analyze of the chromatogram from our samples showed the presence of eight fatty acid peaks which appeared between 10 and 25 min retention time that explained the various fatty acid molecules in olive oils.

The quantitative characterization of the acidic composition (expressed in % of total fatty acids) showed that oleic acid was the predominant component which represents 77.4% of the total fatty acids. Other compounds were present in a relatively high percentage as palmitic acid (C16:0) (11.0%) and linoleic (C18:2) (5.9%). Within these compounds, several minor fatty acids were also detected such as stearic (C18:0) (2.7%), linolenic (C18:3) (1.7%), gadoleic (C20:1) (0.6%), palmitoleic (C16:1) and arachidic (C20:0) (0.2%) acids. Moreover, our results showed that Sayali oil cultivar was rich with unsaturated fatty acids (90.1%), especially monounsaturated ones (78.3%). Consequently, the high percentage of monounsaturated fatty acids in Sayali cultivar explains the nutritional benefits of olive since numerous researches indicating the beneficial health effects of these components [24,25]. The qualitative characterization of Sayali fatty acids composition was in agreement with those listed in literature [19,26–28]. Concerning the quantitative characterization of the fatty acid compounds, results showed that it differed from one olive oil to another. Indeed, Salvador et al. [26] reported that olive oil from Cornicabra cultivar (Spain) contained about 80% of oleic acidic, 10% of palmitic acid and 4% of linoleic acid. However, Buccioni et al. [27] mentioned that the percentages of these fatty acids in Italian olive oil sample were, respectively, 38.74, 21.35 and 19.6%. Moreover, the content of these major fatty acids from Tunisian cv. Sayali was 77.4, 11 and 5.9% for oleic, palmitic and linoleic acids, respectively. Thus, we explained the difference in the quantitative characterization by the fact that the content of fatty acids is affected by geographical g rowing area and difference in olive varieties [29–32].

3.2 Analyze of triacylglycerols

HPLC technique with a RP-18 column separates TAG according to both length and unsaturation degree of their carbon chain [33]. The oil sample was dissolved in acetone and directly injected into an HPLC column without any preliminary chemical derivatization or purification. Identification of TAG peaks was made by comparison of their retention times with authentic standards. The TAG peaks in the chromatogram appear between 12 and 38 min retention time and this is due to the various TAG species in Sayali olive oil (Fig. 1). The main peak in the HPLC chromatogram corresponds to the triolein (OOO).

Fig. 1

Triacylglycerols profile of Sayali olive oils analyzed by HPLC. (L, linoleic; Ln, Linolenic; O, oleic; P, palmitic; A, arachidic; S, stearic acids; MG, monoacylglycerol; DG, diacylglycerol).

Results from the quantitative characterization of the sample (expressed in % of total triacylglycerols) showed the presence of fifteen TAG which differed in their contents. OOO was expressed at higher level which represented 47.4% of total identified TAG. Moreover, POO (22.1%) and LOO (11.9%) were present in a relatively high percentage. Besides these compounds, several minor TAG molecular species were identified in our sample as SOO (3.7%), POP (2.7%), LLO ≈ LnOO (1.9%), ALO (0.9%) and LnLP (0.2%). In Sayali olive oil, the percentage of the main TAG species were present in this order OOO > POO > LOO > LOP. After this quantitative characterization of TAG molecular species, we deduce that the fatty acids content of Sayali oil predict the TAG composition of the studied olive oil. In fact, the percentage of the main fatty acids determined in Sayali oil were in order of Oleic (77.5%) > Palmtic (10.8%) > Linoleic acids (5.8%). The different TAG species and their percentages from the studied cultivar were in agreement with those listed in literature. Indeed, results from the quantitative characterization of TAG from olive sample studied by Jakab et al. [10] showed that OOO (46.43%) was the highest component followed by POO (18.14%) and LOO (12.34%). Moreover, Ollivier et al. [34] reported that OOO (45.36%), POO (21.69%) and LOO (12.05%) were the main TAG species detected in French olive oils collected from the area of Haute-Provence.

3.3 Analyze of sterols (4-desmethylsterols) and stanols

Sterols and stanols extracted from the unsaponifiable matter of Sayali oil were silylated and then directly injected into GC-MS chromatograph. The sterols identified and stanols are given in Table 1. The results from the qualitative characterization of the sample showed the presence of eleven sterols and two phytostanols (sitostanol and campestanol). The quantification of identified compounds was achieved using GC-FID.

Table 1

Sterols content (expressed in mg/100 g oil) of olive (Cvs Sayali and Picual) and hazelnut oil samples.

Compounds Cv. Sayalia Cv. Picualb Hazelnut oilc
Cholesterol 1.8 ± 1.1 0.3 0.6
24-Methylene cholesterol 0.5 ± 0.2 0.2 d
Campesterol 3.7 ± 1.7 3.4 3.9
Campestanol 0.2 ± 0.4 0.1 0.2
Stigmasterol 1.4 ± 0.9 0.5 0.8
Δ7-Campesterol 0.3 ± 0.1 0.1
Clerosterol 0.9 ± 0.6 0.9
β-Sitosterol 147.5 ± 12.4 86.4 63.5
Sitostanol 0.7 ± 0.5 0.8
Δ5-Avenasterol 18.3 ± 3.7 6.1 3.9
5.24-Stigmastadienol 0.3 ± 0.1 0.5 0.3
Δ7-Stigmastenol 0.2 ± 0.1 0.1 0.2
Δ7-Avenasterol 0.3 ± 0.1 0.3 0.5

a Each value is a mean of three determinations.

b Results reported by Casas et al. [4].

c Results reported by Azadmard-Damirchi et al. [14].

d Values not mentioned.

Results from the quantitative analysis of sterols from Sayali oil (expressed in mg/100 g of oil) showed that β-sitosterol was the predominant component (147.5 mg/100 g oil) accounting of over 82% of total sterols. Beside this compound, Δ5-avenasterol was present in a relatively high concentration (18.3 mg/100 g oil). However, campesterol (3.7 mg/100 g oil), cholesterol (1.8 mg/100 g oil), stigmasterol (1.4 mg/100 g oil), 5,24-Stigmastadienol (0.3 mg/100 g oil) amounted to less than 5% of total sterols content. The Δ7-sterols were the minor sterols detected in Sayali olive oil and they represented by Δ7-avenasterol (0.2 mg/100 g oil) and Δ7-campesterol (0.3 mg/100 g oil). In addition to sterols, the studied oil contains phytostanols which represent the saturated forms of sterols (campesterol and β-sitosterol [35]. In our sample, stanols were found to be minor components of the sterolic fraction. Sitostanol (0.7 mg/100 g oil) and campestanol (0.2 mg/100 g oil) were the unique stanols detected in Sayali olive oil. The qualitative characterization of our samples was in agreement with the results reported by Casas et al. [4] (Table 1). However, the quantitative characterization was different which can be explained by the fact that the level of 4-desmethylsterols is affected by geographical growing area and difference in olives varieties [4,36,37]. A direct comparison of sterols (4-desmethylsterols) and stanols of Sayali olive oil with the hazelnut ones [14] (Table 1) showed that the composition of these compounds were rather similar in both olive and hazelnut oils.

3.4 Analyze of triterpene alcohols and monomethylsterols

After their separation by preparative TLC, methylsterols (triterpene alcohols (4,4′-dimetylsterols) and monomethylsterols) subfractions were analyzed by GC-MS and GC. The identified triterpene alcohols and monomethylsterols were given in Table 2. The quantitative characterization of triterpene alcohols (expressed in mg/100 g of oil) showed that 24-methylene cycloartenol was the dominant triterpene alcohols in Sayali olive oil (146.4 mg/100 g oil) accounting of over 91% of total triterpene alcohols. Moreover, cycloartenol (52.3 mg/100 g oil) was found at minor amount compared to 24-methylene cycloartenol, thus cycloartenol is formed as the first cyclic triterpenoid precursor of phytosterols and works as a substrate for the first methylation reaction, resulting in 24-methylene cycloartenol [38]. However, β-amyrin (10.1 mg/100 g oil), δ-amyrin (2.8 mg/100 g oil) and traroxerol (2.6 mg/100 g oil) were less present in Sayali olive oil. The characterizations of our samples mentioned above were in agreement with those of Azadmard-Damirchi et al. [12] (Table 2).

Table 2

Triterpene alcohols and 4-monomethylsterols content (expressed in mg/100 g oil) of olive and hazelnut oil samples.

Compound Cv. Sayalia Olive oilb Hazelnut oilb
Triterpene alcohols
 δ-Amyrin 2.8 ± 1.2 12.3 1.5
 Taraxerol 2.6 ± 1.1 7.0 nd
 β-Amyrin 10.1 ± 2.2 30.7 1.2
 Cycloartenol 52.3 ± 4.5 75.0 2.0
 24-Methylene cycloartenol 146.4 ± 12.6 173.4 6.2
Monomethyl
 Obtusifoliol 7.7 ± 1.9 9.4 5.2
 Gramisterol 4.2 ± 1.4 4.2 1.9
 Cycloeucalenol 16.2 ± 3.8 12.7 tr
 Citostradienol 42.1 ± 4.1 40.2 29.7

a Each value is a mean of three determinations.

b Results reported by Azadmard-Damirchi et al. [12].

In Sayali olive oil, the 4-monomethylsterol components were minor compared to triterpene alcohols (4,4′-dimethylsterols) and sterols (4-desmetylsterols). In the present study, the total 4-monomethylsterol components were found at about 8% of total phytosterols. Results from the quantitative characterization showed that cycloeucalenol (42.1 mg/100 g oil) and citrostadienol (16.2 mg/100 g oil) were the most abundant 4-monomethylsterol compounds followed by obtusifoliol (7.7 mg/100 g oil) and gramisterol (4.2 mg/100 g oil) (Table 2). The qualitative and quantitative characterizations of 4-monomethylsterols components differed from one vegetable oil to another. Harrabi et al. [39] suggested that corn oils contained 34% of obtusifoliol, 28% of gramisterol and 44% of citrostadienol. However, Azadmard et al. [14] demonstrated also that cycloeucalenol was present at only a trace level in hazelnut oils. On the other hand, our results show that citrostadienol (59%) and cycloeucalenol (23%) were the major 4-monomethylsterols compounds in olive oils. Therefore, we propose to use 4-monomethylsterols fraction to detect the adulteration of vegetable oils.

3.5 Analyze of aliphatic alcohols

The results from the qualitative characterization of Sayali olive using GC-MS indicated that the aliphatic alcohol fraction of oil was made up of very long chain aliphatic primary alcohols (20–36 carbon). The identified compounds were docosanol, tricosanol, tetracosanol, pentacosanol, hexacosanol, heptacosanol, octacosanol and triacontanol (Table 3). The quantitative characterization of aliphatic alcohols of Sayali olive oil (expressed in mg/100 g of oil) showed that hexacosanol (49.3 mg/100 g oil), tetracosanol (36.5 mg/100 g oil), octacosanol (28.9 mg/100 g oil) and docosanol (20.1 mg/100 g oil) were the dominant policosanol compounds accounting for over 85% of total policosanol. However, pentacosanol (9 mg/100 g/oil), heptacosanol (7.2 mg/oil) and tricosanol (3.5 mg/100 g/oil) were less present in Sayali olive oil. In fact, the results from the quantitative characterisation of samples examined here showed that the aliphatic alcohols with pair carbon chain were more accumulated than the impair ones. Moreover, the qualitative characterization of Sayali oil showed that all the identified aliphatic alcohols fraction were policosanol (aliphatic alcohols with 20–36 carbon atoms). Policosanol is a mixture of bioactive molecules shown to have beneficial effect in treating hypercholesterolemia. Recently, food products enriched with policosanol are currently available in the US market [40]. Thus, the wealth in long chain aliphatic alcohols level makes olive of great beneficial effects since recent published studies focused on its healthy effects [41,42]. Concerning the aliphatic alcohols composition of hazelnut oil, a direct comparison with those of Sayali olive oil is not realizable since, to our knowledge, no information is not available concerning of the aliphatic alcohol composition of hazelnut (Table 3).

Table 3

Retention time (RT) and mass spectrometric data for aliphatic alcohols components identified by GC-MS.

R.T (min) Mains fragmentation ions (M/Z) Compound Contenta (mg/100 g oil)
13.41 280, 195, 111, 69, 55, 43 Docosanol 20.1 ± 2.8
16.75 308, 223, 125, 111, 57, 43 Tricosanol 3.5 ± 1.3
19.20 336, 252, 153, 111, 97, 57 Tetracosanol 36.5 ± 3.2
22.04 350, 265, 139, 97, 83, 43 Pentacosanol 9.0 ± 2.1
25.17 364, 236, 125, 111, 97, 57 Hexacosanol 49.3 ± 4.2
28.21 378, 208, 111, 97, 71, 29 Heptacosanol 7.2 ± 1.8
31.19 364, 265, 125, 97, 69, 43 Octacosanol 28.9 ± 2.9
36.70 392, 336, 223, 139,111, 57 Triacontanol 1.7 ± 0.9

a Each value is a mean of three determinations.

3.6 Analyze of flavour fraction

The knowledge of the flavour composition of olive oil is very important since it is related to its authenticity and is used to detect olive oil adulteration [43]. In the present study, flavour components were extracted using SPME and then were identified by CG-MS. In Sayali olive oil, eighteen volatile compounds were detected (Fig. 2). Results from the quantitative characterization of Sayali volatiles showed that (E)-2-undecenal (23.4%), (E)-2-decenal (19.1%) and nonanal (11.2%) were the main flavours. Beside these dominant components, camphor (0.6%), decanal (0.9%), dodecanal (0.3%) and pentacosane (1.1%) were also present. However, camphene, 1,8-cineole and (E,E)-α-farnesene were found as trace (< 0.1%) in Sayali olive oil. After this characterization using SPME, results showed that the aldehyde compounds were responsible for the flavour and aroma in Sayali olive oil. Moreover, results from the qualitative and quantitative characterizations of our sample were different from those listed in the literature [44,45]. This difference can be explained by the fact that the volatile composition is extremely influenced by several factors, such as, degree of olive maturity, effect of variety, agronomic conditions and the extracted method used [22,46]. Furthermore, it is interesting to mention that the flavour fraction of hazelnut oil has never previously been studied; that is why we cannot establish a comparison with those of olive oil.

Fig. 2

Typical mass chromatogram of the aroma components extracted from Sayali olive oil.

4 Conclusion

In summary, taken together the results from the analysis of the glyceridic, unsaponifiable and flavour fractions of Sayali olive oil: (1) the olive and hazelnut oils have nearly similar fatty acids and TAG profiles; (2) the triterpene alcohols (4,4′-dimethylsterols) and the monomethylsterols were present differently (qualitatively and/or quantitatively) into the two types of oil; (3) the aliphatic alcohol composition of hazelnut was not characterized previously; (4) the olive and hazelnut oils have different flavour tastes. Thus, it is interesting to mention that the unsaponifiable fraction determines both the origin and the nature of lipids. Therefore, we suggest the use of triterpene alcohols and the monomethylsterols as obligatory analyses by the International Olive oil Council during the world commercialization of the vegetable oils.

Acknowledgements

This work has been done as a part of a National Research Project. We thank the Ministry of Scientific Research, Technology and Competence Development of Tunisia for financially supporting this investigation. Part of this work was carried out in both at “Centre d’étude structurale et d’analyse des molécules organiques”. Bordeaux 1, France and at “Dipartimento di Chimica Bioorganica e Biofarmacia”, Pisa, Italy.


References

[1] A.B. Awad; A. Downie; C.S. Fink; U. Kim Dietary phytosterol inhibits the growth and metastasis of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells grown in SCID mice, Anticancer Res., Volume 20 (2000), pp. 821-826

[2] Z. Ovesna; A. Vachalkova; K. Horvathova Taraxasterol and beta-sitosterol: new naturally compounds with chemoprotective/chemopreventive effect, Neoplasma, Volume 51 (2004), pp. 327-333

[3] V.D.P. Nair; I. Kanfer; J. Hoogmartens Determination of stigmasterol, β-sitosterol and stigmastanol in oral dosage forms using high performance liquid chromatography with evaporate light scattering detection, J. Pharmac. Biomed. Anal., Volume 41 (2006), pp. 731-737

[4] J.S. Casas; E.O. Bueno; A.M.M. García; M.M. Cano Sterol and erythrodiol + uvaol content of virgin olive oils from cultivars of Extremadura (Spain), Food Chem., Volume 87 (2004), pp. 225-230

[5] T. Rezanka; H. Rezankova Characterization of fatty acids and triacylglycerols in vegetable oils by gas chromatography and statistical analysis, Anal. Chim. Acta, Volume 398 (1999), pp. 253-261

[6] N.K. Andrikopoulos; I.G. Giannakis; V. Tzamtzis Screening for Sarin in Air and Water by Solid-Phase Microextraction–Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. Sci., Volume 39 (2001), pp. 137-162

[7] D.S. Lee; E.S. Lee; H.J. Kim; S.O. Kim; K. Kim Reversed phase liquid chromatographic determination of triacylglycerol composition in sesame oils and the chemometric detection of adulteration, Anal. Chim. Acta, Volume 429 (2001), pp. 321-330

[8] A. Cert; W. Moreda; M.C. Perez-Camino Chromatographic analysis of minor constituents in vegetable oils, J. Chromatogr. A, Volume 881 (2000), pp. 131-148

[9] I.M. Larenzo; J.L.P. Pavon; M.E.F. Laespada; C.G. Pinto; B.M. Cordero Detection of adulterants in olive oil by headspace-mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, Volume 945 (2000), pp. 221-230

[10] A. Jakab; K. Héberger; E. Forgács Comparative analysis of different plant oils by high-performance liquid chromatography-atmosopheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, Volume 976 (2000), pp. 255-263

[11] J.O.J. Lay; R. Liyanage; B. Durham; J. Brooks Rapid characterization of edible oils by direct matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis using Triacylglycerols, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., Volume 20 (2006), pp. 952-958

[12] S. Azadmard-Damirchi; P.C. Dutta Novel solid-phase extraction method to separate 4-desmethyl-4-monomethylsterols-, 4,4′-dimethylsterols in vegetable oils, J. Chromatogr., Volume 1108 (2006), pp. 183-187

[13] S.S. Cunha; J.O. Fernandes; M.B.P.P. Oliveira Quantification of free and esterified sterols in Portuguese olive oils by solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, Volume 1128 (2006), pp. 220-227

[14] S. Azadmard-Damirchi; G.P. Savage; P.C. Dutta Sterol fractions in hazelnut and virgin olive oils and 4,4′-dimethylsterols as possible markers for detection of adulteration of virgin olive oil, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., Volume 82 (2005) no. 10, pp. 717-725

[15] A.K. Kiritsakis; W.W. Christie Analysis of edible oils, Handbook of olive oil: analysis and properties, Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD, 2000 (pp. 129–58)

[16] L. Di Giovacchino; N. Costantini; A. Serraiocco; G. Surricchio; C. Basti Natural antioxidants and volatile compounds of virgin olive oils obtained by two or three-phases centrifugal decamters, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., Volume 103 (2001), pp. 279-285

[17] M. Ridofli; S. Terenziani; M. Patumi; G. Fontanazza Characterization of the lipoxygenases in some olive cultivars and determination of their role in volatile compounds formation, J. Agric. Food Chem., Volume 50 (2002), pp. 835-839

[18] Advances in lipid methodology (W.W. Christie, ed.), The Oily Press, Ayr, UK, 1992 (pp. 239–271)

[19] N. Ruiz-López; E. Martínez-Force; R. Garcés Sequential one-step extraction and analysis of triacylglycerols and fatty acids in plant tissues, Anal. Biochem., Volume 317 (2003), pp. 247-254

[20] H.R. Mottram; R.P. Evershed Structure analysis of triacylglycerol positional isomers using atmospheric-pressure chemical-ionization mass spectrometry, Tetrahedron Lett., Volume 37 (1996), pp. 8593-8596

[21] B. Canãbate-Dıáz; A. Segura Carretero; A. Fernández-Gutiérrez; A. Belmonte Vega; A. Garrido Frenich; J.L. Martínez Vidal; J. Duran Martos Separation and determination of sterols in olive oil by HPLC-MS, Food Chem., Volume 102 (2007), pp. 593-598

[22] G. Flamini; P. Lui Cioni; I. Morelli Volatiles from leaves, fruits and virgin oil from Olea europaea Cv. Olivastra Seggianese from Italy, J. Agric. Food Chem., Volume 51 (2003), pp. 1382-1386

[23] G. Flamini; P. Lui Cioni; I. Morelli Composition of the essential oils and in vivo emission of volatiles of four Lamium species from Italy: L. purpureum, L. hybridum, L. bifidum and L. Amplexicaule, Food Chem., Volume 91 (2003), pp. 63-68

[24] T.M. Sorci; M.D. Wilson; I.F. Johnson; L.L. Rudeell Studies on the expression of genes encoding apolipoprptein B 100 and the LDL receptor in non human primates. Comparison of dietary fat and cholesterol, J. Biol. Chem., Volume 264 (1998), pp. 9039-9045

[25] T. Aoki; M. Wakisaka; T. Hase; I. Tokimitsu Anti-obesity effect of dietary in C57BL/6J mice: dietary stimulates intestinal lipid metabolism, J. Lipid. Res., Volume 43 (2000), pp. 1312-1319

[26] M.D. Salvador; F. Aranda; G. Fregapane Influence of fruit ripening on Cornicabra virgin olive oil quality a study of four successive crop seasons, Food Chem., Volume 73 (2001), pp. 45-53

[27] A. Buccini; M. Antongiovanni; F. Petacchi; M. Mele; A. Serra; P. Secchiari; D. Benvenuti Effect of diatary fat quality on C18:1 fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid production: an in vitro rumen fermentation study, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., Volume 127 (2006), pp. 268-282

[28] I.B. Pons; S.M. Pons; A.I. Castellote Determination of phospholipid fatty acids in biological samples by solid-phase extraction and fast gas chromatography, J. Chromatogr. A, Volume 116 (2006), pp. 204-208

[29] G. Bianchia; L. Giansantea; A. Shawb; D.B. Kellb Chemometric criteria for the characterization of Italian protected denomination of origin (DOP) olive oils from their metabolic profiles, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., Volume 103 (2001), pp. 141-150

[30] A.M. Paz; G. Beltrn; D. Ortega; M. Uceda Characterisation of virgin olive oil of Italian olive cultivars grown in Andalusia, Food Chem., Volume 89 (2005), pp. 387-391

[31] S. Lanteri; C. Armanino; E. Perri; A. Palopoli Study of oils from Calabrian olive cultivars by chemometric methods, Food Chem., Volume 76 (2002), pp. 501-507

[32] R. Bucci; A.D. Magri; A.L. Magri; D. Marini; F. Marini Chemical authentication of extra virgin oil varieties by supervised chemometric procedures, J. Agric. Food Chem., Volume 50 (2002), pp. 413-418

[33] S. Boukhchina; J. Gresti; H. Kallel; J. Bésard Stereospecific analysis of TAG from sunflower seed, Oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., Volume 80 (2003), pp. 5-8

[34] D. Ollivier; J. Artaud; C. Pinatel; J.P. Durbec; M. Guérère Differentiation of French virgin olive oil RDOs by sensory characteristics, fatty acid and triacylglycerol compositions and chemometrics, Food Chem., Volume 97 (2006), pp. 382-393

[35] M. Venkatramesh; C.A. Karunanandaa; B.S. Gunter; S. Boddupalli; G.M. Kishore Expression of a Streptomyces 3-hydroxysteroid oxidase gene in oilseeds for converting phytosterols to phytostanols, Phytochemistry, Volume 62 (2002), pp. 39-46

[36] A. Koutsaftakis; F. Kotsifaki; E. Stefanoudaki; A. Cert Estudio sobre las variaciones de determinados parámetros quími-cos y de los components menores de los aceites de oliva virgin obtenidos de aceitunas recolectadas en distintas fases de maduración, Olivae, Volume 80 (2000), pp. 22-27

[37] E. Stefanoudaki; K. Chartzoulakis; A. Koutsaftakis; F. Kotsifaki Effect of drought on qualitative characteristics of olive oil of cv Koroneiki, Grasas y Aceites, Volume 52 (2001), pp. 202-206

[38] P. Benveniste, The Arabidopsis Book (2002). http://www.aspb.org/publications.

[39] S. Harrabi; F. Sakouhi; A. St-Amand; S. Boukhchina; H. Kallel; P.M. Mayer Accumulation of Phytosterols Triterpene Alcohols and Phytostanols in Developing Zea mays L. Kernels, J. Plant Sci., Volume 2 (2007) no. 3, pp. 260-272

[40] S. Irmak; N.T. Dunford; J. Milligan Policosanol contents of beeswax, sugar cane and wheat extracts, Food Chem., Volume 95 (2005), pp. 312-318

[41] P.R. Warren; R.A. Burger; R.W. Sidwell; L.L. Clark Effect of triacontanol on numbers and functions of cells involved in inflammatory responses, Proceed. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., Volume 200 (2002), pp. 349-352

[42] V.A. Varady; Y. Wang; P.J.H. Jones Role of policosanols in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease, Nutr. Rev., Volume 61 (2003), pp. 376-383

[43] J.F. Cavalli; X. Fernandez; C.V. Lizzani; A.M. Loiseau Characterization of volatile compounds of French and Spanish virgin olive oils by HS-SPME: identification of quality freshness markers, Food Chem., Volume 88 (2004), pp. 151-157

[44] F. Angerosa Influence of volatile compounds on virgin olive oil quality evaluated by analytical approaches and sensor panels, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., Volume 104 (2002), pp. 639-660

[45] B. Baccouri; S. Ben Temime; E. Campeol; P.C. Luigi; D. Daoud; M. Zarrouk Application of solid-phase microextraction to the analysis of volatile compounds in virgin olive oils from five new cultivars, Food Chem, Volume 102 (2007), pp. 850-856

[46] A. Guadarama; M.L. Rodriguez-Mendez; C. Sanz; J.L. Rios; J.A. De Saja Electronic nose based on conducting polymers for the quality control of the olive aroma: discrimination of quality, variety of olive and geographic origin, Anal Chim Acta, Volume 432 (2001), pp. 283-292


Comments - Politique