Outline
Comptes Rendus

Full paper
Pt(II) complex of Schiff base derived from L-phenylalanine and furfuraldehyde in the presence of 8-hydroxyquinoline: Structural analysis, composition of complex and biological activity
Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 23 (2020) no. 2, pp. 127-142.

Abstract

In the present study, we synthesized a Schiff base (L 1 ) derived from L-phenylalanine with furfuraldehyde and its Pt(II) complex ([Pt(L 1 )(L 2 )]: [Pt(N-(furfuralidene)phenylalanine)(8-hydroxyquinoline)]) in the presence of 8-hydroxyquinoline (L 2 ). The chemical structures of the synthesized Schiff base and Pt(II) complex were characterized using ESI-MS, UV–Visible, FT-IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and powder-XRD spectroscopy. The surface morphologies and elemental composition were determined by SEM and EDX. Thermal analysis was performed with TG-DTA. Mole ratio of Meyer and Job methods were used for the composition of complexes. According to these methods, the ratio [Pt 2+ ] : [L 1 +L 2 ] was found to be 1 : 1. In addition, the antimicrobial activities of L 1 and the complex showed that the compounds have significant antibacterial and antifungal properties. They also show important cytotoxic effects against the growth of mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF) and human prostate adenocarcinoma (Du145) cancer cells. L 1 , L 2 , and the Pt(II) complex also displayed effective antioxidant activity.

Supplementary Materials:
Supplementary material for this article is supplied as a separate file:

Metadata
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published online:
DOI: 10.5802/crchim.9
Keywords: Synthesis, Spectral Characterization, Antimicrobial Activity, Cytotoxic Activity, Antioxidant Activity

Özlen Altun 1; Melike Özge Koçer 1

1 Trakya University, Department of General and Inorganic Chemistry, 22030 Edirne/TURKEY
License: CC-BY 4.0
Copyrights: The authors retain unrestricted copyrights and publishing rights
@article{CRCHIM_2020__23_2_127_0,
     author = {\"Ozlen Altun and Melike \"Ozge Ko\c{c}er},
     title = {Pt(II) complex of {Schiff} base derived from {L-phenylalanine} and furfuraldehyde in the presence~of 8-hydroxyquinoline: {Structural} analysis,~composition of complex and biological~activity},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Chimie},
     pages = {127--142},
     publisher = {Acad\'emie des sciences, Paris},
     volume = {23},
     number = {2},
     year = {2020},
     doi = {10.5802/crchim.9},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Özlen Altun
AU  - Melike Özge Koçer
TI  - Pt(II) complex of Schiff base derived from L-phenylalanine and furfuraldehyde in the presence of 8-hydroxyquinoline: Structural analysis, composition of complex and biological activity
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Chimie
PY  - 2020
SP  - 127
EP  - 142
VL  - 23
IS  - 2
PB  - Académie des sciences, Paris
DO  - 10.5802/crchim.9
LA  - en
ID  - CRCHIM_2020__23_2_127_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Özlen Altun
%A Melike Özge Koçer
%T Pt(II) complex of Schiff base derived from L-phenylalanine and furfuraldehyde in the presence of 8-hydroxyquinoline: Structural analysis, composition of complex and biological activity
%J Comptes Rendus. Chimie
%D 2020
%P 127-142
%V 23
%N 2
%I Académie des sciences, Paris
%R 10.5802/crchim.9
%G en
%F CRCHIM_2020__23_2_127_0
Özlen Altun; Melike Özge Koçer. Pt(II) complex of Schiff base derived from L-phenylalanine and furfuraldehyde in the presence of 8-hydroxyquinoline: Structural analysis, composition of complex and biological activity. Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 23 (2020) no. 2, pp. 127-142. doi : 10.5802/crchim.9. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/chimie/articles/10.5802/crchim.9/

Version originale du texte intégral (Propose a translation )

1. Introduction

Schiff bases are an important class of ligands that help to elucidate the mechanisms of various reactions in biological and chemical systems due to the presence of an imine group in their structures. Schiff bases have a significant role in coordination chemistry since they easily form stable complexes with most of the transition metal ions. Schiff bases containing nitrogen and oxygen donor atoms can be obtained by the condensation of various aldehydes and amines. Due to their structural and functional properties, Schiff bases derived from aldehydes and amino acids with transition metal ions have various applications in chemical, biological, and medical fields [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. These compounds also have antimicrobial and antifungal activities against certain bacteria and fungal strains, respectively [6, 7, 8, 9].

Metal complexes of Schiff bases derived from amino acids play a significant role in the investigation of DNA-binding and bovine serum albumin (BSA)-binding properties. DNA-binding metal complexes have been extensively investigated as potential anticancer drugs, DNA-dependent electron transfer, DNA structural and conformational probes [10]. Apart from DNA, many other proteins such as serum albumins, which are the most abundant proteins in the blood, are also extensively important in the accumulation and transportation of various drug molecules [11]. BSA is generally selected as a target protein due to its low cost and similarity to human serum albumin (HSA) [12]. Previously, DNA and BSA-binding properties of metal-based Schiff base complexes were investigated by Wei’s [13, 14, 15] and Guo’s groups [16, 17, 18]. For example, two hexacoordinated octahedral nickel (II) complexes [14] of Schiff bases derived from o-vanillin/salicylaldehyde with glutamine and an Ni(II) complex [15] of Schiff base of o-vanillin and l-methionine in the presence of 1,10-phenanthroline were synthesized and characterized. The DNA-binding properties of Ni(II) complexes and the interactions of the nickel (II) complexes with BSA were studied by using spectroscopic analysis. In another study, vanadium complexes of Schiff bases derived from o-vanillin/L-valine [17] and L-serine/2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde in the presence of 1,10-phenanthroline [18] were synthesized and the binding properties studied. The results showed that the complexes can intercalate into calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) and quench the intrinsic fluorescence of BSA in a static quenching process and cause conformational changes of BSA by binding to the BSA.

There are many methods which characterize Schiff bases derived from amino acids and aldehydes in the presence of various metals [19, 20, 21, 22, 23]. The Pt(II) complexes were found to act as active homogeneous catalysts in hydrogenation reactions [24], oxidative hydrolysis [25, 26] of olefins, and activation of alkanes [27]. Since the platinum ions have the ability to form complexes, they bind to amino acids. Although there are many reports of transition metal complexes of Schiff bases derived from amino acids, information about the corresponding platinum(II) derivatives is still limited [28]. For these reasons, in this study, a Pt(II) complex [Pt(L1)(L2)] was synthesized using a Schiff base (L1) derived from L-phenylalanine with furfuraldehyde in the presence of 8-hydroxyquinoline. The structure of the complex was investigated by Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), UV–Visible spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), 13C NMR, powder-X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-Ray analysis (EDX) and thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA). As a result of physico-chemical, spectral, and thermal analyses, it was found that one molecule of L1 and one molecule of L2 react with one Pt2+ ion. The Schiff base and the complex were examined for antibacterial activities against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Salmonella thyphimirium ATCC 14028, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC19115, gram positive Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Bacillus cereus ATTCC 11778 and antifungal activity against Candida albicans ATCC 1023. These results are compared with the antibiotic ampicillin and the antifungal amphotericin B. The Schiff base and the Pt(II) complex were also investigated for cytotoxic activity against mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF ATCC®SCRC-1008™) and human prostate adenocarcinoma (Du145 ATCC®HTB-81™) cells. In addition, antioxidant activities were determined for the obtained Schiff base and complex.

Scheme 1.

The synthesis of Schiff base (L1).

2. Experimental section

2.1. Materials

L-phenylalanine, furfuraldehyde, 8-hydroxyquinoline, methanol, n-heptane, and K2PtCl4 were purchased from Sigma, Aldrich, and Merck and used as supplied.

2.2. Physical measurements

Elemental analysis for C, H, N, and O were performed with a Costech ECS 4010 CHNSO element analyzer and an ICP-MS 7700X (Agilent) element analyzer was used for Pt. Conductivity measurements were done with an Inolab Thermal 740P in dimethylformamide (DMF). The magnetic moments were determined by an MK-1 Sherwood scientific magnetic susceptibility balance. ESI-MS was performed on an Agilent 6400 Series Triple Quadrupole. UV–Visible spectra were measured with a Shimadzu UV-1700 Pharma spectrophotometer in the wavelength range of 200–800 nm. FT-IR spectra were recorded in transmission mode by a Shimadzu FT-IR-470 spectrometer in the wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm−1. KBr was used as matrix material for pellets. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were performed in D2O for Schiff base and CD3OD for the complex on a Bruker, DPX-400 spectrometer. A Shimadzu XRD-6000 was used for XRD analysis. SEM analysis was performed with a scanning electron microscope, model ZEIS LEVO LS 10. EDX was completed on an EVO LS 10 analyzer. The TG-DTA curves were recorded with a Seiko Exstar TG-DTA 6200 thermal analyzer with a heating rate of 10 °C⋅min−1 in the static atmosphere of dry air at a temperature range of 25–1200 °C. Platinum crucibles of 5–10 mg sample size were used in the analysis.

2.3. Synthesis of Schiff base (L1)

The reaction mixture, including a methanolic solution (20 mL) of furfuraldehyde (1 mmol, 0.08 mL) and a solution of L-phenylalanine (1 mmol, 0.20 g) in methanol (20 mL) were refluxed for 3 h at 70 °C. Then the solvent was removed by evaporation. The obtained yellow crystals were recrystallized from water. The reaction is given in Scheme 1.

L1(C14H13O3N): Yield (%): 88. Color: Yellow. M.P. (°C): 225. Elemental Analysis (%): Calcd.: C 69.13, H 5.35, O 19.75, N: 5.76; Found: C 69.08, H 5.30, O 19.69, N: 5.70. ESI-MS (m/z): Calcd. for L1 [M + H]+: 244. Found: 243.

Scheme 2.

The possible reaction of the Pt(II) complex with L1 and L2.

2.4. Synthesis of the Pt(II) complex in the presence of L1 and L2

The L-phenylalanine (1 mmol, 0.16 g) was dissolved in 20 mL methanol containing NaOH (2 mmol, 0.08 g) and stirred magnetically at room temperature. Then, 0.08 mL furfuraldehyde (1 mmol), solid K2PtCl4 (1 mmol, 0.10 g), and 8-hydroxyquinoline (1 mmol, 0.14 g) in 10 mL methanol were added to the solution and the mixture was stirred magnetically for 3 hours at room temperature. The solution volume was reduced 75% by evaporation. The obtained brown solid was recrystallized from methanol.

[Pt(L1)(L2)]([Pt(C14H12O3N)(C9H6ON)]): Yield (%): 82. Color: Brown. M.P. (°C): 195. Elemental Analysis (%): Calcd.: C 47.49, H 3.09, O 11.01, N 4.82, Pt: 32.56; Found: C 47.44, H 3.06, O 10.98, N 4.79, Pt: 33.57. Magnetic Moment (μeff, BM): 0.00, Diamagnetic. Conductivity (Ω−1 cm2 mol−1): 27.5, ESI-MS (m/z): Calcd. for [[Pt(L1)(L2)] [M + H]+: 582.09. Found: 581.08. Accordingly, the following reaction was determined:

2.5. Antimicrobial activity

Since antimicrobial properties of L2 were reported in previous studies [29, 30, 31, 32], in this study, antimicrobial activities of the synthesized L1 and Pt(II) complex were evaluated using the broth micro-dilution method and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) procedures [33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38]. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values for each compound were determined against three gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, and Listeria monocytogenes ATCC19115); two gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and Bacillus cereus ATTCC 11778); and fungal (Candida albicans ATCC 1023) strains. The area of the zone of inhibition was measured using ampicillin and amphotericin B (positive control) for bacterial and fungal strains, respectively. The concentrations of tested compounds were prepared in the range 200–6.25 μg/mL. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which has no activity, was used as negative control. Microorganisms were seeded in a 96-well sterile microplate. The microplate was then incubated for the growth of test organisms for 24 h at 37 °C. The absorbance was measured on a Thermo Multiscan GO Microplate Reader Spectrophotometer at 600 nm. The color change was determined visually. Any color change from purple to pink was considered as positive. The lowest concentration with a color change was recorded as the MIC value. All experiments were repeated four times.

2.6. Cytotoxic activity

Anticancer therapy is generally used with chemotherapeutic compounds that promote the destruction of sensitive tumors and show cytotoxic activity against cell proliferation [104, 105]. The cell viability was evaluated with the MTT method [39, 40, 41, 42]. The MTT assay is a well-documented cell viability assay for cytotoxic activity that was first tested by Mosmann [43]. The MTT assay can be applied to any cancer cell because MTT can be metabolized by all living cells. In this analysis, cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% L-glutamine, 5% heat-inactivated penicillin–streptomycin (100 IU/mL) and kept in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Healthy human (MEF, ATCC®SCRC-1008™) cells and human prostate adenocarcinoma (Du145, ATCC®HTB-81™) cancer cells were transferred into a 96-well sterile microplate using a culture medium (density of approximately 7500 cells/well in 200 μL) for 24 h. The cell viability was determined with trypan blue dye using a hemocytometer and a 95% viability was confirmed. For cell attachment, the microplate was incubated in a 5% carbon dioxide incubator for 24 h at 37 °C. After 24 h, synthesized Pt(II) complex in the concentration of 25, 50,100, 200, 400, and 800 μM was added to the wells and again kept in incubation for 24 h. Then, 20 μL/200 μL per well of 5 mg/mL MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) solution was added and incubated at 37 °C for an additional 4 h. The formazan blue formed in the cells was dissolved in DMF (200 μL/well). The optical density (OD) was measured on a Thermo Multiscan GO Microplate Reader Spectrophotometer at 490 nm. The measured absorbance value for each concentration of the Pt(II) complex was compared to the DMF-treated control. The IC50 values were evaluated. All experiments were performed six times. Growth inhibition percentage was calculated with the following formula [44]:

Growth inhibition %=OD controlOD treated sampleOD control×100  (1)

2.7. Antioxidant activity

The stable DPPH (2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging assay is a widely used method to evaluate antioxidant activities, as it is a simple and rapid method compared to others [45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50]. Different concentrations of the free ligands and Pt(II) complex were dissolved by serial dilution in methanol to attain final concentrations ranging from 1 to 5 μg/mL. The prepared solutions were added to a sterile 96-well microplate. BHT (2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) was used at a concentration range of 1–5 μg/mL in methanol as positive control. Methanol was chosen for blanks. After 1 h of incubation in the dark, the absorbance (A) was recorded against a blank at 517 nm on a Tecan-PC infinite M200 Pro Plate reader and IC 50 (50% inhibition of DPPH color) values were calculated. Experiments were duplicated. DPPH inhibition percentage (Antioxidant Activity %) was calculated using the following formula:

Antioxidant %=AblankAsampleAblank×100,(2)
where Ablank is the absorbance of the blank and Asample is the absorbance of sample.

Figure 1.

ESI-MS spectrum of L1.

3. Results and discussion

Elemental analysis for C, H, N, and O is in accordance with the proposed general formula of L1 and the Pt(II) complex. In order to determine the molar conductivity, the complex was dissolved in DMF 10−3 M at 25 °C. The molar conductivity Λ of the complex was calculated using the following formula:

Λm=KC,(3)
where K is the measured conductivity (specific conductance) and C is the molar concentration of the complex solution. The molar conductivity value for this complex was 27.5Ω1cm2mol1. Therefore, this complex can be considered as a non-electrolyte [51, 52]. The magnetic moment of the complex was determined to be μeff = 0.00 BM: the complex is diamagnetic, in a low-spin state and with square-planar geometry.

In the ESI-MS of L1 (Figure 1), the peak at mz = 244 (found: 243) corresponds to [M + H]+ of L1 and supports the suggested structure in Scheme 1. The ESI-MS spectrum of the complex (Figure 2) shows a molecular pattern with maximum intensity at mz = 582.09 (found: 581.08) that is compatible with [M + H]+ for the structure presented in Scheme 2. The spectrum also shows isotope peaks at m/z 338, 339, and 340 corresponding to the molecular cation, resulting from removal of L1 molecule from the parent ion.

Figure 2.

ESI-MS spectrum of the Pt(II) complex.

The UV–Visible spectra of L1, L2, and their Pt(II) complex (Figure 3) in CHCl3 showed absorption bands between 200 nm and 800 nm. While the electronic spectrum of L1 contains three bands, L2 has two bands in the UV region. The first bands for L1 at 249 nm and for L2 at 225 nm are assigned to ππ* and n–π* (–C=N, –C=O) transitions. The second bands of L1 and L2 at 305 and 275 nm, respectively, and the third band of L1 at 404 nm may be ascribed to the long pair electrons of nitrogen and oxygen atoms. These values are shifted to higher values in the UV–Visible spectrum of the complex. The complex shows three absorption bands at 252, 354, and 416 nm which are attributed to 1A1g1Eg, 1A1g1B1g and 1A1g1A2g transitions, respectively. As a result, the observed transitions are consistent with low-spin square-planar geometry [53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59].

Figure 3.

UV–Visible spectrum of L1, L2, and the Pt(II) complex.

The FT-IR spectra of free ligands and their Pt(II) complex are detailed in Table 1. In the FT-IR spectrum of the complex, the symmetric and asymmetric vibrations of the –COO group are not observed since the amino acid-derived Schiff bases are not in the form of their salts. But the characteristic bands at 1597 and 1454 cm−1 which may be caused by the symmetric ν(COO) and asymmetric ν(COO) stretching vibrations, respectively, of the coordinated carboxylate group [60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67]. This assignment is based on the fact that non-ionized and uncoordinated ν(COO) stretching band occurs usually around 1750–1700 cm−1, while the ionized and coordinated ν(COO) stretching appears around 1600–1400 cm−1.In addition, in the FT-IR spectrum of L1, the characteristic bands at 1635 and 1548 cm−1 are attributed to ν(C=N) and ν(C=C) stretching vibrations. These bands are shifted to 1643 and 1502 cm−1 in the complex, which indicates that the imino nitrogen and phenolic oxygen of the Schiff base are coordinated to the Pt(II) ion. The broad OH stretching band in the 3200–3100 cm−1 region for L2 is missing in the spectrum of the complex. A significant feature of FT-IR spectra of the metal complexes in the presence of L2 is the absence of band ∼3440 cm−1 due to the OH stretching vibration of the free OH group in L2. This observation leads to the conclusion that complex formation takes place by deprotonation of the hydroxyl group of the L2 moiety. Furthermore, the stretching vibration of the azomethine, which appears at 1630 cm−1 in L2, is shifted to a lower frequency in the complex, which indicates coordination through the ternary nitrogen donor of L2 [61]. The coordination through the nitrogen atom in ν(C–N) and ν(C=N) groups is supported by the appearance of new bands at 598 cm−1 in the spectrum of the complex which may be connected with the ν(Pt–N) vibration and a new band of weak intensity observed at 698 cm−1 which may be assigned to the ν(Pt–O) vibration [63].

Table 1.

Characteristic FT-IR bands (cm−1) of the free ligands and Pt(II) complex

L1L2Pt(II) complex
ν(OH)-3100-
ν(COOH)1709--
ν(C=N)163516301643
νas(COO)--1597
ν(C=C)154815241502
νs(COO)--1454
ν(Pt–O)--698
ν(Pt–N)--598

1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O for Schiff base and CD3OD for complex) (Table 2) and 13C NMR (75 MHz, D2O for Schiff base and CD3OD for complex) (Table 3) spectra of free ligands and their Pt(II) complex were recorded to verify the binding of the Schiff base and 8-hydroxyquinoline molecules to the Pt2+ ion. For the Schiff base, the characteristic 1H NMR signal at 9.2 ppm is assigned to the COOH proton. The peak at 7.7 ppm is attributed to the HC=N proton. The multiplets in the 6.5–7.4 ppm range are attributed to aromatic and furan protons. The two signals at 3.8 and 2.7 ppm are assigned to the aliphatic hydrogen protons (–CH and –CH2, respectively) of the L-phenylalanine moiety. For the 8-hydroxyquinoline [68, 69], the characteristic 1H NMR signal at 9.7 ppm is attributed to the OH proton. The other six protons of the quinoline ring appear as multiplets between 6.7 ppm and 8.9 ppm. In the 1H NMR spectrum of the complex, –OH and –COOH peaks are missing and little shifts are seen in the other peak positions. According to Table 4, the 13C NMR spectrum of L1 has signals at δ: 152 (s, C1), 126 (s, C2), 114 (s, C3), 150 (s, C4), 181 (s, C5), 53 (s, C6), 176 (s, C7), 34 (s, C8), 138 (s, C9), 132 (s, C10 and s, C14), 134 (s, C11 and s, C13), and 130 ppm (s, C12), whereas the 13C NMR spectrum of L2 shows signals at δ: 150 (s, C1), 122 (s, C2), 136 (s, C3), 118 (s, C4), 127 (s, C5), 122 (s, C6), 153 (s, C7), 139 (s, C8), and 127 ppm (s, C9). 1H and 13C NMR data indicate that the complex was shifted in comparison with L1 and L2 [70].

Table 2.

1H NMR chemical shifts (𝛿/ppm) of the free ligands and Pt(II) complex

L1L2Pt(II) complex
OH - 9.7 (m,5H) -
COOH 9.2 (s,1H) - -
HC=N 7.7 (s,1H) - 7.5 (s,1H)
Ar.CH6.5–7.4 (m,5H) -6.9–7.4 (m,5H)
Furan CH6.5–7.4 (m,3H) -6.9–7.4 (m,3H)
8-Qring CH -6.7–8.9 (m,6H)9.0–9.5 (m,6H)
CH 3.8 (t,1H) - 4.9 (t,1H)
CH2 2.7 (m,2H) -3.1–3.4 (m,2H)

Table 3.

13C NMR chemical shifts (𝛿/ppm) of the free ligands and Pt(II) complex

L1L2Pt(II) complex
C1152150 160 and 152
C2126122 130 and 125
C3114136 117 and 140
C4150118 153 and 121
C5181127 185 and 128
C6053122 56 and 115
C7176153 180 and 158
C8034139 38 and 145
C9138127 142 and 131
C10132 136
C11134 138
C12130 133
C13134 138
C14132 136

Table 4.

XRD analysis data of the Pt(II) complex

Strongest peak no2θ (deg)d (Å)I/IIFWHM (deg)Intensity (counts)Integrated Intensity (counts)
0912.52067.06402088 0.25070 150 2138
2224.88193.57558084 0.25730 143 2045
2728.12123.17064100 0.56050 171 4491
3840.43852.22879038 0.23710 065 0870
4546.31021.95895043 0.31550 074 1433
5166.72501.40071003 0.17000 014 0166

Table 5.

Thermal analysis data of the Pt(II) complex

CompoundSteps Tb-Tc (°C)Weight loss (%)Assignments
Pt(II) complex1st025–20000.4Possible water molecule
2nd200–50046.6Organic Component
3rd500–90053.4PtO

Despite several attempts, [71, 72], single crystal of the studied complex could not be obtained. Therefore, the XRD-powder pattern of the Pt(II) complex was investigated in order to test the degree of crystallinity of the complex [73, 74, 75, 76]. The X-ray powder diffraction patterns of the complex were determined over 2θ = 5–80° and six important peaks were observed in the angle range of 10–70° (2θ), which arise from diffraction of X-rays by the planes of the complex (Figure 4). The inter-planar spacing (d) was found from the positions of intense peaks using Bragg’s equation. Angle (2θ), inter-planar spacing (d), full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of prominent intensity peak, intensity (%), and integrated intensity (%) are given in Table 4. According to Table 4, the 2θ values with maximum intensity of the peaks for the complex are determined to be 12.5206, 24.8819, 28.1212, 40.4385, 46.3102, and 66.7250 (2θ) which corresponds to d: 7.06402, 3.57558, 3.17064, 2.22879, 1.95895, and 1.40071 Å, respectively. There are good agreements between 2θ and d values. All the peaks calculated from the observed values of inter-planar distance were compared to the recorded one. The unit cell calculations were recorded for cubic symmetry from all significant peaks, and h2 + k2 + l2 and (hkl) values were evaluated. The h2 + k2 + l2 values are 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2.8 and the (hkl) values (000), (001), (001), (111), (200) and (220) for the Pt(II) complex. These results are compatible with characteristic XRD peaks of other Pt(II) complexes in the literature. The average crystallite size (D) of the complex dxrd was calculated using Scherrer’s equation [77, 78, 79, 80].

D=K𝜆βCosθ,(4)
where D is the particle size of the crystal, K is a constant, which is 0.94 for Cu grid, 𝜆 is the X-ray wavelength (1.5406 A), θ is the Bragg diffraction angle; and 𝛽 is the FWHM. The complex has a crystallite size of 33 nm, suggesting that the complexes are in a nanocrystalline phase.

Figure 4.

XRD patterns of the Pt(II) complex.

The surface of the Pt(II) complex was examined using SEM [81, 82, 83]. SEM is a simple method that indicates the structure of the surface of the prepared complex. SEM analyses the surface of the complex showing small to medium sized particles that tend to agglomerate in different ways compared to the starting materials. The SEM image of the complex (Figure 5) shows that Pt(II) particles are spherical in size. The Pt(II) particles are quite visible throughout the complex as the presence of small grains in the nanometer range. In addition, EDX [81, 82, 83] was used for the elemental analysis on different sizes of nanoparticles from the complex (Figure 6). The results obtained by EDX indicated that there were platinum, carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen peaks and each metal ion for the formed Schiff base complex was distributed homogeneously.

Figure 5.

SEM image of the Pt(II) complex.

Figure 6.

EDX analysis of the Pt(II) complex.

TG-DTA values of the complex are given in Table 5. Three decomposition steps are obtained in the temperature range of 25–900 °C. The first decomposition in the range of 25–200 °C corresponds to the loss of 0.4%, which in turn corresponds to the loss of possible water molecules. The second decomposition in the range of 200–500 °C is the decomposition of the organic component (46.6%). The temperature range 500–1000 °C leads to the formation of platinum oxide (PtO, 53.4%) as a residue. These results indicate that the complex has good compatibility with the proposed structure. As a result of thermal analysis, qualitative conclusions can be made about the stability of the complex.

3.1. Solution study

The most commonly used method for determining the stability of a Pt(II) complex in a physiological medium is a time-based electronic spectrum study of the complex in a reference physiological buffer (50 mM phosphate, 4 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) [84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89]. The complex is poorly soluble in water, but its solubility is quite high in organic solvents such as CHCl3, CH3OH, and DMF. Therefore, the stability of the Pt(II) complex dissolved in a minimum amount of CH3OH, followed by phosphate buffered saline (PBS), giving a final concentration of the complex 10−3 M at room temperature was evaluated using a UV–Visible spectrophotometer. In Figure 7, the observed transitions in the range of 300–450 nm, attributed to ligand to metal charge transfer bands, are stable over 18 hours. This result showed that the Pt(II) complex is stable when dissolved in a reference physiological buffer.

3.2. Determination of the optimum conditions

In order to evaluate the wavelength for the reactions, various solutions with pH values ranging from 1 to 10 of the molar composition (L1 + L2) with Pt(II) were arranged in the mole ratio of 1:1:1 (L1 + L2 + Pt2+) and the spectra were obtained at room temperature. The complex produced an absorption band at 𝜆 = 416 nm. Since the absorbance became stable at pH values above 7 (Figure 8), the wavelength value 𝜆 = 416 nm and the pH value of 7 were chosen [90, 91, 92].

3.3. Composition of the Pt(II) complex

Figure 7.

UV–Visible spectrum of the Pt(II) complex in physiological buffer at t = 0 (a) and t = 18 hours (b).

Figure 8.

The effect of pH on absorbance.

The perpetual change method of mole ratio [93] and Job’s method of continuous variations [94, 95] were used for examination of the composition of the complex during the reaction. For the perpetual change method of mole ratio, various methanolic solutions were prepared at total concentrations of 2 × 10−3 M, under the general procedure, including L1 + L2 in the presence of Pt(II). The absorbances were recorded at 416 nm and the perpetual change graph (Figure 9) was plotted against [Pt2+]∕[L1 + L2] after necessary absorbance adjustment. The perpetual change demonstrated one maximum for [Pt2+]∕[L1 + L2] = 1. For the Job’s method, various solutions were prepared at total concentrations of 1 × 10−3 M under the general procedure, including (L1 + L2) and Pt(II). The absorbances were recorded at 416 nm and the perpetual change graph (Figure 10) was plotted against [Pt2+]∕([Pt2+] + [L1 + L2]). Job’s method of continuous variations produced one maximum for the complex and is [Pt2+]∕([Pt2+] + [L1 + L2]) ∼ 0.5. According to Figures 9 and 10, one molecule of L1 and one molecule of L2 react with one Pt(II) ion.

Figure 9.

Determination of mole ratio.

Figure 10.

The composition of the Pt(II) complex.

3.4. Antimicrobial activity results

Antimicrobial properties of 8-hydroxyquinoline (L2) were reported in previous studies, L2 was determined to be a very strong antimicrobial agent against gram positive S. aureus and fungal C. albicans [29, 30, 31, 32]. In this study, the antimicrobial activities of L1 and the Pt(II) complex were evaluated by the micro-broth dilution method and MIC values were calculated. The antimicrobial activities of the L1 and Pt(II) complex were examined against bacterial and fungal strains. The results are recorded in Figure 11 and Table 6. Previous studies about the antimicrobial activity of various Pt(II) complexes indicate a broad spectrum of antibacterial and antifungal activity. Compared with antimicrobial activity data from previously reported literature [96, 97, 98], the Pt(II) complex have significant activity against S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and C. albicans strains in our study. According to our antimicrobial activity results, while the obtained complex was effective against S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and C. albicans at 6.25 μg/mL concentrations, L1 showed moderate antibacterial activity against S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and C. albicans at 12.5, 12.5, and 6.25 μg/mL concentrations, respectively. As a result of antimicrobial experiments, the synthesized complex shows increased activity compared with L1 and L2. The high activity of the Pt(II) complex may be due to the effect of Pt+2 ion on the normal cell membrane. The higher antibacterial activity of Pt(II) than L1 and L2 can be explained by chelation of L1 and L2 with Pt+2 since metal chelates display both polar and non-polar properties [99, 100]. These properties make them suitable for permeation into cells. The polarity of the metal ion is reduced due to partial sharing of the positive charge of the metal ion with the donor groups, such as nitrogen and oxygen on L1 and L2. Chelation enhances the penetration of complex into lipid membranes by increasing the delocalization of π-electrons over the entire chelate ring [101, 102]. It also increases the lipophilic nature of the central metal ions, leading to liposolubility through the lipid layer of cell membranes. The lipophilicity, which controls the rate of entry of molecules into the cell, is modified by coordination. Therefore, the obtained Pt(II) complex can become more active than the free L1 and L2 [103] and may be preferable to other inorganic complexes of platinum(II) due to its high effectiveness in preventing infection.

Figure 11.

The viability (%) values for L1 (a) and the Pt(II) complex (b) at different concentrations (200–6.25 μg/mL) for E. coli, Salmonella thyphimirium, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus, and Candida albicans (n = 4) ± S.E.

Table 6.

Antimicrobial activity data for the L1 and Pt(II) complex

Name of bacteria/fungus İnhibition % L1 (Complex) AntibioticMIC (μg/mL) L1 (Complex)
E. coli04.9889 (8.8757)0 Ampicillin 06.25 (6.25)
S. typhimurium09.6174 (19.6877) Ampicillin 06.25 (6.25)
S. aureus50.9212 (63.7653) Ampicillin 12.5 (6.25)0
L. monocytogenes47.6417 (59.3048) Ampicillin 12.5 (6.25)0
B. cereus10.5767 (15.3787) Ampicillin 06.25 (6.25)
C. albicans53.6662 (67.8547)Amphotericin B 06.25 (6.25)

3.5. Cytotoxicity results

Figure 12.

The viability (%) values of L1 (a) and the Pt(II) complex (b) at different concentrations (25–800 μM) for MEF. Values are presented as the means (n = 6) ± S.E for 24 h.

The coordination complexes of Pt(II) show interesting cytotoxic and antitumor properties [106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112]. Previously, many studies reported the cytotoxic properties of (L2) 8-hydroxyquinoline [113, 114]. Hence, in our study, the cytotoxic activities of L1 and the Pt(II) complex were determined for MEF cells and Du145 cancer cells by an MTT assay. The results are presented in Figures 12 and 13. The IC50 values within the nanomolar range (50% inhibition) were evaluated from the dose response curves. The IC50 values of L1 and Pt(II) complex for MEF were calculated as >1000 μM and >1000 μM. For the Du145, the IC50 values of L1 and Pt(II) were determined as 77 μM and 41 μM, respectively. According to the analysis results, no death was observed in MEF cells at any concentration, whereas L1 was effective on Du145 cancer cells at 100, 200, 400, and 800 μM concentrations. The complex showed significant effect on Du145 cancer cells at 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 μM concentrations over 24 h compared with their respective control groups after 24 h. These results indicate that the presence of L1 and L2 coordinated with a Pt(II) center leads to activation of cytotoxic properties. As a result of the analysis, the cytotoxic activity of the Pt(II) complex is more active than L1 and L2. In a previous study, A. A. Yadav et al. [115] investigated molecular mechanisms of the biological activity of the elesclomol and its complexes with Cu(II), Ni(II), and Pt(II). In their study, for the mechanism of biological activity of metal–elesclomol complex, they proposed that the metal(II) was selectively transported to the mitochondria and enzymatic or non-enzymatic reduction of the metal(II) deposited in the mitochondria would yield metal. They also proposed that after reduction and dissociation of the complex, the elesclomol was effluxed from the cell and continued to shuttle more metal(II) into the cell [116]. The same result may be suggested for the mechanism of the cytotoxicity activity of our Pt(II) complex.

Figure 13.

The viability (%) values of L1 (a) and the Pt(II) complex (b) at different concentrations (25–800 μM) for Du145. Values are presented as the means (n = 6) ± S.E for 24 h.

3.6. Antioxidant activity results

Free radicals, which are included in the process of lipid peroxidation, are considered to play a major role in medicine. A compound with radical reducing power may serve as a potential antioxidant. Antioxidants are free radical scavengers that may prevent, protect, or reduce the extension of oxidative damage. The DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) test [117, 118, 119, 120, 121] is commonly used to evaluate the ability of compounds to act as free radical scavengers or hydrogen donors, and to assess antioxidant activity. The DPPH assay is performed quickly and easily with the UV–Visible spectrophotometer, which explains the widespread use in antioxidant studies. DPPH is a stable nitrogen radical, which does not resemble transient peroxyl radicals in lipid peroxidation. Many antioxidants that react quickly with peroxyl radicals may react slowly with DPPH or be ineffective on DPPH due to steric hindrance. The effect of antioxidants on DPPH radical scavenging is due to the hydrogen donating ability or radical scavenging activity of the samples [122]. A freshly prepared DPPH solution exhibits a dark purple color with maximum absorption at 517 nm because of the DPPH free radical. This purple color usually disappears when it reacts with an antioxidant that can donate electrons to the DPPH radical and DPPH converts to a stable yellow compound (DPPH–H) [100, 117]. Therefore, antioxidant molecules can quench DPPH free radicals, leading to a decrease in absorbance at 517 nm. The scavenging reaction between DPPH and an antioxidant (H–D) is shown below,

(DPPH)+(HD)DPPHH+(D)(Purple)(Yellow)

Stronger antioxidants can reduce absorbance rapidly. The IC50 value, defined as the concentration of the sample causing the DPPH concentration to be reduced by 50%, is calculated from the linear regression of the concentration graphs of the compounds tested against the mean percentage of antioxidant activity [123, 124]. The lower the IC50 value, the higher the antioxidant activity of the tested samples. The antioxidant activities of L1, L2, and the Pt(II) complex were assessed using the DPPH radical scavenging method at different concentrations. For comparison, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as a standard. The antioxidant results of L1, L2 and the Pt(II) complex are presented in Figure 14 and Table 7. The IC50 values of L1, L2 and the Pt(II) complex were calculated as 3.2, 3.6, and 2.3 μM, respectively. The antioxidant activity was significantly increased as a result of the electron withdrawing effect of the Pt2+ ion, which facilitates hydrogen release to reduce the DPPH radical [125]. The complex also showed significant free radical scavenging when tested against DPPH. As a result, the antioxidant activity of L1 and L2 were determined to be enhanced on complexation with the Pt2+ ion. Compared to previously reported antioxidant data, the synthesized Pt(II) complex showed significant antioxidant activity. As a result, the obtained Pt complex as an antioxidant can inhibit the oxidation of lipids or other molecules by preventing the oxidative chain reactions at low concentrations. Thus, it can prevent the damage done to the body’s cells by oxygen [100, 126]. In addition, it can protect the human body against the damages of reactive oxygen species produced during normal cellular functions in the body and involved in the etiopathogenesis of many chronic diseases [127].

Figure 14.

Percent antioxidant activity of the free ligands and Pt(II) complex (n = 2) ± S.E.

Table 7.

IC50 (μM) values of antioxidant activity of the free ligands and Pt(II) complex

Compound IC50 (μM)
L13.2
L23.6
Pt(II) complex2.3

4. Conclusion

In this work, we studied the synthesis and spectral analysis of a Pt(II) complex of a Schiff base (L1) derived from L-phenylalanine and furfuraldehyde in the presence 8-hydroxyquinoline (L2). According to physico-chemical, spectrophotometric, and thermal analysis results, small shifts in spectral analysis are observed in the Pt(II) complex and the reaction of L1 and L2 in the presence of Pt(II) is a complex reaction. One molecule of L1 and one molecule of L2 react with one molecule of Pt(II) ion. The complex is active against some of the chosen bacterial and fungal strains. According to the test results, the antimicrobial activities of the complex increase compared to the antimicrobial activities of the free ligands. L1 and the Pt(II) complex show strong cell-growth inhibition against Du145 cancer cells with MTT assay implying that they induce apoptosis in these cancer cells. Whereas L1 is effective on Du145 cancer cells at 100, 200, 400, and 800 μM concentrations, the complex shows significant effect on Du145 cancer cells at 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 μM concentrations over 24 h compared to the respective control groups after 24 h. The free ligands and Pt(II) complex also have significant antioxidant activity. Accordingly, the antioxidant activity results show that the complex is effective at preventing the formation of the DPPH radical. This activity is explained with chelation theory. Furthermore, the IC50 values observed in cytotoxicity and antioxidant activities indicate that the synthesized complex exhibits differential and selective properties.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by Trakya University, Research Fund (TUBAP, project # 2016/250). We (Assoc Prof Özlen ALTUN and Research Student Melike Özge KOÇER) confirm that “Trakya University” only provided financial support within the scope of the project for chemicals in the manuscript and we declare that the support received did not lead to any conflict of interests regarding the publication of this manuscript. There is no need for Trakya University’s confirmation to publish this manuscript.

Supplementary data

Supporting information for this article is available on the journal’s website under https://doi.org/10.5802/crchim.9 or from the author. The experimental details and randomization protocols are provided.


References

[1] Z. Cimerman; S. Miljanic; N. Galic Croat. Chem. Acta, 73 (2000), pp. 81-95

[2] S. H. Rahaman; H. Chowdhury; D. Bose; R. Ghosh; C. H. Hung; B. K. Ghosh Polyhedron, 24 (2005), pp. 1755-1763

[3] Z. H. Chohan; M. Arif; M. Sarfraz Appl. Organomet. Chem., 21 (2007), pp. 294-302

[4] Y. Li; Z. Y. Yang; T. R. Li Synthesis, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 56 (2008), pp. 1528-1534

[5] İ. Şakıyan; R. Özdemir; H. Öğütçü Synth. React. Inorg. M., 44 (2014), pp. 417-423

[6] A. S. Gaballa; M. S. Asker; A. S. Barakat; S. M. Teleb Spectrochim. Acta part A, 67 (2006), pp. 114-121

[7] S. Kumar; D. N. Dhar; P. N. Saxena J. Sci. Ind. Res. India, 68 (2009), pp. 181-187

[8] M. S. Suresh; V. Prakash J. Chem., 8 (2011), pp. 1408-1416

[9] G. Nizami; R. Sayyed IOSR J. Appl. Chem., 10 (2017), pp. 40-51

[10] M. R. Gill; J. A. Thomas Chem. Soc. Rev., 41 (2012), pp. 3179-3192

[11] D. C. Carter; J. X. Ho Adv. Protein Chem., 45 (1994), pp. 153-203

[12] X. M. He; D. C. Carter Nature, 358 (1992), pp. 209-215

[13] H. Liu; Q. Guo; J. Dong; Q. Wei; H. Zhang; X. Sun; C. Liu; L. Li J. Coord. Chem., 68 (2015), pp. 1040-1053

[14] Q. Wei; J. Dong; P. Zhao; M. Li; F. Cheng; J. Kong; L. Li J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol., 161 (2016), pp. 355-367

[15] P. Zhao; Q. Wei; J. Dong; F. Ding; J. Li; L. Lia J. Coord. Chem., 69 (2016), pp. 2437-2453

[16] H. Liu; L. Li; Q. Guo; J. Dong; J. Li Trans. Met. Chem., 38 (2013), pp. 441-448

[17] Q. Guo; L. Li; J. Dong; H. Liu; T. Xu; J. Li Spectrochim. Acta A, 106 (2013), pp. 155-162

[18] S. Zhai; Q. Guo; J. Dong; T. Xu; L. Li Trans. Met. Chem., 39 (2014), pp. 271-280

[19] D. R. Laurence; P. N. Bennett; M. J. Brown Antibacterial drugs, Clinical Pharmacology, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1997, 211 pages

[20] Z. Guo; P. J. Sadler Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 38 (1999), pp. 1512-1531

[21] O. E. Offiong; E. Nfor; A. A. Ayi; S. Martelli Trans. Met. Chem., 25 (2000), pp. 369-373

[22] İ. Şakıyan; N. Gündüz; T. Gündüz Synth. React. Inorg. M., 31 (2001), pp. 1175-1187

[23] İ. Şakıyan Trans. Met. Chem., 32 (2007), pp. 131-135

[24] B. R. James Adv. Organomet. Chem., 17 (1979), pp. 319-405

[25] F. R. Hartley Chem. Rev., 69 (1969), pp. 799-844

[26] P. M. Henry Palladium Oxidation of Hydrocarbons Catalyzed, D. Reidel Publishing Campany, Dordrecht, Holland, 1979, 41 pages

[27] D. E. Webster Adv. Organomet. Chem., 15 (1977), pp. 147-188

[28] C. Rimbu; R. Danac; A. Pui Chem. Pharm. Bull., 62 (2014), pp. 12-15

[29] R. Mladenova; M. Ignatova; N. Manolova; T. Petrova; I. Rashkov Eur. Poly. J., 38 (2002), pp. 989-999

[30] S. S. Patil; G. A. Thakur; M. M. Shaikh Int. Sch. Res. Network, ISRN Pharmaceutics (2011) p. 1-6

[31] V. Prachayasittikul; S. Prachayasittikul; S. Ruchirawat; V. Prachayasittikul Drug Des. Dev. Ther., 7 (2013), pp. 1157-1178

[32] S. Srisung; T. Suksrichavalit; S. Prachayasittikul; S. Ruchirawat; V. Prachayasittikul Int. J. Pharm., 9 (2013), pp. 170-175

[33] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: Approved Standard M27-A2, CLSI, Wayne, PA, 2002

[34] I. Kobayashi; H. Muraoka; T. Saika; M. Nishida; T. Fujioka; M. Nasu J. Med. Microbiol., 53 (2004), pp. 403-406

[35] I. Wiegand; K. Hilpert; R. E. W. Hancock Nat. Protoc., 3 (2008), pp. 163-175

[36] E. G. Kaya; H. Özbilge; S. Albayrak ANKEM, 23 (2009), pp. 110-114

[37] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 15th Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M100-S22, CLSI, PA, 2012

[38] E. Kaya; H. Ozbilge Turk. J. Med. Sci., 42 (2012), pp. 325-328

[39] M. V. Blagosklonny; A. B. Pardee Cancer Res., 61 (2001), pp. 4301-4305

[40] L. Giovagnini; L. Ronconi; D. Aldinucci; D. Lorenzon; S. Sitran; D. Fregona J. Med. Chem., 48 (2005), pp. 1588-1595

[41] R. Kim; M. Emi; K. Tanabe Cancer Chemoth. Pharm., 57 (2006), pp. 545-553

[42] P. Z. Lu; C. Y. Lai; W. H. Chan Int. J. Mol. Sci., 9 (2008), pp. 698-718

[43] S. H. Liu; C. Chen; R. S. Yang; Y. P. Yen; Y. T. Yang; C. Tsai J. Orthop. Res., 29 (2011), pp. 954-960

[44] O. Doganlar; Z. B. Doganlar Biomed. Res., 27 (2016), pp. 268-278

[45] T. Mossman J. Immunol., 65 (1983), pp. 55-63

[46] S. Sathiyaraj; R. J. Butcher; C. Jayabalakrishnan J. Mol. Struct., 1030 (2012), pp. 95-103

[47] M. S. Blois Nature, 181 (1958), pp. 1199-1200

[48] K. Shimada; K. Fujikawa; K. Yahara; T. Nakamura J. Agric. Food Chem., 40 (1992), pp. 945-948

[49] B. Tanti; A. K. Buragohain; L. Guring; D. Kakati; A. K. Das; S. P. Borah Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour., 1 (2010), pp. 17-21

[50] A. Choudhary; R. Sharma; M. Nagar; M. Mohsin; H. S. Meena J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 56 (2011), pp. 911-917

[51] O. A. El-Gammal; M. M. Mostafa Spectrochim. Acta Part A, 127 (2014), pp. 530-542

[52] P. Kavitha; K. L. Reddy Arab. J. Chem., 9 (2016), pp. 640-648

[53] W. J. Geary Coord. Chem. Rev., 7 (1971), pp. 81-122

[54] S. F. A. Kettle Coordination Compounds, Thomas Nelson, London, 1975

[55] J. R. Dyer Application of Absorption Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1965

[56] O. Siimann; J. Fresco J. Am. Chem. Soc., 92 (1970), pp. 2652-2656

[57] A. B. P. Lever Inorganic Electronic Spectroscopy, Elsevier, New York, 1984

[58] R. K. Agarwal; S. Prasad Turk. J. Chem., 29 (2005), pp. 289-298

[59] S. S. Ezzat Rafidain J. Sci., 19 (2008), pp. 42-47

[60] J. G. Kang; D. H. Cho; C. Park; S. K. Kang; I. T. Kim; S. W. Lee; H. H. Lee; Y. N. Lee; D. W. Lim; S. J. Lee; S. H. Kim; Y. J. Bae Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 29 (2008), pp. 599-603

[61] S. M. S. Jambi; S. S. Kandil J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 3 (2012), pp. 591-604

[62] K. Nakamato; V. Morimoto; A. E. Martelli J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83 (1961), pp. 4528-4532

[63] J. B. Lambert; H. F. Shurwell; L. Verbit; R. G. Cooks; G. H. Stout Organic Structural Analysis, Mac Millan, New York, 1976

[64] G. Socrates Infrared Characterization Group Frequencies, John Wiley, New York, 1980

[65] K. Nakamato Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1986

[66] M. S. İslam; M. S. Ahmed; S. C. Pal; Y. Reza; S. Jesmin Indian J. Chem., 34 A (1995), pp. 816-818

[67] K. Nakamato Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, John Wiley, New York, 1997

[68] I. T. Ahmed; A. A. A. Boraei J. Chem. Eng. Data, 43 (1998), pp. 459-464

[69] M. A. El-Gahami; Z. A. Khafagy; A. M. M. Ali; N. M. İsmail; J. Inorg Organomet. Polym., 14 (2004), pp. 117-129

[70] S. Katayama; Y. Akahori; H. Mori Chem. Pharm. Bull., 21 (1973), pp. 2622-2626

[71] A. A. Fomichev; Y. S. Ryabokobylko; A. V. Kessenikh; A. Ataev; B. V. Parusnikov; I. A. Krasavin; V. M. Dziomko Chem. Heterocycl. Com., 13 (1977), pp. 996-997

[72] L. Jin; İ. Sakıyan; N. S. Gonzales; D. Lane; S. Cherala Inorg. Chim. Acta Part A, 423 (2014), pp. 72-78

[73] P. G. Jones Chemistry in Britain, 17 (1981), pp. 222-225

[74] P. Van Der Sluis; A. M. F. Hezemans; J. Kroon J. Appl. Crystallogr., 22 (1989), pp. 340-344

[75] M. Zhang; Y. Li; Z. Yan; J. Jing; J. Xie; M. Chen Electrochim. Acta, 158 (2015), pp. 81-88

[76] C. S. Dilip; V. Thangaraj; A. P. Raj Arab. J. Chem., 9 (2016), p. S731-S742

[77] M. D. Udayagiri; N. G. Yernale; B. H. M. Mruthyunjayaswamy Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci., 8 (2016), pp. 344-351

[78] M. A. Salem; E. A. Bakr; H. G. El-Attar Spectrochim. Acta Part A, 188 (2018), pp. 155-163

[79] B. E. Warren X-ray Diffraction, Dover, New York, 1990

[80] D. Arish; M. S. Nair Arab. J. Chem., 5 (2012), pp. 179-186

[81] A. H. Atta; A. I. El-Shenawy; M. S. Refat; K. M. Elsabawy J. Mol. Struct., 1039 (2013), pp. 51-60

[82] S. P. Velammal; T. A. Devi1; T. P. Amaladhas J. Nanostruct. Chem., 6 (2016), pp. 247-260

[83] F. A. Al-Saif Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 9 (2014), pp. 398-417

[84] M. V. Lokhande Int. J. Curr. Res. Chem. Pharm. Sci., 2 (2015), pp. 89-98

[85] H. F. G. Barbosa; M. Attjioui; A. P. G. Ferreira; E. R. Dockal; N. E. El Gueddari; B. M. Moerschbacher; E. T. G. Cavalheiro Molecules, 22 (2017), pp. 1-19

[86] H. B. Pedersen; J. Josephsen; G. Kerszman Chem. Biol. Interact., 54 (1985), pp. 1-8

[87] S. Carotti; A. Guerri; T. Mazzei; L. Messori; E. Mini; P. Orioli Inorg. Chim. Acta, 281 (1998), pp. 90-94

[88] F. Abbate; P. Orioli; B. Bruni; G. Marcon; L. Messori Inorg. Chim. Acta, 311 (2000), pp. 1-5

[89] A. Casini; M. C. Diawara; R. Scopelliti; S. M. Zakeeruddin; M. Gratzel; P. J. Dyson Dalton Trans., 39 (2010), pp. 2239-2245

[90] V. Amani; A. Abedi; S. Ghabeshi; H. R. Khavasi; S. M. Hosseini; N. Safari Polyhedron, 79 (2014), pp. 104-115

[91] H. C. Chen; D. G. H. Hetterscheid; R. M. Williams; J. I. Van Der Vlugt; J. N. H. Reek; A. M. Brouwer Energy Environ. Sci., 8 (2015), pp. 975-982

[92] O. Altun; H. Akbaş; E. Dolen Spectrochim. Acta Part A, 66 (2007), pp. 499-502

[93] O. Altun; S. Bilcen Spectrochim. Acta Part A, 75 (2010), pp. 789-793

[94] O. Altun; M. Suozer J. Mol. Struct., 1149 (2017), pp. 307-314

[95] A. S. Meyer; G. H. Ayres J. Am. Chem. Soc., 79 (1957), pp. 49-53

[96] P. Job Ann. Chim., 9 (1928), pp. 113-203

[97] P. Job Ann. Chim., 6 (1936), pp. 97-105

[98] N. R. Filipovic; I. Markovic; D. Mitic; N. Polovic; M. Milcic; M. Dulovic; M. Jovanovic; M. Savic; M. Niksic; K. Andelkovic; T. Todorovic J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol., 28 (2014), pp. 99-110

[99] A. A. S. Al-Hamdani; A. M. Balkhı; A. Falah; S. A. Shaker J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 60 (2015), pp. 2774-2785

[100] E. Pahontu; C. Paraschivescu; D. C. Ilies; D. Poirier; C. Oprean; V. Paunescu; A. Gulea; T. Rosu; O. Bratu Molecules, 21 (2016), p. 674-1-18

[101] R. S. Joseyphus; M. S. Nair Mycobiology, 36 (2008), pp. 93-98

[102] I. P. Ejidike; P. A. Ajibade Molecules, 20 (2015), pp. 9788-9802

[103] T. D. Thangadurai; K. Natarajan Trans. Met. Chem., 26 (2001), pp. 500-504

[104] M. A. Neelakantan; S. S. Marriappan; J. Dharmaraja; T. Jeyakumar; K. Muthukumaran Spectrochim. Acta A, 71 (2008), pp. 628-635

[105] N. Farrell Coord. Chem. Rev., 252 (2007), pp. 1-31

[106] W. Hernandez; J. Paz; A. Vaisberg; E. Spodine; R. Richter; L. Beyer Bioinorg. Chem. Appl., 10 (2008), pp. 1-9

[107] A. Bakalova; R. Buyukliev; G. Momekov; D. Ivanov J. Chem. Technol. Metall., 48 (2013), pp. 631-636

[108] L. J. Li; C. Wang; C. Tian; X. Y. Yangi; X. X. Hua; J. L. Du Res. Chem. Intermediat., 39 (2013), pp. 733-746

[109] V. Volarevic; J. M. Vujic; M. Milovanovic; T. Kanjevac; A. Volarevic; S. R. Trifunovic; N. Arsenijevic J. BUON, 18 (2013), pp. 131-137

[110] J. Pranczk; D. Jacewicz; D. Wyrzykowski; L. Chmurzynski Curr. Pharm. Anal., 10 (2014), pp. 2-9

[111] K. A. Abu-Safieh; A. S. Abu-Surrah; H. D. Tabba; H. A. Al-Masri; R. M. Bawadi; F. M. Boudjelal; L. H. Tahtamouni J. Chem. (2016), pp. 1-7

[112] V. Simic; S. Kolarevic; I. Brceski; D. Jeremic; B. Vukovic-Gacic Turk. J. Biol., 40 (2016), pp. 661-669

[113] A. Y. Shen; S. N. Wu; C. T. Chiu J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 51 (1999), pp. 543-548

[114] A. Y. Shen; C. P. Chen; S. Rofffler Life Sci., 64 (1999), pp. 813-825

[115] A. A. Yadav; D. Patel; X. Wu; B. B. Hasinoff J. Inorg. Biochem., 126 (2013), pp. 1-6

[116] M. Nagai; N. H. Vo; L. S. Ogawa; D. Chimmanamada; T. Inoue; J. Chu; B. C. Beaudette-Zlatanova; R. Lu; R. K. Blackman; J. Barsoum; K. Koya; Y. Wada Free Radic. Biol. Med., 52 (2012), pp. 2142-2150

[117] H. N. Elena; C. T. Miron; P. Gabriela; H. Mihaela; C. Titus; B. T. Alexandru Int. J. Mol. Sci., 7 (2006), pp. 130-143

[118] S. Medhe; P. Bansal; M. M. Srivastava Appl. Nanosci., 4 (2014), pp. 153-161

[119] V. Sanna; N. Pala; G. Dessì; P. Manconi; A. Mariani; S. Dedola; M. Rassu; C. Crosio; C. Iaccarino; M. Sechi Int. J. Nanomed., 9 (2014), pp. 4935-4951

[120] K. Saritha; U. Saraswathi World J. Pharm. Sci., 2 (2014), pp. 1545-1551

[121] I. P. Ejidike; P. A. Ajibade Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. (2015), pp. 1-9

[122] P. Arulpriya; P. Lalitha; S. Hemalatha Merr. Der Chem. Sin., 1 (2010), pp. 73-79

[123] V. Saritha; R. K. Anilakumar; F. Khanum Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Arch., 1 (2010), pp. 376-384

[124] N. Neelofar; N. Ali; A. Khan; S. Amir; N. A. Khan; M. Bilal Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiopia, 31 (2017), pp. 445-456

[125] S. Tetteh; D. K. Dodoo; R. Appiah-Opong; I. Tuffour J. Inorg. Chem. (2014), pp. 1-7

[126] S. Tachakittirungrod; S. Okonogi; S. Chowwanapoon-pohn Food Chem., 103 (2007), pp. 381-388

[127] D. L. Madhavi; S. S. Deshpande; D. K. Salunkhe Food Antioxidants: Technological, Toxicological, Health Perspective, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996


Comments - Policy