Plan
Comptes Rendus

Article de synthèse
Uncovering the mechanisms of sexual differentiation: insights from Drosophila research
[La drosophile, un modèle pour comprendre les bases biologiques de la différenciation sexuelle]
Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 348 (2025), pp. 89-105.

Résumés

The differences between males and females represent the largest phenotypic dimorphism observed in most species. In humans, this variation contributes to disparities in the risk, incidence, and treatment responses for numerous diseases, with many of these significant differences remaining unexplained. While hormones derived from sex organs play critical roles in shaping and maintaining certain sex differences, recent research using the Drosophila model underscores the significance of cell-intrinsic mechanisms linked to the sex chromosomes.

Les différences entre mâles et femelles représentent le plus grand dimorphisme phénotypique observé chez la plupart des espèces. Chez l’homme, cette variation contribue à des disparités dans le risque, l’incidence et les réponses au traitement de nombreuses maladies, et beaucoup de ces différences significatives restent inexpliquées. Alors que les hormones dérivées des organes sexuels jouent un rôle essentiel dans la formation et le maintien de certaines différences entre les sexes, des recherches récentes utilisant le modèle de la drosophile soulignent l’importance des mécanismes intrinsèques aux cellules liés aux chromosomes sexuels.

Métadonnées
Reçu le :
Révisé le :
Accepté le :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.5802/crbiol.177
Keywords: Sex determination, Sex chromosomes, Drosophila, Development, Physiology
Mots-clés : Détermination du sexe, Chromosomes sexuels, Drosophile, Développement, Physiologie

Bruno Hudry 1

1 Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Inserm, Institut de Biologie Valrose, Nice 06108, France
Licence : CC-BY 4.0
Droits d'auteur : Les auteurs conservent leurs droits
@article{CRBIOL_2025__348_G1_89_0,
     author = {Bruno Hudry},
     title = {Uncovering the mechanisms of sexual differentiation: insights from {\protect\emph{Drosophila}} research},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Biologies},
     pages = {89--105},
     publisher = {Acad\'emie des sciences, Paris},
     volume = {348},
     year = {2025},
     doi = {10.5802/crbiol.177},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bruno Hudry
TI  - Uncovering the mechanisms of sexual differentiation: insights from Drosophila research
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Biologies
PY  - 2025
SP  - 89
EP  - 105
VL  - 348
PB  - Académie des sciences, Paris
DO  - 10.5802/crbiol.177
LA  - en
ID  - CRBIOL_2025__348_G1_89_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Bruno Hudry
%T Uncovering the mechanisms of sexual differentiation: insights from Drosophila research
%J Comptes Rendus. Biologies
%D 2025
%P 89-105
%V 348
%I Académie des sciences, Paris
%R 10.5802/crbiol.177
%G en
%F CRBIOL_2025__348_G1_89_0
Bruno Hudry. Uncovering the mechanisms of sexual differentiation: insights from Drosophila research. Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 348 (2025), pp. 89-105. doi : 10.5802/crbiol.177. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/biologies/articles/10.5802/crbiol.177/

Version originale du texte intégral (Proposez une traduction )

Le texte intégral ci-dessous peut contenir quelques erreurs de conversion par rapport à la version officielle de l'article publié.

1. Introduction

Living organisms use two main biological mechanisms to generate sex differences [1, 2, 3]. The first mechanism involves the development of male- and female-specific sex organs that produce systemic signals. These gonadal hormones can shape and maintain somatic sex differences over time, regardless of the sex of the receiving cells. The second mechanism relies on cell-intrinsic mechanisms, where sex-chromosomal genes create distinctions in equivalent differentiated cells in both males and females. Sex chromosome functions have traditionally been explored using invertebrate model systems. This review will outline how research on the Drosophila model has uncovered fundamental principles of sexual differentiation that are broadly applicable across various species.

2. Drosophila as a model for the study of sexual differentiation

2.1. X-Chromosome dose determines sexual fate

In many species, the development of testes or ovaries is determined by specific genetic elements known as sex chromosomes, which carry the loci responsible for sex determination [4]. In Drosophila melanogaster, females possess two X chromosomes, while males have one X and one Y chromosome [5]. The number of X chromosomes acts as the primary sex-determination signal in this species (Figure 1). Individuals with two X chromosomes develop as females, whereas those with a single X chromosome develop as males. This mechanism is referred to as dose-dependent X sex determination. Notably, the fly’s Y chromosome is irrelevant and does not play a role in sex determination. The immediate target of the X chromosome dosage is the X-linked switch gene, Sex-lethal (Sxl), which directs female differentiation [6]. Sxl functions as a female determinant, produced exclusively in female cells; its absence leads to male developmental commitment. Cells determine whether to express Sxl by counting their X chromosomes through a small set of specific X-linked numerator genes that convey the X-chromosome dose to an Sxl promoter [7]. A diplo-X dose, involving four genes—scute, sisterless A, unpaired, and runt—activates Sxl transcription, initiating female development. Conversely, a haplo-X dose is insufficient to activate Sxl, resulting in male development. This X chromosome-counting mechanism occurs during a brief 30–40 min period just before the onset of cellularisation. Afterward, Sxl engages in a positive autoregulatory loop that sustains its protein production in female cells. Ultimately, a transient twofold concentration difference in these four X-linked proteins determines sex, leading to distinct sexual fates.

Figure 1.

The sex determination process in Drosophila melanogaster.

2.2. Sex-specific splicing mediates sexual determination

Sxl is an RNA-binding protein that regulates pre-mRNA splicing to drive female development [6]. It controls the alternative splicing of its own gene, as well as those of the SR splicing factor transformer (tra) and male-specific-lethal 2 (msl-2) [5]. These three female-specific splicing events are crucial for governing all aspects of sexual differentiation. Sxl sustains its own expression by preventing the inclusion of a poison cassette exon that contains a premature stop codon. For its targets tra and msl-2, Sxl interferes with U2 snRNP auxiliary factor (U2AF) binding, redirecting splicing to an alternative 3′ splice site or promoting intron retention. As a result, the female tra isoform contains an extended open reading frame that bypasses the introduction of a premature stop codon. In the case of msl-2, intron retention leads to translational repression in the cytoplasm. Sexual fate in Drosophila is mainly controlled by alternative splicing, but two additional biological processes—RNA methylation and splicing factor phosphorylation—also play critical roles in sex determination (Figure 1). Specifically, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation near the poison cassette exon is important for the female-specific alternative splicing of Sxl, as demonstrated by the knockout of several subunits of the m6A methylosome complex [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. It is hypothesised that m6A readers bind to these methylated sites, and modulate the splicing machinery to promote skipping of the poison exon in females. Although m6A writers and readers are not absolutely required for sex determination—since null mutants are viable and fertile—multiple components of the m6A pathway genetically interact with Sxl in sensitised backgrounds. These findings suggest that RNA methylation contributes to the robustness of Sxl alternative splicing, highlighting its role in fine-tuning the sex determination process. Phosphorylation of the female-specific splicing factor Tra is essential for its activity and for sex determination [15]. The fly CDC-like kinase (CLK), known as Darkener of apricot (Doa), mediates this phosphorylation [16]. Mutations in Doa lead to somatic female-to-male sex transformations, underscoring its critical role in establishing female fate [15, 16].

2.3. Doublesex is the terminal effector of sexual differentiation

Sxl regulates the sex-specific splicing of its target tra, which in turn influences the splicing of two critical genes: doublesex (dsx) [17, 18, 19] and fruitless (fru) [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. These two key factors are the terminal effectors of sexual differentiation and shape most of the sex differences in flies [5]. The male-specific isoform of fru (fruM) is essential for producing transcription factors that govern specific neuronal circuits involved in sexual orientation and aggression [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. Both male (dsxM) and female (dsxF) isoforms of dsx encode transcription factors, though only a few direct targets of Dsx are well characterised [29]. DsxM plays a crucial role in regulating sexual behaviours by controlling the development of male-specific neurons [30, 31]. DsxF supports egg growth by activating yolk protein (Yp) genes in fat body cells [32] and promotes pheromone production by regulating the desaturase DesatF [33]. Sex-specific gonadal development is the last and critical aspect of sexual differentiation regulated by dsx (Figure 1) [5, 34]. Although dsx is expressed in only a subset of cells and required at specific developmental stages to form dimorphic structures [35, 36, 37], its continued expression can be essential for maintaining sex differences throughout adulthood. For instance, thermosensitive alleles have highlighted the importance of the sex determination cascade in sustaining sex-specific Yp synthesis [38, 39] and desatF expression [29]. In the adult gonads, sexual plasticity is also evident; continuous expression of DsxM in testis cyst cells is necessary to preserve their male identity, while ectopic expression of DsxF can feminise these cells into a follicle-like phenotype [34, 40]. Additionally, dsx plays a role in adulthood by inhibiting male-male courtship behaviours [41, 42, 43].

3. Sex-determining mechanisms are diverse and can evolve rapidly

Dose-dependent X or Z chromosome sex determination has been observed in two other model organisms following its discovery in Drosophila: the invertebrate Caenorhabditis elegans [44] and the chicken [45]. In nematodes, males have an X0 genotype, while hermaphrodites are XX. The X-chromosome counting mechanism in C. elegans regulates a male-specific switch gene called xol-1. Interestingly, the effect of X-chromosome dosage on xol-1 is the opposite of that on Sxl in Drosophila: a single X chromosome (haplo dose) leads to high levels of xol-1 transcripts, while two X chromosomes (diplo dose) result in low levels. X-linked numerator genes convey the X-chromosome dose by repressing xol-1 in a cumulative, dose-dependent manner at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels in XX embryos. Xol-1 encodes a GHMP kinase that promotes male development by repressing the hermaphrodite fate.

In chickens, as in most birds, males are the homogametic sex (ZZ), and females are heterogametic (ZW). Avian gonadal sex determination primarily depends on the dosage of a single Z-linked gene, Dmrt1, which is homologous to dsx in flies [45]. During the critical period of gonadal development, males (ZZ) express Dmrt1 at significantly higher levels than females (ZW), with Dmrt1 functioning as the primary testis-determining factor. Deleting one copy of Dmrt1 in chromosomally male (ZZ) chickens leads to ovarian development [46, 47], while overexpression of Dmrt1 in genetically female (ZW) gonads results in their masculinisation [48]. Unlike the ubiquitous expression of sex-determining genes, Sxl and xol-1, Dmrt1 expression is specifically restricted to the sex organs. Thus, Dmrt1 dosage is the central switch in avian gonadal sex determination.

Accurate differentiation into fertile males and females is a fundamental developmental process in animals, yet the primary signals for sex determination are not conserved across species. Diverse mechanisms are employed to determine sex (Figure 2A) [4]. Another common mechanism for sex determination, besides dose-dependent X chromosome systems, involves dominant Y-linked factors that confer maleness (Figure 2A). In many non-Drosophilid Diptera, the primary signal for sex determination is a dominant male-determining factor (often called the M factor) located either on the Y chromosome or at a male-determining locus on a homomorphic sex chromosome. Examples include the male determiner Mdmd in Musca domestica [49, 50], Maleness-on-the-Y (MoY) in Ceratitis capitata [51], Yob in Anopheles gambiae [52, 53], Nix in Aedes aegypti [54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60], AsuMf in Armigeres subalbatus [61] and Guy1 in Anopheles stephensi [62, 63] (Figure 2B). These Y-linked dominant M factors are both necessary and sufficient to initiate male development during embryogenesis, primarily by inhibiting the activity of Tra homologs, thereby suppressing female fate. Similarly, in therian mammals (placental mammals and marsupials), male sex determination is controlled by a Y-linked testis-determining factor, SRY [64]. Teleost fish represent another prime example of a taxonomic group characterised by frequent turnovers of Y-linked factors that govern maleness [65, 66] (Figure 3). Within this group, various components of the gonadal TGF-β signalling pathway—including ligands (Amhy [67, 68, 69, 70, 71], Gsdfy [72], Gdf6 [73, 74]), receptors (Amhr [75, 76, 77], Bmpr [78]), and regulators (Id2bby [79])—have been independently recruited to the top of the sex determination cascade (Figure 3). This underscores the TGF-β signalling pathway as a hotspot for the evolution of new master sex-determining genes in teleosts [65].

Figure 2.

Sex-determining mechanisms are diverse and can evolve rapidly. (A) Beyond dose-dependent X chromosome systems, sex determination can also involve dominant Y/W-linked factors, haplodiploid systems, and allele heterozygosity at a single locus. (B) In many non-Drosophilid Diptera, the primary signal for sex determination is a dominant male-determining factor located on the Y chromosome. While many primary sex determinants encode proteins, in Bombyx mori, sex is determined by a single female-specific piRNA, Fem, and in the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile), the primary sex determinant is a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA). Masquer

Sex-determining mechanisms are diverse and can evolve rapidly. (A) Beyond dose-dependent X chromosome systems, sex determination can also involve dominant Y/W-linked factors, haplodiploid systems, and allele heterozygosity at a single locus. (B) In many non-Drosophilid Diptera, the primary signal for ... Lire la suite

Figure 3.

The TGF-β signalling pathway as a hotspot for the evolution of new master sex-determining genes in teleosts. Teleost fish represent a prime example of a taxonomic group characterised by frequent turnovers of Y-linked factors that govern maleness. Within this group, various components of the gonadal TGF-β signalling pathway—including ligands (Amhy, Gsdfy, Gdf6), receptors (Amhr, Bmpr), and regulators (Id2bby)—have been independently recruited to the top of the sex determination cascade.

A third strategy for sex determination is the haplodiploid mechanism observed in many hymenopteran insects [80]. In this system, males are haploid and develop from unfertilised eggs, while females are diploid and develop from fertilised eggs. In other words, a paternal genome is essential for initiating female development; in its absence, uniparental haploid males arise. At the molecular level, the master switch gene for sex determination displays a parent-of-origin effect, being maternally silenced and transcribed only from the paternal allele in fertilised eggs to induce female development. This mechanism is exemplified by the wasp overruler of masculinisation (wom) gene in Nasonia vitripennis [80].

Lastly, a recently discovered mechanism of sex determination in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana involves allele heterozygosity at a single gene called Masculinizer (Masc), which acts as the primary sex-determining switch [81]. Embryos with either one or two identical alleles (monoallelic) develop into females, while those with two distinct alleles (polyallelic) develop into males. Heterozygosity activates the Masc factor, triggering male development, whereas hemizygosity or homozygosity result in an inactive Masc state, leading to the default female developmental pathway.

The remarkable diversity of sex determination mechanisms is accompanied by the rapid evolution of the primary sex determinants, which often vary even among closely related species. This phenomenon is exemplified in Diptera, where none of the M factors share a common origin. For instance, Nix is an SR splicing factor distantly related to the transformer2 gene in flies [60], Mdmd originated from a duplication of the spliceosomal factor gene CWC22 [49], AsuMf from a duplication of an autosomal Drosophila behaviour/human splicing (DBHS) gene [61] and MoY bears no resemblance to any known proteins [51]. This evolutionary plasticity is further highlighted by the variety in the molecular nature of master switch genes. While many primary sex determinants encode proteins, in Bombyx mori, sex is determined by a single female-specific piRNA, Fem [82]. The silkworm utilises a WZ sex determination system similar to birds, where males have two Z chromosomes and females have one Z and one W chromosome. The W-linked Fem piRNA dominantly silences Masc, which is crucial for male development. In the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile), which follows a haplodiploid system, the primary sex determinant is a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) [83] (Figure 2B).

4. Sex-specific splicing is a widespread mechanism for sex determination

While master sex determinants often evolve rapidly, the phenomenon of sex-specific alternative splicing may serve as a more conserved transduction mechanism of sex determination. The sex-specific splicing of dsx is observed across most insects and predates the last common ancestor of hexapods (Figure 4) [84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92]. In many insect species, male and female sexual development is governed by this splicing process. Notably, in early-branching insect orders, dsx primarily functions as a male-determining gene, crucial for male-specific sexual differentiation but not for female development [86, 93]. Over time, the female-specific dsx isoforms evolved additional functions essential for female differentiation.

Figure 4.

The sex-specific splicing of dsx governs sexual differentiation across most insects and predates the last common ancestor of hexapods.

Splicing has also been linked to sex determination in vertebrates, a process that can be influenced by a number of different factors in this taxonomic group, ranging from genes on sex chromosomes, as seen in flies, to environmental factors such as temperature. In the red-eared slider turtle (Trachemys scripta), which exhibits temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD), functional studies have shown that the histone demethylase Kdm6b, an epigenetic modifier, plays a crucial role [94, 95]. Kdm6b binds to and demethylates the promoter of the dominant male determinant gene, Dmrt1 (a dsx homologue), thereby activating male development. Remarkably, loss of Kdm6b function at the male-producing temperature leads to male-to-female sex reversal [94]. Interestingly, in this species, Kdm6b undergoes temperature-dependent alternative splicing (Figure 5A) [96], a phenomenon also observed in other reptilian species with TSD, such as the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) [97] and the central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) [97]. While P. vitticeps has a ZZ/ZW chromosomal sex determination system, high temperatures can induce sex reversal from the ZZ genotype to a female phenotype. In sex-reversed individuals, high temperature incubation eliminates an intron retention event in Kdm6b gene, and products a specific Kdm6b isoform [97]. The functional significance of these alternative splicing events in triggering the male sex determination cascade remains to be fully understood.

Figure 5.

Splicing and its role in vertebrate sex determination. (A) In the red-eared slider turtle (Trachemys scripta), which exhibits temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD), kdm6b undergoes temperature-sensitive alternative splicing. Kdm6b binds to and demethylates the promoter of the dominant male determinant gene dmrt1 (a homologue of doublesex), thereby promoting male development. In this species, temperature-dependent CLK kinase activity regulates TSD-associated alternative splicing of kdm6b. (B) In mammals, the ovarian-determining factor has recently been identified as an alternatively spliced isoform of the Wilms’ tumour suppressor gene Wt1, specifically the Wt1-KTS isoform. Masquer

Splicing and its role in vertebrate sex determination. (A) In the red-eared slider turtle (Trachemys scripta), which exhibits temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD), kdm6b undergoes temperature-sensitive alternative splicing. Kdm6b binds to and demethylates the promoter of the dominant male ... Lire la suite

What factors regulate the temperature-dependent splicing of Kdm6b? Notably, homologs of the fly kinase Doa, such as CLK1, have been implicated in linking temperature changes to alternative splicing through the phosphorylation of SR splicing factors [98]. The temperature-activity profile of alligator CLK4 and turtle CLK1 correspond closely with the critical temperature ranges for temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) in these species. For instance, CLK1 is active below 26 °C, the male-producing temperature, but its activity significantly decreases at the female-producing temperature above 31 °C. Moreover, inhibition of Clk1-4 prevents intron retention at lower temperatures, providing evidence that temperature-dependent CLK activity controls TSD-associated alternative splicing events. CLK kinases may act as molecular thermometers, functioning as an on-off switch for sex determination by regulating SR factor phosphorylation in response to temperature changes (Figure 5A). However, the specific splicing factors involved in this process have yet to be identified.

Although functional studies in reptiles are still lacking, the role of Kdm6b alternative splicing has been validated in a fish species with temperature-induced sex reversal, the Nile tilapia [99]. In many fish species, sex determination is notably plastic and temperature-sensitive. Nile tilapia have a genetic sex-determination system (XX/XY); however, exposure to high temperatures during a critical thermosensitive period can induce XX females to develop as pseudo-males. In this species, alternative splicing of Kdm6bb, a paralogue of Kdm6b in P. vitticeps, produces two isoforms: Kdm6bb_tv1, lacking intron 5, and Kdm6bb_tv2, which includes intron 5. Notably, overexpression of Kdm6bb_tv1, but not Kdm6bb_tv2, induces sex reversal in XX fish. Furthermore, high temperatures specifically upregulate Kdm6bb_tv1, directly linking elevated temperatures to the activation of Dmrt1 expression by demethylating H3K27me3, ultimately leading to male sex determination.

In mammals, while the Y-linked testis-determining gene Sry has been known for some time, the ovarian-determining factor was only recently identified as an alternatively spliced isoform of the Wilms’ tumour suppressor gene, Wt1 (specifically the Wt1-KTS isoform) (Figure 5B) [100]. Elevated expression of this variant, as observed in Frasier syndrome, can lead to male-to-female sex reversal by promoting ovarian development independently of chromosomal sex. Interestingly, in the turtle Chelydra serpentina, which exhibits temperature-dependent sex determination, a rapid increase in Wt1-KTS isoform expression is triggered when eggs are shifted from a male- to a female-promoting temperature [101]. Although the exact mechanism by which Wt1-KTS induces ovarian development remains unclear, it is known that Wt1 interacts with Wilms’ tumor 1-associated protein (WTAP) to form a splicing complex. The Drosophila homolog of WTAP, Fl(2)d, is a key component of the m6A writer complex, which is implicated in the female-specific splicing of Sxl and tra [12, 13]. In mammals, WTAP acts also as a regulatory subunit of the m6A methylome complex, guiding the complex to nuclear speckles and target mRNAs [102]. Therefore, Wt1-KTS may drive ovarian differentiation by influencing sex-specific splicing or by modulating m6A modifications, either directly or indirectly, through its interaction with WTAP.

Additionally, sex-specific splicing has been proposed as a crucial mechanism for sex determination in another phylum, the Platyhelminthes. In schistosomes, which possess ZW sex chromosomes, the splicing factor u2af2 has been identified as a potential W-linked candidate for primary sex determination [103]. This conserved factor may initiate a sex-specific splicing cascade, akin to the mechanisms that govern sex determination in Drosophila.

5. Sex determination: it all evolves around Doublesex

In addition to the conservation of the transduction mechanism, the terminal effectors of sex determination are also highly conserved across the animal kingdom. dsx and its homologs have emerged as evolutionarily conserved downstream genes in the sex determination pathway, regulated by a variety of upstream factors [104, 105]. In many dioecious species, these transcription factors play crucial roles in sex-specific development through their DNA-binding motif, known as the DM domain (named after doublesex and male-abnormal-3), suggesting that DM domain genes and sexual reproduction may have coevolved in metazoans.

dsx homologs consistently occupy a key position at the base of the sex-determination cascade in virtually all species studied (Figure 6). In the closest insect relative analysed to date, the branchiopod crustacean Daphnia magna, Dsx1 is transcribed specifically in males, orchestrating male trait formation in both somatic and gonadal tissues [106, 107]. Knockdown of DapmaDsx1 in male embryos results in the development of female traits, including ovarian maturation, while ectopic expression of DapmaDsx1 in female embryos leads to the development of male-like phenotypes [106, 107].

Figure 6.

dsx homologs occupy a key position at the base of the sex-determination cascade in virtually all species. In some cases, dsx homologs move up the regulatory hierarchy and act as the upstream sex-determining factor.

In molluscs, Dmrt1 is exclusively expressed in the testes. Functional experiments in the bivalve species Tridacna crocea have demonstrated that Dmrt1 primarily regulates spermatogenesis [108]. Similarly, in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea, the predicted dsx homolog plays a male-specific role in the maintenance and regeneration of the testes and male accessory reproductive organs [109].

In vertebrates, the loss of Dmrt1 is linked to XY sex reversal in humans, and knockout studies in mice have shown that this gene is essential for testis development [104]. Dmrt1 is also critical for male sexual differentiation in the Chinese soft-shelled turtle, Pelodiscus sinensis [110]. In this species, Dmrt1 exhibits early male-specific embryonic expression, and knockdown of Dmrt1 in ZZ embryos results in male-to-female sex reversal.

In some cases, dsx homologs move up the regulatory hierarchy and act as the upstream sex-determining factor, as observed in chickens [45]. In amphibians, the first primary sex determinant identified is also a DM domain-containing factor: the dominant female-specific gene Dm-W in the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis [111, 112]. In Xenopus, which has a ZZ/ZW sex chromosome system, a duplicated copy of Dmrt1 on the W chromosome, known as Dm-W, acts as a dominant-negative regulator. It interferes with the transcriptional activation of Dmrt1 target genes, functioning as an anti-male factor that promotes ovary formation. Similarly, in some fish species, such as Cynoglossus semilaevis (tongue sole) [113, 114] and Oryzias latipes (medaka) [115, 116], a duplicated copy of Dmrt1 on the sex chromosomes serves as a male-determining factor. In these species, the deficiency of Dmrt1 results in male-to-female sex reversal phenotypes, underscoring its essential role in male sex determination.

These examples highlight the central and conserved role of dsx/DMRT1 homologs in sex determination and differentiation across a wide range of animal taxa, emphasising their fundamental importance in the evolution of sexual development. The striking contrast between the strong evolutionary conservation of dsx/DMRT1 gene functions and the rapid diversification of upstream sex-determining mechanisms has spurred investigation into the evolutionary forces that drive this turnover. A central question is why sex determination remains highly labile in some taxa, yet remarkably stable in others. Although this remains an open area of investigation, mounting evidence suggests that sex chromosomes are frequent hotspots of genetic conflict—driven by processes such as meiotic drive and sexually antagonistic selection. These conflicts may play a key role in fuelling the rapid evolution and recurrent turnover of both sex chromosomes and their associated master sex-determining loci.

6. Cellular sex and its impact on adult tissue physiology: insights from Drosophila

As discussed so far, the process of sex organ determination is increasingly well understood. However, the influence of the intrinsic presence of sex chromosomes, referred to as cellular sex, on dimorphic phenotypes in non-sex organs and physiological traits—especially in adult tissues—remains less explored. Recent studies [117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125] using the Drosophila model have begun to shed light on how cellular sex affects organ physiology beyond the gonads.

To investigate this, we used the adult digestive organs of flies as a model system. The intestine, one of the best-characterised adult tissues in Drosophila, undergoes self-renewal during adulthood due to its resident population of adult somatic stem cells (ISCs) [122]. Focusing on ISCs, our work highlights the significant role sex chromosomes play in these cells. We discovered that the sexual identity of ISCs—determined by the presence or absence of female sex determinants, Sxl and Tra—profoundly affects both organ size and the predisposition to genetically induced tumours by modulating the proliferation rate of ISCs (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Cell-autonomous sexual differentiation in Drosophila intestinal stem cells.

By generating mosaic Drosophila in which only certain adult cells underwent sex reversal, we were able to reduce the size of a female gut to a male-like size in vivo within 20 days of adult-specific sex reversal in ISCs. Additionally, this manipulation revealed that only female guts were susceptible to tumour development. These findings also demonstrated that the sexual identity of adult ISCs is: (i) specified during adulthood, (ii) acts in a cell-autonomous manner, and (iii) is partially reversible. Importantly, ISC sexual identity is maintained by a novel branch of the sex differentiation pathway downstream of Tra, independent of the well-known Dsx and Fru pathways. This shows that even dsx/fru-negative cells retain the capacity for sexual differentiation into adulthood.

Using newly developed genetic models, we further demonstrated that every cell possesses an intrinsic sexual identity, governed by a binary and static genetic switch [125]. Through cell-specific sex reversals, we and others have shown that cellular sex significantly influences organ size [117, 125], body weight [118, 119, 125], and lifespan [120, 124].

7. Beyond hormones: cell-autonomous roles of sex chromosomes in mammalian physiology

Building on this body of work, the role of cellular sex in shaping mammalian physiology has become an active area of investigation. Over the past five years, multiple studies have identified X-linked and Y-linked genes as key regulators of sexual differentiation, acting in a cell-autonomous manner. For decades, it was assumed that Y chromosome genes were largely inactive outside of the testes. However, research from David Page’s group demonstrated that many Y-linked genes are also expressed in non-reproductive tissues in humans [126]. Similarly, a growing body of evidence shows that some X-linked genes are expressed at higher levels in XX cells than in XY cells, due to the presence of two copies of the X chromosome [127]. These findings reveal that sex chromosomes can drive functional differences between male and female cells across the body—not just within the reproductive system.

One such gene is Kdm5c, a histone demethylase that removes methyl groups from H3K27me3 and is consistently expressed at higher levels in XX than in XY cells in both mice and humans [128, 129]. Recent studies implicate Kdm5c in the regulation of metabolism in mice. Experimental data show that mice with two copies of Kdm5c exhibit greater body weight, a higher proportion of body fat, and increased food intake during the daytime compared to those with a single copy [130]. These sex differences appear to be primarily driven by Kdm5c expression in preadipocytes, where it influences both their development and metabolic activity [130]. This example illustrates how the dosage of an X-linked gene can contribute to sex differences in normal mammalian physiology.

8. From Kdm6a to SHOX: Gene dosage and the cellular foundations of pathological sex differences

Another compelling example is Kdm6a (also known as Utx), a gene encoding a histone demethylase that targets H3K27me3. Kdm6a has emerged as a key agent of sexual differentiation, contributing to sex differences in both autoimmune disease and neurodegeneration [131]. Notably, most autoimmune diseases are more prevalent in women than in men. Multiple sclerosis (MS), a putative T cell-mediated disease, exhibits a threefold higher incidence in females. A similar female bias is observed in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE), a mouse model of MS induced by immunisation with myelin protein autoantigens and adjuvant [132]. Kdm6a is expressed at higher levels in XX than XY CD4+ T cells. Conditional deletion of Kdm6a specifically in CD4+ T cells confers strong protection from EAE and reduces neuroinflammation [133]. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that Kdm6a loss upregulates T helper cell–related pathways while downregulating genes involved in neuroinflammation [133]. The gene dosage of Kdm6a—two copies in XX cells versus one in XY—has also been implicated in sex-biased vulnerability in neurodegenerative diseases. In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), men tend to experience earlier mortality, more severe cognitive decline, and greater neurodegeneration than women [134]. In vitro, treatment of neurons with the neurotoxin Aβ42 leads to greater cell death in XY than XX neurons, correlating with higher Kdm6a expression in XX neurons. Reducing Kdm6a levels in XX neurons to match XY levels increases their vulnerability to Aβ42-induced neurotoxicity. Conversely, elevating Kdm6a expression in XY neurons attenuates this toxicity. In vivo, overexpression of Kdm6a in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of XY male mice enhances learning and memory performance.

While lifestyle factors and sex hormones have long been recognised as contributors to sex differences in cancer incidence and outcomes, three recent independent studies have uncovered additional cell-intrinsic, non-hormonal mechanisms involving Y chromosome genes as additional contributors [135, 136, 137]. In the first study, conducted in a mouse model of colorectal cancer, male mice showed significantly worse survival than females, mirroring human sex disparities [135]. The authors found that the intrinsic presence of the Y chromosome in cancer cells acted as a risk factor, driven by upregulation of a Y-linked histone demethylase. In contrast, the other two studies revealed a protective role for the Y chromosome in different cancer types. These studies showed that loss of the Y chromosome (LOY) is extremely common across multiple tumour types, often occurring at frequencies higher than those of canonical driver mutations [137]. While LOY may arise in the context of genomic instability and might be dismissed as a passenger event due to the chromosome’s small size and low gene density, the authors demonstrated that Y loss can be a driver event—notably in uveal melanoma [137] and bladder cancer [136]. In bladder cancer, experimental removal of the Y chromosome led to increased tumour burden. Further analyses identified Uty, a gene located in the male-specific region of the Y chromosome, as partly responsible for this tumour-suppressive effect.

Direct effects of sex chromosome genes on phenotype are also evident in conditions where sex chromosome dosage is altered. For example, a hallmark feature of Turner syndrome—caused by the complete or partial absence of one X chromosome (typically resulting in an XO karyotype)—is short stature. This phenotype is largely driven by the dosage of an X-linked gene called short stature homeobox (SHOX). SHOX is expressed in the developing long bones of the forearms and lower limbs [138]. Human studies have shown that individuals with a deletion of one copy of SHOX exhibit short stature [139, 140], whereas individuals with an extra sex chromosome—and therefore an additional copy of SHOX—tend to be taller than average [141]. This exemplifies the dose-sensitive role of SHOX in skeletal growth.

Together, these studies—all conducted within the past five years—provide compelling evidence in mammals, building on foundational work in Drosophila, that the intrinsic expression of sex chromosome-linked genes can drive sex differences. They also highlight the dynamism and rapid growth of this field. Crucially, the manifestation of sex differences in cells, organs, or behaviours varies greatly across species. This diversity reflects the influence of each species’ unique ecology and evolutionary pressures. There are no universal or fixed male or female traits—what is sexually dimorphic in one species may be monomorphic in another. While every cell carries the potential to harness sex chromosome genes to generate sex-specific traits, this potential is not always realised. The presence of sex chromosomes does not inherently lead to overt physiological differences. This underscores the importance of studying cellular sex: to reveal when and where it matters, and to understand how it shapes organ development, function, and disease within specific biological contexts.

Declaration of interests

The authors do not work for, advise, own shares in, or receive funds from any organization that could benefit from this article, and have declared no affiliations other than their research organizations.

Acknowledgments

I thank all the members of the BH laboratory for fruitful discussions and comments. This work was supported by the Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS (ATIP-Avenir program), INSERM, European Research Council (ERC starting grant CellSex, Grant number: ERC-2019-STG#850934), and the French Government (National Research Agency, ANR) through the “Investments for the Future” programs LABEX SIGNALIFE ANR-11-LABX-0028-01 and IDEX UCAJedi ANR-15-IDEX-01.


Bibliographie

[1] A. P. Arnold Rethinking sex determination of non-gonadal tissues, Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., Volume 134 (2019), pp. 289-315 | DOI

[2] A. P. Arnold A general theory of sexual differentiation: a general theory of sexual differentiation, J. Neurosci. Res., Volume 95 (2017), pp. 291-300 | DOI

[3] A. P. Arnold X chromosome agents of sexual differentiation, Nat. Rev. Endocrinol., Volume 18 (2022), pp. 574-583 | DOI

[4] D. Bachtrog; J. E. Mank; C. L. Peichel et al. Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it?, PLoS Biol., Volume 12 (2014), e1001899 | DOI

[5] N. Camara; C. Whitworth; M. Van Doren The creation of sexual dimorphism in the Drosophila soma, Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., Volume 83 (2008), pp. 65-107 | DOI

[6] T. W. Cline Autoregulatory functioning of a Drosophila gene product that establish es and maintains the sexually determined state, Genetics, Volume 107 (1984), pp. 231-277 | DOI

[7] D. A. Harrison Sex determination: controlling the master, Curr. Biol., Volume 17 (2007), p. R328-R330 | DOI

[8] T. Lence; J. Akhtar; M. Bayer et al. m6A modulates neuronal functions and sex determination in Drosophila, Nature, Volume 540 (2016), pp. 242-247 | DOI

[9] I. U. Haussmann; Z. Bodi; E. Sanchez-Moran; N. P. Mongan; N. Archer; R. G. Fray; M. Soller m6A potentiates Sxl alternative pre-mRNA splicing for robust Drosophila sex determination, Nature, Volume 540 (2016), pp. 301-304 | DOI

[10] L. Kan; A. V. Grozhik; J. Vedanayagam et al. The m6A pathway facilitates sex determination in Drosophila, Nat. Commun., Volume 8 (2017), 15737 | DOI

[11] P. Knuckles; T. Lence; I. U. Haussmann et al. Zc3h13/Flacc is required for adenosine methylation by bridging the mRNA-binding factor Rbm15/Spenito to the m6A machinery component Wtap/Fl(2)d, Genes Dev., Volume 32 (2018), pp. 415-429 | DOI

[12] J. Guo; H.-W. Tang; J. Li; N. Perrimon; D. Yan Xio is a component of the Drosophila sex determination pathway and RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase complex, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 115 (2018), pp. 3674-3679 | DOI

[13] Y. Wang; L. Zhang; H. Ren et al. Role of Hakai in m6A modification pathway in Drosophila, Nat. Commun., Volume 12 (2021), 2159 | DOI

[14] P. Bawankar; T. Lence; C. Paolantoni et al. Hakai is required for stabilization of core components of the m6A mRNA methylation machinery, Nat. Commun., Volume 12 (2021), 3778 | DOI

[15] C. Du; M. E. McGuffin; B. Dauwalder; L. Rabinow; W. Mattox Protein phosphorylation plays an essential role in the regulation of alternative splicing and sex determination in Drosophila, Mol. Cell, Volume 2 (1998), pp. 741-750 | DOI

[16] L. Rabinow; M.-L. Samson The role of the Drosophila LAMMER protein kinase DOA in somatic sex determination, J. Genet., Volume 89 (2010), pp. 271-277 | DOI

[17] B. S. Baker; K. A. Ridge Sex and the single cell. I. On the action of major loci affecting sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, Volume 94 (1980), pp. 383-423 | DOI

[18] B. S. Baker; M. F. Wolfner A molecular analysis of doublesex, a bifunctional gene that controls both male and female sexual differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster, Genes Dev., Volume 2 (1988), pp. 477-489 | DOI

[19] K. C. Burtis; B. S. Baker Drosophila doublesex gene controls somatic sexual differentiation by producing alternatively spliced mRNAs encoding related sex-specific polypeptides, Cell, Volume 56 (1989), pp. 997-1010 | DOI

[20] H. Ito; K. Fujitani; K. Usui; K. Shimizu-Nishikawa; S. Tanaka; D. Yamamoto Sexual orientation in Drosophila is altered by the satori mutation in the sex-determination gene fruitless that encodes a zinc finger protein with a BTB domain, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 93 (1996), pp. 9687-9692 | DOI

[21] L. C. Ryner; S. F. Goodwin; D. H. Castrillon et al. Control of male sexual behavior and sexual orientation in Drosophila by the fruitless gene, Cell, Volume 87 (1996), pp. 1079-1089 | DOI

[22] G. Lee; M. Foss; S. F. Goodwin; T. Carlo; B. J. Taylor; J. C. Hall Spatial, temporal, and sexually dimorphic expression patterns of the fruitless gene in the Drosophila central nervous system, J. Neurobiol., Volume 43 (2000), pp. 404-426 | DOI

[23] S. F. Goodwin; B. J. Taylor; A. Villella; M. Foss; L. C. Ryner; B. S. Baker; J. C. Hall Aberrant splicing and altered spatial expression patterns in fruitless mutants of Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, Volume 154 (2000), pp. 725-745 | DOI

[24] E. Demir; B. J. Dickson fruitless splicing specifies male courtship behavior in Drosophila, Cell, Volume 121 (2005), pp. 785-794 | DOI

[25] D. S. Manoli; M. Foss; A. Villella; B. J. Taylor; J. C. Hall; B. S. Baker Male-specific fruitless specifies the neural substrates of Drosophila courtship behaviour, Nature, Volume 436 (2005), pp. 395-400 | DOI

[26] K.-I. Kimura; M. Ote; T. Tazawa; D. Yamamoto Fruitless specifies sexually dimorphic neural circuitry in the Drosophila brain, Nature, Volume 438 (2005), pp. 229-233 | DOI

[27] T. R. Shirangi; B. J. Taylor; M. McKeown A double-switch system regulates male courtship behavior in male and female Drosophila melanogaster, Nat. Genet., Volume 38 (2006), pp. 1435-1439 | DOI

[28] E. J. Rideout; J.-C. Billeter; S. F. Goodwin The sex-determination genes fruitless and doublesex specify a neural substrate required for courtship song, Curr. Biol., Volume 17 (2007), pp. 1473-1478 | DOI

[29] E. Clough; E. Jimenez; Y.-A. Kim et al. Sex- and tissue-specific functions of Drosophila doublesex transcription factor target genes, Dev. Cell, Volume 31 (2014), pp. 761-773 | DOI

[30] T. Nojima; A. Rings; A. M. Allen; N. Otto; T. A. Verschut; J.-C. Billeter; M. C. Neville; S. F. Goodwin A sex-specific switch between visual and olfactory inputs underlies adaptive sex differences in behavior, Curr. Biol., Volume 31 (2021), p. 1175-1191.e6 | DOI

[31] E. J. Rideout; A. J. Dornan; M. C. Neville; S. Eadie; S. F. Goodwin Control of sexual differentiation and behavior by the doublesex gene in Drosophila melanogaster, Nat. Neurosci., Volume 13 (2010), pp. 458-466 | DOI

[32] K. C. Burtis; K. T. Coschigano; B. S. Baker; P. C. Wensink The doublesex proteins of Drosophila melanogaster bind directly to a sex-specific yolk protein gene enhancer, EMBO J., Volume 10 (1991), pp. 2577-2582 | DOI

[33] T. R. Shirangi; H. D. Dufour; T. M. Williams; S. B. Carroll Rapid evolution of sex pheromone-producing enzyme expression in Drosophila, PLoS Biol., Volume 7 (2009), e1000168 | DOI

[34] N. Camara; C. Whitworth; A. Dove; M. Van Doren Doublesex controls specification and maintenance of the gonad stem cell niches in Drosophila, Development, Volume 146 (2019), dev170001 | DOI

[35] C. C. Robinett; A. G. Vaughan; J.-M. Knapp; B. S. Baker Sex and the single cell. II. There is a time and place for sex, PLoS Biol., Volume 8 (2010), e1000365 | DOI

[36] Y. Pan; C. C. Robinett; B. S. Baker Turning males on: activation of male courtship behavior in Drosophila melanogaster, PLoS One, Volume 6 (2011), e21144 | DOI

[37] P. Stockinger; D. Kvitsiani; S. Rotkopf; L. Tirián; B. J. Dickson Neural circuitry that governs Drosophila male courtship behavior, Cell, Volume 121 (2005), pp. 795-807 | DOI

[38] J. M. Belote; A. M. Handler; M. F. Wolfner; K. J. Livak; B. S. Baker Sex-specific regulation of yolk protein gene expression in Drosophila, Cell, Volume 40 (1985), pp. 339-348 | DOI

[39] M. Bownes; M. Steinmann-Zwicky; R. Nöthiger Differential control of yolk protein gene expression in fat bodies and gonads by the sex-determining gene tra-2 of Drosophila, EMBO J., Volume 9 (1990), pp. 3975-3980 | DOI

[40] L. Grmai; B. Hudry; I. Miguel-Aliaga; E. A. Bach Chinmo prevents transformer alternative splicing to maintain male sex identity, PLoS Genet., Volume 14 (2018), e1007203 | DOI

[41] Q. Peng; J. Chen; Y. Pan From fruitless to sex: On the generation and diversification of an innate behavior, Genes Brain Behav., Volume 20 (2021), e12772 | DOI

[42] Q. Peng; J. Chen; X. Su; R. Wang; C. Han; Y. Pan The sex determination gene doublesex is required during adulthood to maintain sexual orientation, J. Genet. Genomics, Volume 49 (2022), pp. 165-168 | DOI

[43] J. Chen; S. Jin; D. Chen; J. Cao; X. Ji; Q. Peng; Y. Pan fruitless tunes functional flexibility of courtship circuitry during development, Elife, Volume 10 (2021), e59224 | DOI

[44] T. W. Cline; B. J. Meyer Vive la différence: males vs females in flies vs worms, Annu. Rev. Genet., Volume 30 (1996), pp. 637-702 | DOI

[45] C. A. Smith; K. N. Roeszler; T. Ohnesorg; D. M. Cummins; P. G. Farlie; T. J. Doran; A. H. Sinclair The avian Z-linked gene DMRT1 is required for male sex determination in the chicken, Nature, Volume 461 (2009), pp. 267-271 | DOI

[46] J. Ioannidis; G. Taylor; D. Zhao et al. Primary sex determination in birds depends on DMRT1 dosage, but gonadal sex does not determine adult secondary sex characteristics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 118 (2021), e2020909118 | DOI

[47] H. J. Lee; M. Seo; H. J. Choi et al. DMRT1 gene disruption alone induces incomplete gonad feminization in chicken, FASEB J., Volume 35 (2021), e21876 | DOI

[48] L. S. Lambeth; C. S. Raymond; K. N. Roeszler; A. Kuroiwa; T. Nakata; D. Zarkower; C. A. Smith Over-expression of DMRT1 induces the male pathway in embryonic chicken gonads, Dev. Biol., Volume 389 (2014), pp. 160-172 | DOI

[49] A. Sharma; S. D. Heinze; Y. Wu et al. Male sex in houseflies is determined by Mdmd, a paralog of the generic splice factor gene CWC22, Science, Volume 356 (2017), pp. 642-645 | DOI

[50] X. Li; S. Visser; J. H. Son et al. Divergent evolution of male-determining loci on proto-Y chromosomes of the housefly, Nat. Commun., Volume 15 (2024), 5984 | DOI

[51] A. Meccariello; M. Salvemini; P. Primo et al. Maleness-on-the-Y (MoY) orchestrates male sex determination in major agricultural fruit fly pests, Science, Volume 365 (2019), pp. 1457-1460 | DOI

[52] E. Krzywinska; N. J. Dennison; G. J. Lycett; J. Krzywinski A maleness gene in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae, Science, Volume 353 (2016), pp. 67-69 | DOI

[53] E. Krzywinska; J. Krzywinski Effects of stable ectopic expression of the primary sex determination gene Yob in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae, Parasit. Vectors, Volume 11 (2018), 648 | DOI

[54] A. B. Hall; S. Basu; X. Jiang et al. SEX DETERMINATION. A male-determining factor in the mosquito Aedes aegypti, Science, Volume 348 (2015), pp. 1268-1270 | DOI

[55] J. Turner; R. Krishna; A. E. Van’t Hof; E. R. Sutton; K. Matzen; A. C. Darby The sequence of a male-specific genome region containing the sex determination switch in Aedes aegypti, Parasit. Vectors, Volume 11 (2018), 549 | DOI

[56] P. Liu; B. Jin; X. Li; Y. Zhao; J. Gu; J. K. Biedler; Z. J. Tu; X.-G. Chen Nix is a male-determining factor in the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus, Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol., Volume 118 (2020), 103311 | DOI

[57] A. Aryan; M. A. E. Anderson; J. K. Biedler et al. Nix alone is sufficient to convert female Aedes aegypti into fertile males and myo-sex is needed for male flight, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 117 (2020), pp. 17702-17709 | DOI

[58] C. Lutrat; R. P. Olmo; T. Baldet; J. Bouyer; E. Marois Transgenic expression of Nix converts genetic females into males and allows automated sex sorting in Aedes albopictus, Commun. Biol., Volume 5 (2022), 210 | DOI

[59] B. B. Kojin; E. Jakes; J. K. Biedler; Z. Tu; Z. N. Adelman Partial masculinization of Aedes aegypti females by conditional expression of Nix, PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., Volume 16 (2022), e0010598 | DOI

[60] J. K. Biedler; A. Aryan; Y. Qi et al. On the origin and evolution of the mosquito male-determining factor Nix, Mol. Biol. Evol., Volume 41 (2024), msad276 | DOI

[61] P. Liu; W. Yang; L. Kong et al. A DBHS family member regulates male determination in the filariasis vector Armigeres subalbatus, Nat. Commun., Volume 14 (2023), 2292 | DOI

[62] F. Criscione; Y. Qi; Z. Tu GUY1 confers complete female lethality and is a strong candidate for a male-determining factor in Anopheles stephensi, Elife, Volume 5 (2016), e19281 | DOI

[63] Y. Qi; Y. Wu; R. Saunders; X.-G. Chen; C. Mao; J. K. Biedler; Z. J. Tu Guy1, a Y-linked embryonic signal, regulates dosage compensation in Anopheles stephensi by increasing X gene expression, Elife, Volume 8 (2019), e43570 | DOI

[64] P. N. Goodfellow; R. Lovell-Badge SRY and sex determination in mammals, Annu. Rev. Genet., Volume 27 (1993), pp. 71-92 | DOI

[65] Q. Pan; T. Kay; A. Depincé; M. Adolfi; M. Schartl; Y. Guiguen; A. Herpin Evolution of master sex determiners: TGF-β signalling pathways at regulatory crossroads, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, Volume 376 (2021), 20200091 | DOI

[66] H. Yu; X. Du; X. Chen; L. Liu; X. Wang Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β): A master signal pathway in teleost sex determination, Gen. Comp. Endocrinol., Volume 355 (2024), 114561 | DOI

[67] Q. Pan; A. Herpin; Y. Guiguen Inactivation of the anti-müllerian hormone receptor type 2 (amhrII) gene in northern pike (Esox lucius) results in male-to-female sex reversal, Sex Dev., Volume 16 (2022), pp. 289-294 | DOI

[68] R. S. Hattori; G. M. Somoza; J. I. Fernandino; D. C. Colautti; K. Miyoshi; Z. Gong; Y. Yamamoto; C. A. Strüssmann The duplicated Y-specific amhy gene is conserved and linked to maleness in silversides of the genus Odontesthes, Genes (Basel), Volume 10 (2019), 679 | DOI

[69] M. Li; Y. Sun; J. Zhao et al. A tandem duplicate of anti-müllerian hormone with a missense SNP on the Y chromosome is essential for male sex determination in Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, PLoS Genet., Volume 11 (2015), e1005678 | DOI

[70] W. Song; Y. Xie; M. Sun et al. A duplicated amh is the master sex-determining gene for Sebastes rockfish in the Northwest Pacific, Open Biol., Volume 11 (2021), 210063 | DOI

[71] R. S. Hattori; K. Kumazawa; M. Nakamoto et al. Y-specific amh allele, amhy, is the master sex-determining gene in Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus, Front. Genet., Volume 13 (2022), 1007548 | DOI

[72] T. Myosho; H. Otake; H. Masuyama et al. Tracing the emergence of a novel sex-determining gene in medaka, Oryzias luzonensis, Genetics, Volume 191 (2012), pp. 163-170 | DOI

[73] B. Imarazene; K. Du; S. Beille et al. A supernumerary “B-sex” chromosome drives male sex determination in the Pachón cavefish, Astyanax mexicanus, Curr. Biol., Volume 31 (2021), p. 4800-4809.e9 | DOI

[74] J. Štundlová; M. Hospodářská; K. Lukšíková et al. Sex chromosome differentiation via changes in the Y chromosome repeat landscape in African annual killifishes Nothobranchius furzeri and N. kadleci, Chromosome Res., Volume 30 (2022), pp. 309-333 | DOI

[75] S. Zheng; W. Tao; H. Yang et al. Identification of sex chromosome and sex-determining gene of southern catfish (Silurus meridionalis) based on XX, XY and YY genome sequencing, Proc. Biol. Sci., Volume 289 (2022), 20212645 | DOI

[76] M. Nakamoto; T. Uchino; E. Koshimizu et al. A Y-linked anti-Müllerian hormone type-II receptor is the sex-determining gene in ayu, Plecoglossus altivelis, PLoS Genet., Volume 17 (2021), e1009705 | DOI

[77] T. Kamiya; W. Kai; S. Tasumi et al. A trans-species missense SNP in Amhr2 is associated with sex determination in the tiger pufferfish, Takifugu rubripes (fugu), PLoS Genet., Volume 8 (2012), e1002798 | DOI

[78] N. Rafati; J. Chen; A. Herpin et al. Reconstruction of the birth of a male sex chromosome present in Atlantic herring, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 117 (2020), pp. 24359-24368 | DOI

[79] M. C. Adolfi; K. Du; S. Kneitz et al. A duplicated copy of id2b is an unusual sex-determining candidate gene on the Y chromosome of arapaima (Arapaima gigas), Sci. Rep., Volume 11 (2021), 21544 | DOI

[80] Y. Zou; E. Geuverink; L. W. Beukeboom; E. C. Verhulst; L. van de Zande A chimeric gene paternally instructs female sex determination in the haplodiploid wasp Nasonia, Science, Volume 370 (2020), pp. 1115-1118 | DOI

[81] A. E. Van’t Hof; S. Whiteford; C. J. Yung et al. Zygosity-based sex determination in a butterfly drives hypervariability of Masculinizer, Sci. Adv., Volume 10 (2024), eadj6979 | DOI

[82] T. Kiuchi; H. Koga; M. Kawamoto et al. A single female-specific piRNA is the primary determiner of sex in the silkworm, Nature, Volume 509 (2014), pp. 633-636 | DOI

[83] Q. Pan; H. Darras; L. Keller LncRNA gene ANTSR coordinates complementary sex determination in the Argentine ant, Sci. Adv., Volume 10 (2024), eadp1532 | DOI

[84] Y. Chikami; M. Okuno; A. Toyoda; T. Itoh; T. Niimi Evolutionary history of sexual differentiation mechanism in insects, Mol. Biol. Evol., Volume 39 (2022), msac145 | DOI

[85] M. Takahashi; G. Okude; R. Futahashi; Y. Takahashi; M. Kawata The effect of the doublesex gene in body colour masculinization of the damselfly Ischnura senegalensis, Biol. Lett., Volume 17 (2021), 20200761 | DOI

[86] J. Wexler; E. K. Delaney; X. Belles; C. Schal; A. Wada-Katsumata; M. J. Amicucci; A. Kopp Hemimetabolous insects elucidate the origin of sexual development via alternative splicing, Elife, Volume 8 (2019), e47490 | DOI

[87] Y. Wang; A. H. Rensink; U. Fricke; M. C. Riddle; C. Trent; L. van de Zande; E. C. Verhulst Doublesex regulates male-specific differentiation during distinct developmental time windows in a parasitoid wasp, Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol., Volume 142 (2022), 103724 | DOI

[88] S. Cho; Z. Y. Huang; J. Zhang Sex-specific splicing of the honeybee doublesex gene reveals 300 million years of evolution at the bottom of the insect sex-determination pathway, Genetics, Volume 177 (2007), pp. 1733-1741 | DOI

[89] I. Nissen; M. Müller; M. Beye The Am-tra2 gene is an essential regulator of female splice regulation at two levels of the sex determination hierarchy of the honeybee, Genetics, Volume 192 (2012), pp. 1015-1026 | DOI

[90] J. N. Shukla; S. R. Palli Sex determination in beetles: production of all male progeny by parental RNAi knockdown of transformer, Sci. Rep., Volume 2 (2012), 602 | DOI

[91] J. N. Shukla; S. R. Palli Tribolium castaneum Transformer-2 regulates sex determination and development in both males and females, Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol., Volume 43 (2013), pp. 1125-1132 | DOI

[92] M. G. Suzuki; F. Ohbayashi; K. Mita; T. Shimada The mechanism of sex-specific splicing at the doublesex gene is different between Drosophila melanogaster and Bombyx mori, Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol., Volume 31 (2001), pp. 1201-1211 | DOI

[93] J. Just; M. Laslo; Y. J. Lee; M. Yarnell; Z. Zhang; D. R. Angelini Distinct developmental mechanisms influence sexual dimorphisms in the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus, Proc. Biol. Sci., Volume 290 (2023), 20222083 | DOI

[94] C. Ge; J. Ye; C. Weber et al. The histone demethylase KDM6B regulates temperature-dependent sex determination in a turtle species, Science, Volume 360 (2018), pp. 645-648 | DOI

[95] C. Weber; Y. Zhou; J. G. Lee; L. L. Looger; G. Qian; C. Ge; B. Capel Temperature-dependent sex determination is mediated by pSTAT3 repression of Kdm6b, Science, Volume 368 (2020), pp. 303-306 | DOI

[96] R. A. Marroquín-Flores; R. M. Bowden; R. T. Paitz Brief exposure to warm temperatures reduces intron retention in Kdm6b in a species with temperature-dependent sex determination, Biol. Lett., Volume 17 (2021), 20210167 | DOI

[97] S. L. Whiteley; S. Wagner; C. E. Holleley; I. W. Deveson; J. A. Marshall Graves; A. Georges Truncated jarid2 and kdm6b transcripts are associated with temperature-induced sex reversal during development in a dragon lizard, Sci. Adv., Volume 8 (2022), eabk0275 | DOI

[98] T. Haltenhof; A. Kotte; F. De Bortoli et al. A conserved kinase-based body-temperature sensor globally controls alternative splicing and gene expression, Mol. Cell, Volume 78 (2020), p. 57-69.e4 | DOI

[99] Z. L. Yao; Q. F. Fang; J. Y. Li et al. Alternative splicing of histone demethylase Kdm6bb mediates temperature-induced sex reversal in the Nile tilapia, Curr. Biol., Volume 33 (2023), p. 5057-5070.e5 | DOI

[100] E. P. Gregoire; M.-C. De Cian; R. Migale et al. The -KTS splice variant of WT1 is essential for ovarian determination in mice, Science, Volume 382 (2023), pp. 600-606 | DOI

[101] T. Rhen; R. Fagerlie; A. Schroeder; D. A. Crossley; J. W. Lang Molecular and morphological differentiation of testes and ovaries in relation to the thermosensitive period of gonad development in the snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina, Differentiation, Volume 89 (2015), pp. 31-41 | DOI

[102] Q. Huang; J. Mo; Z. Liao; X. Chen; B. Zhang The RNA m6A writer WTAP in diseases: structure, roles, and mechanisms, Cell Death Dis., Volume 13 (2022), 852 | DOI

[103] M. Elkrewi; M. A. Moldovan; M. A. L. Picard; B. Vicoso Schistosome W-linked genes inform temporal dynamics of sex chromosome evolution and suggest candidate for sex determination, Mol. Biol. Evol., Volume 38 (2021), pp. 5345-5358 | DOI

[104] D. Zarkower; M. W. Murphy DMRT1: an ancient sexual regulator required for human gonadogenesis, Sex Dev., Volume 16 (2022) no. 2–3, pp. 112-125 | DOI

[105] M. A.-L. Picard; C. Cosseau; G. Mouahid; D. Duval; C. Grunau; È. Toulza; J.-F. Allienne; J. Boissier The roles of Dmrt (Double sex/Male-abnormal-3 Related Transcription factor) genes in sex determination and differentiation mechanisms: ubiquity and diversity across the animal kingdom, C. R. Biol., Volume 338 (2015), pp. 451-462 | DOI

[106] Y. Kato; K. Kobayashi; H. Watanabe; T. Iguchi Environmental sex determination in the branchiopod crustacean Daphnia magna: deep conservation of a Doublesex gene in the sex-determining pathway, PLoS Genet., Volume 7 (2011), e1001345 | DOI

[107] Y. Kato; H. Watanabe Regulation of doublesex1 expression for environmental sex determination in the cladoceran crustacean Daphnia, Front. Cell Dev. Biol., Volume 10 (2022), 881255 | DOI

[108] Z. Noor; Z. Zhao; S. Guo et al. A testis-specific DMRT1 (double sex and Mab-3-related transcription factor 1) plays a role in spermatogenesis and gonadal development in the hermaphrodite boring giant clam Tridacna crocea, Int. J. Mol. Sci., Volume 25 (2024), 5574 | DOI

[109] T. Chong; J. J. Collins; J. L. Brubacher; D. Zarkower; P. A. Newmark A sex-specific transcription factor controls male identity in a simultaneous hermaphrodite, Nat. Commun., Volume 4 (2013), 1814 | DOI

[110] W. Sun; H. Cai; G. Zhang et al. Dmrt1 is required for primary male sexual differentiation in Chinese soft-shelled turtle Pelodiscus sinensis, Sci. Rep., Volume 7 (2017), 4433 | DOI

[111] S. Yoshimoto; E. Okada; H. Umemoto et al. A W-linked DM-domain gene, DM-W, participates in primary ovary development in Xenopus laevis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 105 (2008), pp. 2469-2474 | DOI

[112] A. J. Bewick; D. W. Anderson; B. J. Evans Evolution of the closely related, sex-related genes DM-W and DMRT1 in African clawed frogs (Xenopus), Evolution, Volume 65 (2011), pp. 698-712 | DOI

[113] Y. Zhu; Z. Cui; Y. Yang; W. Xu; C. Shao; X. Fu; Y. Li; S. Chen Expression analysis and characterization of dmrt2 in Chinese tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis), Theriogenology, Volume 138 (2019), pp. 1-8 | DOI

[114] B. Feng; S. Li; Q. Wang; L. Tang; F. Huang; Z. Zhang; S. Mahboobe; C. Shao lncRNA DMRT2-AS acts as a transcriptional regulator of dmrt2 involving in sex differentiation in the Chinese tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis), Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol., Volume 253 (2021), 110542 | DOI

[115] I. Nanda; M. Kondo; U. Hornung et al. A duplicated copy of DMRT1 in the sex-determining region of the Y chromosome of the medaka, Oryzias latipes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 99 (2002), pp. 11778-11783 | DOI

[116] A. Herpin; I. Braasch; M. Kraeussling; C. Schmidt; E. C. Thoma; S. Nakamura; M. Tanaka; M. Schartl Transcriptional rewiring of the sex determining dmrt1 gene duplicate by transposable elements, PLoS Genet., Volume 6 (2010), e1000844 | DOI

[117] E. J. Rideout; M. S. Narsaiya; S. S. Grewal The sex determination gene transformer regulates male-female differences in Drosophila body size, PLoS Genet., Volume 11 (2015), e1005683 | DOI

[118] L. W. Wat; C. Chao; R. Bartlett et al. A role for triglyceride lipase brummer in the regulation of sex differences in Drosophila fat storage and breakdown, PLoS Biol., Volume 18 (2020), e3000595 | DOI

[119] L. W. Wat; Z. S. Chowdhury; J. W. Millington; P. Biswas; E. J. Rideout Sex determination gene transformer regulates the male-female difference in Drosophila fat storage via the adipokinetic hormone pathway, Elife, Volume 10 (2021), e72350 | DOI

[120] J. C. Regan; Y.-X. Lu; E. Ureña et al. Sexual identity of enterocytes regulates autophagy to determine intestinal health, lifespan and responses to rapamycin, Nat. Aging, Volume 2 (2022), pp. 1145-1158 | DOI

[121] J. C. Regan; M. Khericha; A. J. Dobson; E. Bolukbasi; N. Rattanavirotkul; L. Partridge Sex difference in pathology of the ageing gut mediates the greater response of female lifespan to dietary restriction, Elife, Volume 5 (2016), e10956 | DOI

[122] B. Hudry; S. Khadayate; I. Miguel-Aliaga The sexual identity of adult intestinal stem cells controls organ size and plasticity, Nature, Volume 530 (2016), pp. 344-348 | DOI

[123] B. Hudry; E. de Goeij; A. Mineo et al. Sex differences in intestinal carbohydrate metabolism promote food intake and sperm maturation, Cell, Volume 178 (2019), p. 901-918.e16 | DOI

[124] R. Delanoue; C. Clot; C. Leray; T. Pihl; B. Hudry Y chromosome toxicity does not contribute to sex-specific differences in longevity, Nat. Ecol. Evol., Volume 7 (2023), pp. 1245-1256 | DOI

[125] C. Hérault; T. Pihl; B. Hudry Cellular sex throughout the organism underlies somatic sexual differentiation, Nat. Commun., Volume 15 (2024), 6925 | DOI

[126] A. K. Godfrey; S. Naqvi; L. Chmátal; J. M. Chick; R. N. Mitchell; S. P. Gygi; H. Skaletsky; D. C. Page Quantitative analysis of Y-Chromosome gene expression across 36 human tissues, Genome Res., Volume 30 (2020), pp. 860-873 | DOI

[127] A. P. Arnold X chromosome agents of sexual differentiation, Nat. Rev. Endocrinol., Volume 18 (2022), pp. 574-583 | DOI

[128] S. Naqvi; A. K. Godfrey; J. F. Hughes; M. L. Goodheart; R. N. Mitchell; D. C. Page Conservation, acquisition, and functional impact of sex-biased gene expression in mammals, Science, Volume 365 (2019), eaaw7317 | DOI

[129] T. Tukiainen; A.-C. Villani; A. Yen et al. Landscape of X chromosome inactivation across human tissues, Nature, Volume 550 (2017), pp. 244-248 | DOI

[130] J. C. Link; C. B. Wiese; X. Chen et al. X chromosome dosage of histone demethylase KDM5C determines sex differences in adiposity, J. Clin. Invest., Volume 130 (2020), pp. 5688-5702 | DOI

[131] N. Tran; A. Broun; K. Ge Lysine demethylase KDM6A in differentiation, development, and cancer, Mol. Cell Biol., Volume 40 (2020), e00341-20 | DOI

[132] D. L. Smith-Bouvier; A. A. Divekar; M. Sasidhar et al. A role for sex chromosome complement in the female bias in autoimmune disease, J. Exp. Med., Volume 205 (2008), pp. 1099-1108 | DOI

[133] Y. Itoh; L. C. Golden; N. Itoh; M. A. Matsukawa; E. Ren; V. Tse; A. P. Arnold; R. R. Voskuhl The X-linked histone demethylase Kdm6a in CD4+ T lymphocytes modulates autoimmunity, J. Clin. Invest., Volume 129 (2019), pp. 3852-3863 | DOI

[134] E. J. Davis; L. Broestl; S. Abdulai-Saiku et al. A second X chromosome contributes to resilience in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease, Sci. Transl. Med., Volume 12 (2020), eaaz5677 | DOI

[135] J. Li; Z. Lan; W. Liao et al. Histone demethylase KDM5D upregulation drives sex differences in colon cancer, Nature, Volume 619 (2023), pp. 632-639 | DOI

[136] H. A. Abdel-Hafiz; J. M. Schafer; X. Chen; T. Xiao; T. D. Gauntner; Z. Li; D. Theodorescu Y chromosome loss in cancer drives growth by evasion of adaptive immunity, Nature, Volume 619 (2023), pp. 624-631 | DOI

[137] M. Qi; J. Pang; I. Mitsiades; A. A. Lane; E. Rheinbay Loss of chromosome Y in primary tumors, Cell, Volume 186 (2023) no. 14, p. 3125-3136.e11 | DOI

[138] M. Clement-Jones; S. Schiller; E. Rao et al. The short stature homeobox gene SHOX is involved in skeletal abnormalities in Turner syndrome, Hum. Mol. Genet., Volume 9 (2000), pp. 695-702 | DOI

[139] E. Rao; B. Weiss; M. Fukami et al. Pseudoautosomal deletions encompassing a novel homeobox gene cause growth failure in idiopathic short stature and Turner syndrome, Nat. Genet., Volume 16 (1997), pp. 54-63 | DOI

[140] A. Marchini; T. Ogata; G. A. Rappold A track record on SHOX: from basic research to complex models and therapy, Endocr. Rev., Volume 37 (2016), pp. 417-448 | DOI

[141] T. Ogata; N. Matsuo Sex chromosome aberrations and stature: deduction of the principal factors involved in the determination of adult height, Hum. Genet., Volume 91 (1993), pp. 551-562 | DOI


Commentaires - Politique