Outline
Comptes Rendus

External Geophysics, Climate and Environment
Cosmic rays and climate of the Earth: Possible connection
[Rayons cosmiques et climat de la Terre : connexion possible]
Comptes Rendus. Géoscience, Volume 340 (2008) no. 7, pp. 441-450.

Abstracts

Despite much evidence relating climatic changes on Earth to solar variability, a physical mechanism responsible for this is still poorly known. A possible link connecting solar activity and climate variations is related to cosmic rays and the physical-chemical changes they produce in the atmosphere. Here we review experimental evidence and theoretical grounds for this relation. The cosmic ray–climate link seems to be a plausible climate driver which effectively operates on different time scales, but its exact mechanism and relative importance still remain open questions.

En dépit de nombreuses preuves d'une relation entre les changements de climat sur la Terre et la variabilité solaire, un mécanisme physique pouvant l'expliquer est encore mal connu. Une liaison entre l'activité solaire et les variations climatiques peut être recherchée du côté des rayons cosmiques et des changements physicochimiques qu'ils induisent dans l'atmosphère. Dans cet article, les auteurs présentent les preuves expérimentales et les fondements théoriques de cette relation. La liaison rayons cosmiques–climat semble être un élément moteur possible qui agit, en fait, à différentes échelles de temps, mais son mécanisme exact et son importance relative demeurent encore des questions ouvertes.

Metadata
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:
DOI: 10.1016/j.crte.2007.11.001
Keywords: Cosmic rays' changes, Terrestrial climate changes, Cosmic rays–climate link, Experimental data, Modelling, Variation du rayonnement cosmique, Changements climatiques terrestres, Liaison rayonnement cosmique–climat, Données expérimentales, Modélisation

Ilya G. Usoskin 1; Gennady A. Kovaltsov 2

1 Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, Oulu unit, POB 3000, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
2 Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute, 26, Polytekhnicheskaya, St Petersburg 194021, Russia
@article{CRGEOS_2008__340_7_441_0,
     author = {Ilya G. Usoskin and Gennady A. Kovaltsov},
     title = {Cosmic rays and climate of the {Earth:} {Possible} connection},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. G\'eoscience},
     pages = {441--450},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {340},
     number = {7},
     year = {2008},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crte.2007.11.001},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilya G. Usoskin
AU  - Gennady A. Kovaltsov
TI  - Cosmic rays and climate of the Earth: Possible connection
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Géoscience
PY  - 2008
SP  - 441
EP  - 450
VL  - 340
IS  - 7
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crte.2007.11.001
LA  - en
ID  - CRGEOS_2008__340_7_441_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Ilya G. Usoskin
%A Gennady A. Kovaltsov
%T Cosmic rays and climate of the Earth: Possible connection
%J Comptes Rendus. Géoscience
%D 2008
%P 441-450
%V 340
%N 7
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crte.2007.11.001
%G en
%F CRGEOS_2008__340_7_441_0
Ilya G. Usoskin; Gennady A. Kovaltsov. Cosmic rays and climate of the Earth: Possible connection. Comptes Rendus. Géoscience, Volume 340 (2008) no. 7, pp. 441-450. doi : 10.1016/j.crte.2007.11.001. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/geoscience/articles/10.1016/j.crte.2007.11.001/

Original version of the full text

1 Introduction

The Sun ultimately defines the climate on Earth, supplying the planet with energy via radiation, which is received by the terrestrial system, but the role of the solar variability in climate variations is far from clear. Variability of the total solar irradiance (TSI) measured during the last decades is known to be too small to explain the observed climate variations [24,25,27,45]. On the other hand, there are other ways that solar variability may affect climate (see [34] for a review), e.g., an unknown long-term trend in TSI [68,95], a terrestrial amplifier of the spectral irradiance variations [33,66], or an indirect mechanism also driven by the solar activity. The latter can be realized by cosmic rays (CR) via the ionization effect in the atmosphere. Cosmic-ray-induced ionization (CRII) is the principle source of the ionization of the low and middle atmosphere and can slightly modulate cloud formation [20,52,71,73,81]. Even a small change in the cloud cover modifies the transparency/absorption/reflectance of the atmosphere and affects the amount of absorbed solar radiation, even with no changes in the solar irradiance. Since the flux of CR is modulated by the solar magnetic activity, this provides a link between solar variability and climate [47]. It is noteworthy that the CR flux on Earth is modulated not only by solar activity but also by the slowly changing geomagnetic field which does not allow the least energetic but most abundant CR particles to impinge on the Earth. Since the two CR modulation mechanisms are independent and act on different time scales, this gives an opportunity to study the CR effect on Earth. Here we present an overview of recent experimental evidence and theoretical considerations of the CR–climate link.

2 Cosmic ray variability

The CR intensity (energy-integrated flux measured by a certain device) is commonly measured by ground-based neutron monitors (NMs) which are effectively sensitive to CR with energy of a few tens of GeV [1]. The world network of NMs routinely measures the CR intensity since 1951. A usual proxy for CR intensity for longer time scales is the abundance (converted into the production rate in the atmosphere) of cosmogenic isotopes C14 and Be10 in independently dated terrestrial archives such as tree rings, ice cores or marine sediments. While the effective energy of CR for the production of these isotopes is somewhat lower than that for NM, cosmogenic isotope data can still be roughly considered as an extension of the NM record in the past [6,61]. Variability of CR on different time scales is shown in Fig. 1. Panel a) depicts a ground level enhancement (GLE) due to a strong flux of solar energetic particles associated with the extreme solar flare of 20/01/2005. Such severe GLEs, when the CR intensity increases by a factor of 3–10 within an hour, occur 1–2 times per solar cycle. Panel b) shows a Forbush decrease caused by the passage of an interplanetary shock, when the CR intensity is suppressed by 10–20% for several days. There is a dozen such decreases per solar cycle. Solar modulation of CR on a decadal time scale is shown in panel c). One can also see a GLE in 1989 and a number of Forbush decreases. The CR flux, as measured by NMs, varies by about 25% in anti-phase with the solar activity, i.e. it is maximum during a solar minimum. The CR changes due to long-term solar variability are shown in panel d) and depict the 11-yr cycle superimposed on a long-term trend of 15% since the Maunder minimum in the 17th century. The multi-millennium CR variability, quantified in the production rate of radiocarbon C14 cosmogenic isotope [79], is shown in panel e) for the Holocene (the 11 000-yr long period characterized by a pretty stable warm climate). The fast variability is caused by the solar activity, while the slow changing CR level is mostly related to the changing geomagnetic shielding. Panel f) depicts smooth variations of CR, measured as the Be10 concentration in deep marine sediments [26], that are caused by geomagnetic changes. Panel g) shows hypothetical changes in the CR flux (normalized to the modern flux Φ0) due to the changing galactic environment of the solar system, as suggested by [64].

Fig. 1

Cosmic ray variability on different time scales: (a) Event of solar cosmic rays (GLE of 20/01/2005 measured by Oulu NM); (b) Forbush decrease (the event of Sept. 2005 measured by Oulu NM); (c) Solar cycle modulation of cosmic rays as recorded by Oulu NM; (d) Centennial variability (reconstruction of a polar NM count rate [82]); (e) Multi-millennium variability (atmospheric production rate of C14 computed for the Holocene in [79]); (f) Long-term variability (normalized Be10 production measured in deep marine sediments [26]); (g) Geological scales (normalized CR flux Φ proposed in [64]). Note the different time scales.

Variabilité du rayonnement cosmique à différentes échelles de temps. (a) Événement GLE du 20 janvier 2005 du rayonnement cosmique solaire, mesuré par Oulu NM ; (b) diminution Forbush (événement de septembre 2005 mesuré par Oulu NM) ; (c) modulation du cycle solaire du rayonnement cosmique enregistré par Oulu NM ; (d) variabilité centenaire (reconstitution du taux de comptage polaire NM[82]; (e) variabilité multimillénaire (taux de production atmosphérique de 14C estimé pour l'Holocène[79]; (f) variabilité à long terme (production de 10Be normalisé, mesurée dans les sédiments marins profonds[26]) ; (g) échelles géologiques (flux Φ normalisé CR[64]; noter les différentes échelles de temps).

Thus, the CR flux varies on all time scales, from sporadic changes due to solar eruptive and transient phenomena on minutes-to-days time scale, to variations due to geomagnetic or even galactic changes on kyr and Myr scale. In subsequent sections, we will compare these CR changes with the known climatic reconstruction on different time scales and discuss their theoretical grounds.

3 Climate variability and its relation to cosmic rays

3.1 Daily/weekly time scales

In addition to regular daily variations (at the level of about 1%) of the CR flux due to the local CR anisotropy, strong transient phenomena sometimes occur (Figs. 1(a) and (b)) that either enhance or reduce the CR flux for hours – days. These phenomena are sporadic and their net contribution is tiny [85], but on the other hand, their rare occurrence and strong momentary effect give a good opportunity for case studies of solar–terrestrial relations. Many statistical studies have been performed, looking for a relation between such sporadic CR variations and the atmospheric/climatic parameters. For example, it was suggested that a small reduction of the mean cloud cover at high latitudes (>60°N) [58], as well as changes in the atmospheric transparency at high latitudes (>55°N) [60], could be associated with Forbush decreases. Another superposed epoch analysis [40,41] of ISCCP data suggests that the cloud cover is reduced at all latitudes over regions with relatively higher cloud cover and probably increased over ocean surfaces at middle and lower latitudes in regions with thinner cloud, in association with CR flux reduction. However, a recent thorough analysis [10] has not shown any statistically significant changes in the ISCCP-based cloud cover in correlation with six largest Forbush decreases. Also, formation of an aerosol layer, observed in stratosphere, has been associated with some strong solar particle events [50,51,67]. On the other hand, as suggested in [75,77], CR may primarily affect vorticity in polar/subpolar regions during the cold season, leading either to a reduction [77] after Forbush decreases or to an increase [89] during/after solar particle events. Also, a lowering of the tropospheric pressure layers has been reported in association with solar energetic particle events in North Atlantic [90].

In summary, although a global one-to-one relation between the cloud cover and CR variations is not confirmed [10] on the daily scale, much evidence implies that CR changes may affect the process of cyclogenesis through changing transparency and pressure, particularly in the North Atlantic during cold seasons.

3.2 Interannual variability

The 11-year solar cycle is the most pronounced variation of the CR flux on the time scale of decades, when there exist reliable satellite-based data on cloud cover. Accordingly, the CR–climate relations are mostly studied on the interannual time scale. A reported decadal cycle in the global coverage of low clouds was attributed to the CR flux variations [71,73]. This result initiated a dispute in the literature covering both arguments, pro [11,39,46–48] and con [30,43,44,70,78]. However, as mentioned by Gierens and Ponater [30], the globally averaged cloud data hardly shows a consistent correlation with the CR flux. On the other hand, a highly significant persistent correlation between the low cloud cover and cosmic rays was found in some geographical regions during the last 22 years [56,83,92]. Note, however, that low clouds can be partly masked by high clouds in the satellite data set, leading to spurious correlations in some regions [55,86]. Other mechanisms may also affect the cloud formation, especially at higher altitudes, e.g., via the global current system [74] or UV heating [33], which work in anti-phase with CR variations, as well as volcanos or ENSO variability. A recent thorough study [92,93] explored all these possibilities and has shown that a statistically significant direct correlation between low clouds and CR exists in a few climate-defining regions in mid-high latitudes (see Fig. 2), the largest being the North Atlantic+Europe and the South Atlantic. This pattern roughly corresponds to the model result [38] which predicts that the strongest response of the aerosol concentration to changes in CRII is expected at mid-to-high latitudes over oceans. An example of the temporal variations of low clouds and CRII in Europe is shown in Fig. 3, depicting the striking similarity between the two quantities. However, almost no correlation is observed outside these regions.

Fig. 2

Geographical distribution of the partial correlation between low cloud amount [36] and solar indices, CRII and UV-index for 1984–2004 (see [92] for details). Only areas with statistically significant (at the 90 % level) correlation are hatched. The horizontal and vertical hatching depict areas where the correlation with UVI and CRII dominates, respectively (red/blue colour stands for positive/negative correlation). Inclined hatching indicates that the observed correlation may be spuriously induced by other types of clouds (middle or high clouds).

Distribution géographique de la corrélation partielle entre proportion de nuages bas [36] et indices solaires, CRII et UV pour la période 1984–2004 (voir [92] pour les détails). Seules les zones à corrélation statistiquement significative (au niveau 90%) sont hachurées. Les hachures horizontales et verticales correspondent aux zones pour lesquelles la corrélation avec UVI et CRII est dominante (respectivement rouge/bleu pour la corrélation positive/négative). Les hachures obliques indiquent que la corrélation observée peut être faussement induite par d'autres types de nuages (nuages de moyenne ou de haute altitude).

Fig. 3

Variability of the low cloud amount [36] (upper curves, left axis) and cosmic ray-induced ionization at about 3-km altitude [80] (lower curve, right axis), averaged over the West European region (30–70°N, 10°W–15°E). The grey curve depicts the annual mean of the cloud data.

Variabilité de la quantité de nuages bas [36] (courbes du haut, axe de gauche) et du rayonnement cosmique induit par ionisation à environ 3 km d'altitude [80] (courbe du bas, axe de droite), moyennée sur l'Europe occidentale (30–70° N, 10° W–15°E). La courbe grise correspond à la moyenne annuelle des données sur les nuages.

In summary, the link between low clouds and CR is statistically significant on the interannual time scale in some limited geographical regions since 1984. Use of global or even zonally averaged data may be misleading.

3.3 Centennial to millennial time scales

A detailed study [54] of a possible link between CR and cloudiness was performed by using the results of sunshine observations during the 20th century. Although the data is not easy to interpret and analyze, it suggests that a link between the total cloud cover and CR is unlikely. On the other hand, the data is in general agreement with the hypothesis of a link between low clouds and CR.

Numerous studies (see reviews [16,81,91]) confirm a relation between solar/CR activity and different indices of climate behaviour (e.g., δO18 or drift ice debris [8]) during the Holocene.

For example, there is an apparent agreement between the grand minima of reduced solar activity and cold/wet climate episodes (see [91] for review). Fig. 4 confronts a physics-based reconstruction of the solar activity from the C14 data [69,87] with periods of identified sudden climatic shifts to cold/wet conditions in Europe during the last 7000 years [7,49]. One can see that they tend to appear during the grand minima periods. We note that 12 out of 14 climate shifts after 5000 BC occurred during grand minima of solar activity identified by Usoskin et al. [87], giving a 86% hit rate. On the other hand, only 3 (ca. 4200 BC, 700 AD and 1050 AD) out of 15 grand minima identified for the same period are not accompanied by climate shifts (80% hit rate). This also suggests, with high significance, a close relation between shifts of the climate type and solar activity (cosmic rays), at least in the European region. Although such studies cannot distinguish whether the primary effect is via CR or solar irradiation (e.g., [17]), an analysis of the geomagnetic field variation may help in disentangling the mechanisms (see a subsequent section).

Fig. 4

Sunspot number reconstruction (line – [87]) as well as known climate shifts to cold/wet conditions (dots – [7,49,88]) for the last 6500 years.

Reconstitution du nombre de taches solaires (ligne –[87]) ainsi que des dérives climatiques connues, dans les conditions de climat froid/humide (points –[7,49,88]) pour les 6500 dernières années.

In summary, there is a set of evidence that the solar variability affects the climate changes on centennial–millennial time scales, but it is hard to distinguish the role of cosmic rays, and the exact mechanisms need to be resolved.

3.4 Effect of the geomagnetic field

Although CR and solar activity variations are closely related, the former are also affected by another factor, the geomagnetic field, which changes independently of the solar variability, and with a different characteristic time scale. Therefore, a simultaneous study of climate, solar and geomagnetic proxies would help in disentangling the CR and solar irradiance effects on climate.

A detailed study [84] has revealed a weak but persistent correlation between the Northern Hemisphere temperature and the geomagnetic field intensity during the last millennium, implying that CR play a role in climate variations, although this correlation is not strong [94]. It is suggested that centennial climatic changes could be triggered by enhanced secular variation of the geomagnetic field [5,18], in particular by archeeomagnetic jerks [28,29]. It was found that on the multi-millennial time scale, periods of geomagnetic field reversal roughly correspond to cold episodes of the palaeoclimatic reconstructions [12–14,21,96].

It is important to note that not only the changes of the geomagnetic dipole strength affect CRII, but also fast migration of the geomagnetic axis can lead to dramatic changes in different regions [42]. Accordingly, studying regional data may shed new light on the possible mechanisms.

In summary, the relation between the geomagnetic field changes and climatic variations provides an evidence favouring a possible CR influence on climate.

3.5 Mega-year time scales

On the geological time scale (longer than a million years), CR variations are assumed to be determined either by the geomagnetic field changes or by the changing local galactic environment. For example, if the Solar System enters a galactic spiral arm during its evolution, a greatly enhanced flux of CR would be impinging on Earth [9,61]. Although the path of the Solar System relative to the Milky Way spiral arms is poorly known, CR variability on the geologal time scale (see Fig. 1g)) can be guessed [63–65] to depict a similarity with palaeoclimatic reconstructions [62,63]. This result has been both disputed [59] and supported [31] by other researchers. Note that, even if the correlation itself was real, its interpretation is not straightforward since it is based on an assumption that the climate and its drivers remain unchanged throughout millions of years. Also, there are concurrent effects which may lead to similar relations. E.g., a large amount of galactic dust would be loaded into the Earth’s atmosphere in galactic spiral arms, leading to enhanced opaqueness of the atmosphere and thus to a cool climate [57], in concurrence with the CR effect. Interestingly, the rate of geomagnetic field reversals also varies on the geological time scale [23,96] quite synchronously with the climatic variations. This itself modulates the CR flux impinging on the Earth also in synchronization with the CR effect due to spiral arm crossing. Moreover, the type of climate, seismic activity and physical-chemical properties of the atmosphere were essentially different on the geological time scale, and it is hardly possible to distinguish the role of indirect mechanisms.

In summary, although there is an indication of the climate changes synchronously with the putative CR flux on Myr time scales, these results remain speculative.

4 Possible mechanisms

Although the amount of energy deposited by energetic CR in the atmosphere is very small (about 10−5  W/m2), they affect, via their ionizing effect, the chemical-physical conditions of the atmosphere. This, in turn, can influence the ability of the terrestrial system to absorb/trap/reflect solar radiation through, e.g., the cloud cover [52,71]. Therefore, with a negligible amount of its own energy, CR may greatly modify the amount of solar radiation received by the planet, and change its radiation budget, thus being a very effective trigger/amplifier of the solar variability. Note that clouds, whose formation can be supposedly modulated by CR, lead to both the trapping of outgoing long-wave radiation and reflection of the incoming solar radiation. However, the net effect of these concurrent processes is cooling (i.e. more clouds correspond to a cooler climate).

Essential progress has been achieved recently in the development of a precise physical model of the CR-induced nucleonic-electromagnetic cascade in the atmosphere, leading to a full understanding of the ionizing effect of cosmic rays [19,53,80,83]. However, a detailed mechanism of how CRII can affect cloud formation is still not well understood, and two main hypotheses are discussed in the literature (see, e.g., reviews in [35,72,76]).

One hypothesis is the most ‘apparent’ and exploits the ionizing effect of CR [4,20,38,46,97,98]. It assumes that ions produced by CR rapidly interact with molecules in the atmosphere and are converted into complex cluster ions, which may grow by ion–ion recombination or ion–aerosol attachment and thus affect the number of aerosols acting as cloud condensation nuclei. A simple analogy for this mechanism is a cloud chamber (also known as the Wilson chamber), where charged particles leave visible tracks of droplets condensated along their paths. However, this analogy is not entirely valid, as the cloud chamber uses heavily supersaturated vapour and in this sense is different from the real atmospheric conditions, where vapour is not (or is marginally) saturated and there are other admixtures, like aerosols, also affecting the condensation process. The presence of aerosols, especially gaseous H2SO4, in the atmosphere is important to allow new particle growth under CRII [4,37]. The role of ions as nucleation agents was first established for the stratosphere and mesopause [2,3] and later [4,22] confirmed for the cold upper troposphere. However, this mechanism can work in different ways, depending on the ambient conditions [37,38]. This may lead to the geographical pattern of the observed CR-cloud relation (see Section 3.2).

An alternative hypothesis [74,75] is based on the assumption that cloud formation is affected by the atmospheric electric field via precipitation and ice formation in super-cooled water. On one hand, the electric field is influenced by CR since CRII controls the atmospheric conductivity. On the other hand, the same processes which modulate CR (interplanetary magnetic field, solar wind, interplanetary shocks, etc.) also greatly affect the planet’s global current system and thus the electric fields. Cosmic rays only play a partial role in this mechanism and work in concurrence with the direct solar activity.

There is also a possibility that solar variability may affect cloud formation even without the direct influence of CR, i.e. via circulation changes due to stratospheric heating caused by the ozone absorption of solar UV radiation [32,33]. In particular, such changes may lead to changes in winter circulation patterns that affect middle-latitude storm tracks.

All these mechanisms can work in different conditions (e.g., at different altitudes or geographical regions – see, e.g., [37,92]) or in concurrence, and it is difficult to distinguish between them. Unfortunately, none of these possible mechanisms has a solid support of a quantitative physical model. Despite the significant progress in modelling the aerosol nucleation [15,38], the predictions of current atmospheric nucleation models are quite uncertain, since the link between micro- and macro-physics is still missing. On the other hand, all experimental evidences, as described above, are based on statistical, often marginally significant, studies, lacking for a clear case study.

A new step has been made recently in modelling the chemistry of the lower atmosphere in laboratory conditions – the SKY experiment conducted at the Danish National Space Center [72] (an enlarged and improved version of this experiment is under construction at CERN [11].) The result of this experiment (Fig. 5) indicates that enhanced ionization of air in realistic conditions facilitates the formation of stable, ultra-small clusters of sulphuric acid and water molecules. This result is preliminary and waits to be confirmed. Even though further steps from micro- (molecular clusters) to macro- (cloud condensation nuclei) physics remain unresolved, it provides the first laboratory evidence that ionization can affect physical-chemical properties of the atmosphere. This complements the existing statistical relations and theoretical models linking ultra-fine aerosols and CRII [4,15,37,51] and confirms experimentally the first step of CRII-related mechanism linking CR to the cloud formation.

Fig. 5

The results of SKY experiment [72] – a relation between ion density and aerosol nucleation. Asterisks depict the experimental data, while the line corresponds to a best-fit linear relation.

Résultats de l'expérience SKY [72] – une relation entre densité ionique et nucléation d'aérosols. Les astérisques correspondent aux données expérimentales, tandis que la ligne correspond à la relation linéaire la plus appropriée.

5 Conclusions

We have reviewed the experimental evidence and theoretical models relating cosmic ray variations to the terrestrial climate changes.

On a short time scale of a few days, there exists much evidence that CR changes may affect the process of cyclogenesis via the changing transparency and pressure, particularly in the North Atlantic during cold seasons. Although each individual piece of evidence is barely significant, in aggregate, they suggest that the relation can be real.

A link between low clouds and CR appears statistically significant on the interannual time scale since 1984 in limited geographical regions, the largest being North Atlantic + Europe and South Atlantic. We note that many reconstructions of the past climate are based on European data, where the CR–cloud relation is the most pronounced. Extension of this relation to the global scale may be misleading.

A relation between the geomagnetic field changes and climatic variations provides evidence favouring the possible CR influence on climate. A study of regional climate variations in relation to the geomagnetic dipole axis migration over the last millennium is also promising.

There is an indication of the climate changes synchronously with the CR flux on Myr time scales, but this result is not straightforward to interpret. Large uncertainties make it only indicative.

Essential progress has been recently achieved in theoretical modelling of both ionizing effect of CR and physical mechanisms relating CRII to cloud variations, but the link between micro- and macro-physics is still missing. A new experimental evidence, obtained by the SKY experiment team, confirm that enhanced ionization notably facilitates the production of small ion clusters in realistic atmospheric conditions.

In conclusion, a CR–climate link seems to be a plausible climate driver, as supported by the bulk of statistical studies and existing theoretical models. However, further studies, in particular a clear case study as well as improved model development, are foreseen to improve our understanding of the link between cosmic rays and the climate on Earth.

Acknowledgements

Support from the Academy of Finland and the Finnish Academy of Science and Letters Vilho, Yrjö and Kalle Väisälä Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. GAK acknowledges also the Program of Presidium RAS N16-3-5.4. E. Usoskina is acknowledged for suggestions on improving the manuscript style.


References

[1] K. Alanko; I.G. Usoskin; K. Mursula; G.A. Kovaltsov Heliospheric modulation strength and the neutron monitor effective energy, Adv. Space Res., Volume 32 (2003), pp. 615-620

[2] F. Arnold Ion-induced nucleation of atmospheric water vapor at the mesopause, Planet. Space Sci., Volume 28 (1980), pp. 1003-1009

[3] F. Arnold Ion nucleation, a potential source for stratospheric aerosols, Nature, Volume 299 (1982), pp. 134-137

[4] F. Arnold Atmospheric aerosol and cloud condensation nuclei formation: A possible influence of cosmic rays?, Space Sci. Rev., Volume 125 (2006), pp. 169-186

[5] V. Bakhmutov The connection between geomagnetic secular variation and long-range development of climate changes for the last 13,000 years: the data from NNE Europe, Quat. Int., Volume 149 (2006), pp. 4-11

[6] J. Beer Neutron monitor records in broader historical context, Space Sci. Rev., Volume 93 (2000), pp. 107-119

[7] M. Blaauw; B. van Geel; J. van der Plicht Solar forcing of climatic change during the mid-Holocene: indications from raised bogs in The Netherlands, Holocene, Volume 14 (2004), pp. 35-44

[8] G. Bond; B. Kromer; J. Beer et al. Persistent solar influence on North Atlantic climate during the Holocene, Science, Volume 294 (2001), pp. 2130-2136

[9] I. Büsching, M.S. Potgieter, The variability of the proton cosmic ray flux on the sun’s way around the galactic center, Adv. Space Res. (2008 – in press).

[10] J. Calagovic, L. Desorgher, J. Beer, E.O. Flückiger, F. Arnold, Forbush decrease and cloud cover (in preparation).

[11] K.S. Carslaw; R.G. Harrison; J. Kirkby Cosmic rays, clouds, and climate, Science, Volume 298 (2002), pp. 1732-1737

[12] M. Christl; A. Mangini; S. Holzkämper; C. Spötl Evidence for a link between the flux of galactic cosmic rays and Earth’s climate during the past 200,000 years, J. Atmos. Solar–Terr. Phys., Volume 66 (2004), pp. 313-322

[13] V. Courtillot; J.-L. Le Mouël; J. Ducruix Geomagnetic secular variation as a precursor of climatic change, Nature, Volume 297 (1982), pp. 386-387

[14] V. Courtillot; Y. Gallet; J.-L. Le Mouël et al. Are there connections between the Earth’s magnetic field and climate?, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Volume 253 (2006), pp. 328-339

[15] J. Curtius; E.R. Lovejoy; K.D. Froyd Atmospheric ion-induced aerosol nucleation, Space Sci. Rev., Volume 125 (2006), pp. 159-167

[16] C. de Jager Solar Forcing of Climate. 1: Solar Variability, Space Sci. Rev., Volume 120 (2005), pp. 197-241

[17] C. de Jager; I.G. Usoskin On possible drivers of Sun-induced climate changes, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., Volume 68 (2006), pp. 2053-2060

[18] V.A. Dergachev; O.M. Raspopov; B. van Geel et al. The ‘Sterno-Etrussia’ geomagnetic excursion around 2700 BP and changes of solar activity, cosmic ray intensity, and climate, Radiocarbon, Volume 46 (2004), pp. 661-681

[19] L. Desorgher; E.O. Flückiger; M. Gurtner et al. Atmocosmics: a Geant 4 Code for Computing the Interaction of Cosmic Rays with the Earth’s Atmosphere, Int. J. Modern Phys. A, Volume 20 (2005), pp. 6802-6804

[20] R.E. Dickinson Solar variability and the lower atmosphere, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., Volume 56 (1975), pp. 1240-1248

[21] C.S.M. Doake Climatic change and geomagnetic field reversals: A statistical correlation, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Volume 38 (1978), pp. 313-318

[22] S. Eichkorn; S. Wilhelm; H. Aufmhoff et al. Cosmic ray-induced aerosol-formation: First observational evidence from aircraft-based ion mass spectrometer measurements in the upper troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., Volume 29 (2002), p. 1698

[23] E.A. Eide; T.H. Torsvik Paleozoic supercontinental assembly, mantle flushing, and genesis of the Kiaman Superchron, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Volume 144 (1996), pp. 389-402

[24] P. Foukal A comparison of variable solar total and ultraviolet irradiance outputs in the 20th century, Geophys. Res. Lett., Volume 29 (2002), p. 2089

[25] P. Foukal; C. Frohlich; H. Spruit; T.M.L. Wigley Variations in solar luminosity and their effect on the Earth’s climate, Nature, Volume 443 (2006), pp. 161-166

[26] M. Frank; B. Schwarz; S. Baumann et al. A 200 kyr record of cosmogenic radionuclide production rate and geomagnetic field intensity from Be-10 in globally stacked deep-sea sediments, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Volume 149 (1997), pp. 121-129

[27] C. Fröhlich Solar irradiance variability since 1978 – Revision of the PMOD composite during solar cycle 21, Space Sci. Rev., Volume 125 (2006), pp. 53-65

[28] Y. Gallet; A. Genevey; F. Fluteau Does Earth’s magnetic field secular variation control centennial climate change?, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Volume 236 (2005), pp. 339-347

[29] Y. Gallet; A. Genevey; M. Le Goff et al. Possible impact of the Earth’s magnetic field on the history of ancient civilizations, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., Volume 246 (2006), pp. 17-26

[30] K. Gierens; M. Ponater Comment on “Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage – a missing link in solar-climate relationships”, J. Atmos. Solar–Terr. Phys., Volume 61 (1999), pp. 795-797

[31] D.R. Gies; J.W. Helsel Ice age epochs and the sun’s path through the galaxy, Astrophys. J., Volume 626 (2005), pp. 844-848

[32] J.D. Haigh The role of stratospheric ozone in modulating the solar radiative forcing of climate, Nature, Volume 370 (1994), pp. 544-546

[33] J.D. Haigh The impact of solar variability on climate, Science, Volume 272 (1996), pp. 981-984

[34] J.D. Haigh, M. Lockwood, M.S. Giampapa, The Sun, Solar Analogs and the Climate, Saas-Fee Advanced Course 34, Springer, 2005.

[35] R.G. Harrison; K.S. Carslaw Ion – aerosol – cloud processes in the lower atmosphere, Rev. Geophys., Volume 41 (2003), p. 1012

[36] ISCCP–D2 database of cloud amount (http://isccp.giss.nasa.gov).

[37] J. Kazil; E.R. Lovejoy Tropospheric ionization and aerosol production: A model study, J. Geophys. Res., Volume 109 (2004), p. D19206

[38] J. Kazil; E.R. Lovejoy; M. Barth; K. O’Brien Aerosol nucleation over oceans and the role of galactic cosmic rays, Atmos. Chem. Phys., Volume 6 (2006), pp. 4905-4924

[39] J. Kirkby; A. Laaksonen Solar variability and clouds, Space Sci. Rev., Volume 94 (2000), pp. 397-409

[40] D.R. Kniveton Precipitation, cloud cover and Forbush decreases in galactic cosmic rays, J. Atmos. Solar–Terr. Phys., Volume 66 (2004), pp. 1135-1142

[41] D.R. Kniveton; B.A. Tinsley Daily changes in global cloud cover and Earth transits of the heliospheric current sheet, J. Geophys. Res., Volume 109 (2004), p. D11201

[42] G.A. Kovaltsov, I.G. Usoskin, Regional cosmic ray induced ionization and geomagnetic field changes, Adv. Geosci. 13 (2007) 31–35.

[43] J.E. Kristjánsson; A. Staple; J. Kristiansen et al. A new look at possible connections between solar activity, clouds and climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., Volume 29 (2002), p. 2107

[44] P. Laut Solar activity and terrestrial climate: an analysis of some purported correlations, J. Atmos. Solar–Terr. Phys., Volume 65 (2003), pp. 801-812

[45] J. Lean; J. Beer; R. Bradley Reconstruction of solar irradiance since 1610: Implications for climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., Volume 22 (1995), pp. 3195-3198

[46] N. Marsh; H. Svensmark Cosmic rays, clouds, and climate, Space Sci. Rev., Volume 94 (2000), pp. 215-230

[47] N. Marsh; H. Svensmark Solar influence on Earth’s climate, Space Sci. Rev., Volume 107 (2003), pp. 317-325

[48] N. Marsh; H. Svensmark Comment on “Solar influences on cosmic rays and cloud formation: A reassessment” by Bomin Sun and Raymond S. Bradley, J. Geophys. Res., Volume 109 (2004), p. D14205

[49] D. Mauquoy; B. van Geel; M. Blaauw et al. Changes in solar activity and Holocene climatic shifts derived from C-14 wiggle-match dated peat deposits, Holocene, Volume 14 (2004), pp. 45-52

[50] I.A. Mironova, M.I. Pudovkin, C. Böckmann, Variations of aerosol optical properties and solar proton events, in: G. Pappalardo, A. Amadeo (Eds.), ESA SP-561, 2004, pp. 617–619.

[51] I.A. Mironova; M.I. Pudovkin Increase in the aerosol content of the lower atmosphere after the solar proton flares in January and August 2002 according to data of lidar observations in Europe, Geom. Aeronom. (2005), pp. 221-226

[52] E.P. Ney Cosmic Radiation and the Weather, Nature, Volume 183 (1959), pp. 451-452

[53] K. O’Brien The theory of cosmic-ray and high-energy solar-particle transport in the atmosphere (J.P. McLaughlin; S.E. Simopoulos; F. Steinhusler, eds.), Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on the Natural Radiation Environment, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005, pp. 29-44

[54] E. Pallé; C.J. Butler The proposed connection between clouds and cosmic rays: cloud behaviour during the past 50–120 years, J. Atmosph. Solar-Terr. Phys., Volume 64 (2002), pp. 327-337

[55] E. Pallé Possible satellite perspective effects on the reported correlations between solar activity and clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., Volume 32 (2005), p. L03802

[56] E. Pallé; C.J. Butler; K. O’Brien The possible connection between ionization in the atmosphere by cosmic rays and low level clouds, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., Volume 66 (2004), pp. 1779-1790

[57] A.A. Pavlov; O.B. Toon; A.K. Pavlov et al. Passing through a giant molecular cloud: “Snowball” glaciations produced by interstellar dust, Geophys. Res. Lett., Volume 32 (2005), p. L03705

[58] M.I. Pudovkin; S.V. Veretenenko Cloudiness decreases associated with Forbush-decreases of galactic cosmic rays, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., Volume 57 (1995), pp. 1349-1355

[59] S. Rahmstorf; D. Archer; D.S. Ebel et al. Cosmic Rays, Carbon Dioxide and Climate, EOS Transactions AGU, Volume 85 (2004) no. 4, p. 38

[60] V.C. Roldugin; B.A. Tinsley Atmospheric transparency changes associated with solar wind-induced atmospheric electricity variations, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., Volume 66 (2004), pp. 1143-1149

[61] K. Scherer; H. Fichtner; T. Borrmann et al. Interstellar–terrestrial relations: Variable cosmic environments, the dynamic heliosphere, and their imprints on terrestrial archives and climate, Space Sci. Rev., Volume 127 (2006), pp. 327-465

[62] N.J. Shaviv Cosmic ray diffusion from the galactic spiral arms, iron meteorites, and a possible climatic connection, Phys. Rev. Lett., Volume 89 (2002), p. 051102

[63] N. Shaviv The spiral structure of the Milky Way, cosmic rays, and ice age epochs on Earth, New Astron., Volume 8 (2003), pp. 39-77

[64] N. Shaviv; J. Veizer Celestial driver of Phanerozoic climate?, GSA Today, Volume 13/7 (2003), pp. 4-10

[65] N.J. Shaviv On the link between cosmic rays and terrestrial climate, Int. J. Modern Phys. A, Volume 20 (2005), pp. 6662-6665

[66] D. Shindell; D. Rind; N. Balachandran; J. Lean; P. Lonergan Solar cycle variability, ozone, and climate, Science, Volume 284 (1999), pp. 305-308

[67] O.I. Shumilov; E.A. Kasatkina; K. Henriksen; E.V. Vashenyuk Enhancement of stratospheric aerosols after solar proton event, Ann. Geophys., Volume 14 (1996), pp. 1119-1123

[68] S.K. Solanki; N.A. Krivova Solar irradiance variations: From current measurements to long-term estimates, Solar Phys., Volume 224 (2004), pp. 197-208

[69] S.K. Solanki; I.G. Usoskin; B. Kromer; M. Schüssler; J. Beer An unusually active Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years, Nature, Volume 431 (2004), pp. 1084-1087

[70] B. Sun; R.S. Bradley Solar influences on cosmic rays and cloud formation: A reassessment, J. Geophys. Res., Volume 107 (2002), p. 4211

[71] H. Svensmark Influence of Cosmic Rays on Earth’s Climate, Phys. Rev. Lett., Volume 81 (1998), pp. 5027-5030

[72] H. Svensmark Cosmoclimatology: a new theory emerges, Astron. Geosci., Volume 48 (2007), pp. 18-24

[73] H. Svensmark; E. Friis-Christensen Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage – A missing link in solar-climate relationships, J. Atmos. Solar Terr. Phys., Volume 59 (1997), pp. 1225-1232

[74] B.A. Tinsley Influence of solar wind on the global electric circuit, and inferred effects on cloud microphysics, temperature, and dynamics in the troposphere, Space Sci. Rev., Volume 94 (2000), pp. 231-258

[75] B.A. Tinsley; G.W. Deen Apparent tropospheric response to MeV-GeV particle flux variations: A connection via electrofreezing of supercooled water in high-level clouds?, J. Geophys. Res., Volume 96 (1991), pp. 22283-22296

[76] B.A. Tinsley, F. Yu, in: J. Pap, P. Fox (Eds.), Solar Variability and its Effects on Climate, Geophys. Monogr. 141, Washington, 2004. p. 321.

[77] B.A. Tinsley; G.M. Brown; P.H. Scherrer Solar variability influences on weather and climate: Possible connections through cosmic ray fluxes and storm intensification, J. Geophys. Res., Volume 94 (1989), pp. 14783-14792

[78] P.M. Udelhofen; R.D. Cess Cloud cover variations over the United States: An influence of cosmic rays or solar variability?, Geophys. Res. Lett., Volume 28 (2001), pp. 2617-2620

[79] I.G. Usoskin; B. Kromer Reconstruction of the C-14 production rate from measured relative abundance, Radiocarbon, Volume 47 (2005), pp. 31-37

[80] I.G. Usoskin; G.A. Kovaltsov Cosmic ray induced ionization in the atmosphere: Full modeling and practical applications, J. Geophys. Res., Volume 111 (2006), p. D21206

[81] I.G. Usoskin; G.A. Kovaltsov Link between cosmic rays and clouds on different time scales (W.-H. Ip; M. Duldig, eds.), Advances in Geosciences, vol. 2, World Scientific, Singapore, 2006, pp. 321-330

[82] I.G. Usoskin; K. Mursula; S.K. Solanki et al. A physical reconstruction of cosmic ray intensity since 1610, J. Geophys. Res., Volume 107 (2002), p. 1374

[83] I.G. Usoskin; N. Marsh; G.A. Kovaltsov et al. Latitudinal dependence of low cloud amount on cosmic ray induced ionization, Geophys. Res. Lett., Volume 31 (2004), p. L16109

[84] I.G. Usoskin; M. Schüssler; S. Solanki; K. Mursula Solar activity, cosmic rays and Earth’s temperature: A millennium-scale comparison, J. Geophys. Res., Volume 110 (2005), p. A10102

[85] I.G. Usoskin; S.K. Solanki; G.A. Kovaltsov et al. Solar proton events in cosmogenic isotope data, Geophys. Res. Lett., Volume 33 (2006), p. L08107

[86] I.G. Usoskin; M. Voiculescu; G.A. Kovaltsov; K. Mursula Correlation between clouds at different altitudes and solar activity: Fact or Artifact?, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., Volume 68 (2006), pp. 2164-2172

[87] I.G. Usoskin; S. Solanki; G.A. Kovaltsov Grand minima and maxima of solar activity: New observational constraints, Astron. Astrophys., Volume 471 (2007), pp. 301-309

[88] J. Van der Plicht; B. Van Geel; S.J.P. Bohncke et al. The Preboreal climate reversal and a subsequent solar-forced climate shift, J. Qua. Sci., Volume 19 (2004), pp. 263-269

[89] S. Veretenenko; P. Thejll Effects of energetic solar proton events on the cyclone development in the North Atlantic, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., Volume 66 (2004), pp. 393-405

[90] S. Veretenenko; P. Thejll Cyclone regeneration in the North Atlantic intensified by energetic solar proton events, Adv. Space Res., Volume 35 (2005), pp. 470-475

[91] G.J.M. Versteegh Solar Forcing of Climate. 2: Evidence from the Past, Space Sci. Rev., Volume 120 (2005), pp. 243-286

[92] M. Voiculescu; I.G. Usoskin; K. Mursula Different response of clouds at the solar input, Geophys. Res. Lett., Volume 33 (2006), p. L21802

[93] M. Voiculescu; I.G. Usoskin; K. Mursula Effect of ENSO and volcanic events on the Sun–cloud link, Adv. Space Res., Volume 40 (2007), pp. 1140-1145

[94] G. Wagner; D. Livingstone; J. Masarik et al. Some results relevant to the discussion of a possible link between cosmic rays and the Earth’s climate, J. Geophys. Res., Volume 106 (2001), pp. 3381-3388

[95] Y.M. Wang; J.L. Lean; N.R. Sheeley Modeling the sun’s magnetic field and irradiance since 1713, Astrophys. J., Volume 625 (2005), pp. 522-538

[96] J. Wendler External forcing of the geomagnetic field? Implications for the cosmic ray flux-climate variability, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., Volume 66 (2004), pp. 1195-1203

[97] F.Q. Yu; R.P. Turco The role of ions in the formation and evolution of particles in aircraft plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett. (1997), pp. 1927-1930

[98] F.Q. Yu Altitude variations of cosmic ray induced production of aerosols: Implications for global cloudiness and climate, J. Geophys. Res., Volume 107 (2002), p. 1118


Comments - Policy