The Sagnac effect and its interpretation by Paul Langevin

Gianni Pascoli

doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2017.10.010

The Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences throughout history / Les Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences à travers l'histoire

The Sagnac effect and its interpretation by Paul Langevin
[L'effet Sagnac et son interpretation by Paul Langevin]

Gianni Pascoli ¹

¹ Université de Picardie Jules-Verne, Faculté des sciences, Département de physique, 33, rue Saint-Leu, 80000 Amiens, France

Comptes Rendus. Physique, Volume 18 (2017) no. 9-10, pp. 563-569.

Résumé
Abstract

Le nom de Georges Sagnac est aujourd'hui très connu des ingénieurs travaillant sur les systèmes de navigation, tant maritime qu'aérienne, qui exploitent sa découverte de 1913. Ce que l'on sait moins est que ce physicien était un farouche opposant à la relativité, théorie révolutionnaire qui avait été élaborée par Albert Einstein quelques années auparavant, en 1905. L'expérience de Sagnac a été pensée pour prouver l'existence de l'éther luminifère. Son interprétation correcte (relativiste) a été fournie par Paul Langevin en 1921.

The French physicist Georges Sagnac is nowdays frequently cited by the engineers who work on devices such as ring-laser gyroscopes. These systems operate on the principle of the Sagnac effect. It is less known that Sagnac was a strong opponent to the theory of special relativity proposed by Albert Einstein. He set up his experiment to prove the existence of the aether discarded by the Einsteinian relativity. An accurate explanation of the phenomenon was provided by Paul Langevin in 1921.

Publié le : 2017-10-31

DOI : 10.1016/j.crhy.2017.10.010

Mots clés : Sagnac effect, Aether, Langevin, Interferometer, Relativity

Affiliations des auteurs :

Gianni Pascoli ¹

¹ Université de Picardie Jules-Verne, Faculté des sciences, Département de physique, 33, rue Saint-Leu, 80000 Amiens, France

@article{CRPHYS_2017__18_9-10_563_0,
     author = {Gianni Pascoli},
     title = {The {Sagnac} effect and its interpretation by {Paul} {Langevin}},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Physique},
     pages = {563--569},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {18},
     number = {9-10},
     year = {2017},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crhy.2017.10.010},
     language = {en},
}

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Gianni Pascoli
TI  - The Sagnac effect and its interpretation by Paul Langevin
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Physique
PY  - 2017
SP  - 563
EP  - 569
VL  - 18
IS  - 9-10
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crhy.2017.10.010
LA  - en
ID  - CRPHYS_2017__18_9-10_563_0
ER  -

%0 Journal Article
%A Gianni Pascoli
%T The Sagnac effect and its interpretation by Paul Langevin
%J Comptes Rendus. Physique
%D 2017
%P 563-569
%V 18
%N 9-10
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crhy.2017.10.010
%G en
%F CRPHYS_2017__18_9-10_563_0

Gianni Pascoli. The Sagnac effect and its interpretation by Paul Langevin. Comptes Rendus. Physique, Volume 18 (2017) no. 9-10, pp. 563-569. doi : 10.1016/j.crhy.2017.10.010. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/physique/articles/10.1016/j.crhy.2017.10.010/

Bibliographie
Cité par

[1] I. Newton Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Reg. Soc. PRÆSES, LONDINI, 1686 (Definitiones, Scholium, Imprimatur S. PEPYS)

[2] E. Mach The Science of Mechanics, Open Court Publishing Company, 1893

[3] F. Arago C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris, 36 (1810), pp. 38-49

[4] H. Fizeau C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris, 33 (1851), pp. 349-355

[5] A.A. Michelson; E.W. Morley Am. J. Sci., 34 (1887), pp. 333-345

[6] F.T. Trouton; H.R. Noble Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 202 (1903), pp. 165-181

[7] H.A. Lorentz; A. Einstein; H. Minkowski Das Relativitätsprinzip, B.G. Teubner, Leipzig und Berlin, 1913

[8] O. Darrigol C. R. Phys., 16 (2014), pp. 789-840

[9] R. Martinez-Chavanz L'Expérience de Sagnac et le disque tournant, Université Paris-6, 1980 (PhD dissertation)

[10] R. Lalli Quad. Stor. Fis., 17 (2011), pp. 47-81

[11] R. Lalli Styles of Thinking in Science and Technology: Proceedings of the III International Congress of the European Society of the History of Science (H. Hunger; F. Seebacher; G. Holzer, eds.), Academy of Science Press, Vienna, 2010

[12] G. Sagnac C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris, 129 (1899), pp. 818-821

[13] G. Sagnac C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris, 141 (1913), pp. 1220-1223

[14] G. Sagnac C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris, 157 (1913), pp. 708-710

[15] G. Sagnac J. Phys. Radium, Ser. 5, 4 (1914), p. 177

[16] D. MacKenzie Technol. Cult., 34 (1993) no. 3, pp. 475-515

[17] K.U. Schreiber; J-P. Wells Rev. Sci. Instrum., 84 (2013)

[18] Y. Sato C. R. Phys., 15 (2014), pp. 898-906

[19] E.J. Post Rev. Mod. Phys., 39 (1967) no. 2, pp. 475-493

[20] R. Anderson; H.R. Bilger; G.E. Stedman Am. J. Phys., 62 (1994) no. 11, pp. 975-985

[21] G.B. Malykin Phys. Usp., 40 (1997) no. 3, pp. 317-321

[22] G.B. Malykin Phys. Usp., 170 (2000) no. 12, pp. 1229-1252

[23] C. R. Phys., 15 (2014), pp. 787-916

[24] A. Di Virgilio et al. C. R. Phys., 15 (2014), pp. 866-874

[25] O.J. Lodge; O.J. Lodge Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser., 184 (1893), pp. 727-807

[26] M. Von Laue Ann. Phys. Berlin, 367 (1920), pp. 448-463

[27] G. Joos Ann. Phys. Berlin, 399 (1930) no. 4, pp. 385-407

[28] A. Brillet; J.L. Hall Phys. Rev. Lett., 42 (1979), pp. 549-552

[29] A. Fresnel Ann. Chim. Phys., 9 (1818), pp. 57-66

[30] A.A. Michelson; H.G. Gale Astrophys. J., 61 (1925), pp. 140-145

[31] R.J. Kennedy; E.M. Thorndike Phys. Rev., 42 (1932), pp. 400-418

[32] H.E. Ives; G.R. Stilwell J. Opt. Soc. Am., 28 (1938) no. 7, p. 215

[33] G. Darboux, Letter to Nobel Committee for physics, 1905, Archives Henri Poincaré, http://henripoincarepapers.univ-lorraine.fr/chp/text/darbouxnobel1912.html.

[34] H. Poincaré C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris, 140 (1905), pp. 1504-1508

[35] A. Einstein Ann. Phys. Berlin, 17 (1905), pp. 891-921

[36] P. Langevin C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris, 173 (1921), pp. 831-834

[37] G. Sagnac C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris, 169 (1919), pp. 469-471 (529-531; 643-646; 783-785)

[38] D. Berthelot C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris, 169 (1919), pp. 1227-1232

[39] E. Picard C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris, 173 (1921), pp. 680-682

[40] M. Von Laue Ann. Phys. Berlin, 62 (1920), pp. 448-463

[41] G. Rizzi; M.L. Ruggiero Relativity in Rotating Frames (G. Rizzi; M.L. Ruggiero, eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004

[42] A. Tartaglia; M.L. Ruggiero Am. J. Phys., 83 (2015), p. 427

[43] G.B. Malykin; V.I. Pozdnyakova, Walter De Gruyter GmbH (2013), p. 8

[44] J.C. Hafele; R.E. Keating Science, 177 (1972) no. 4044, pp. 166-168 (168–170)

[45] D.K. Atwood; M.A. Horne; C.G. Shull; J. Arthur Phys. Rev. Lett., 52 (1984), pp. 1673-1676

[46] F. Hasselbach; M. Nicklaus Phys. Rev. A, 48 (1993), p. 143

[47] B. Barrett; R. Geiger; I. Dutta; M. Matthieu; B. Canuel; A. Gauguet; P. Bouyer; A. Landragin C. R. Phys., 15 (2014), pp. 875-883

[48] Y. Aharonov; D. Bohm Phys. Rev., 123 (1961), pp. 1511-1524

[49] J.J. Sakurai Phys. Rev. D, 21 (1980), p. 2993

Cité par Sources :

Commentaires - Politique