[La politique des modèles sociaux des physiciens]
Je donne un aperçu du sujet de ce dossier, les « applications de la physique (statistique) aux sciences sociales en général ». Je présente plusieurs exemples de modèles sociaux simples mis en avant par les physiciens et je discute leur intérêt. Je soutiens que, bien qu'ils puissent être conceptuellement utiles pour corriger nos modèles intuitifs de mécanismes sociaux, leur pertinence pour les systèmes sociaux réels n'est pas évidente. Qui plus est, puisque les physiciens ont toujours eu besoin de « dompter » le monde à l'intérieur des laboratoires pour rendre leurs modèles pertinents, je suggère que la modélisation sociale pourrait être liée au dressage des humains, un projet politique inquiétant.
Compléments :
Des compléments sont fournis pour cet article dans le fichier séparé :
-
mmc1.pdf
&
I give an overview of the topic of this dossier, the “applications of (statistical) physics to social sciences at large.” I discuss several examples of simple social models put forward by physicists and examine their interest. I argue that while they may be conceptually useful to correct our intuitive models of social mechanisms, their relevance for real social systems is moot. What is more, since physicists have always needed to ‘tame’ the world inside laboratories to make their models relevant, I suggest that social modeling might be linked to human taming, a smashing political project.
Supplementary Materials:
Supplementary material for this article is supplied as a separate file:
-
mmc1.pdf
&
Mot clés : Sociophysique, Politique, Modèle
Pablo Jensen 1, 2
@article{CRPHYS_2019__20_4_380_0,
author = {Pablo Jensen},
title = {The politics of physicists' social models},
journal = {Comptes Rendus. Physique},
pages = {380--386},
publisher = {Elsevier},
volume = {20},
number = {4},
year = {2019},
doi = {10.1016/j.crhy.2019.05.016},
language = {en},
}
Pablo Jensen. The politics of physicists' social models. Comptes Rendus. Physique, Volume 20 (2019) no. 4, pp. 380-386. doi : 10.1016/j.crhy.2019.05.016. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/physique/articles/10.1016/j.crhy.2019.05.016/
[1] Sur l'homme et le développement de ses facultés, ou Essai de physique sociale, Bachelier, Paris, 1835
[2] The Politics of Large Numbers, Harvard University Press, 2002
[3] The Taming of Chance, Cambridge University Press, 1990
[4] Mapping scientific institutions, Scientometrics, Volume 89 (2011) no. 3, p. 943
[5] Complex networks: structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep., Volume 424 (2006) no. 4, pp. 175-308
[6] Epidemic processes in complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys., Volume 87 (2015), pp. 925-979
[7] Scaling behaviour in the dynamics of an economic index, Nature, Volume 376 (1995), pp. 46-49
[8] Physical approach to complex systems, Phys. Rep., Volume 515 (2012) no. 3, pp. 115-226
[9] The emergence of consensus: a primer, R. Soc. Open Sci., Volume 5 (2018) no. 2
[10] Statistical physics of human cooperation, Phys. Rep., Volume 687 (2017), pp. 1-51
[11] Finding and evaluating community structure in networks, Phys. Rev. E, Volume 69 (2004)
[12] Community detection in networks: a user guide, Phys. Rep., Volume 659 (2016), pp. 1-44
[13] Collective motion, Phys. Rep., Volume 517 (2012) no. 3, pp. 71-140
[14] Temporal networks, Phys. Rep., Volume 519 (2012) no. 3, pp. 97-125
[15] Statistical physics of social dynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys., Volume 81 (2009), p. 591
[16] An Ontology for Physicists' Laboratory Life, MIT Press, 2016
[17] Everything is Obvious, Crown Business, 2011
[18] Pourquoi la société ne se laisse pas mettre en équations, Éditions du Seuil, Paris, 2018
[19] Dynamic models of segregation, J. Math. Sociol., Volume 1 (1971), pp. 143-186
[20] Competition between collective and individual dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 106 (2009) no. 49, pp. 20622-20626
[21] Crises and collective socio-economic phenomena: simple models and challenges, J. Stat. Phys., Volume 151 (2013) no. 3, pp. 567-606
[22] Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited, J. Public Econ., Volume 91 (2007) no. 1, pp. 1-24
[23] Giant catalytic effect of altruists in Schelling's segregation model, Phys. Rev. Lett., Volume 120 (2018)
[24] Fill in the gap: a new alliance for social and natural sciences, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., Volume 18 (2015) no. 2, p. 11
[25] Revisiting scale free networks, BioEssays, Volume 27 (2005) no. 10, pp. 1060-1068
[26] Modeling the polycentric transition of cities, Phys. Rev. Lett., Volume 111 (2013)
[27] Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): state of the art and prospects, Qual. Methods, Volume 2 (2004) no. 2, pp. 3-13
[28] Quelques constats sur les previsions conjoncturelles de la croissance francaise, Rev. écon. polit., Volume 122 (2012) no. 6, pp. 833-849
[29] Ourselves and our interactions: the ultimate physics problem?, Science, Volume 325 (2009) no. 5939, pp. 406-408
[30] The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry, Penn State University Press, University Park, PA, USA, 2012
[31] The whole is always smaller than its parts, a digital test of Gabriel Tardes monads, Br. J. Sociol., Volume 63 (2012) no. 4, pp. 590-615
[32] Politics of explanation (S. Woolgar, ed.), Knowledge and Reflexivity, SAGE, 1988
[33] Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA, 1998
[34] Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems, Am. Econ. Rev., Volume 100 (2010) no. 3, pp. 641-672
[35] Growing Artificial Societies. Social Science from the Bottom Up, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996
[36] Markets come to bits: evolution, computation and markomata in economic science, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., Volume 63 (2007), pp. 209-242
[37] The Mangle of Practice, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 1995
[38] The Odd Reality of Life under China's All-Seeing Credit Score System, Wired, 2018
Cité par Sources :
Commentaires - Politique