Plan
Comptes Rendus

Biophysics / Biophysique
In situ measurements of viral particles diffusion inside mucoid biofilms
[Mesure in situ de la diffusion de particules virales à l'intérieur de biofilms mucoïdes]
Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Atelier européen sur la corrélation de fluorescence – Applications des techniques spectroscopiques en biologie, médecine et pharmacologie, faculté de médicine Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 24 & 25 mars 2005, Volume 328 (2005) no. 12, pp. 1065-1072.

Résumés

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) under two-photon excitation was used successfully to characterize the diffusion properties of model virus particles (bacteriophages) in bacterial biofilm of Stenotrophonas maltophilia. The results are compared to those obtained with fluorescent latex beads used as a reference. The FCS data clearly demonstrated the possibility for viral particles to penetrate inside the exopolymeric matrix of mucoid biofilms, and hence to benefit from its protective effect toward antimicrobials (antibiotics and biocides). Microbial biofilms should hence be considered as potential reservoirs of pathogenic viruses, and are probably responsible for numerous persistent viral infections.

La spectroscopie de corrélation de fluorescence (FCS) sous excitation à deux photons a été utilisée avec succès pour caractériser les propriétés de diffusion de particules virales modèles (bacteriophages) dans un biofilm bactérien de Stenotrophonas maltophilia. Les résultats ont été comparés avec ceux obtenus pour des billes de latex fluorescentes utilisées comme référence. Les données obtenues en FCS démontrent la possibilité pour une particule virale de pénétrer dans la matrice exopolymérique de biofilms mucoïdes, et de bénéficier ainsi d'un environnement protecteur vis-à-vis d'agressions extérieures telles que l'action d'agents antimicrobiens (antibiotiques ou désinfectant). Les biofilms peuvent ainsi être considérés comme des réservoirs potentiels de virus pathogènes, et sont probablement impliqués dans de nombreuses infections virales persistantes.

Métadonnées
Reçu le :
Accepté le :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1016/j.crvi.2005.09.010
Keywords: FCS, Fluorescence, Bacterial biofilms, Phages, Viruses
Mots-clés : FCS, Fluorescence, Biofilms bactériens, Phages, Virus

Pascaline Lacroix-Gueu 1 ; Romain Briandet 2 ; Sandrine Lévêque-Fort 1 ; Marie-Noëlle Bellon-Fontaine 2 ; Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart 1

1 Laboratoire de photophysique moléculaire, UPR 3361, fédération LUMAT, université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France
2 Unité de recherche en bioadhésion et hygiène des matériaux, INRA UBHM, av. de la République, 91300 Massy, France
@article{CRBIOL_2005__328_12_1065_0,
     author = {Pascaline Lacroix-Gueu and Romain Briandet and Sandrine L\'ev\^eque-Fort and Marie-No\"elle Bellon-Fontaine and Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart},
     title = {In situ measurements of viral particles diffusion inside mucoid biofilms},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Biologies},
     pages = {1065--1072},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {328},
     number = {12},
     year = {2005},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crvi.2005.09.010},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pascaline Lacroix-Gueu
AU  - Romain Briandet
AU  - Sandrine Lévêque-Fort
AU  - Marie-Noëlle Bellon-Fontaine
AU  - Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart
TI  - In situ measurements of viral particles diffusion inside mucoid biofilms
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Biologies
PY  - 2005
SP  - 1065
EP  - 1072
VL  - 328
IS  - 12
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crvi.2005.09.010
LA  - en
ID  - CRBIOL_2005__328_12_1065_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Pascaline Lacroix-Gueu
%A Romain Briandet
%A Sandrine Lévêque-Fort
%A Marie-Noëlle Bellon-Fontaine
%A Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart
%T In situ measurements of viral particles diffusion inside mucoid biofilms
%J Comptes Rendus. Biologies
%D 2005
%P 1065-1072
%V 328
%N 12
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crvi.2005.09.010
%G en
%F CRBIOL_2005__328_12_1065_0
Pascaline Lacroix-Gueu; Romain Briandet; Sandrine Lévêque-Fort; Marie-Noëlle Bellon-Fontaine; Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart. In situ measurements of viral particles diffusion inside mucoid biofilms. Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Atelier européen sur la corrélation de fluorescence – Applications des techniques spectroscopiques en biologie, médecine et pharmacologie, faculté de médicine Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 24 & 25 mars 2005, Volume 328 (2005) no. 12, pp. 1065-1072. doi : 10.1016/j.crvi.2005.09.010. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/biologies/articles/10.1016/j.crvi.2005.09.010/

Version originale du texte intégral

Le texte intégral ci-dessous peut contenir quelques erreurs de conversion par rapport à la version officielle de l'article publié.

1 Introduction

Surfaces exposed to non-sterile and wet environments can be colonized by adherent microorganisms that encage themselves in hydrated exopolymeric substances (EPS) containing mainly polysaccharides, proteins and nucleic acids, forming a slimy layer known as a biofilm [1]. In medical medium, bacterial biofilms are able to colonize various surfaces (walls, floors, surgical tables, etc.) or implanted medical devices (catheters, endoscopes, pacemakers...), and are responsible for about 65% of nosocomial infections by direct infection or transmission [2,3].

Biofilms are characterized by a high level of structuration, most likely correlated to their specific function and their stability. Indeed, bacteria embedded in biofilms present specific physiological and genetic features that differentiate them from their planktonic counterparts [4]. Furthermore, biofilms are highly heterogeneous, with structures such as streamers and water channels, depending on the prevailing conditions, environmental stresses and EPS nature, which create a vascularization system similar to animal tissue. The biofilm depth can vary from a few micrometres up to centimetres depending on the strain and the environment.

The physicochemical and structural natures of EPS influence the bacterial physiology [5], but also may act to various degrees as a protection against environmental changes, such as desiccation or action of antimicrobials (antibiotics and biocides). Moreover, these exopolymers have been frequently invoked to account for the development of anaerobic micro-zones and structural heterogeneity in biofilms and thus may also act as a reservoir for pathogenic viral particles [6], leading to persistent viral infection.

Thus measuring the diffusive capabilities of various chemical species within the biofilm matrix is of importance to understand the dynamics of these microbial communities and to identify the role and function of EPS. Such studies have been first approached by means of scanning confocal laser microscopy (SCLM) combined with fluorescence recovery after photobleaching measurements (FRAP) [5]. However, FRAP does not allow a direct visualization of the fluorophore diffusion inside the excited volume and requires high fluorophore concentrations that can lead to inaccuracy in the diffusion coefficient determination [7]. More recently, we have demonstrated for the first time that fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) under two-photon excitation (TPE) can be successfully applied to characterize the penetration and diffusion capabilities of fluorescent tracer particles in monomicrobial biofilms [8]. FCS, based on the analysis of fluctuation intensities in the fluorescence signals emitted by a small number of molecules in a microvolume, is ideally suited for non-invasive in vivo measurements [9]. By comparison with conventional one-photon FCS, TPE minimizes photobleaching in spatially restricted volumes (∼1 femtolitre), thereby preventing long-term signal acquisition and measurement with single molecule sensitivity. Furthermore, the use of infrared wavelengths ensures deeper penetration than SCLM.

In this work we analyse the role of the Stenotrophonas maltophilia biofilm structure and specially the influence of EPS towards the diffusion and reactivity of bacteriophages. These viral particles also named phages are considered as favoured model for human enteric virus due to their similarity of structure, size, composition and morphology as well as behaviour toward conventional water treatment processes. The model viral particle used in this study was a C2 bacteriophage known to recognize specific surface sites of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis bacteria lacking on Stenotrophonas maltophilia cells. Stenotrophonas maltophilia is an aerobic bacillus of growing clinical importance [10] because it is the third bacteria involved in nosocomial infections after Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. This microorganism, when grown as a biofilm, contains mucoid mushroom-like structure typical of many gram negative bacteria [11], and is known to be particularly resistant to antimicrobials.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Bacterial biofilms in continuous flow cells

This study was carried out with the bacterial strain Stenotrophonas maltophilia 114N-Sm provided by UNIR association (http://www.unir.org). The strain was stored at −20 °C, transferred twice in TSB (Trypcase Soy Broth, BioMérieux) before being cultivated overnight in 100 ml of TSB in continuous flow slide culture at 30 °C under oxygenated conditions.

Bacterial cells in stationary phase were washed by a succession of three centrifugations (7000g, 4 °C, 10 min) and resuspensions in 150 ml NaCl. Bacterial concentration was adjusted to 109 CFU/ml by measurements of the absorbance (A400nm=0.8). Two millilitres of the suspension were poured into a flow cell (BST FC81, Biosurface Technology, Bozeman, USA) with a sterile syringe. In this experimental setup, the biofilms grow up on the glass cover slit of the flow cell (0.17×24×60mm). After 3 h of static adhesion in NaCl 150 mM, a bulk laminar flow rate of 0.5 ml min−1 of growth medium (TSB 1:10) crosses the flow cell in order to eliminate planktonic cells, to allow adherent bacteria to multiply and to form a biofilm (flow obtained from a Watson and Marlow 205S peristaltic pump). The biofilm development period in dynamic conditions prior to FCS experiments was always 24 h at 20 °C in order to minimize bacterial physiological variations in the biofilm structure and thus artefacts in the FCS measurements. Stenotrophonas maltophilia biofilms (Fig. 1) have been extensively studied and represent well-defined systems with mushroom-like structure (zone 2) of ∼30-μm thickness separated by homogeneous layers of bacteria (zone 1) of less than 10 μm. Biofilm depth was determined manually using the computer-controlled focusmeter of a SCLM system (TCS SP2, Leica Microsystems, France) and defined with respect to the cover slit surface (i.e. at the attachment of the biofilm); the top layer of the biofilm (∼30 μm from the glass cover slit) corresponds to the interface with the flowing growth medium.

Fig. 1

Confocal imaging of Stenotrophonas maltophilia biofilm showing (zone 1) unstructured and (zone 2) mushroom-like structure.

2.2 Prolate bacteriophages

The model viral of particle used in this study was a C2 bacteriophage infecting Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. The 22163-bp genome of this lactococal phage was fully sequenced [12]. The C2 phage exhibits a prolate structure with a 100-nm head and a 200-nm non-contractile tail. Lactococcus lactis was cultivated when necessary in M17 growth medium (Oxoid, France) supplemented with 0.5% of glucose and incubated at 30 °C overnight. Phage C2 and the C2-sensitive strain Lactococcus lactis, subsp. lactis were provided by S. Kulakauskas (INRA URLGA, Jouy-en Josas).

Phage titration was performed using the serial dilution technique and the formation of lytic plaques on a layer of the sensitive bacteria on a Petri dish, as described previously [13]. Experimentally, 0.1 ml of the phage suspension was added to 0.2 ml of a mid-log-phase bacterial culture of the C2-sensitive bacteria L. lactis. 30 μl of CaCl2 1 M were added to favour phage infection, and the mixture was incubated 10 min at 30 °C. Each mixture was added to 3 ml of soft agar (M17 Oxoid supplemented with 8 g l−1 of agar and 0.5% of glucose) in order to create a soft double layer on agar plates (M17 Oxoid supplemented with 15 g l−1 of agar and 0.5% of glucose). Petri dishes were incubated overnight at 30 °C in order to enumerate the visible lytic plaques.

For phage amplification, 108 PFU (Plaque Forming Units) of phage C2 were added to 400 ml of a L. lactis culture (DO600 nm = 0.1). Infected bacterial cells were incubated at 30 °C until clearance of the suspension. The mixture was then centrifuged to eliminate bacterial debris for 10 min at 7000 g and 4 °C. Phage particles were then washed in NaCl 150 mM by a centrifugation at 18000 g for 6 h. The pellet was resuspended in 10 ml of 150 mM NaCl and sterilized by filtration (0.22 μm, Steriflip, Millipore). The final phage suspension titrated 1010 PFU/ml was stored at 4 °C.

2.3 Fluorescent probes

The anionic carboxylate-modified fluorescent latex beads of 110-nm diameter (range size of bacteriophage head), obtained from Molecular Probes were used as reference. The beads were used in suspension in deionised water (Purit, France). The solutions were filtered and sonicated before each experiment in order to eliminate most of the aggregates and to obtain a final concentration from 1 nM (in solution) to 10 nM (in biofilms). The latex beads could be considered to have a globular structure, enabling an estimation of their diffusion coefficient using the Stokes equation.

The selection criteria for bacteriophage fluorescent labelling were imposed by the experimental conditions required for FCS under TPE: (i) the fluorophore must be excited by two photons in the wavelength range 700–900 nm; (ii) detection of the fluorescence signal emitted during the counting interval needed to be significant despite the low excitation energy and the low fluorophore concentration used, which required to use a fluorophore with a significant fluorescence quantum yield; (iii) the fluorophore must be able to label the bacteriophage and not the living cells inside the biofilms. Because of these constraints, the fluorescent probe used to label the C2 bacteriophage was Sytox green (Molecular probes). The maximal concentration of labelled bacteriophages was obtained by adding 30 μl of Sytox green (5 mM solution) to 5 ml of C2 bacteriophage suspension titrated at 1010 PFU ml−1. The excess of free Sytox green was removed by careful rinsing. The labelled bacteriophage solution was used as it was for FCS measurements in biofilms and diluted by a factor 10 for experiments in solution. Before the FCS measurements inside biofilms, the growth medium flow was stopped and 2 ml of fluorophores were injected aseptically through the flow cell.

2.4 FCS set-up

The TPE experimental system used in this study has been described in detail elsewhere [14]. Briefly, the fluorescence excitation source was a femtosecond Ti:Sapphire laser (MIRA 900, Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, CA) pumped in the green by a continuous-wave diode-pumped solid-state laser (VERDI, Coherent Inc.) generating 100-fs pulses at a 76-MHz repetition rate with about 700-mW average power output. An excitation wavelength of 890 nm was fixed for all of the TPE experiments described here. The laser beam is expanded 3 times at the entrance of the microscope in order to reach a diameter of approximately 5 mm in diameter to fill the back aperture of the objective. After the beam expander, parallel laser light epi-illuminates a Zeiss 63×1.4 numerical aperture, oil immersion objective. Fluorescence emission was collected through the same objective, separated from the excitation radiation by a dichroic mirror. It was then filtered through short-pass filters to absorb any possible diffused infrared excitation light and focused on the surface of a photomultiplier tube (R7205-01, Hamamatsu, Massy, France). This device was connected to a discriminator (TC 454, Oxford Instruments Inc., Oxford, UK), and the output signal was transmitted to a digital autocorrelator module (Flex2kx2-12, correlator) that computes on-line the correlation function of the fluorescence fluctuations. To measure translational diffusion time with 10 to 20% (see below) accuracy, data recording times are 60–100 s for solution acquisitions and 100–300 s in the biofilms and corresponds to 10–20 iterations, respectively. The data are stored in the computer and analysed by a home-written routine that allows to: (i) select and average chosen successive acquisitions, (ii) make anomal diffusion fit if necessary (see below), (iii) calculate the associated standard deviations.

A general concern in fluorescence microscopy measurements and especially for applications with slow moving particles through biofilm depth is the risk of photobleaching the fluorophores at high laser power values. For this reason, we always used less than 1 mW at the sample and thus no cellular degradation was observed during the time of experiments as verified by confocal microscopy with the live/dead bacterial viability kit (Molecular probes). Furthermore, while IR excitation wavelength was used (890 nm), no significant temperature increase due to water absorption was observed.

2.5 FCS diffusion analysis

The conceptual and theoretical basis of FCS has been well established [7,9,15,16]. Assuming that the excitation intensity profile could be approximated using a three-dimensional Gaussian distribution, the fluorescence correlation curves in the case of free Brownian motion of molecules can be fitted using the following normalized autocorrelation function:

g(τ)=1+(18N)(11+(τ/τD))(11+(ω0/z0)2(τ/τD))1/2(1)
N denotes the mean number of fluorescent molecules in the excitation volume (it must be noted that fluorescence correlation measurements required low N values to allow detection); ω0 is the beam-waist at the focal point and z0 the focal depth. Previous calibration experiments, using 50 nm radius spheres (D=4μm2s−1) diffusing in water enabled us to determine a ω0 value of 0.52±0.02μm and ω0/z0=0.3±0.01 [14].

Under biphotonic excitation, the translational diffusion time can be related to the beam waist ω0 and the diffusion coefficient Dt of the fluorophore by the relation:

τD=ω02/8Dt(2)

For approximately spherical particles (such as latex beads) of hydrodynamic radius (R), the local viscosity η of the medium can be obtained via the Stokes–Einstein equation:

η=4kTτD3πRω02(3)

In the presence of obstacles that lead to deviation of the molecules from Brownian motion (called anomal diffusion) [7], the normalized autocorrelation function is transformed into:

g(τ)=1+(18N)(11+(τ/τD)2/dw)(11+(ω0/z0)2(τ/τD)2/dw)1/2(4)

The parameter dw is equal to 2 for free diffusion and increases with increasing obstacle concentration. This results in an increase of the translational diffusion time, τD, and to a decrease of the apparent diffusion coefficient, Dt.

3 Results and discussion

The main goal of this work was to demonstrate the possibility of investigating the influence of biofilm structure on viral particle diffusion using FCS under TPE.

The diffusion processes were characterized by comparing the fluorescence correlation curves measured for C2 bacteriophages in solution and integrated into the Stenotrophonas maltophilia biofilm. As a reference, FCS measurements were also performed using reference anionic latex beads.

3.1 Solution measurements

Typical experimental fluorescence correlation curves obtained in aqueous solutions at room temperature (water viscosity ηw=0.96cP at 295 K) for latex beads and free fluorescent labelled bacteriophages are shown in Fig. 2. The τD and N values are obtained by fitting the experimental curves considering Brownian motion diffusion (Eq. (1)). The corresponding diffusion coefficients (D) calculated using Eq. (2) were 3.1 μm2 s−1 and 1.2 μm2 s−1 for the carboxylate beads and the viral particles, respectively. It can be observed that this D value is ∼2.6 time lower for the bacteriophage compared to fluorescent beads revealing that the exocellular tail of the viral particle significantly reduces its mobility.

Fig. 2

Experimental fluorescence correlation curves g(τ) corresponding to (●) anionic latex beads of 55-nm radius and (○) fluorescent labelled C2 bacteriophages in water. Continuous lines correspond to the fitting of the curves using Eq. (1). Parameters obtained from fit are: N = 1.5, τd=11.2ms for the latex beads and N=5.8, τd=28.6ms for the phages. Standard deviation was 5% of the values. Masquer

Experimental fluorescence correlation curves g(τ) corresponding to (●) anionic latex beads of 55-nm radius and (○) fluorescent labelled C2 bacteriophages in water. Continuous lines correspond to the fitting of the curves using Eq. (1). Parameters obtained from ... Lire la suite

Moreover, the experimental diffusion coefficient measured for the fluorescent microspheres is in good agreement with the theoretical value (D0) expected from the Stokes–Einstein equation (D0=4.0μm2s−1), a result that demonstrates the accuracy of our FCS technique.

3.2 Application of FCS to microbial biofilms

We have observed that, in our experimental conditions, the bacterial autofluorescence as well as the overall biofilm movement were able to create a correlation signal (Fig. 3, inset). However, the translational diffusion coefficient associated to this background movement (τD>50s) was out of range compared to the τD values obtained for the fluorescent probes (τD<150ms) and thus did not interfere with the fluorophore diffusion.

Fig. 3

Fluorescence correlation curves for the anionic latex beads obtained in water and in the two distinct structural zones of Stenotrophonas maltophilia biofilm. The fitting of the curves was obtained using Eq. (1) in water (●) and zone 1 (○) and with Eq. (4) for the more distorted curve in zone 2 (▿).

3.2.1 Latex beads

The differences of mobility of the anionic latex beads at different horizontal positions within the S. maltophilia biofilm are apparent in Fig. 3: the FCS measured in zone 1 (more homogenous structure) can be fitted using Eq. (1), while the FCS recorded in zone 2 (mushroom-like structure) requires an anomal diffusion model (Eq. (4)) for interpretation.

In zone 1, we found a mean τD value of 13 ms corresponding to a diffusion coefficient of 2.6 μm2 s−1 and to a local viscosity of the medium of η=0.81cP (Eq. (3)). This value is in the same order as in water, revealing that the local viscosity through the homogenous structure of the biofilm is not very different from that of water. This result is in agreement with previous observations that describe biofilms as open architectures in which the biomass is interspersed with channels of lower density, such as water channels [17].

Because of the complex nature of biofilms, it is necessary to rule out any artefacts before the diffusion can be termed truly anomalous. In particular, the diffusion rates can be mediated by binding of the probes to the biofilm constituents through physicochemical interactions, essentially electrostatic and Lewis acid–base interactions, as already observed in different eukaryotic living cells [9,15,18]. Micro-electrophoresis measurements of the latex beads revealed their anionic nature with a zeta potential of 51±5mV at the pH of the study (pH = 6.0). This anionic character was the consequence of the prevalence of the deprotonated form of the carboxylate groups on the beads surface (pKa<4), which also precludes hydrogen-bond formation at pH 6.0. Considering that S. maltophilia bacteria are also negatively charged (7±3mV at pH 6.0) [8], the electrostatic immobilization of the fluorescent probes within biofilms was very constrained.

Given the higher density of EPS in the mushroom-like structure compared to the homogeneous zone 1, an increased viscosity might have been expected, resulting in a parallel shift of the fluorescence correlation curve toward longer times (Fig. 3). However, the curve measured in zone 2 could not be superposed upon those obtained for the anionic latex beads in media with controlled viscosity [8]. Thus, with regard to the behaviour of the latex beads inside the mushroom structure, its diffusion can be only described as anomalous. The apparent diffusion coefficient obtained in this case was D=1.5μm2s−1 (τD=23ms) with a mean dw value of 2.7 (Table 1). A previous study revealed, by contrast, diffusion inhibition for such large anionic latex beads in the mushroom-like structure of Stenotrophonas maltophilia biofilm grown in static conditions [8]. This apparent contradiction stresses out the dramatic influence of the biofilm growth mode on the diffusion processes.

Table 1

Translational diffusion time τD and dw parameters obtained from the fitting with Eq. (4) of the correlation curves of the fluorescent probes in the two distinct structural zones of Stenotrophonas maltophilia biofilm

Fluorophore Zone 1 Zone 2
τD(ms) dw τD(ms) dw
Carboxylated modified latex beads 13 ± 1 2.0 23 ± 7 2.5–2.9
Fluorescent labelled bacteriophages 123 ± 15 2.5–2.9 130 ± 10 3.0–3.4

Reasons for a non-Brownian diffusion of particles inside a biofilm can be only speculated. However, it should not be surprising that environmental heterogeneities (c.a. rafts, EPS density, water channels...) or local confinement can occur in the mushroom-like biofilm structure.

3.2.2 Fluorescent labelled bacteriophages

Fluorescent correlation curve profiles obtained for the labelled bacteriophages were markedly dependent upon local biofilm structure. Within more homogeneous structure (zone 1), the fluorescence correlation curves were already distorted in comparison with that obtained for free bacteriophages. These distortions increased with the compactness of local biofilm structure. Fig. 4 provides a series of fluorescent correlation curves at different depths within a mushroom-like region (zone 2) of the biofilm, nonetheless revealing any significant difference in all the bulk of the mushroom structure.

Fig. 4

Comparison of the fluorescence correlation curves for the labelled bacteriophages in water and at different depths of the mushroom-like structure of the biofilm (zone 2). The depth was expressed in μm from the glass cover slit surface. The fitting of the curves in zone 2 of the biofilm was obtained using Eq. (4).

No inhibition of the viral particle diffusion was observed, but it appears complex in each part of the biofilm and requires to be analysed considering its intrinsic properties. As mentioned previously, the Stenotrophonas maltophilia bacteria are not sensitive to the C2 phages, precluding specific interaction between the two particles. Moreover, a viral particle can be considered as a biocolloid able to exchange physicochemical interactions with the surrounding medium. However, the bacteriophage immobilization inside the biofilm matrix due to electrostatic interactions should be also reasonably excluded as for the reference latex bead. Indeed, the electrophoretic mobility measurement reveals a global negative charge of the phage surfaces with a zeta potential of −29 mV. Thus, the mobility of the C2 bacteriophages can be termed truly anomalous and the correlation curves satisfactorily fitted using Eq. (4). The experimental τD and dw values are summarized in Table 1. We find for zones 1 and 2 comparable data for τD corresponding to a mean diffusion coefficient D=0.3μm2s−1. The ratio of diffusion coefficients for the C2 bacteriophages and the reference latex beads was ∼3 in water and reached ∼10 in zone 1 of Stenotrophonas maltophilia biofilm. Owing to the absence of viscosity change in this part of the biofilm (see above), the slowing down of the diffusion could be related to the C2 phage morphology and specially its long tail. Furthermore, in both cases of latex beads and bacteriophages, the dw values increase with the compactness of the medium (Table 1), emphasizing the role of EPS in diffusion.

4 Biological relevance

From a biological point of view, it has been previously hypothesized that the synergetic action of the bacteria in producing EPS may protect the majority of the biofilm occupant from infectious phage [19,20] or that bacteriophage migration through mucoid biofilms was governed through a reduction in EPS viscosity by enzymatic degradation [6,21]. Our in situ experimental measurements suggest that, even in the absence of specific enzymatic reactions (no local viscosity change detected), viral particles can penetrate inside the EPS structure of mucoid biofilms. After penetration inside the polymeric matrix, the biological particle may then take advantage from the specific ‘biofilm lifestyle’, and in particular benefit from protection against ‘outside’ environmental stresses, such as desiccation or the action of antimicrobial agents. Bacterial cells present in a bacterial biofilm are typically 1000 times more resistant to antibiotics than they planktonic counterparts [2]. During biofilm erosion or sloughing, these protected immobilized viral particles may be released in the environmental fluid, and be in contact with their target hosts for a viral infectious cycle. Previous studies have demonstrated that immobilized viral particles on solid surface most often keep their infectious potential after desorption [22]. Interactions of pathogenic viruses with bacterial biofilm are also consistent with previous studies reporting the persistence of enteric virions or poliovirus-1 in microbial biofilm [23–25].

From a public health point of view, biofilms were already regarded as a common cause of bacterial infections. They should now also be considered as protective reservoirs of pathogenic viral particles, and are probably responsible for numerous persistent viral infections.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank H. Bidnenko and S. Kulakauskas for their expertise in handling lactic acid bacteria bacteriophages and the French department of Essonne for its financial support for the purchase of a laser confocal microscope (ASTRE No. A02137).


Bibliographie

[1] J.W. Costerton; K.J. Cheng; G.G. Geesey; T.I. Ladd; N.C. Nickel; M. Dosgupton; I.J. Marine Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., Volume 41 (1987), pp. 4635-4641

[2] E. Licking, Getting a grip on bacterial slim, Business Week (13 September 1999) 98–100

[3] J.W. Costerton; P.S. Steward; E.P. Greenberg Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections, Science, Volume 284 (1999), pp. 1318-1322

[4] B. Christensen; C. Sternberg; J.B. Andersen; L. Eberl; S. Moller; M. Givskov; S. Molin Establishment of new genetic traits in a microbial biofilm community, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Volume 64 (1998), pp. 2247-2255

[5] J.R. Lawrence; G.M. Wolfaardt; D.R. Korber Determination of diffusion coefficients in biofilm by confocal laser microscopy, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Volume 60 (1994), pp. 1166-1173

[6] G.W. Hanlon; S.P. Denyer; C.J. Olliff; L.J. Ibrahim Reduction in exopolysaccaride viscosity as an aid to bacteriophage penetration through Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Volume 67 (2001), pp. 2746-2753

[7] P. Schwille; J. Korlach; W.W. Webb Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with single molecule sensitivity on cell and model membranes, Cytometry, Volume 36 (1999), pp. 176-182

[8] E. Guiot; P. Georges; A. Brun; M.-P. Fontaine-Aupart; M.-N. Bellon-Fontaine; R. Briandet Heterogeneity of diffusion inside microbial biofilms determined by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy under two-photon excitation, Photochem. Photobiol., Volume 75 (2002), pp. 570-578

[9] E. Haustein; P. Schwille Ultrasensitive investigations of biological systems by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, Methods, Volume 29 (2003), pp. 153-166

[10] H.C. Chang; C.R. Chen; J.W. Lin; G.H. Shen; K.M. Chang; Y.H. Tseng; S.F. Weng Isolation and characterization of novel giant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia phage phiSMA5, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Volume 71 (2005), pp. 1387-1393

[11] D. Davies; M.R. Parsek; J.P. Pearson; B.H. Iglewski; J.W. Costerton; E.P. Greenberg The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm, Science, Volume 280 (1998), pp. 295-298

[12] M.W. Lubbers; N.R. Waterfield; T.P.J. Beresford; R.W.F. Le Page; A.W. Jarvis Sequencing and analysis of the prolate-headed lactococcal bacteriophage C2 genome and identification of the structural genes, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Volume 61 (1995), pp. 4348-4356

[13] B.E. Terzaghi; W.E. Sandine Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Volume 29 (1975), pp. 807-813

[14] E. Guiot; M. Enescu; B. Arrio; G. Johannin; G. Roger; S. Tosti; F. Tfibel; F. Mérola; A. Brun; P. Georges; M.-P. Fontaine-Aupart Molecular dynamics of biological probes by fluorescence correlation microscopy with two-photon excitation, J. Fluorescence, Volume 10 (2000), pp. 413-419

[15] M. Wachsmuth; W. Waldeck; J. Langowski Anomalous diffusion of fluorescent probes inside living cell nuclei investigated by spatially-resolved fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, J. Mol. Biol., Volume 298 (2000), pp. 677-689

[16] E.V. Craenenbroeck; Y. Engelborghs Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: molecular recognition at the single molecule level, J. Mol. Recognit., Volume 13 (2000), pp. 93-100

[17] J.R. Lawrence; D.R. Korber; B.D. Hoyle; J.W. Costerton; D.E. Caldwell Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms, J. Bacteriol., Volume 173 (1991), pp. 6558-6567

[18] K.M. Berland; P.T.C. So; E. Gratton Two-photon fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: method and application to the intracellular environment, Biophys. J., Volume 68 (1995), pp. 694-701

[19] K.A. Hugues; I.W. Sutherland; M.V. Jones Biofilm susceptibility to bacteriophage attack: the role of phage-borne polysaccharide depolymerase, Microbiology, Volume 144 (1998), pp. 3039-3047

[20] K.A. Hughes; I.W. Sutherland; J. Clarks; M.V. Jones Bacteriophage and associated polysaccaride depolymerases – novel tools for study of bacterial biofilms, J. Appl. Microbiol., Volume 85 (1998), pp. 583-590

[21] I.W. Sutherland; K.A. Hugues; L.C. Skillman; K. Tait The interaction of phage and biofilms, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., Volume 232 (2004), pp. 1-6

[22] S.S. Thompson; M. Flury; M.V. Yates; W.A. Jury Role of air– water–solid interface in bacteriophage sorption experiments, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Volume 64 (1998), pp. 304-309

[23] M.V. Storey; N.J. Ashbolt Enteric virions and microbial biofilms – a second source of public health concern?, Water Sci. Technol., Volume 48 (2003), pp. 97-104

[24] J. Langmark; M.V. Storey; N.J. Ashbolt; T.A. Stenstrom Accumulation and fated of microorganisms and microspheres in biofilms formed in a pilot-scale water distribution system, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Volume 71 (2005), pp. 706-712

[25] F. Quignon; M. Sardin; L. Kiene; L. Schwartzbrod Poliovirus-1 inactivation and interaction with biofilm: a pilot scale study, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Volume 63 (1999), pp. 978-982


Cité par

  • Chinnadurai Lelin; Ganapathi Uma; Ramamoorthy Sathishkumar; Sathiyapandian Balasubramanian; Selvaraj Jeraldin Nisha; Ramachandran Indhu Nisha; Thavasimuthu Citarasu Characterization and Antibacterial Potential of Escherichia Phage CMSTMSU Isolated from Shrimp Farm Effluent Water, Indian Journal of Microbiology (2025) | DOI:10.1007/s12088-025-01450-7
  • Harini Ragupathi; Mahamahima Muthuswamy Pushparaj; Sarves Mani Gopi; Deenadayalan Karaiyagowder Govindarajan; Kumaravel Kandaswamy Biofilm matrix: a multifaceted layer of biomolecules and a defensive barrier against antimicrobials, Archives of Microbiology, Volume 206 (2024) no. 11 | DOI:10.1007/s00203-024-04157-3
  • Jagadish Sankaran; Scott A. Rice; Thorsten Wohland Single Microcolony Diffusion Analysis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Volume 2721 (2024), p. 153 | DOI:10.1007/978-1-0716-3473-8_11
  • Linyong Zhi; Zhen Li; Zeliang Su; Jun Wang Immunotoxicity of microplastics: Carrying pathogens and destroying the immune system, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, Volume 177 (2024), p. 117817 | DOI:10.1016/j.trac.2024.117817
  • Tom Luthe; Larissa Kever; Kai Thormann; Julia Frunzke Bacterial multicellular behavior in antiviral defense, Current Opinion in Microbiology, Volume 74 (2023), p. 102314 | DOI:10.1016/j.mib.2023.102314
  • Edgar Tumwesigye; Chika Felicitas Nnadozie; Frank C Akamagwuna; Xavier Siwe Noundou; George William Nyakairu; Oghenekaro Nelson Odume Microplastics as vectors of chemical contaminants and biological agents in freshwater ecosystems: Current knowledge status and future perspectives, Environmental Pollution, Volume 330 (2023), p. 121829 | DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121829
  • Beatriz Vieira‐da‐Silva; Miguel A. R. B. Castanho The structure and matrix dynamics of bacterial biofilms as revealed by antimicrobial peptides' diffusion, Journal of Peptide Science, Volume 29 (2023) no. 6 | DOI:10.1002/psc.3470
  • Hamid Ezzatpanah; Vicente Manuel Gómez‐López; Tatiana Koutchma; Farnoush Lavafpour; Frank Moerman; Mohammad Mohammadi; Dele Raheem Risks and new challenges in the food chain: Viral contamination and decontamination from a global perspective, guidelines, and cleaning, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, Volume 21 (2022) no. 2, p. 868 | DOI:10.1111/1541-4337.12899
  • Cédric Perez; Christine Lors; Benjamin Erable Methodological approaches for the structural, chemical, and microbial analysis of microbial biofilms developed on the surface of cementitious materials: Overview and future prospects, International Biodeterioration Biodegradation, Volume 175 (2022), p. 105485 | DOI:10.1016/j.ibiod.2022.105485
  • Vinod Kumar Vashistha; Sonali Gautam; Renu Bala; Anuj Kumar; Dipak Kumar Das Transition Metal-Based Nanoparticles as Potential Antimicrobial Agents, Reviews and Advances in Chemistry, Volume 12 (2022) no. 4, p. 222 | DOI:10.1134/s2634827622600244
  • Xin You; Niclas Klose; René Kallies; Hauke Harms; Antonis Chatzinotas; Lukas Y. Wick Mycelia-Assisted Isolation of Non-Host Bacteria Able to Co-Transport Phages, Viruses, Volume 14 (2022) no. 2, p. 195 | DOI:10.3390/v14020195
  • Nicolas Castaño; Seth C. Cordts; Myra Kurosu Jalil; Kevin S. Zhang; Saisneha Koppaka; Alison D. Bick; Rajorshi Paul; Sindy K. Y. Tang Fomite Transmission, Physicochemical Origin of Virus–Surface Interactions, and Disinfection Strategies for Enveloped Viruses with Applications to SARS-CoV-2, ACS Omega, Volume 6 (2021) no. 10, p. 6509 | DOI:10.1021/acsomega.0c06335
  • Jian Meng; Qun Zhang; Yifan Zheng; Guimei He; Huahong Shi Plastic waste as the potential carriers of pathogens, Current Opinion in Food Science, Volume 41 (2021), p. 224 | DOI:10.1016/j.cofs.2021.04.016
  • Vanessa Moresco; David M. Oliver; Manfred Weidmann; Sabine Matallana-Surget; Richard S. Quilliam Survival of human enteric and respiratory viruses on plastics in soil, freshwater, and marine environments, Environmental Research, Volume 199 (2021), p. 111367 | DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111367
  • Hongchen Shen; David P. Durkin; Ashlee Aiello; Tara Diba; John Lafleur; Jason M. Zara; Yun Shen; Danmeng Shuai Photocatalytic graphitic carbon nitride-chitosan composites for pathogenic biofilm control under visible light irradiation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 408 (2021), p. 124890 | DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124890
  • Mary Garvey Bacteriophages and the One Health Approach to Combat Multidrug Resistance: Is This the Way?, Antibiotics, Volume 9 (2020) no. 7, p. 414 | DOI:10.3390/antibiotics9070414
  • Stephen T. Abedon Phage-Phage, Phage-Bacteria, and Phage-Environment Communication, Biocommunication of Phages (2020), p. 23 | DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-45885-0_2
  • David C. M. Yeung; Ronald Lai; Eddy W. Y. Wong; Jason Y. K. Chan Care of Patients With a Laryngectomy During the COVID‐19 Pandemic, Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Volume 163 (2020) no. 4, p. 695 | DOI:10.1177/0194599820933185
  • Legesse Geredew Kifelew; James G. Mitchell; Peter Speck Mini-review: efficacy of lytic bacteriophages on multispecies biofilms, Biofouling, Volume 35 (2019) no. 4, p. 472 | DOI:10.1080/08927014.2019.1613525
  • Cailin Dawley; Kristen E. Gibson Virus–Bacteria Interactions: Implications for Prevention and Control of Human Enteric Viruses from Environment to Host, Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, Volume 16 (2019) no. 2, p. 81 | DOI:10.1089/fpd.2018.2543
  • Jagadish Sankaran; Nicholas J. H. J. Tan; Ka Pui But; Yehuda Cohen; Scott A. Rice; Thorsten Wohland Single microcolony diffusion analysis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms, npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, Volume 5 (2019) no. 1 | DOI:10.1038/s41522-019-0107-4
  • Jagadish Sankaran; Andreas Karampatzakis; Scott A Rice; Thorsten Wohland Quantitative imaging and spectroscopic technologies for microbiology, FEMS Microbiology Letters, Volume 365 (2018) no. 9 | DOI:10.1093/femsle/fny075
  • Emilia L Simmons; Knut Drescher; Carey D Nadell; Vanni Bucci Phage mobility is a core determinant of phage–bacteria coexistence in biofilms, The ISME Journal, Volume 12 (2018) no. 2, p. 532 | DOI:10.1038/ismej.2017.190
  • Stephen T. Abedon Phage “delay” towards enhancing bacterial escape from biofilms: a more comprehensive way of viewing resistance to bacteriophages, AIMS Microbiology, Volume 3 (2017) no. 2, p. 186 | DOI:10.3934/microbiol.2017.2.186
  • Ruth E. Baltus; Appala Raju Badireddy; Armin Delavari; Shankararaman Chellam Free Diffusivity of Icosahedral and Tailed Bacteriophages: Experiments, Modeling, and Implications for Virus Behavior in Media Filtration and Flocculation, Environmental Science Technology, Volume 51 (2017) no. 3, p. 1433 | DOI:10.1021/acs.est.6b05323
  • Sebastian Schlafer; Rikke L. Meyer Confocal microscopy imaging of the biofilm matrix, Journal of Microbiological Methods, Volume 138 (2017), p. 50 | DOI:10.1016/j.mimet.2016.03.002
  • Loni L. Schumacher; Anne R. Huss; Roger A. Cochrane; Charles R. Stark; Jason C. Woodworth; Jianfa Bai; Elizabeth G. Poulsen; Qi Chen; Rodger G. Main; Jianqiang Zhang; Phillip C. Gauger; Alejandro Ramirez; Rachel J. Derscheid; Drew M. Magstadt; Steve S. Dritz; Cassandra K. Jones; Yongchang Cao Characterizing the rapid spread of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) through an animal food manufacturing facility, PLOS ONE, Volume 12 (2017) no. 11, p. e0187309 | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0187309
  • Diana Vilas Boas; Carina Almeida; Sanna Sillankorva; Ana Nicolau; Joana Azeredo; Nuno F. Azevedo Discrimination of bacteriophage infected cells using locked nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (LNA-FISH), Biofouling, Volume 32 (2016) no. 2, p. 179 | DOI:10.1080/08927014.2015.1131821
  • Leon Cantas; Kaya Suer; Emrah Guler; Turgut Imir High Emergence of ESBL-Producing E. coli Cystitis: Time to Get Smarter in Cyprus, Frontiers in Microbiology, Volume 6 (2016) | DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01446
  • Danielle L. Peters; Karlene H. Lynch; Paul Stothard; Jonathan J. Dennis The isolation and characterization of two Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteriophages capable of cross-taxonomic order infectivity, BMC Genomics, Volume 16 (2015) no. 1 | DOI:10.1186/s12864-015-1848-y
  • C. Chagnot; C. Shen; C. Munzer; J. Deschamps; F. Feugeas; T. Meylheuc Méthode d’évaluation de la biocontamination de surface des matériaux cimentaires par microscopie confocale à balayage laser, Matériaux Techniques, Volume 103 (2015) no. 2, p. 205 | DOI:10.1051/mattech/2015027
  • Nicole Billings; Alona Birjiniuk; Tahoura S Samad; Patrick S Doyle; Katharina Ribbeck Material properties of biofilms—a review of methods for understanding permeability and mechanics, Reports on Progress in Physics, Volume 78 (2015) no. 3, p. 036601 | DOI:10.1088/0034-4885/78/3/036601
  • Mohamed Elbreki; R. Paul Ross; Colin Hill; Jim O'Mahony; Olivia McAuliffe; Aidan Coffey Bacteriophages and Their Derivatives as Biotherapeutic Agents in Disease Prevention and Treatment, Journal of Viruses, Volume 2014 (2014), p. 1 | DOI:10.1155/2014/382539
  • Mahmood Golmohamadi; Rhett J. Clark; Jonathan G. C. Veinot; Kevin J. Wilkinson The role of charge on the diffusion of solutes and nanoparticles (silicon nanocrystals, nTiO2, nAu) in a biofilm, Environmental Chemistry, Volume 10 (2013) no. 1, p. 34 | DOI:10.1071/en12106
  • Susan Mills; Fergus Shanahan; Catherine Stanton; Colin Hill; Aidan Coffey; R. Paul Ross Movers and shakers, Gut Microbes, Volume 4 (2013) no. 1, p. 4 | DOI:10.4161/gmic.22371
  • Nerino Allocati; Michele Masulli; Mikhail Alexeyev; Carmine Di Ilio Escherichia coli in Europe: An Overview, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Volume 10 (2013) no. 12, p. 6235 | DOI:10.3390/ijerph10126235
  • J. Floury; S. Jeanson; M.-N. Madec; S. Lortal Porosity of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis LD61 colonies immobilised in model cheese, International Journal of Food Microbiology, Volume 163 (2013) no. 2-3, p. 64 | DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.02.014
  • P. Vasickova; K. Kovarcik Natural persistence of food- and waterborne viruses, Viruses in Food and Water (2013), p. 179 | DOI:10.1533/9780857098870.3.179
  • Andrew Chibeu; Erika J. Lingohr; Luke Masson; Amee Manges; Josée Harel; Hans-W. Ackermann; Andrew M. Kropinski; Patrick Boerlin Bacteriophages with the Ability to Degrade Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli Biofilms, Viruses, Volume 4 (2012) no. 4, p. 471 | DOI:10.3390/v4040471
  • Zeshi Zhang; Elena Nadezhina; Kevin J. Wilkinson Quantifying Diffusion in a Biofilm of Streptococcus mutans, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Volume 55 (2011) no. 3, p. 1075 | DOI:10.1128/aac.01329-10
  • Olivier Habimana; Karine Steenkeste; Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart; Marie-Noëlle Bellon-Fontaine; Saulius Kulakauskas; Romain Briandet Diffusion of Nanoparticles in Biofilms Is Altered by Bacterial Cell Wall Hydrophobicity, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Volume 77 (2011) no. 1, p. 367 | DOI:10.1128/aem.02163-10
  • Thomas-Otavio Peulen; Kevin J. Wilkinson Diffusion of Nanoparticles in a Biofilm, Environmental Science Technology, Volume 45 (2011) no. 8, p. 3367 | DOI:10.1021/es103450g
  • Jérôme Labille; Jean-Yves Bottero Fate of Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media, Nanoethics and Nanotoxicology (2011), p. 291 | DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-20177-6_13
  • Ricardo Dunia; Roger Bonnecaze, Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference (2011), p. 2903 | DOI:10.1109/acc.2011.5991092
  • François Waharte; Karine Steenkeste; Romain Briandet; Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart Diffusion Measurements inside Biofilms by Image-Based Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching (FRAP) Analysis with a Commercial Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Volume 76 (2010) no. 17, p. 5860 | DOI:10.1128/aem.00754-10
  • Jun Hu; Kazuhiko Miyanaga; Yasunori Tanji Diffusion properties of bacteriophages through agarose gel membrane, Biotechnology Progress, Volume 26 (2010) no. 5, p. 1213 | DOI:10.1002/btpr.447
  • P. Vasickova; I. Pavlik; M. Verani; A. Carducci Issues Concerning Survival of Viruses on Surfaces, Food and Environmental Virology, Volume 2 (2010) no. 1, p. 24 | DOI:10.1007/s12560-010-9025-6
  • Shubhankar Nath; Gary M. Aron; Gregory M. Southard; Robert J. C. McLean Potential for Largemouth Bass Virus to Associate with and Gain Protection from Bacterial Biofilms, Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, Volume 22 (2010) no. 2, p. 95 | DOI:10.1577/h09-046.1
  • Marit Sletmoen; Dionne C.G. Klein; Bjørn T. Stokke Single-molecule characterization of microbial polysaccharides, Microbial Glycobiology (2010), p. 253 | DOI:10.1016/b978-0-12-374546-0.00014-6
  • Michael Hoa; Mausumi Syamal; Livjot Sachdeva; Richard Berk; James Coticchia Demonstration of Nasopharyngeal and Middle Ear Mucosal Biofilms in an Animal Model of Acute Otitis Media, Annals of Otology, Rhinology Laryngology, Volume 118 (2009) no. 4, p. 292 | DOI:10.1177/000348940911800410
  • M.I. Rudenko; S. Kühn; E.J. Lunt; D.W. Deamer; A.R. Hawkins; H. Schmidt Ultrasensitive Qβ phage analysis using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy on an optofluidic chip, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Volume 24 (2009) no. 11, p. 3258 | DOI:10.1016/j.bios.2009.04.005
  • M.A. LAKINS; J.L. MARRISON; P.J. O’TOOLE; M.W. VAN DER WOUDE Exploiting advances in imaging technology to study biofilms by applying multiphoton laser scanning microscopy as an imaging and manipulation tool, Journal of Microscopy, Volume 235 (2009) no. 2, p. 128 | DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03190.x
  • Kitao Fujiwara; Shun Hirokawa; Motohide Aoki Comparison of Fluorescence Correlation Spectrometry with the Ordinary Fluorescence Optical Configuration with Flow Cytometry as a Tool for Micrometer-level Size Determination, Analytical Sciences, Volume 24 (2008) no. 12, p. 1623 | DOI:10.2116/analsci.24.1623
  • R. Briandet; P. Lacroix-Gueu; M. Renault; S. Lecart; T. Meylheuc; E. Bidnenko; K. Steenkeste; M.-N. Bellon-Fontaine; M.-P. Fontaine-Aupart Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy To Study Diffusion and Reaction of Bacteriophages inside Biofilms, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Volume 74 (2008) no. 7, p. 2135 | DOI:10.1128/aem.02304-07
  • Byron F. Brehm-Stecher New Technologies for Imaging and Analysis of Individual Microbial Cells, Imaging Cellular and Molecular Biological Functions (2007), p. 313 | DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-71331-9_11
  • Jérôme Labille; Nicolas Fatin-Rouge; Jacques Buffle Local and Average Diffusion of Nanosolutes in Agarose Gel: The Effect of the Gel/Solution Interface Structure, Langmuir, Volume 23 (2007) no. 4, p. 2083 | DOI:10.1021/la0611155

Cité par 56 documents. Sources : Crossref


Commentaires - Politique


Il n'y a aucun commentaire pour cet article. Soyez le premier à écrire un commentaire !


Publier un nouveau commentaire:

Publier une nouvelle réponse: