Outline
Comptes Rendus

Ecology/Écologie
The impact of Acacia saligna invasion on Italian coastal dune EC habitats
Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 336 (2013) no. 7, pp. 364-369.

Abstract

Alien species can represent a threat to several ecosystems because they can alter species relationships and ecosystem function. In Italy, Acacia saligna is a major invader and it forms dense stands in coastal environments. We analyze the impact of A. saligna in Italian Mediterranean dune systems. We randomly sampled coastal dune vegetation and investigated its floristic composition with ordination techniques. We compared species richness in invaded and non-invaded plots with rarefaction curves and analyzed the frequency of focal and ruderal species. A. saligna invaded Mediterranean scrub (habitats 2250* and 2260) and coastal Pinus dune wood (habitat 2270*) and it is particularly prevalent in sunny areas of habitat 2270*. We observed an increase in ruderal species and a decrease in focal species in the invaded plots of habitat 2270*. We suggest that more open and disturbed areas are more prone to A. saligna invasion.

Supplementary Materials:
Supplementary material for this article is supplied as a separate file:

Metadata
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2013.06.004
Keywords: Alien species, Guild, Priority habitat, SCI

Silvia Del Vecchio 1; Alicia Acosta 1; Angela Stanisci 2

1 Biology department, Roma Tre University, V.le Marconi 446, 00146 Rome, Italy
2 Bioscience and Territory Department, Molise University, V.le Duca degli Abruzzi, 86039 Termoli, Italy
@article{CRBIOL_2013__336_7_364_0,
     author = {Silvia Del Vecchio and Alicia Acosta and Angela Stanisci},
     title = {The impact of {\protect\emph{Acacia} saligna} invasion on {Italian} coastal dune {EC} habitats},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Biologies},
     pages = {364--369},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {336},
     number = {7},
     year = {2013},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crvi.2013.06.004},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Silvia Del Vecchio
AU  - Alicia Acosta
AU  - Angela Stanisci
TI  - The impact of Acacia saligna invasion on Italian coastal dune EC habitats
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Biologies
PY  - 2013
SP  - 364
EP  - 369
VL  - 336
IS  - 7
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crvi.2013.06.004
LA  - en
ID  - CRBIOL_2013__336_7_364_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Silvia Del Vecchio
%A Alicia Acosta
%A Angela Stanisci
%T The impact of Acacia saligna invasion on Italian coastal dune EC habitats
%J Comptes Rendus. Biologies
%D 2013
%P 364-369
%V 336
%N 7
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crvi.2013.06.004
%G en
%F CRBIOL_2013__336_7_364_0
Silvia Del Vecchio; Alicia Acosta; Angela Stanisci. The impact of Acacia saligna invasion on Italian coastal dune EC habitats. Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 336 (2013) no. 7, pp. 364-369. doi : 10.1016/j.crvi.2013.06.004. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/biologies/articles/10.1016/j.crvi.2013.06.004/

Version originale du texte intégral

1 Introduction

The spread of species outside their original range and their establishment in new areas are currently considered as global processes posing significant challenges for the conservation of native biodiversity. Alien species often represent a threat to natural ecosystem functions because they can alter species relationships and can also affect ecosystem services [1–4].

Coastal ecosystems are particularly sensitive to the introduction of alien species [5–11]. Coastal plants species are stress-tolerant, and often specialized to survive in this environment. As a consequence of this specialization, plant species are not able to establish in different environment, and this makes coastal ecosystems particularly vulnerable to the displacement of native species and to biodiversity loss [12,13].

The genus Acacia includes more than 1350 species [14] distributed throughout South America, Africa, Asia and Australia [15]. Australian species of Acacia are especially significant invaders and have become major invaders in many areas outside Australia [16–19].

In Europe, the most invasive Australian acacias are Adealbata, A. longifolia, A. mearnsii, A. melanoxylon, A. pycnantha, A. retinodes, and A. saligna [18,20–23]. However, in Europe, the possible effects of invasion have been investigated only for A. dealbata and A. longifolia [20,21,23]. The ability of A. dealbata to spread in new areas appears to depend on its plasticity, in response to environmental and soil changes and on its resistance to fire, rapid vegetative reproduction and allelopathic potential [20]. A. longifolia can modify the chemical and microbial properties of the soil and can consequently affect native vegetation [21]. Seed dispersal mechanism in the secondary distribution areas is unclear too. In the native range, seeds are mainly dispersed by ants [24], while in tropical areas, seeds can be dispersed by frugivorous birds [25]. Some authors hypothesize a myrmecochory dispersal mechanism also in Europe, although this has not been demonstrated yet [24].

According to Celesti-Grapow et al. [26], the most invasive acacia in Italy is Acacia saligna Labill. This species has been introduced in coastal areas for reforestation purposes and for dune stabilization. However, its spread has not been controlled, and it currently occurs in many Italian regions: Liguria, Tuscany, Campania, Basilicata, Calabria, Apulia, Molise, Sicily, and Sardinia. In particular, this species is widespread on the Southern Adriatic coast, and it grows between the Mediterranean scrub and the evergreen forest of the fixed dunes in central and southern Italy [27].

A. saligna is a fast-growing species. It is characterized by both clonal and sexual reproduction; it is well adapted to arid environments and is fire-resistant [1,19,28]. Seeds can remain dormant for a long time, even for decades, forming a persistent soil seed bank [1]. This species has been widely planted outside its natural range, and it has become an invader in several areas, including South Africa, the Middle East, Portugal, France, Spain and Cyprus [1,16,18,20,21,29–32].

Although the invasive potential of A. saligna is now recognized [28,33], the impact of this species in invaded areas is still poorly explored. Studies conducted in the Middle East have shown that introduced A. saligna can modify soil characteristics by increasing the levels of total N and of organic matter, favoring the development of nitrophilous species [29]. On top of this, vascular plant species diversity can be lower in patches under A. saligna trees than in patches outside the tree canopy [16]. In South African Fynbos invaded by A. saligna, plant species richness, species cover and frequency can also decline, and these changes can modify the vertebrate and invertebrate guild structure [25]. However, to our knowledge, the effects of A. saligna on the European Mediterranean coasts have not yet been investigated.

For this reason, we analyzed the impact of A. saligna on Italian Adriatic dune ecosystems, which are the most invaded areas of the Italian coast. We selected this region as a representative sample of the dune systems invaded by this species in the Mediterranean coastal environments. In particular, we focused on EC habitats “Coastal dunes with Juniperus spp.” (habitat code: 2250*; hereafter “Juniper dune shrubland”), “Wooded dunes with Pinus pinea and/or Pinus pinaster” (habitat code: 2270*; hereafter “Pinus dune wood”) and “Cisto-Lavanduletalia dune sclerophyllous scrubs” (habitat code: 2260; hereafter “Dune sclerophyllous scrubs”), as they are the only suitable habitats for the establishment and development of bushes and trees plants species, such as A. saligna, in the study area. We investigated the distribution of this alien species in these target habitats and its influence on the total plant species richness and composition. As the presence of an alien plant can have differential effects on particular native groups of species or “plant guilds” [34,35], we identified from the total pool of species two distinct groups that are particularly sensitive to environmental changes [35,36]: focal and ruderal plant species. Focal species are the descriptors of dune habitats, according to the European Directive Habitat 92/43/EEC [37]. These species play a crucial role in determining the structure and functioning of the plant communities; they are particularly vulnerable to disturbance and habitat modification [38,39]. On the contrary, ruderal species tend to occupy disturbed areas [40–42]. We analyzed the impact of A. saligna on these guilds, since we assume that they are good indicators of the conservation status of coastal dune habitats.

2 Methods

The study was conducted in the dune system of the Molise region (Adriatic coast), where A. saligna forms dense stands. We analyzed a coastal strip of 11 km, including three Sites of Community Importance (SCIs): Foce Trigno–Marina di Petacciato (IT7228221), Foce Biferno–Litorale di Campomarino (IT7222216), and Foce Saccione–Bonifica Ramitelli (IT7222217). In particular, the SCI Foce Saccione–Bonifica Ramitelli (IT7222217) hosts the most northern stand of the population of Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. macrocarpa (EU habitat 2250*) along the Italian Adriatic coast [43,44]. As a consequence, the local Juniperus population has a remarkable biogeographic value and its conservation is relevant.

A. saligna was planted in the study area in approximately 1950 along a narrow strip between the Mediterranean scrub of mobile dunes and the Pinus afforestation area located on the fixed dunes. The plantation was established to create a vegetation belt to protect the pine wood from salt spray and the strong salty winds blowing from the sea [45–47].

We used photo-interpretation and a map of EU habitats [43] to identify the fixed dune vegetation of the study area. In a GIS environment, we selected all patches belonging to the following vegetation types: Pinus dune wood (habitat 2270*), Juniper dune shrubland (habitat 2250*) and Dune sclerophyllous scrubs (habitat 2260), which are the only habitats in the study area, where A. saligna individuals could establish and grow. We used these habitats as layers for a random sample, generating 70 random points with ArcGIS 9.2 within the polygon of vegetation that included the selected habitats. Then, we eliminated the points in inaccessible or non-vegetated areas, producing a sample of 55 points.

A GPS (GPSmap 60CSx) was then used to identify the georeferenced points in the field. At each point, we recorded all the vascular plants together with their percentage of cover on the Braun–Blanquet scale [48] in a 4 m × 4 m plot, which was previously estimated to be a sampling area of suitable size for the fixed dune vegetation [49,50]. In each point, we also recorded the percentage cover of the tree layer.

The focal species were successively identified and selected according to the list of diagnostic and characteristic species of the “Italian Interpretation Manual of the 92/43/EEC Directive habitats” [38]. Focal species of other habitats that were accidentally present in the target habitat (2250*, 2260, and 2270*) were not considered. All the other opportunistic species, identified according to Pignatti [42], were classified as “ruderal” species (Supplementary data).

2.1 Data analysis

Random sampling yielded a matrix of 55 relevés × 72 species. We analyzed the matrix with multivariate techniques (PCoA) using species as explanatory variables and the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index to measure the distance (R software [51]). The ordination scatter diagram allowed us to identify groups of relevés according to the floristic differences and similarities among different EU habitats. To test statistically the differences between these groups, we performed analysis of similarities (ANOSIM; 999 permutation). We then identified plots that were invaded or not invaded by A. saligna. Successively, we explore the distribution of A. saligna relative to the tree coverage of the Pinus dune wood (habitat 2270*) by a logistic regression model, with the dependent variable being the invaded or non-invaded plots and the independent variable being the percentage of cover of the tree layer (canopy cover).

To analyze the impact of A. saligna on species richness, we compared the invaded and non-invaded plots using rarefaction curves, which are simple tools to compare general trends of species richness (EstimateS v 8.0 [52]). The 95% confidence intervals of the rarefaction curves (ŜMao Tao) were calculated to determine whether species richness was significantly different among data sets.

Finally, to investigate the effect of A. saligna on the identified species guild on the flora of the habitats, we analyzed the frequency of focal and ruderal species (weighted by species cover) in invaded and non-invaded plots and verified the differences with a Chi-squared test (Statistica 7.0).

3 Results

The ordination scatter diagram obtained from the PCoA analysis separated the relevés into two groups according to their floristic composition (Fig. 1). The groups were statistically different (ANOSIM test; R: 0.4613; P < 0.001). One group included the shrubby vegetation of the Mediterranean scrub belonging to the Juniper dune shrubland (habitats 2250*) and the Dune sclerophyllous scrubs (habitat 2260). The other group was primarily represented by the Pinus dune wood (habitat 2270*). This ordination highlights that A. saligna is able to colonize both Mediterranean scrub (habitat 2250* and 2260) and Pinus dune wood (habitat 2270*), although it is more common in the latter vegetation type.

Fig. 1

PCoA scatter diagram of sampled plots, using species as explanatory variables. Only the first two axes are represented. Solid symbols represent Acacia saligna invaded plots; empty symbols represent non-invaded plots.

Most of the invaded plots were located in areas of lower tree coverage, suggesting that A. saligna grows better in open woods. The logistic regression model (extraction method = forward conditional; −2 log likelihood = 27.6) allowed correct classification of 68.8% of the cases (χ2 = 12.1, P < 0.001), and showed that the presence of A. saligna was significantly influenced by the percentage of canopy cover (score 0.051, P = 0.005; Fig. 2). The ecological equation was:

Fig. 2

Total number of Acacia saligna invaded plots in relation to canopy cover percentage classes. The presence of Acacia saligna decrease when the canopy cover is higher.

The rarefaction curves (based on the overlapping confidence intervals for ŜMao Tao) show similar species richness values in invaded and non-invaded plots (Figs. 3 and 4). However, we found significant differences in the identified guilds. In the Pinus dune wood plots (habitat 2270*), we found a higher frequency of ruderal species in the invaded plots and a higher frequency of focal species in the non-invaded plots (Chi-squared test; χ2 = 0.06; P < 0.001; Fig. 5). Conversely, in the Mediterranean scrub (habitats 2250* and 2260), we observed no differences in the frequency of the ruderal species or the focal species between the invaded and non-invaded plots (Chi-squared test; χ2 = 25.97; P = 0.8; Fig. 6).

Fig. 3

Rarefaction curves for all vascular plant species in Acacia saligna invaded and non-invaded plots of the Juniper dune shrubland (habitat 2250*), and Dune sclerophyllous scrubs (2260). The differences in species richness were not significant.

Fig. 4

Rarefaction curves for all vascular plant species in Acacia saligna invaded and non-invaded plots of the Pinus dune wood (habitat 2270*). The differences in specie richness were not significant.

Fig. 5

Frequency of ruderal species and focal species between Acacia saligna invaded and non-invaded plots of the habitat 2270*. Ruderal species: 56% in invaded plots; 32% in non-invaded plots. Focal species: 44% in invaded plots; 68% in non-invaded plots.

Fig. 6

Frequency of ruderal species and focal species between Acacia saligna invaded and non-invaded plots of the habitat 2250* and 2260. Ruderal species: 23% in invaded plots; 24% in non-invaded plots. Focal species: 77% in invaded plots; 76% in non-invaded plots.

4 Discussion

A. saligna is considered to be an invasive alien in several different countries. It can form dense stands due to its great ability to survive in harsh environments and to resprout after cutting or fire [1,19]. Our results showed that A. saligna is able to colonize the Mediterranean scrub (habitat 2250* and 2260) as well as wooded dunes with Pinus pinea and/or Pinus pinaster.

In particular, in our study area, this alien species is more invasive in the Pinus dune wood (habitat 2270*) than in Mediterranean scrub (habitats 2250* and 2260). It is probable that A. saligna began to spread from the original plantation towards the inland stands of Pinus dune wood and, toward the coastline, to the Mediterranean scrub (habitat 2250* and 2260). This colonization process occurs although the latter habitats appear to be more resistant to alien invasion. In fact, Mediterranean scrubs are close to the sea and grow on less mature and sandy soil. The shorter distance from the beach entails a stronger influence of the sea, a higher drought and mobility of the soil, which create harsher condition to A. saligna seedling germination and survival. Moreover, soil-heating favors seed germination in A. saligna [53]. We hypothesize that the germination of this species can be contrasted in the Mediterranean scrub (habitat 2250* and 2260) because this vegetation has a dense structure that shades the soil. It is likely that a lower solar irradiation entail a lower soil temperature, which could impair A. saligna seed germination. To support this hypothesis, we observed that in the Pinus dune wood (habitat 2270*), A. saligna invades sites where the tree canopy is open, with a higher solar irradiation at the soil level (such as wood gaps). So, we suggest that these features decrease the propagation potential of A. saligna in the Mediterranean scrub habitats.

Although we did not find any effect of A. saligna on total species richness, we observed significant results if species belonging to particular guilds were considered. In the invaded plots of the Pinus dune wood (habitat 2270*), we found an increase in ruderal grass species, typical of disturbed environments with a significant decrease in focal species. Previous studies demonstrated that other invasive Acacia species proliferate in disturbed areas, such as abandoned fields or after disturbance events (e.g. fire, soil movement) [19,33]. Other quoted studies have found that in Fynbos shrublands, forbs represent the major growth form in areas that have been invaded by A. saligna for a long time. In light of our findings, it is possible that the presence of A. saligna is favored by the presence of more open, disturbed sites. However, this species can also promote the proliferation of ruderal species. Acacias are N-fixing species and produce substantial amounts of litter (including leaves, twigs, flowers, and fruits). The litter can modify the properties of the soil by enhancing the N pool and the organic matter content [23,25,29]. The vegetation of coastal dunes is sensitive to soil modification caused by litter accumulation from invasive plants [54–56]. Native species of semi-fixed and fixed dunes are, in fact, adapted to grow in poor soils [57], and soil modification as surrogate for disturbance can alter the turnover of species, favoring ruderal species, which are often nitrophilous [58]. In agreement with this finding, A. saligna is related to an increase of ruderal species in the coastal dunes, such as the small annuals Bromus madritensis, Geranium purpureum, Oryzopsis miliacea, and Parietaria officinalis, which grow in mesotrophic soils on coastal sand substrate [38]. We suggest that A. saligna could establish in open and disturbed areas where ruderal species already occur; otherwise, it could also be the cause of the increase of ruderals in the understory flora of Pinus dune wood (EC habitat 2270*) by habitat modification. However, further studies are needed to elucidate this, also investigating the population structure in dense and open areas.

We observed that A. saligna affected only focal and ruderal species, not the total pool of species. This finding can depend on the time of colonization by the invading species. Long time invaded areas show a stronger impact of alien species on the native flora [59]. Since A. saligna has been introduced relatively recently (approximately 1950), it is possible that currently only specific guilds have been affected by the more or less recent colonization process. Thus, it is possible that our findings represent only an early stage of the A. saligna invasion process, whereas other effects could be observed at a later stage. In fact, although no significant differences were recorded for the plant species guilds of Mediterranean scrub, we cannot exclude changes in the near future.

These results may also have useful implications for coastal ecosystem management. In fact, it was noted that A. saligna invasive processes represent an important threat to the conservation of EC priority habitat 2270* in Italian sand dunes [38]. For this reason, the monitoring and management of this invasive species should be thoroughly planned.

Finally, we could highlight that Acacia species management in invaded areas has recently become a relevant research topic. The main strategies to control Acacia species spread are eradication or biological control [60,61]. However, it seems that species removal is often not enough to eliminate this invader successfully [19]. It has been suggested that management plans should combine the species removal with the reduction of the seed bank and native species planting in order to contrast the species spread effectively [19,33,53].

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.


References

[1] M. Strydom; K.J. Esler; A.R. Wood Acacia saligna seed banks: sampling methods dynamics, Western Cape, South Africa, S. Afr. J. Bot., Volume 79 (2012), pp. 140-147

[2] D. Simberloff How common are invasion-induced ecosystem impacts?, Biol. Inv., Volume 13 (2011), pp. 1255-1268

[3] M. Vilá; J.L. Espinar; M. Hejda; P.E. Hulme; V. Jarosik; J.L. Maron; J. Pergl; U. Schaffner; Y. Sun; P. Pyšek Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species communities and ecosystems, Ecol. Lett., Volume 14 (2011), pp. 702-708

[4] M. Chytrý; J. Wild; P. Pyšek; L. Tichý; J. Danihelka; I. Knollova Maps of the level of invasion of the Czech Republic by alien plants, Preslia, Volume 81 (2009), pp. 187-207

[5] M.L. Carranza; M. Carboni; S. Feola; A. Acosta Landscape-scale patterns of alien plant species on coastal dunes: the case of iceplant in central Italy, Appl. Veg. Sci., Volume 13 (2010), pp. 135-145

[6] M. Carboni; W. Thuiller; F. Izzi; A. Acosta Disentangling the relative effects of environmental versus human factors on the abundance of native and alien plant species in Mediterranean sandy shores, Divers. Distrib., Volume 16 (2010), pp. 537-546

[7] B. Padron; M. Nogales; A. Traveset; M. Vilà; A. Martinez-Abrain; D.P. Padilla; P. Marrero Integration of invasive Opuntia spp. by native and alien seed dispersers in the Mediterranean area and the Canary Islands, Biol. Inv., Volume 13 (2011), pp. 831-844

[8] P. Lorenzo; A. Palomera-Pérez; M.J. Reigosa; L. González Allelopathic interference of invasive Acacia dealbata Link on the physiological parameters of native understory species, Plant Ecol., Volume 212 (2011), pp. 403-412

[9] L. Gonzáles; X.C. Souto; M.J. Reigosa Allelopathic effects of Acacia melanoxylon RBR phyllodes during their decomposition, Forest Ecol. Manag., Volume 77 (1995), pp. 53-63

[10] A. Acosta; C.F. Izzi; A. Stanisci Comparison of native and alien plant traits in Mediterranean coastal dunes, Commun. Ecol., Volume 7 (2006), pp. 35-41

[11] A. Stanisci; A. Acosta; A. Di Iorio; M. Vergalito Leaf and root trait variability of alien and native species along Adriatic coastal dunes (Italy), Plant Biosyst., Volume 144 (2010), pp. 47-52

[12] M. Carboni; R. Santoro; A. Acosta Dealing with scarce data to understand how environmental gradients and propagule pressure shape fine-scale alien distribution patterns on coastal dunes, J. Veg. Sci., Volume 22 (2011), pp. 751-765

[13] M.T. Sykes; J.B. Wilson Vegetation of a coastal sand dune system in southern New-Zealand, J Veg. Sci., Volume 2 (1991), pp. 531-538

[14] B.R. Maslin; J.T. Miller; D.S. Seigler Overview of the generic status of Acacia (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae), Aust. Syst. Bot., Volume 16 (2003), pp. 1-18

[15] P. Van de Wouw; C. Echeverria; J.M. Rey-Benayas; M. Holmgren Persistent Acacia savannas replace Mediterranean sclerophyllous forests in South America, Forest Ecol. Manag., Volume 262 (2011), pp. 1100-1108

[16] N. Odat; W. Al Khateeb; R. Muhaidat; M. Al U’datt; L. Irshiad The effect of exotic Acacia saligna tree on plant biodiversity of Northern Jordan, Int. J. Agr. Biol., Volume 13 (2011), pp. 823-826

[17] M. Herrera; J.A. Campos Flora alóctona invasora en Bizkaia, Instituto para la Sostenibilidad de Bizkaia, Bizkaia, Pais Vasco, España, 2010

[18] D.M. Richardson; J. Carruthers; C. Hui; F.A.C. Impson; J.T. Miller; M.P. Robertson; M. Rouget; J.-J. Le Roux; J.R.U. Wilson Human-mediated introductions of Australian acacias–a global experiment in biogeography, Divers. Distrib., Volume 17 (2011), pp. 771-787

[19] D.C. Le Maitre; M. Gaertner; E. Marchante; E.J. Ens; P.M. Holmes; A. Pauchard; P.J. O’Farrell; A.M. Rogers; R. Blanchard; J. Blignaut; D.M. Richardson Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration, Divers. Distrib., Volume 17 (2011), pp. 1015-1029

[20] P. Lorenzo; L. González; M.J. Reigosa The genus Acacia as invader: the characteristic case of Acacia dealbata Link in Europe, Ann. Forest Sci., Volume 67 (2010) no. 11, pp. 1-11

[21] E. Marchante; A. Kjoller; S. Struwe; H. Freitas Short- and long-term impacts of Acacia longifolia invasion on the belowground processes of a Mediterranean coastal dune ecosystem, Appl Soil Ecol., Volume 40 (2008), pp. 210-217

[22] H. Marchante; H. Freitas; J.H. Hoffmann Assessing the suitability and safety of a well-known bud-galling wasp, Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae, for biological control of Acacia longifolia in Portugal, Biol. Control, Volume 56 (2011), pp. 193-201

[23] C. Hellmann; R. Sutter; K.G. Rascher; C. Maguas; O. Correia; C. Werner Impact of an exotic N-2-fixing Acacia on composition and N status of a native Mediterranean community, Acta Oecol.,Int. J. Ecol., Volume 37 (2011), pp. 43-50

[24] D. Montesinos; S. Castro; S. Rodriguez-Echeverria Invasive acacias experience higher ant seed removal rates at the invasion edges, Web Ecol., Volume 12 (2012), pp. 33-37 ([317–332])

[25] P.M. Holmes; R.M. Cowling The effects of invasion by Acacia saligna on the guild structure and regeneration capabilities of South African fynbos shrublands, J. Appl. Ecol., Volume 34 (1997)

[26] L. Celesti-Grapow; F. Pretto; E. Carli; C. Blasi, Università La Sapienza, Roma (2010), p. 208

[27] C.F. Izzi; A. Acosta; M.L. Carranza; G. Ciaschetti; F. Conti; L. Di Martino; G. D’Orazio; A. Frattaroli; A. Stanisci Il censimento della flora vascolare degli ambienti dunali costieri dell’Italia centrale, Fitosociologia, Volume 44 (2007), pp. 129-137

[28] C. Birnbaum; L.G. Barrett; P.H. Thrall; M.R. Leishman Mutualisms are not constraining cross-continental invasion success of Acacia species within Australia, Divers. Distrib., Volume 18 (2012), pp. 962-976

[29] S.G. Yelenik; W.D. Stock; D.M. Richardson Ecosystem level impacts of invasive Acacia saligna in the South African fynbos, Restor. Ecol., Volume 12 (2004), pp. 44-51

[30] S. Derbel; J. Cortina; M. Chaieb Acacia saligna plantation impact on soil surface properties and vascular plant species composition in central Tunisia, Arid Land Res. Manag., Volume 23 (2009), pp. 28-46

[31] D. Lehrer; N. Becker; P. Bar The economic impact of the invasion of Acacia saligna in Israel, Int. J. Sust. Dev. World, Volume 18 (2011), pp. 118-127

[32] F. Gutierres; A. Gil; E. Reis; A. Lob; C. Neto; H. Calado; J.C. Costa Acacia saligna (Labill.) H. Wendl in the Sesimbra County: invaded habitats and potential distribution modeling, J. Coastal Res., Volume 64 (2011), pp. 403-407

[33] J.R.U. Wilson; C. Gairifo; M.R. Gibson; M. Arianoutsou; B.B. Bakar; S. Baret; L. Celesti-Grapow; J.M. DiTomaso; J.M. Dufour-Dror; C. Kueffer; C.A. Kull; J.H. Hoffmann; F.A.C. Impson; L.L. Loope; E. Marchante; H. Marchante; J.L. Moore; D.J. Murphy; J. Tassin; A. Witt; R.D. Zenni; D.M. Richardson Risk assessment, eradication, and biological control: global efforts to limit Australian acacia invasions, Divers. Distrib., Volume 17 (2011), pp. 1030-1046

[34] P. Dostal Plant competitive interactions and invasiveness: searching for the effects of phylogenetic relatedness and origin on competition intensity, Am. Nat., Volume 177 (2011), pp. 655-667

[35] R.J. Lambeck Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation, Conserv. Biol., Volume 11 (1997), pp. 849-856

[36] M. Chytrý Vegetation of the Czech Republic: diversity, ecology, history and dynamics, Preslia, Volume 84 (2012), pp. 427-504

[37] D.E. European Commission Interpretation manual of European Union habitats, EUR 27, Brussels, BE, 2007

[38] E. Biondi; C. Blasi; S. Burrascano; S. Casavecchia; R. Copiz; E. Del Vico; D. Galdenzi; D. Gigante; C. Lasen; G. Spampinato; R. Venanzoni; L. Zivkovic Italian interpretation manual of the 92/43/EEC directive habitats, Società Botanica Italiana. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della tutela del territorio e del mare, D.P.N, 2009 (Available at http://vnr.unipg.it/habitat/)

[39] A. Chiarucci; G. Bacaro; D. Rocchini Quantifying plant species diversity in a Natura 2000 network: old ideas and new proposals, Biol. Conserv., Volume 141 (2008), pp. 2608-2618

[40] J.J. Navarra; P.F. Quintana-Ascencio Spatial pattern and composition of the Florida scrub seed bank and vegetation along an anthropogenic disturbance gradient, Appl. Veg. Sci., Volume 15 (2012), pp. 349-358

[41] M. Abd El-Ghani; M.N. Shehata; A. Mobarak; R. Bakr Factors affecting the diversity and distribution of synanthropic vegetation in urban habitats of the Nile Delta, Egypt, Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat., Volume 23 (2012), pp. 327-337

[42] S. Pignatti Bioindicator values of vascular plants of the Flora of Italy, Braun Blanquetia, Volume 39 (2005), pp. 3-97

[43] A. Stanisci; A. Acosta; M.L. Carranza; S. Feola; M. Giuliano Gli habitat di interesse comnunitario sul litorale molisano e il loro valore naturalistico su base floristica, Fitosociologia, Volume 44 (2007), pp. 171-176

[44] F. Taffetani; E. Biondi La vegetazione del litorale molisano e pugliese tra le foci dei fiumi Biferno e Fortore (Adriatico centro meridionale), Colloques phytosociologiques XXVIII: phytosociologie littorale et taxonomie, 1989, pp. 323-349

[45] I.N.F.C. Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei Serbatoi Forestali di Carbonio, MiPAAF (G. Tabacchi; F. De Natale; L. Di Cosmo; A. Floris; C. Gagliano; P. Gasparini; L. Genchi; G. Scrinzi; V. Tosi, eds.), Ispettorato Generale Corpo Forestale dello Stato, CRA–MPF, Trento, 2007

[46] O. Ciancio; R. Mercurio; S. Nocentini, Annali Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura, Arezzo ( 1981-1982 ), p. 731

[47] O. Ciancio; F. Iovino; V. Mendicino; G. Mneguzzato; S. Nicolaci; S. Nocentini Structure and management of Aleppo pine forests, Options Médit. Serie, Volume A (2007), pp. 61-72

[48] J. Braun-Blanquet Plant sociology, Mc Graw-Hill BookComp, New York and London, 1932

[49] A. Acosta; M.L. Carranza; L. Di Martino; A. Frattaroli; C.F. Izzi; A. Stanisci Patterns of native and alien plant species occurrence on coastal dunes in Central Italy (B. Tokarska-Guzik; J.H. Brock; G. Brundu; L. Child; C.C. Daehler; P. Pyšek, eds.), Plant Invasions: human perception, ecological impacts and management, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, 2008, pp. 235-248

[50] A. Acosta; M.L. Carranza; C.F. Izzi Are there habitats that contribute best to plant species diversity in coastal dunes?, Biodiv. Conserv., Volume 18 (2009), pp. 1087-1098

[51] R. R-Development-Core-Team A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2012

[52] R.K. Colwell EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, Version 8.0.0., 2006 (User's Guide and application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates)

[53] O. Cohen; J. Riov; J. Katan; A. Gamliel; P. Bar Reducing persistent seed banks of invasive plants by soil solarization-the case of Acacia saligna, Weed Sci., Volume 56 (2008), pp. 860-865

[54] M. Isermann; M. Diekmann; S. Heemann Effects of the expansion by Hippophae rhamnoides on plant species richness in coastal dunes, Appl. Veg. Sci., Volume 10 (2007), pp. 273-280

[55] S. Rodriguez-Echeverria; J.A. Crisostomo; C. Nabais; H. Freitas Belowground mutualists and the invasive ability of Acacia longifolia in coastal dunes of Portugal, Biol. Inv., Volume 11 (2009), pp. 651-661

[56] R. Santoro; T. Jucker; M.L. Carranza; A. Acosta Assessing the effects of Carpobrotus invasion on coastal dune soils. Does the nature of the invaded habit?, Commun. Ecol., Volume 12 (2011), pp. 234-240

[57] L.J.L. Van den Berg; H.B.M. Tomassen; J.G.M. Roelofs; R. Bobbink Effects of nitrogen enrichment on coastal dune grassland: a mesocosm study, Environ. Pollut., Volume 138 (2005), pp. 77-85

[58] N. Maurel; S. Salmon; J.F. Ponge; N. Machon; J. Moret; A. Muratet Does the invasive species Reynoutria japonica have an impact on soil and flora in urban wastelands?, Biol. Inv., Volume 12 (2010), pp. 1709-1719

[59] M. Gaertner; A. Den Breeyen; C. Hui; D.M. Richardson Impacts of alien plant invasions on species richness in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: a meta-analysis, Prog. Phys. Geogr., Volume 33 (2009), pp. 319-338

[60] V.C. Moran; J.H. Hoffmann Conservation of the fynbos biome in the Cape Floral Region: the role of biological control in the management of invasive alien trees, Biocontrol, Volume 57 (2012), pp. 139-149

[61] H. Kaplan; H.W.F. Van Zyl; J.J. Le Roux; D.M. Richardson; J.R. U Wilson Distribution and management of Acacia implexa (Benth.) in South Africa: a suitable target for eradication?, S. Afr. J. Bot., Volume 83 (2012), pp. 23-35


Comments - Policy