Disclaimer: this translation is made available to the public with the aim of broadening the scientific dissemination of the original article, but has not been verified by either the authors (unless their names appear among those of the authors of the translation) or the journal's editorial team. This version does not engage the scientific responsibility of the editors. The original version remains the only scientific reference.
Abstract translation
Mots-clés : Stress réplicatif, Conflits réplication–transcription, R-loops, Instabilité génomique, Oncogènes, Cancer
CC-BY 4.0
Jonathan Heuzé; Yea-Lih Lin; Armelle Langronne; Jérôme Poli; Philippe Pasero. Impact des R-loops sur le stress réplicatif induit par les oncogènes dans les cellules cancéreuses (2023) doi : 10.5802/crbiol.123-fr (Jonathan Heuzé; Yea-Lih Lin; Armelle Lengronne; Jérôme Poli; Philippe Pasero. Impact of R-loops on oncogene-induced replication stress in cancer cells. Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 346 (2023), pp. 95-105. doi: 10.5802/crbiol.12)
@article{CRBIOL_2023__346_G2_95_0,
author = {Jonathan Heuz\'e and Yea-Lih Lin and Armelle Lengronne and J\'er\^ome Poli and Philippe Pasero},
title = {Impact of {R-loops} on oncogene-induced replication stress in cancer cells},
journal = {Comptes Rendus. Biologies},
pages = {95--105},
year = {2023},
publisher = {Acad\'emie des sciences, Paris},
volume = {346},
doi = {10.5802/crbiol.123},
language = {en},
}
TY - JOUR AU - Jonathan Heuzé AU - Yea-Lih Lin AU - Armelle Lengronne AU - Jérôme Poli AU - Philippe Pasero TI - Impact of R-loops on oncogene-induced replication stress in cancer cells JO - Comptes Rendus. Biologies PY - 2023 SP - 95 EP - 105 VL - 346 PB - Académie des sciences, Paris DO - 10.5802/crbiol.123 LA - en ID - CRBIOL_2023__346_G2_95_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Jonathan Heuzé %A Yea-Lih Lin %A Armelle Lengronne %A Jérôme Poli %A Philippe Pasero %T Impact of R-loops on oncogene-induced replication stress in cancer cells %J Comptes Rendus. Biologies %D 2023 %P 95-105 %V 346 %I Académie des sciences, Paris %R 10.5802/crbiol.123 %G en %F CRBIOL_2023__346_G2_95_0
[1] Building a double hexamer of DNA helicase at eukaryotic replication origins, EMBO J., Volume 30 (2011), pp. 4853-4855 | DOI
[2] Replisome structure and conformational dynamics underlie fork progression past obstacles, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., Volume 21 (2009), pp. 336-343 | DOI
[3] DNA replication origin activation in space and time, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., Volume 16 (2015), pp. 360-374 | DOI
[4] Think global, act local—how to regulate S phase from individual replication origins, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., Volume 10 (2000), pp. 178-186 | DOI
[5] DNA replication in eukaryotic cells, Annu. Rev. Biochem., Volume 71 (2002), pp. 333-374 | DOI
[6] Regulation of early events in chromosome replication, Curr. Biol., Volume 14 (2004), p. R778-R786 | DOI
[7] Cellular DNA replicases: components and dynamics at the replication fork, Annu. Rev. Biochem., Volume 74 (2005), pp. 283-315 | DOI
[8] GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks, Nat. Cell Biol., Volume 8 (2006), pp. 358-366 | DOI
[9] Origin firing regulations to control genome replication timing, Genes (Basel), Volume 10 (2019), 199 | DOI
[10] Mammalian DNA replication timing, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., Volume 13 (2021), a040162 | DOI
[11] The replication stress response on a narrow path between genomic instability and inflammation, Front. Cell Dev. Biol., Volume 9 (2021), 702584 | DOI
[12] The fate of two unstoppable trains after arriving destination: replisome disassembly during DNA replication termination, Front. Cell Dev. Biol., Volume 9 (2021), 658003
[13] Causes and consequences of replication stress, Nat. Cell Biol., Volume 16 (2014), pp. 2-9 | DOI
[14] The essential kinase ATR: ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., Volume 18 (2017), pp. 622-636 | DOI
[15] Four pillars of the S-phase checkpoint, Genes Dev., Volume 27 (2013), pp. 227-233 | DOI
[16] Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts, Mol. Cell, Volume 6 (2000), pp. 839-849 | DOI
[17] Human Claspin is required for replication checkpoint control, J. Biol. Chem., Volume 278 (2003), pp. 30057-30062 | DOI
[18] The human Tim/Tipin complex coordinates an intra-S checkpoint response to UV that slows replication fork displacement, Mol. Cell. Biol., Volume 27 (2007), pp. 3131-3142 | DOI
[19] Hallmarks of DNA replication stress, Mol. Cell, Volume 82 (2022), pp. 2298-2314 | DOI
[20] Replication fork reversal in eukaryotes: from dead end to dynamic response, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., Volume 16 (2015), pp. 207-220 | DOI
[21] Replication fork reversal: players and guardians, Mol. Cell, Volume 68 (2017), pp. 830-833 | DOI
[22] et al. MRX increases chromatin accessibility at stalled replication forks to promote nascent DNA resection and cohesin loading, Mol. Cell, Volume 77 (2020), pp. 395-410 (e393) | DOI
[23] Nucleases acting at stalled forks: how to reboot the replication program with a few shortcuts, Annu. Rev. Genet., Volume 51 (2017), pp. 477-499 | DOI
[24] Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11, Cell, Volume 145 (2011), pp. 529-542 | DOI
[25] A fork in the road: where homologous recombination and stalled replication fork protection part ways, Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol., Volume 113 (2020), pp. 14-26 | DOI
[26] Exploiting DNA replication stress for cancer treatment, Cancer Res., Volume 79 (2019), pp. 1730-1739 | DOI
[27] Signaling pathways of replication stress in yeast, FEMS Yeast Res., Volume 17 (2017), fow101
[28] Redox-sensitive alteration of replisome architecture safeguards genome integrity, Science, Volume 358 (2017), pp. 797-802 | DOI
[29] et al. Excessive reactive oxygen species induce transcription-dependent replication stress, Nat. Commun., Volume 14 (2023), 1791 | DOI
[30] dNTP pools determine fork progression and origin usage under replication stress, EMBO J., Volume 31 (2012), pp. 883-894 | DOI
[31] DNA building blocks at the foundation of better survival, Cell Cycle, Volume 2 (2003), pp. 171-173 | DOI
[32] et al. Mec1 is activated at the onset of normal S phase by low-dNTP pools impeding DNA replication, Mol. Cell, Volume 78 (2020), pp. 396-410 | DOI
[33] RNase H and postreplication repair protect cells from ribonucleotides incorporated in DNA, Mol. Cell, Volume 45 (2012), pp. 99-110 | DOI
[34] et al. Enzymatic removal of ribonucleotides from DNA is essential for mammalian genome integrity and development, Cell, Volume 149 (2012), pp. 1008-1022 | DOI
[35] Processing ribonucleotides incorporated during eukaryotic DNA replication, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., Volume 17 (2016), pp. 350-363 | DOI
[36] High density of unrepaired genomic ribonucleotides leads to Topoisomerase 1-mediated severe growth defects in absence of ribonucleotide reductase, Nucleic Acids Res., Volume 48 (2020), pp. 4274-4297 | DOI
[37] Transcription-mediated replication hindrance: a major driver of genome instability, Genes Dev., Volume 33 (2019), pp. 1008-1026 | DOI
[38] Toxic R-loops: cause or consequence of replication stress?, DNA Repair (Amst.), Volume 107 (2021), 103199 | DOI
[39] R loops: from physiological to pathological roles, Cell, Volume 179 (2019), pp. 604-618 | DOI
[40] Walking a tightrope: the complex balancing act of R-loops in genome stability, Mol. Cell, Volume 82 (2022), pp. 2267-2297 | DOI
[41] DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer, Annu. Rev. Pathol.: Mech. Dis., Volume 10 (2015), pp. 425-448 | DOI
[42] Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development, Cell, Volume 145 (2011), pp. 435-446 | DOI
[43] Sources, resolution and physiological relevance of R-loops and RNA–DNA hybrids, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., Volume 23 (2022), pp. 521-540 | DOI
[44] et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication, Nature, Volume 444 (2006), pp. 638-642 | DOI
[45] et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints, Nature, Volume 444 (2006), pp. 633-637 | DOI
[46] Targeting ATR and Chk1 kinases for cancer treatment: a new model for new (and old) drugs, Mol. Oncol., Volume 5 (2011), pp. 368-373 | DOI
[47] ATR signaling can drive cells into senescence in the absence of DNA breaks, Genes Dev., Volume 22 (2008), pp. 297-302 | DOI
[48] Thresholds of replication stress signaling in cancer development and treatment, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., Volume 19 (2012), pp. 5-7 | DOI
[49] et al. Exploiting oncogene-induced replicative stress for the selective killing of Myc-driven tumors, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., Volume 18 (2011), pp. 1331-1335 | DOI
[50] The ATR barrier to replication-born DNA damage, DNA Repair, Volume 9 (2010), pp. 1249-1255 | DOI
[51] et al. Overexpression of Claspin and Timeless protects cancer cells from replication stress in a checkpoint-independent manner, Nat. Commun., Volume 10 (2019), 910 | DOI
[52] Transcription–replication conflict orientation modulates R-loop levels and activates distinct DNA damage responses, Cell, Volume 170 (2017), pp. 774-786 (e719) | DOI
[53] Consequences and resolution of transcription–replication conflicts, Life (Basel), Volume 11 (2021), 637
[54] The organization of the bacterial genome, Annu. Rev. Genet., Volume 42 (2008), pp. 211-233 | DOI
[55] Spatial and temporal control of evolution through replication–transcription conflicts, Trends Microbiol., Volume 25 (2017), pp. 515-521 | DOI
[56] Replication–transcription conflicts generate R-loops that orchestrate bacterial stress survival and pathogenesis, Cell, Volume 170 (2017), pp. 787-799 (e718) | DOI
[57] Transcription shapes DNA replication initiation and termination in human cells, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., Volume 26 (2019), pp. 67-77 | DOI
[58] Replication landscape of the human genome, Nat. Commun., Volume 7 (2016), 10208 | DOI
[59] et al. Genome-scale analysis of metazoan replication origins reveals their organization in specific but flexible sites defined by conserved features, Genome Res., Volume 21 (2011), pp. 1438-1449 | DOI
[60] et al. Topoisomerase 1 prevents replication stress at R-loop-enriched transcription termination sites, Nat. Commun., Volume 11 (2020), 3940 | DOI
[61] Defining R-loop classes and their contributions to genome instability, DNA Repair (Amst.), Volume 106 (2021), 103182 | DOI
[62] Prevalent, dynamic, and conserved R-loop structures associate with specific epigenomic signatures in mammals, Mol. Cell, Volume 63 (2016), pp. 167-178 | DOI
[63] et al. Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription, Nat. Cell Biol., Volume 11 (2009), pp. 1315-1324 | DOI
[64] Intragenic origins due to short G1 phases underlie oncogene-induced DNA replication stress, Nature, Volume 555 (2018), pp. 112-116 | DOI
[65] ATR checkpoint kinase and CRL1betaTRCP collaborate to degrade ASF1a and thus repress genes overlapping with clusters of stalled replication forks, Genes Dev., Volume 28 (2014), pp. 875-887 | DOI
[66] et al. Mec1, INO80, and the PAF1 complex cooperate to limit transcription replication conflicts through RNAPII removal during replication stress, Genes Dev., Volume 30 (2016), pp. 337-354 | DOI
[67] WDR82/PNUTS-PP1 prevents transcription–replication conflicts by promoting RNA polymerase II degradation on chromatin, Cell Rep., Volume 33 (2020), 108469 | DOI
[68] et al. A regulatory phosphorylation site on Mec1 controls chromatin occupancy of RNA polymerases during replication stress, EMBO J., Volume 40 (2021), e108439 | DOI
[69] RNases H: structure and mechanism, DNA Rep. (Amst.), Volume 84 (2019), 102672 | DOI
[70] Functions of replication protein A as a sensor of R loops and a regulator of RNaseH1, Mol. Cell, Volume 65 (2017), pp. 832-847 (e834) | DOI
[71] RNase H1 and H2 are differentially regulated to process RNA–DNA hybrids, Cell Rep., Volume 29 (2019), pp. 2890-2900 (e2895) | DOI
[72] Aicardi–Goutieres syndrome and the type I interferonopathies, Nat. Rev. Immunol., Volume 15 (2015), pp. 429-440 | DOI
[73] RNase H2, mutated in Aicardi–Goutières syndrome, resolves co-transcriptional R-loops to prevent DNA breaks and inflammation, Nat. Commun., Volume 13 (2022), 2961 | DOI
[74] Senataxin: genome guardian at the interface of transcription and neurodegeneration, J. Mol. Biol., Volume 429 (2017), pp. 3181-3195 | DOI
[75] Sen1 is a key regulator of transcription-driven conflicts, Mol. Cell, Volume 82 (2022), pp. 2952-2966 | DOI
[76] et al. Branchpoint translocation by fork remodelers as a general mechanism of R-loop removal, Cell Rep., Volume 41 (2022), 111749 | DOI
[77] The interplay of RNA:DNA hybrid structure and G-quadruplexes determines the outcome of R-loop-replisome collisions, Elife, Volume 10 (2021), e72286 | DOI
[78] The DNA damage response acts as a safeguard against harmful DNA–RNA hybrids of different origins, EMBO Rep., Volume 20 (2019), e47250 | DOI
[79] R-loop formation during S phase is restricted by PrimPol-mediated repriming, EMBO J., Volume 38 (2019), e99793 | DOI
[80] The end-joining factor Ku acts in the end-resection of double strand break-free arrested replication forks, Nat. Commun., Volume 8 (2017), 1982 | DOI
[81] Direct visualization of transcription–replication conflicts reveals post-replicative DNA:RNA hybrids, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., Volume 30 (2023), pp. 348-359 | DOI
[82] et al. Fork cleavage-religation cycle and active transcription mediate replication restart after fork stalling at Co-transcriptional R-loops, Mol. Cell, Volume 77 (2020), pp. 528-541 (e528) | DOI
[83] et al. RNA:DNA hybrids from Okazaki fragments contribute to establish the Ku-mediated barrier to replication-fork degradation, Mol. Cell, Volume 83 (2023), pp. 1061-1074 | DOI
[84] R-loops as Janus-faced modulators of DNA repair, Nat. Cell Biol., Volume 23 (2021), pp. 305-313 | DOI
[85] SAMHD1 and the innate immune response to cytosolic DNA during DNA replication, Curr. Opin. Immunol., Volume 56 (2019), pp. 24-30 | DOI
[86] et al. SAMHD1 acts at stalled replication forks to prevent interferon induction, Nature, Volume 557 (2018), pp. 57-61 | DOI
[87] et al. R-loop-derived cytoplasmic RNA–DNA hybrids activate an immune response, Nature, Volume 613 (2023), pp. 187-194 | DOI
Cited by Sources:
Comments - Policy