Plan
Comptes Rendus

Erratum to “Sedimentology and chemostratigraphy of the Bwipe Neoproterozoic cap dolostones (Ghana, Volta Basin): A record of microbial activity in a peritidal environment” [C. R. Geoscience 339 (2007) 223–239]
Comptes Rendus. Géoscience, Volume 339 (2007) no. 7, pp. 516-518.
Métadonnées
Reçu le :
Accepté le :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1016/j.crte.2007.05.004
Anne Nédélec 1 ; Pascal Affaton 2 ; Christian France-Lanord 3 ; André Charrière 1 ; Javier Alvaro 4

1 UMR 5563–LMTG, université Paul-Sabatier, 14, avenue Édouard-Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
2 UMR 6635–CEREGE, Europôle méditerranéen de l’Arbois, BP 80, 13545 Aix-en-Provence cedex 04, France
3 UPR 2300–CRPG, 15, rue Notre-Dame-des-Pauvres, 54501 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
4 UMR 801–LP3, UFR Sciences de la Terre, université Lille-1, bâtiment SN5, 59655 Villeneuve-d’Ascq cedex, France
@article{CRGEOS_2007__339_7_516_0,
     author = {Anne N\'ed\'elec and Pascal Affaton and Christian France-Lanord and Andr\'e Charri\`ere and Javier Alvaro},
     title = {Erratum to {{\textquotedblleft}Sedimentology} and chemostratigraphy of the {Bwipe} {Neoproterozoic} cap dolostones {(Ghana,} {Volta} {Basin):} {A} record of microbial activity in a peritidal environment{\textquotedblright} {[C.} {R.} {Geoscience} 339 (2007) 223{\textendash}239]},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. G\'eoscience},
     pages = {516--518},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {339},
     number = {7},
     year = {2007},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crte.2007.05.004},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Anne Nédélec
AU  - Pascal Affaton
AU  - Christian France-Lanord
AU  - André Charrière
AU  - Javier Alvaro
TI  - Erratum to “Sedimentology and chemostratigraphy of the Bwipe Neoproterozoic cap dolostones (Ghana, Volta Basin): A record of microbial activity in a peritidal environment” [C. R. Geoscience 339 (2007) 223–239]
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Géoscience
PY  - 2007
SP  - 516
EP  - 518
VL  - 339
IS  - 7
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crte.2007.05.004
LA  - en
ID  - CRGEOS_2007__339_7_516_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Anne Nédélec
%A Pascal Affaton
%A Christian France-Lanord
%A André Charrière
%A Javier Alvaro
%T Erratum to “Sedimentology and chemostratigraphy of the Bwipe Neoproterozoic cap dolostones (Ghana, Volta Basin): A record of microbial activity in a peritidal environment” [C. R. Geoscience 339 (2007) 223–239]
%J Comptes Rendus. Géoscience
%D 2007
%P 516-518
%V 339
%N 7
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crte.2007.05.004
%G en
%F CRGEOS_2007__339_7_516_0
Anne Nédélec; Pascal Affaton; Christian France-Lanord; André Charrière; Javier Alvaro. Erratum to “Sedimentology and chemostratigraphy of the Bwipe Neoproterozoic cap dolostones (Ghana, Volta Basin): A record of microbial activity in a peritidal environment” [C. R. Geoscience 339 (2007) 223–239]. Comptes Rendus. Géoscience, Volume 339 (2007) no. 7, pp. 516-518. doi : 10.1016/j.crte.2007.05.004. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/geoscience/articles/10.1016/j.crte.2007.05.004/

Version originale du texte intégral

Two modifications of the original Table 2 (p. 231) are necessary:

  • – the whole line of Tb contents is missing (between Gd and Dy lines), without any consequences for the Rare Earth Elements (REEs) distribution patterns of Fig. 6 (p. 234);
  • – 6 out of the 23 Ce anomaly values are wrong, and must be modified as indicated in the Table; accordingly, Fig. 6 is also modified regarding the vertical distribution of Ce anomalies and the limestone REE patterns (the dolostone patterns remain unchanged).

Table 2

pro parte. REE contents of Bwipe cap carbonates (changes in bold)

Tableau 2 pro parte. Teneurs en terres rares des cap carbonates de Bwipe (modifications en gras)

Sample no. 7099 7102 7104 7106 7109 7112 7114 7115 7119 7122 7129 7134 7136 7140 7142 7144 7146 7147 7149 7150 7151 7152 7154
La (ppm) 4.36 6.54 3.76 4.20 4.39 5.33 4.89 3.68 4.60 5.76 3.90 3.62 3.85 4.27 4.64 4.77 3.14 3.59 10.08 3.85 7.84 12.21 6.02
Ce 8.79 11.48 6.71 7.21 9.19 8.55 8.29 7.00 7.83 9.84 6.84 6.68 6.98 6.82 7.80 8.01 5.33 5.14 14.86 9.85 18.50 20.13 12.07
Pr 1.03 1.60 0.95 0.97 1.20 1.25 1.19 0.94 1.11 1.48 0.91 0.89 1.00 1.03 1.18 1.16 0.77 0.80 2.30 1.26 2.36 2.76 1.54
Nd 4.18 6.64 3.82 4.38 5.03 4.74 5.05 3.65 4.27 5.96 3.43 3.63 3.75 4.27 4.53 4.58 3.02 3.18 9.14 5.46 9.80 10.30 6.04
Sm 1.07 1.55 0.86 0.86 1.26 0.99 1.06 0.80 0.92 1.34 0.68 0.60 0.78 0.83 1.02 0.98 0.72 0.62 2.04 1.21 1.78 2.02 1.29
Eu 0.32 0.34 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.26 0.30 0.19 0.25 0.32 0.16 0.14 0.19 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.15 0.16 0.52 0.30 0.49 0.50 0.35
Gd 0.94 1.31 1.05 0.80 1.18 1.15 1.09 0.88 0.91 1.40 0.64 0.68 0.72 0.83 0.93 1.02 0.62 0.71 2.41 0.91 1.64 1.66 1.00
Tb 0.16 0.18 0.14 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.12 0.13 0.22 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.16 0.08 0.10 0.34 0.15 0.24 0.22 0.15
Dy 0.94 1.17 0.83 0.75 1.04 1.22 1.03 0.72 0.94 1.43 0.70 0.52 0.60 0.78 0.82 0.96 0.54 0.60 2.33 0.84 1.22 1.39 0.83
Ho 0.21 0.24 0.17 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.18 0.31 0.12 0.09 0.12 0.17 0.18 0.24 0.13 0.14 0.48 0.14 0.27 0.28 0.17
Er 0.65 0.60 0.46 0.41 0.51 0.75 0.53 0.34 0.52 0.80 0.34 0.29 0.39 0.48 0.51 0.66 0.33 0.39 1.48 0.37 0.65 0.70 0.42
Tm 0.09 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.14 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.10 0.05 0.07 0.24 0.06 0.10 0.11 0.06
Yb 0.66 0.60 0.53 0.41 0.45 0.73 0.49 0.36 0.54 0.85 0.34 0.39 0.39 0.49 0.56 0.74 0.34 0.37 1.47 0.30 0.64 0.65 0.38
Lu 0.09 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.11 0.08 0.04 0.08 0.14 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.06 0.05 0.24 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.06
Ce anomaly after (Elderfield & Greaves, [10]) −0.02 −0.08 −0.08 −0.08 −0.02 −0.12 −0.10 −0.05 −0.09 −0.10 −0.08 −0.06 −0.08 −0.12 −0.11 −0.10 −0.10 −0.16 −0.15 0.03 0.01 −0.10 −0.03
Fig. 6

Vertical distribution of the Ce anomaly in Bwipe cap carbonates and rare-earth element patterns normalised to the post-Archaean Australian shales (PAAS); Atlantic seawater patterns for comparison.

Fig. 6. Distribution verticale de l’anomalie en Ce dans les cap carbonates de Bwipe et spectres de terres rares normalisés aux shales australiens post-archéens (PAAS) ; spectres de l’eau de mer atlantique pour comparaison.

Consequently, the text of p. 235 must also be slightly altered as follows:

  • – lines 2–4: The Ce negative anomaly of the dolostones […] is small (−0.02 to −0.16), without exception instead of The Ce negative anomaly of the dolostones […] is small (−0.02 to −0.16), except for one sample (7144).
  • – lines 12–13: The Ce anomaly ranges from 0.03 to −0.10 in the upper limestones instead of The Ce anomaly ranges from −0.42 to −0.81 in the upper limestones.

We apologize to our readers for these mistakes and thank G. Shields for having pointed them out.


Commentaires - Politique