In this paper, we prove the theorem announced in the title.
Revised:
Accepted:
Published online:
Adel Alahmadi  1 ; Florian Luca  2 , 3 , 4
CC-BY 4.0
@article{CRMATH_2022__360_G10_1177_0,
author = {Adel Alahmadi and Florian Luca},
title = {There are no {Carmichael} numbers of the form $2^np+1$ with $p$ prime},
journal = {Comptes Rendus. Math\'ematique},
pages = {1177--1181},
year = {2022},
publisher = {Acad\'emie des sciences, Paris},
volume = {360},
doi = {10.5802/crmath.393},
language = {en},
}
Adel Alahmadi; Florian Luca. There are no Carmichael numbers of the form $2^np+1$ with $p$ prime. Comptes Rendus. Mathématique, Volume 360 (2022), pp. 1177-1181. doi: 10.5802/crmath.393
[1] There are infinitely many Carmichael numbers, Ann. Math., Volume 139 (1994) no. 3, pp. 703-722 | MR | Zbl | DOI
[2] Sierpiński and Carmichael numbers, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., Volume 367 (2015) no. 1, pp. 355-376 | DOI | Zbl
[3] Carmichael numbers in the sequence , Math. Comput., Volume 85 (2016) no. 297, pp. 357-377 | MR | Zbl | DOI
[4] On the density of odd integers of the form and related questions, J. Number Theory, Volume 11 (1979), pp. 257-263 | MR | DOI | Zbl
[5] Primes in intervals of bounded length, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., Volume 52 (2015) no. 2, pp. 171-222 | MR | DOI | Zbl
[6] The impossibility of certain types of Carmichael numbers, Integers, Volume 12 (2012) no. 5, pp. 951-964 | MR | Zbl | DOI
Cited by Sources:
Comments - Policy
