SoNICS: design and workflow of a new CFD software

Michael Lienhardt; Bertrand Michel

doi:10.5802/crmeca.334

Article de recherche

SoNICS: design and workflow of a new CFD software
[SoNICS : conception et flux opérationnel d’un logiciel de CFD]

Michael Lienhardt ¹ ; Bertrand Michel ²

¹DTIS, ONERA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91120 Palaiseau, France
²DAAA, ONERA, 92320 Châtillon, France

Comptes Rendus. Mécanique, Volume 353 (2025), pp. 1261-1287

Cet article fait partie du numéro thématique Les environnements de simulation multiphysiques coordonné par Nicolas Bertier et al..

Abstract (VO)
Résumé

SoNICS is a new CFD software which builds upon the experience acquired in the years developing and extending the elsA CFD tool implemented at ONERA and used in industry. This article presents an overview of the SoNICS design and workflow, the motivation for this new tool, its structure and how it manages the user configuration (including the input mesh) to produce in the end a graph of tasks to schedule. In particular, we will discuss how well-studied concepts like variability, task graphs and compilations passes are cornerstones of the SoNICS workflow and allow for: a relatively easy evolution and maintenance of the code-base; a relatively straightforward user experience; and good performances.

SoNICS est un nouveau logiciel CFD qui s’appuie sur l’expérience acquise durant les années de développement et d’extension de l’outil CFD elsA, implanté à l’ONERA et utilisé dans l’industrie. Cet article présente une vue d’ensemble de la conception de SoNICS et de son flux opérationnel, la motivation derrière ce nouvel outil, sa structure et la manière dont il gère la configuration utilisateur (y compris le maillage d’entrée) pour produire au final un graphe de tâches à exécuter. Nous aborderons en particulier la manière dont des concepts bien étudiés tels que la variabilité, les graphes de tâches et les passes de compilation constituent les pierres angulaires du flux opérationnel de SoNICS et permettent : une évolution et une maintenance relativement faciles de la base de code ; une expérience utilisateur relativement simple ; et de bonnes performances.

Reçu le : 2025-01-19
Révisé le : 2025-10-09
Accepté le : 2025-10-20
Publié le : 2025-12-01

DOI : 10.5802/crmeca.334

Keywords: Computational fluid dynamics, variability, code assembly, compilation passes
Mots-clés : Mécanique des fluides numérique, variabilité, assemblage de code, passes de compilation

Affiliations des auteurs :

Michael Lienhardt ¹ ; Bertrand Michel ²

¹ DTIS, ONERA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91120 Palaiseau, France
² DAAA, ONERA, 92320 Châtillon, France

Licence :

CC-BY 4.0

Droits d'auteur : Les auteurs conservent leurs droits

@article{CRMECA_2025__353_G1_1261_0,
     author = {Michael Lienhardt and Bertrand Michel},
     title = {SoNICS: design and workflow of a new {CFD} software},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. M\'ecanique},
     pages = {1261--1287},
     year = {2025},
     publisher = {Acad\'emie des sciences, Paris},
     volume = {353},
     doi = {10.5802/crmeca.334},
     language = {en},
}

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Michael Lienhardt
AU  - Bertrand Michel
TI  - SoNICS: design and workflow of a new CFD software
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Mécanique
PY  - 2025
SP  - 1261
EP  - 1287
VL  - 353
PB  - Académie des sciences, Paris
DO  - 10.5802/crmeca.334
LA  - en
ID  - CRMECA_2025__353_G1_1261_0
ER  -

%0 Journal Article
%A Michael Lienhardt
%A Bertrand Michel
%T SoNICS: design and workflow of a new CFD software
%J Comptes Rendus. Mécanique
%D 2025
%P 1261-1287
%V 353
%I Académie des sciences, Paris
%R 10.5802/crmeca.334
%G en
%F CRMECA_2025__353_G1_1261_0

Michael Lienhardt; Bertrand Michel. SoNICS: design and workflow of a new CFD software. Comptes Rendus. Mécanique, Volume 353 (2025), pp. 1261-1287. doi: 10.5802/crmeca.334

Bibliographie
Cité par

[1] L. Cambier; M. Gazaix; S. Heib; S. Plot; Marc Poinot; J. P. Veuillot; Jean-Francois Boussuge; M. Montagnac An overview of the multi-purpose elsA flow solver, Aerospace Lab (2011) no. 2, AL02-10, 15 pages

[2] L. Cambier; S. Heib; S. Plot The Onera elsA CFD software: input from research and feedback from industry, Mech. Ind., Volume 14 (2013) no. 3, pp. 159-174 | DOI

[3] S. Plot The High Level of Maturity of the elsA CFD Software for Aerodynamics Applications, EUCASS 2019 (2019)

[4] W. Thollet; G. Dufour; X. Carbonneau; F. Blanc Body-force modeling for aerodynamic analysis of air intake–fan interactions, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, Volume 26 (2016) no. 7, pp. 2048-2065 | DOI

[5] G. Carrier; D. Destarac; A. Dumont; M. Meheut; I. Salah El Din; J. Peter; S. Ben Khelil; J. Brezillon; M. Pestana Gradient-based aerodynamic optimization with the elsA software, 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2014), AIAA 2014-0568 | DOI

[6] B. G. van Der Wall; C. Kessler; Y. Delrieux; P. Beaumier; M. Gervais; J. C. Hirsch; K. Pengel; P. Crozier From aeroacoustics basic research to a modern low-noise rotor blade, J. Am. Helicopter Soc., Volume 62 (2017) no. 4, pp. 1-16 | DOI

[7] E. R. Leon; A. Le Pape; M. Costes; J. A. Désidéri; D. Alfano Concurrent aerodynamic optimization of rotor blades using a Nash game method, J. Am. Helicopter Soc., Volume 61 (2016) no. 2, pp. 1-13 | DOI

[8] Damien Guegan; Mickaël Schvallinger; François Julienne; Nicolas Gourdain; Michel Gazaix Three-dimensional full annulus unsteady RANS simulation of an integrated propulsion system, 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2015), AIAA 2015-4021 | DOI

[9] T. Berthelon; A. Dugeai; J. Langridge; F. Thouverez Ground effect on fan forced response, Proc. of the 15th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines, Vol. ISUAAAT15-094, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2018)

[10] F. Blondel; Mugurel Stanciu; F. Lebœuf; M. Lance Modelling unsteadinesses and polydispersion in wet steam flows using the quadrature method of moments and a two-equation model, Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid dynamics & Thermodynamics, European Turbomachinery Society (2013)

[11] Mugurel Stanciu; Meryem Marcelet; Jean-Marc Dorey Numerical Investigation of Condenser Pressure Effect on Last Stage Operation of Low Pressure Wet Steam Turbines, ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. Volume 5B: Oil and Gas Applications; Steam Turbines, ASME Press (2013), pp. 1-11 | DOI

[12] Laurent Hascoët; Valérie Pascual The Tapenade automatic differentiation tool: Principles, model, and specification, ACM Trans. Math. Softw., Volume 39 (2013) no. 3, 20, 43 pages | DOI | MR

[13] William S. Moses; Sri Hari Krishna Narayanan; Ludger Paehler; Valentin Churavy; Michel Schanen; Jan Hückelheim; Johannes Doerfert; Paul Hovland Scalable automatic differentiation of multiple parallel paradigms through compiler augmentation, Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, IEEE Press (2022), 60, 18 pages | DOI

[14] Dougal Maclaurin; David Duvenaud; Ryan P. Adams Autograd: effortless gradients in numpy, ICML 2015 AutoML Workshop, Volume 238 (2015)

[15] James Bradbury; Roy Frostig; Peter Hawkins; Matthew James Johnson; Chris Leary; Dougal Maclaurin; George Necula; Adam Paszke; Jake VanderPlas; Skye Wanderman-Milne; Qiao Zhang JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, version 0.3.13, 2018 http://github.com/jax-ml/jax (Accessed 2025-10-31)

[16] Max Sagebaum; Tim Albring; Nicolas R. Gauger High-Performance Derivative Computations using CoDiPack, ACM Trans. Math. Softw., Volume 45 (2019) no. 4, 38, 26 pages | DOI | MR

[17] Ameer Haj-Ali; Nesreen K. Ahmed; Ted Willke; Yakun Sophia Shao; Krste Asanovic; Ion Stoica NeuroVectorizer: end-to-end vectorization with deep reinforcement learning, CGO ’20: Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization (Jason Mars; Lingjia Tang; Jingling Xue; Peng Wu, eds.), ACM Press (2020), pp. 242-255 | DOI

[18] Yishen Chen; Charith Mendis; Saman Amarasinghe All you need is superword-level parallelism: systematic control-flow vectorization with SLP, PLDI 2022: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (Ranjit Jhala; Işil Dillig, eds.), ACM Press (2022), pp. 301-315 | DOI

[19] Asmae Heydari Tabar; Richard Bubel; Reiner Hähnle Automatic loop invariant generation for data dependence analysis, FormaliSE ’22: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 10th International Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (Stefania Gnesi; Nico Plat; Arnd Hartmanns; Ina Schaefer, eds.), ACM Press (2022), pp. 34-45 | DOI

[20] Bruno Maugars; Sébastien Bourasseau; Cédric Content; Bertrand Michel; Bérenger Berthoul; Jorge Nunez Ramirez; Pascal Raud; Laurent Hascoët Algorithmic Differentiation for an efficient CFD solver, ECCOMAS 2022: 8th European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (2022)

[21] P. Clements; L. Northrop Software product lines: practices and patterns, Addison Wesley Longman, 2001

[22] Diane Poirier; Steven R. Allmaras; Douglas McCarthy; Matthew Smith; Francis Enomoto The CGNS system, 29th AIAA, Fluid Dynamics Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (1998) | DOI

[23] Marc Poinot; Christopher L. Rumsey Seven keys for practical understanding and use of CGNS, 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2018), AIAA 2018-1503 | DOI

[24] Julien Coulet; Clement Benazet; Bérenger Berthoul; Bruno Maugars Maia: a Python and C++ library for parallel algorithms and manipulations over CGNS meshes, version 1.5, 2024 https://github.com/onera/maia/ (Accessed 2025-10-31)

[25] Gregor Kiczales Aspect-oriented programming, ACM Comput. Surv., Volume 28 (1996) no. 4es, 154 | DOI

[26] Gregor Kiczales AspectJ(tm): Aspect-Oriented Programming in Java, Objects, Components, Architectures, Services, and Applications for a Networked World, International Conference NetObjectDays, NODe 2002, Erfurt, Germany, October 7-10, 2002, Revised Papers (Mehmet Aksit; Mira Mezini; Rainer Unland, eds.) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Volume 2591, Springer (2002), p. 1 | DOI

[27] Gregor Kiczales Aspect-oriented programming, ICSE ’05: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering (Gruia-Catalin Roman; William G. Griswold; Bashar Nuseibeh, eds.), ACM Press (2005), p. 730 | DOI

[28] François Pellegrini; Jean Roman SCOTCH: A Software Package for Static Mapping by Dual Recursive Bipartitioning of Process and Architecture Graphs, High-Performance Computing and Networking, International Conference and Exhibition, HPCN Europe 1996, Brussels, Belgium, April 15-19, 1996, Proceedings (Heather M. Liddell; Adrian Colbrook; Louis O. Hertzberger; Peter M. A. Sloot, eds.) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Volume 1067, Springer (1996), pp. 493-498 | DOI

[29] Rémi Barat; Cédric Chevalier; François Pellegrini Multi-criteria Graph Partitioning with Scotch, Proceedings of the Eighth SIAM Workshop on Combinatorial Scientific Computing, CSC 2018, Bergen, Norway, June 6-8, 2018 (Fredrik Manne; Peter Sanders; Sivan Toledo, eds.), Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2018), pp. 66-75 | DOI

[30] George Karypis; Kirk Schloegel; Vipin Kumar ParMETIS — Parallel graph partitioning and sparse matrix ordering library (2003) http://charm.cs.uiuc.edu/...

[31] George Karypis METIS and ParMETIS, Encyclopedia of Parallel Computing (David A. Padua, ed.), Springer, 2011, pp. 1117-1124 | DOI

[32] Eric Quemerais; Bruno Maugars; Bastien Andrieu ParaDiGM: a library for parallel computational geometry, version 2.6.0, 2024 https://github.com/onera/paradigm/ (Accessed 2025-10-31)

[33] Tsung-Wei Huang; Dian-Lun Lin; Chun-Xun Lin; Yibo Lin Taskflow: A Lightweight Parallel and Heterogeneous Task Graph Computing System, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., Volume 33 (2022) no. 6, pp. 1303-1320 | DOI

[34] David Romero-Organvidez; Pablo Neira Ayuso; José A. Galindo; David Benavides Kconfig metamodel: a first approach, Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B, SPLC 2024, Dommeldange, Luxembourg, September 2-6, 2024 (Maxime Cordy; Daniel Strüber; Mónica Pinto; Iris Groher; Deepak Dhungana; Jacob Krüger; Juliana Alves Pereira; Mathieu Acher; Thomas Thüm; Maurice H. ter Beek; Jessie Galasso-Carbonnel; Paolo Arcaini; Mohammad Reza Mousavi; Xhevahire Tërnava; José A. Galindo; Tao Yue; Lidia Fuentes; José Miguel Horcas, eds.), ACM Press (2024), pp. 55-60 | DOI

[35] Reimar Schröter; Sebastian Krieter; Thomas Thüm; Fabian Benduhn; Gunter Saake Feature-model interfaces: the highway to compositional analyses of highly-configurable systems, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2016, Austin, TX, USA, May 14-22, 2016 (Laura K. Dillon; Willem Visser; Laurie A. Williams, eds.), ACM Press (2016), pp. 667-678 | DOI

[36] Ina Schaefer; Lorenzo Bettini; Viviana Bono; Ferruccio Damiani; Nico Tanzarella Delta-Oriented Programming of Software Product Lines, Software Product Lines: Going Beyond - 14th International Conference, SPLC 2010, Jeju Island, South Korea, September 13-17, 2010. Proceedings (Jan Bosch; Jaejoon Lee, eds.) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Volume 6287, Springer (2010), pp. 77-91 | DOI

[37] Michael Lienhardt PYDOP: A Generic Python Library for Delta-Oriented Programming, Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B, SPLC 2023, Tokyo, Japan, 28 August 2023- 1 September 2023 (Paolo Arcaini; Maurice H. ter Beek; Gilles Perrouin; Iris Reinhartz-Berger; Ivan Machado; Silvia Regina Vergilio; Rick Rabiser; Tao Yue; Xavier Devroey; Mónica Pinto; Hironori Washizaki, eds.), ACM Press (2023), pp. 30-33 | DOI

[38] Aaron Meurer; Christopher P. Smith; Mateusz Paprocki; Ondrej Certík; Sergey B. Kirpichev; Matthew Rocklin; Amit Kumar; Sergiu Ivanov; Jason Keith Moore; Sartaj Singh; Thilina Rathnayake; Sean Vig; Brian E. Granger; Richard P. Muller; Francesco Bonazzi; Harsh Gupta; Shivam Vats; Fredrik Johansson; Fabian Pedregosa; Matthew J. Curry; Andy R. Terrel; Stepán Roucka; Ashutosh Saboo; Isuru Fernando; Sumith Kulal; Robert Cimrman; Anthony M. Scopatz SymPy: symbolic computing in Python, PeerJ Comput. Sci., Volume 3 (2017), e103, 27 pages | DOI

[39] Martin Bauer; Johannes Hötzer; Dominik Ernst; Julian Hammer; Marco Seiz; Henrik Hierl; Jan Hönig; Harald Köstler; Gerhard Wellein; Britta Nestler; Ulrich Rüde Code generation for massively parallel phase-field simulations, Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC 2019, Denver, Colorado, USA, November 17-19, 2019 (Michela Taufer; Pavan Balaji; Antonio J. Peña, eds.), ACM Press (2019), 59, 32 pages | DOI

[40] Michael Lienhardt; Maurice H. ter Beek; Ferruccio Damiani Product lines of dataflows, J. Syst. Software, Volume 210 (2024), 111928, 22 pages | DOI

[41] Michael Lienhardt The Hrewrite Library: A Term Rewriting Engine for Automatic Code Assembly, Rewriting Logic and Its Applications - 15th International Workshop, WRLA 2024, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg, April 6-7, 2024, Revised Selected Papers (Kazuhiro Ogata; Narciso Martí-Oliet, eds.) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Volume 14953, Springer (2024), pp. 165-178 | DOI

[42] Kenneth W. McAlister; Lawrence W. Carr; William J. McCroskey Dynamic stall experiments on the NACA 0012 airfoil (1978) no. 19780009057 (Technical Publication)

[43] William J. McCroskey A critical assessment of wind tunnel results for the NACA 0012 airfoil (1987) no. 19880002254 (Technical Memorandum)

[44] V. Schmitt; F. Charpin Pressure distributions on the ONERA-M6-Wing at transonic Mach numbers (1979) no. AGARD AR 138 (Technical report)

[45] Turbulence Model Benchmarking Working Group Turbulence Modeling Resource https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/ (Accessed 2025-10-30)

[46] P. R. Spalart; Steven R. Allmaras A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, Rech. Aerosp., Volume 42 (1994) no. 1, pp. 5-21

[47] F. R. Menter Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications, AIAA J., Volume 32 (1994) no. 8, pp. 1598-1605 | DOI

[48] R. B. Langtry; F. R. Menter Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes., AIAA J., Volume 47 (2009) no. 12, pp. 2894-2906 | DOI

[49] J. H. Williamson Low-Storage Runge-Kutta Schemes., J. Comput. Phys., Volume 35 (1980), pp. 48-56 | DOI

[50] C. William Gear Numerical initial value problems in ordinary differential equations, Prentice Hall, 1971 | MR | Zbl

[51] Sébastien Deck Recent improvements in the Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation (ZDES) formulation, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., Volume 26 (2012), pp. 523-550 | DOI

[52] S. Mouriaux; F. Bassi; A. Colombo; A. Ghidoni NASA Rotor 37, Springer (2021), pp. 533-544 | DOI

[53] D. Deprés; P. Reijasse; J. P. Dussauge Analysis of unsteadiness in afterbody transonic flows, AIAA J., Volume 42 (2004) no. 12, pp. 2541-2550 | DOI

[54] R. Pain; P.-E. Weiss; Sébastien Deck Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation of the Flow Around a Simplified Launcher Afterbody, AIAA J., Volume 52 (2014) no. 9, pp. 1967-1979 | DOI

[55] Lonnie Reid; Royce D. Moore Design and overall performance of four highly loaded, high-speed inlet stages for an advanced high-pressure-ratio core compressor (1978) no. NASA-TP-1337 (Technical Paper)

[56] P. Reijasse Étude expérimentale de l’écoulement d’arrière-corps du lanceur Ariane 5 dans la soufflerie transsonique S3Ch (2007) (Technical report)

[57] CERFACS AVBP, version 7.15, 2025 https://avbp-wiki.cerfacs.fr/ (Accessed 2025-10-31)

[58] Thilo Schonfeld; Michael Rudgyard Steady and unsteady flow simulations using the hybrid flow solver AVBP, AIAA J., Volume 37 (1999) no. 11, pp. 1378-1385 | DOI

[59] Vincent Moureau; Pascale Domingo; Luc Vervisch Design of a massively parallel CFD code for complex geometries, Comptes Rendus. Mécanique, Volume 339 (2011) no. 2–3, pp. 141-148 | DOI | Zbl

[60] Tobias Leicht; Jens Jägersküpper; Daniel Vollmer; Axel Schwöppe; Ralf Hartmann; Jens Fiedler; Tobias Schlauch DLR-Project Digital-X — Next Generation CFD Solver ’Flucs’, Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2016 (2016), 420027, 14 pages

[61] Frank Nielsen Introduction to MPI: The Message Passing Interface, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science, Springer (2016), pp. 21-62 | DOI

[62] Valeria Bartsch; Rui Machado; Dirk Merten; Mirko Rahn; Franz-Josef Pfreundt GASPI/GPI In-memory Checkpointing Library, Euro-Par 2017: Parallel Processing - 23rd International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, August 28 - September 1, 2017, Proceedings (Francisco F. Rivera; Tomás F. Pena; José Carlos Cabaleiro, eds.) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Volume 10417, Springer (2017), pp. 497-508 | DOI

[63] Leonardo Dagum; Ramesh Menon OpenMP: An Industry-Standard API for Shared-Memory Programming, IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng., Volume 5 (1998) no. 1, pp. 46-55 | DOI

[64] Olaf Krzikalla; Arne Rempke; Alexander Bleh; Michael Wagner; Thomas Gerhold Spliss: A Sparse Linear System Solver for Transparent Integration of Emerging HPC Technologies into CFD Solvers and Applications, New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics XIII (Andreas Dillmann; Gerd Heller; Ewald Krämer; Claus Wagner, eds.), Springer (2021), pp. 635-645 | DOI

[65] Andreas Griewank; David Juedes; Jean Utke Algorithm 755: ADOL-C: a package for the automatic differentiation of algorithms written in C/C++, ACM Trans. Math. Softw., Volume 22 (1996) no. 2, pp. 131-167 | DOI

[66] Hrvoje Jasak OpenFOAM: Open source CFD in research and industry, Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng., Volume 1 (2009) no. 2, pp. 89-94 | DOI

[67] Daniel Molinero; Sergio Galván; Jesús Pacheco; Nicolás Herrera Multi GPU Implementation to Accelerate the CFD Simulation of a 3D Turbo-Machinery Benchmark Using the RapidCFD Library, Supercomputing (Moisés Torres; Jaime Klapp, eds.), Springer (2019), pp. 173-187 | DOI

[68] Ping He; Charles A Mader; Joaquim RRA Martins; Kevin J Maki Dafoam: An open-source adjoint framework for multidisciplinary design optimization with openfoam, AIAA J., Volume 58 (2020) no. 3, pp. 1304-1319

[69] Max Sagebaum; Nicolas R. Gauger MeDiPack — Message Differentiation Package, 2024 https://scicomp.rptu.de/software/medi/ (Accessed 2025-10-31)

[70] Francisco Palacios; Michael Colonno; Aniket Aranake; Alejandro Campos; Sean Copeland; Thomas Economon; Amrita Lonkar; Trent Lukaczyk; Thomas Taylor; Juan Alonso Stanford University Unstructured (SU $^{2}$ ): An open-source integrated computational environment for multi-physics simulation and design, 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2013, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2013), AIA 2013-0287, 60 pages | DOI

[71] Nijso Beishuizen; Ujjawal Agrawal SU2GUI, 2024 https://github.com/su2code/su2gui (Accessed 2025-10-31)

[72] Pramod Singh; Avinash Manure Introduction to TensorFlow 2.0, Apress (2020), pp. 1-24 | DOI

[73] Sagar Imambi; Kolla Bhanu Prakash; G. R. Kanagachidambaresan PyTorch, Springer (2021), pp. 87-104 | DOI

[74] H. Topcuoglu; S. Hariri; Min-You Wu Performance-effective and low-complexity task scheduling for heterogeneous computing, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., Volume 13 (2002) no. 3, pp. 260-274 | DOI

[75] Luiz F. Bittencourt; Rizos Sakellariou; Edmundo R. M. Madeira DAG scheduling using a lookahead variant of the heterogeneous earliest finish time algorithm, 2010 18th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing, IEEE (2010), pp. 27-34 | DOI

[76] Hamid Arabnejad; Jorge G. Barbosa List Scheduling Algorithm for Heterogeneous Systems by an Optimistic Cost Table, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., Volume 25 (2014) no. 3, pp. 682-694 | DOI

Cité par Sources :

Commentaires - Politique