Il y a trois options principales de strategies de mitigation concernant les objets géo-croiseurs (NEO ou Near Earth objects). La déviation ou la déstruction d'un NEO demande le développement de nouvelles technologies spatiales. La troisième option, la préparation d'une région à un impacte, demande la création de nouvelles institutions de protéction civile. Les trois options sont complémentaires. On présente les conditions techniques de base pour la stratégie la plus préférée, la déviation de NEOs.
There are three major options for mitigation of Near Earth Objects (NEOs). Deflection and disruption of NEOs require the development of new space technologies. A third option, the preparation of the target area on Earth to mitigate an impact, needs institutions for the required civil defense measures. The three options are complementary. Basic requirements for the presently most preferred strategy, deflection, are presented.
Mot clés : Mitigation, Objets géocroiseurs
Andrea Carusi 1 ; Ettore Perozzi 2 ; Hans Scholl 3
@article{CRPHYS_2005__6_3_367_0, author = {Andrea Carusi and Ettore Perozzi and Hans Scholl}, title = {Mitigation strategy}, journal = {Comptes Rendus. Physique}, pages = {367--374}, publisher = {Elsevier}, volume = {6}, number = {3}, year = {2005}, doi = {10.1016/j.crhy.2005.01.006}, language = {en}, }
Andrea Carusi; Ettore Perozzi; Hans Scholl. Mitigation strategy. Comptes Rendus. Physique, Volume 6 (2005) no. 3, pp. 367-374. doi : 10.1016/j.crhy.2005.01.006. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/physique/articles/10.1016/j.crhy.2005.01.006/
[1] Walter Hohmann's roads in space, J. Space Mission Architecture, Volume 2 (2000), pp. 1-14
[2] M. Hechler, J.L. Cano, A. Yanez, SMART-1 mission analysis: asteroid option, ESOC MAS WP 403, 1998
[3] Basic targeting strategies for rendezvous and Flyby missions to the Near-Earth asteroids, Planet. Space Sci., Volume 49 (2001), pp. 3-22
[4] On the attainability of the Near Earth Asteroids (A. Balnco; E. Dotto; V. Orofino, eds.), Planetay Science, Fifth Italian Meeting, 2003, pp. 121-126
[5] Orbital Motion, Adam-Hilger, Bristol, 1988
[6] The ISHTAR Mission, ESA final report, 2003
[7] Deflecting NEOs in route of collision with the Earth, Icarus, Volume 159 (2002), pp. 417-422
[8] E. Perozzi, V. Fabiani, On targeting long-period and new comets for small satellite missions, ESA WPP-151, P. 3.1–P. 3.6, 1999
[9] NEO space mission preparation, ESA AO4517, 2002
[10] Space mission priorities for Near-Earth Object risk assessment and reduction, ESA report, 2004
[11] NEA deflection: sometimes resonant returns are not of much help, NASA Workshop on Scientific Requirements for Mitigation of Hazardous Comets and Asteroids (Expanded Abstracts), Arlington, USA, 2002
[12] A. Carusi, Early NEO deflections: a viable, lower-energy option, Earth Moon and Planets, 2004, submitted for publication
[13] Close approaches of asteroid 1999 : resonant and non-resonant returns, Astron. Astrophys., Volume 346 (1999), p. L65-L68
Cité par Sources :
Commentaires - Politique