[Introduction aux systèmes d'optique adaptative multi-conjuguée]
Cet article présente les notions de base qui gouvernent le dimensionnement des systèmes d'optique adaptative multi-conjuguée [OAMC]. La synthèse présentée ici reprend principalement les résultats de trois articles. Le premier, publié en 1988 par J. Beckers, introduit le concept de multi-conjugaison and évalue le gain attendu en champ de vue par rapport à l'optique adaptative classique. Le deuxième article fondateur est celui de M. Tallon and R. Foy. Ce travail, publié en 1990, propose une méthode pour estimer quantitativement la carte 3D des perturbations de phase atmosphériques. Cette information est essentielle pour commander les systèmes multi-conjugués introduits par J. Beckers. Un troisième article majeur, publié en 2000 par R. Ragazzoni et al., décrit le principe de l'analyse de front d'onde dite « Layer Oriented ». Cette technique permet d'ouvrir le domaine de l'OAMC vers l'utilisation d'étoiles naturelles pour l'analyse de front d'onde. Ces trois articles ont bien sûr stimulé un grand nombre d'autres contributions émanant de divers instituts, l'essentiel de ces travaux est discuté dans le texte qui suit.
The paper describes the basic concepts underlying the design of Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics systems. The paper takes into account mainly three papers. The first paper, published in 1988, is due to J. Beckers and it introduces the currently used multi-conjugation concept and quantifies the increase in FoV achieved applying this concept with respect to the single conjugate adaptive system. The second paper considered is due to M. Tallon and R. Foy. This paper, published in 1990, provides a quantitative method to estimate the 3D map of the atmospheric phase perturbation. This is the needed information to properly control the multi-conjugate system introduced by J. Beckers. Finally a third paper, published in 2000 and due to R. Ragazzoni et al. is considered, where the Layer Oriented scheme is described opening the multi-conjugate adaptive system field to natural guide stars. These three papers stimulated a lot of other contributions from several people and some of them are briefly discussed in the paper.
@article{CRPHYS_2005__6_10_1039_0,
author = {Simone Esposito},
title = {Introduction to {Multi-Conjugate} {Adaptive} {Optics} systems},
journal = {Comptes Rendus. Physique},
pages = {1039--1048},
publisher = {Elsevier},
volume = {6},
number = {10},
year = {2005},
doi = {10.1016/j.crhy.2005.11.016},
language = {en},
}
Simone Esposito. Introduction to Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics systems. Comptes Rendus. Physique, Volume 6 (2005) no. 10, pp. 1039-1048. doi : 10.1016/j.crhy.2005.11.016. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/physique/articles/10.1016/j.crhy.2005.11.016/
[1] Anisoplanatism in adaptive optics, J. Opt. Soc. Am., Volume 72 (1982), pp. 52-61
[2] Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch within multiconjugate adaptive optics (M.-H. Ulrich, ed.), Proceedings of European Southern Observatory Conference and Workshop on Very Large Telescopes and Their Instrumentation, ESO Conference and Workshop Proceedings, vol. 30, European Southern Observatory, Garching, Germany, 1988, pp. 693-703
[3] Feasibility of adaptive telescopes using laser probe, Astron. Astrophys., Volume 152 (1985), pp. 129-131
[4] Adaptive telescope with laser probe: isoplanatism and cone effect, Astron. Astrophys., Volume 235 (1990), pp. 549-557
[5] Analysis of fundamental limits to artificial-guide-star adaptive-optics-system performance for astronomical imaging, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Volume 11 (1994), pp. 277-287
[6] Analysis of multiconjugate adaptive optics, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Volume 11 (1994), pp. 394-408
[7] Wave-front correction by one or more synthetic beacons, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Volume 11 (1994), pp. 379-393
[8] First order performance evaluation of adaptive optics systems for atmospheric turbulence compensation in extended field of view astronomical telescopes, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Volume 11 (1994), pp. 783-805
[9] Methods for correcting tilt anisoplanatism in laser-guide-star-based multi-conjugate adaptive optics, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Volume 18 (2001), pp. 2539-2547
[10] Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Volume 18 (2001), pp. 2527-2538
[11] R. Ragazzoni, Adaptive optics for 100 m class telescopes: New challenges require new solutions, in: P. Wizinowich (Ed.), Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 4007, 2000, pp. 1076–1087
[12] B. Ellerbroek, F. Rigaut, B.J. Bauman, C. Boyer, S.L. Browne, R.A. Buchroeder, J.W. Catone, P. Clark, C. d'Orgeville, D.T. Gavel, G. Herriot, M.R. Hunten, E. James, E.J. Kibblewhite, I.T. McKinnie, J.T. Murray, D. Rabaud, L.K. Saddlemyer, J. Sebag, J. Stillburn, J.M. Telle, J.P. Veran, Multiconjugate adaptive optics for Gemini-South, in: P. Wizinowich, D. Bonaccini (Eds.), Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 4839, 2003, pp. 55–66
[13] E. Marchetti, R. Brast, B. Delabre, R. Donaldson, E. Fedrigo, C. Frank, N. Hubin, J. Kolb, M. Le Louarn, J.-L. Lizon, S. Oberti, R. Reiss, J. Santos, S. Tordo, R. Ragazzoni, C. Arcidiacono, A. Baruffolo, E. Diolaiti, J. Farinato, E. Vernet-Viard, MAD status report, in: D. Bonaccini Calia, B.L. Ellerbroek, R. Ragazzoni (Eds.), Advancements in Adaptive Optics, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 5490, 2004, pp. 236–247
[14] T. Herbst, R. Ragazzoni, A. Eckart, G. Weigelt, The LINC-NIRVANA interferometric imager for the Large Binocular Telescope, in: A.F.M. Moorwood, I. Masanori (Eds.), in: Ground-Based Instrumentation for Astronomy, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 5492, 2004, pp. 1045–1052
[15] Optical resolution through a randomly inhomogeneous medium for very long and very short exposures, J. Opt. Soc. Am., Volume 56 (1966), pp. 1372-1379
[16] Wave-front compensation error due to finite corrector-element size, J. Opt. Soc. Am., Volume 67 (1977), pp. 393-396
[17] Pupil plane wavefront sensing with an oscillating prism, J. Modern Opt., Volume 43 (1996), p. 289
[18] C. Arcidiacono, E. Diolaitib, R. Ragazzoni, J. Farinato, E. Vernet, Sky coverage for Layer Oriented MCAO: a detailed analytical and numerical study, in: D. Bonaccini Calia, B.L. Ellerbroek, R. Ragazzoni (Eds.), Advancements in Adaptive Optics, in: Proc. SPIE, 5490, 2004, pp. 563–573
[19] R. Flicker, B.L. Ellerbroek, F.J. Rigaut, Comparison of multiconjugate adaptive optics configurations and control algorithms for the Gemini-South 8 m telescope, in: P. Wizinowich (Ed.), Adaptive Optical Systems Technology, in: Proc. SPIE, vol. 4007, 2000, pp. 1032–1043
[20] Limiting precision of tomographic phase, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Volume 18 (2001), pp. 873-882
[21] Fundamental limits on isoplanatic correction with multiconjugate adaptive optics, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Volume 20 (2003), pp. 1949-1957
[22] Analysis of modes and behavior of a multiconjugate adaptive optics system, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Volume 19 (2002), pp. 912-925
[23] Modal tomography for adaptive optics, Astron. Astrophys., Volume 342 (1999), p. L53-L56
[24] Adaptive-optics corrections available for the whole sky, Nature, Volume 403 (2000), pp. 54-56
Cité par Sources :
Commentaires - Politique
MAD: practical implementation of MCAO concepts
Enrico Marchetti; Roland Brast; Bernard Delabre; ...
C. R. Phys (2005)
Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics for ELTs: constraints and limitations
Roberto Ragazzoni; Brice Le Roux; Carmelo Arcidiacono
C. R. Phys (2005)
Wavefront sensing issues in MCAO
Thierry Fusco; Magalie Nicolle; Gérard Rousset; ...
C. R. Phys (2005)