Le développement des nano-technologies soulève de nombreuses questions dʼordre éthique et sociétal. Parmi elles, celles qui portent sur la protection de la vie privée ont fait lʼobjet de nombreux débats. Certains pensent que les technologies sont neutres et quʼelles ne changent pas fondamentalement les problèmes qui sont dʼordre politique, tandis que dʼautres prétendent que les développements techniques contemporains les amplifient considérablement. Il existe même des personnes qui affirment que la protection de la vie privée devient obsolette. Cet article discute ces différentes positions en faisant référence à lʼarchitecture classique du Panopticon qui a été conçue pour faciliter la surveillance et qui se caractérise comme un totale privation de vie privée. Il envisage les évolutions possibles du Panopticon dues au développement des nanotechnologies. Il montre que lʼinfluence des nanotechnologies sur tout ce qui concerne la vie privée ne peut être dissociée de celle des ordinateurs et des biotechnologies, cʼest-à-dire de ce que lʼon a coutume de désigner comme la convergence NBIC. Enfin, cet article conclut sur le nouveau compromis qui doit être trouvé entre les trois exigences contradictoires que sont la sécurité, la transparence et la protection de la vie privée.
Numerous ethical and societal issues are related to the development of nanotechnology. Among them, the risk for privacy has long been discussed. Some people say that technology is neutral and that it does not really change the nature of problems, which are mainly political, while others state that its contemporary developments considerably amplify them; there are even persons who assert that it will make privacy protection obsolete. This article discusses those different positions by making reference to the classical Panopticon that is an architecture for surveillance, which characterizes the total absence of privacy. It envisages the possible evolutions of the Panopticon due to the development of nanotechnologies. It shows that the influence of nanotechnology on privacy concerns cannot be dissociated from the influence of computers and biotechnologies, i.e. from what is currently called the NBIC convergence. Lastly, it concludes on the new ethical trade-off that has to be made between three contradictory requirements that are security, transparency and privacy.
Mots clés : Nano-Panopticon, Nanotechnologies, Panopticon, Vie privée, Sousveillance, Surveillance
Jean-Gabriel Ganascia 1
@article{CRPHYS_2011__12_7_684_0, author = {Jean-Gabriel Ganascia}, title = {The new ethical trilemma: {Security,} privacy and transparency}, journal = {Comptes Rendus. Physique}, pages = {684--692}, publisher = {Elsevier}, volume = {12}, number = {7}, year = {2011}, doi = {10.1016/j.crhy.2011.07.002}, language = {en}, }
Jean-Gabriel Ganascia. The new ethical trilemma: Security, privacy and transparency. Comptes Rendus. Physique, Volume 12 (2011) no. 7, pp. 684-692. doi : 10.1016/j.crhy.2011.07.002. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/physique/articles/10.1016/j.crhy.2011.07.002/
[1] (F. Marano; M. Lahmani; P. Houdy, eds.), Nanoethics and Nanotoxicology, vol. 4, Springer, 2011
[2] Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science (M. Roco; W. Bainbridge, eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers (Springer), Dordrecht, Boston, 2003
[3] Nanotechnology safety concerns revisited, Toxicol. Sci., Volume 101 (2008) no. 1, pp. 4-21
[4] Nanotechnology and the challenge of clean water, Nat. Nanotechnol., Volume 2 (2007) no. 11, pp. 663-664 | DOI
[5] Why the future doesnʼt need us www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html Wired Magazine 8 (0.4), cf.
[6] Nineteen Eighty-Four. A Novel, Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York, 1949
[7] Integrin-targeting thermally cross-linked superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for combined cancer imaging and drug delivery, Nanotechnology, Volume 21 (2010) no. 41, p. 415102
[8] Scary stuff http://www.forbes.com/2007/11/21/privacy-surveillance-technology-oped-cx_res_1126privacy.html (Forbes)
[9] The Human Condition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 1958
[10] The right to privacy, Harvard Law Rev., Volume 4 (1890), pp. 193-220
[11] Prolégomènes à une recherche sur la vie privée dans une perspective historique et sociologique, Lex Electronica, Volume 9 ( Winter 2004 ) no. 2, pp. 1-61 http://www.lex-electronica.org/articles/v9-2/langelier.htm
[12] The Work of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 4, William Tait, London, 1838 pp. 37–172 (Ch. “Panopticon; or, The inspection house: Containing the idea of a new principle of construction applicable to any sort of establishment, in which persons of any descriptions are to be kept under inspection and in particular to penitentiary-houses, prisons, houses of industry, work-houses, poor-houses, manufactories, mad-houses, lazarettos, hospitals and schols)
[13] Discipline and Punish, Vintage, New York, 1977
[14] On Nano-Panopticism: A sociological perspective http://chem4823.usask.ca/~cassidyr/OnNano-Panopticism-ASociologicalPerspective.htm Tech. rep., University of Saskatchewan, On-line, available at (access May 2011, 2003)
[15] RFID technology for human implant devices, C. R. Physique, Volume 12 (2011) no. 7, pp. 675-683 (in this issue)
[16] Gold nanoparticle probes, Coord. Chem. Rev., Volume 253 (2009) no. 11–12, pp. 1607-1618 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TFW-4VCNP9H-2/2/b66681e54f88b82d8c1f89fd90e33d5f | DOI
[17] Nanotechnologies for biomolecular detection and medical diagnostics, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., Volume 10 (2006) no. 1, pp. 11-19 (Print) Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Govʼt, Non-P.H.S. Review (ISSN: 1367-5931)
[18] G. Avoine, P. Oechslin, RFID traceability: A multilayer problem, Tech. rep., EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland [On-line], Available at accessed June 2011 http://fc05.ifca.ai/p11.pdf accessed June 2011 (2003).
[19] Dielectrophoretic manipulation of nano-materials and its application to micro/nano-sensors, Sensor Actuator B Chem., Volume 133 (2008) no. 2, pp. 664-670
[20] As we may think, Atlantic Monthly, Volume 176 (1945) no. 1, pp. 641-649 http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/194507/bush (URL) | DOI
[21] Nano-technology and privacy: On continuous surveillance outside the Panopticon, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Volume 32 (2007) no. 3, pp. 283-297 http://jmp.oxfordjournals.org/content/32/3/283.abstract http://jmp.oxfordjournals.org/content/32/3/283.full.pdf+html | arXiv | DOI
[22] The experience capture experiments of Ringley & Mann, Ethics Inform. Technol., Volume 9 (2007) no. 2, pp. 129-139
[23] From the Internet of things to the Internet of physical world, C. R. Physique, Volume 12 (2011) no. 7, pp. 669-674 (in this issue)
[24] Social aspects of location-monitoring systems: the case of Guide Me and of My-SOS, Social Sci. Inform., Volume 47 (2008) no. 3, pp. 253-274
[25] Cognitive technologies, social science and the three-layered leopardskin of change, Social Sci. Inform., Volume 47 (2008) no. 3, pp. 227-251 http://ssi.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/47/3/227
[26] C. Laudy, J.-G. Ganascia, C. Sedogbo, High-level fusion based on conceptual graphs, in: Proceedings of the 10th international Conference on information Fusion, Quebec, Canada, 2007.
[27] Nanowire transistors without junctions, Nat. Nanotechnol., Volume 5 (2010), pp. 225-229
[28] The Economics of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1981
[29] Privacy, morality and the law, Phil. Pub. Affairs, Volume 12 (1983) no. 2, pp. 69-88
[30] The right to privacy, Phil. Pub. Affairs, Volume 4 (1975), pp. 295-314
[31] Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1989
[32] Sousveillance: Inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments, Surveillance & Society, Volume 1 (2003) no. 3, pp. 331-355
[33] Voir et pouvoir : qui nous surveille?, Editions du Pommier, Paris, 2009
[34] Non-disciplinary power and the network society, Organization, Volume 7 (2000) no. 6, pp. 79-95
[35] Transparency and open government, Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies, The White House, Washington, USA, January 2009 http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Transparency_and_Open_Govern
Cité par Sources :
Commentaires - Politique