[La fin de lʼapproche CKM … et ses séquelles]
Sur la base de données expérimentales bien établies, comme
Using firmly established experimental inputs such as
Mots-clés : Physique de la saveur, LHCb, Super usine á B
Enrico Lunghi 1 ; Amarjit Soni 2
@article{CRPHYS_2012__13_2_152_0, author = {Enrico Lunghi and Amarjit Soni}, title = {Demise of {CKM} and its aftermath}, journal = {Comptes Rendus. Physique}, pages = {152--158}, publisher = {Elsevier}, volume = {13}, number = {2}, year = {2012}, doi = {10.1016/j.crhy.2011.11.007}, language = {en}, }
Enrico Lunghi; Amarjit Soni. Demise of CKM and its aftermath. Comptes Rendus. Physique, Flavour physics and CP violation / Physique de la saveur et violation de CP, Volume 13 (2012) no. 2, pp. 152-158. doi : 10.1016/j.crhy.2011.11.007. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/physique/articles/10.1016/j.crhy.2011.11.007/
[1] Progr. Theoret. Phys., 10 (1963), p. 531
[2] Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl., 117 (2003), p. 111
[3] J. Phys. G, 37 (2010), p. 075021
[4] JHEP, 0709 (2007), p. 053
[5] Phys. Lett. B, 666 (2008), p. 162
[6] et al. Phys. Lett. B, 687 (2010), p. 61
[7] JHEP, 0908 (2009), p. 051
[8] Phys. Rev. Lett., 104 (2010), p. 251802
[9] et al. | arXiv
[10] arXiv
|[11] Phys. Rev. D, 81 (2010), p. 034503
[12] arXiv
|[13]
Our value of
[14] Nucl. Phys. B, 419 (1994), p. 292
[15] arXiv
|[16] Nucl. Phys. B, 347 (1990), p. 491
[17] Phys. Rev. D, 52 (1995), p. 6505
[18] Phys. Rev. D, 82 (2010), p. 094026
[19] Rev. Mod. Phys., 68 (1996), p. 1125
[20] et al. Eur. Phys. J. C, 69 (2010), pp. 399-424
[21] Phys. Rev. D, 78 (2008), p. 033005
[22] Phys. Lett. B, 688 (2010), p. 309
[23] arXiv
(references therein) |[24] JHEP, 0507 (2005), p. 028
[25] JHEP, 0610 (2006), p. 081
[26] Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (2006), p. 251802
[27] arXiv
|[28] Phys. Rev. D, 82 (2010), p. 071101
[29]
The inclusive and exclusive determinations of
[30] Phys. Rev. D, 81 (2010), p. 031301
[31] Nucl. Phys. B, 843 (2011), p. 107
[32] arXiv
|[33] Phys. Lett. B, 395 (1997), p. 241
[34] Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 12 (1997), p. 2459
[35] Phys. Rev. D, 58 (1998), p. 057504
[36] Phys. Lett. B, 407 (1997), p. 61
[37] Phys. Rev. D, 72 (2005), p. 014006
[38] Phys. Rev. D, 72 (2005), p. 094003
[39] Phys. Lett. B, 620 (2005), p. 143
[40] arXiv
|[41] Phys. Lett. B, 644 (2007), pp. 237-240
[42] Phys. Rev. D, 80 (2009), p. 114008
[43] http://www.ichep2010.fr (Talk at ICHEP 2010, July 22–28, 2010, Paris, France)
[44] http://www.bnl.gov/bf2010 (Talk at Brookhaven Forum 2010, May 26–28, BNL)
[45] Phys. Rev. D, 82 (2010), p. 032001
[46] Phys. Rev. Lett., 105 (2010), p. 081801
[47] et al. Phys. Rev. D, 80 (2009), p. 014503
[48] E. Gamiz, Private communication.
[49] Phys. Rev. Lett., 48 (1982), p. 848
[50] JHEP, 0803 (2008), p. 049
Cité par Sources :
☆ Note from the Invited Editors: This article is slightly more advanced than the basic, “well-established topics” approach of the main corpus of this issue. It also shows that, beyond the general concordance of flavour and CP physics with the minimal Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa scheme, hints for new physics may arise from discrepancies between precision measurements. These are difficult to interpret, notably due to the important role of strong interactions corrections, where input is sought from the latest lattice gauge theory simulations – hence the careful discussion and selection of channels by the authors. This contribution is thus a “frontier” one, and is included to show the current stage of research. This contribution also indicates how new experimental measurements (probably earlier than theoretical progress) will clarify the issue. The editors consider it important to include this contribution, which shows the very active (lively) nature of the field.
Commentaires - Politique