Plan
Comptes Rendus

Molecular biology and genetics/Biologie et génétique moléculaires
Analysis of molecular genetic diversity of cardoon (Cynara cardunculus L.) in Tunisia
[Analyse moléculaire de la diversité génétique du cardon (Cynara cardunculus L.) en Tunisie]
Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 335 (2012) no. 6, pp. 389-397.

Résumés

The objective of this study is to investigate the genetic diversity, the relationships among six Tunisian wild cardoon populations (Cynara cardunculus var. sylvestris) and a Tunisian's population of cultivated cardoon (Cynara cardunculus var. altilis DC) in seven different geographical locations (Tiurif, Bahra, Zriba, Bouficha, Enfidha, Beja and Wad mliz) from semi-arid and wet regions of Tunisia. Twenty-three selected microsatellite markers are used for a sample of 98 cardoon genotypes. The total of 243 alleles is detected in the studied populations and the number of alleles per locus ranged from six to 23. The dendrogram based on Nei's (1972) UPGMA method divides the seven studied populations to five clusters. These preliminary results show that microsatellites are effective tools for plant species characterization and the analysed populations have a high genetic variability and will be suitable as genetic stocks for conservation and sustainable utilization programs of Cynara cardunculus L. in Tunisia.

Cette étude s’est intéressée à l’investigation de l’analyse de la diversité moléculaire et des relations phylogéniques entre six populations du cardon sauvage (Cynara cardunculus var. sylvestris) et une du cardon cultivé (Cynara cardunculus var. altilis DC) dans six régions semi-arides et une humide de la Tunisie : Tiurif, Bahra, Zriba, Bouficha, Enfidha, Béja et Wad mliz. Vingt-trois marqueurs microsatellites ont été utilisés pour génotyper 98 individus. Au total 243 allèles ont été détectés pour les sept populations, le nombre d’allèles par locus varie de six à 23. Le dendrogramme basé sur la méthode d’UPGMA de Nei's (1972) a permis de diviser les sept populations étudiées en cinq groupes distincts, ces résultats préliminaires montrent que les microsatellites sont un outil prometteur pour caractériser les espèces végétales et indiquent que les sept populations étudiées ont une diversité génétique satisfaisante qui peut être utilisée comme base pour aménager des programmes de conservation et de développement durable de Cynara cardunculus L. en Tunisie.

Métadonnées
Reçu le :
Accepté le :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1016/j.crvi.2012.04.005
Keywords: Cynara cardunculus, Variability, Microsatellites, Tunisia
Mot clés : Cynara cardunculus, Diversité, Microsatellites, Tunisie
Soumaya Khaldi 1 ; Gabriella Sonnante 2 ; Mohammed El Gazzah 1

1 Laboratory of Biodiversity, Biotechnology and Climat changes, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, 2092, El Manar II, Tunis, Tunisia
2 Laboratory of Plant Genetics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Plant Genetics, National Research Council (CNR), 70126 Bari, Italy
@article{CRBIOL_2012__335_6_389_0,
     author = {Soumaya Khaldi and Gabriella Sonnante and Mohammed El Gazzah},
     title = {Analysis of molecular genetic diversity of cardoon {(\protect\emph{Cynara} cardunculus {L.})} in {Tunisia}},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Biologies},
     pages = {389--397},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {335},
     number = {6},
     year = {2012},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crvi.2012.04.005},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Soumaya Khaldi
AU  - Gabriella Sonnante
AU  - Mohammed El Gazzah
TI  - Analysis of molecular genetic diversity of cardoon (Cynara cardunculus L.) in Tunisia
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Biologies
PY  - 2012
SP  - 389
EP  - 397
VL  - 335
IS  - 6
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crvi.2012.04.005
LA  - en
ID  - CRBIOL_2012__335_6_389_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Soumaya Khaldi
%A Gabriella Sonnante
%A Mohammed El Gazzah
%T Analysis of molecular genetic diversity of cardoon (Cynara cardunculus L.) in Tunisia
%J Comptes Rendus. Biologies
%D 2012
%P 389-397
%V 335
%N 6
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crvi.2012.04.005
%G en
%F CRBIOL_2012__335_6_389_0
Soumaya Khaldi; Gabriella Sonnante; Mohammed El Gazzah. Analysis of molecular genetic diversity of cardoon (Cynara cardunculus L.) in Tunisia. Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 335 (2012) no. 6, pp. 389-397. doi : 10.1016/j.crvi.2012.04.005. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/biologies/articles/10.1016/j.crvi.2012.04.005/

Version originale du texte intégral

1 Introduction

The wild cardoon (Cynara cardunculus L. var. sylvestris [Lamk] Fiori) is a robust perennial plant, non-domesticated, characterized by its rosette of large thorny leaves branched and a blue-purple flowering stems; it belongs to the Asteraceae family, tribe of Cynarae and it is native to the Mediterranean Basin, where it colonizes dry and quiet lands. Molecular studies [1,2] and cytogenetic and isozyme investigations [3] indicated that this specie is the ancestor of both the globe artichoke (C. cardunculus var. scolymus L.) and the leafy or cultivated cardoon (C. cardunculus var. altilis [DC]).

The wild cardoon is allogame and propagated by seeds (achenes). The majority of seeds will be thrown up near the plant and germinated after the first autumn rains, although the germination can occur throughout the year during the good conditions, the growth extends from September (emergence) to July (mature achenes), and the flowers are usually produced by plants of two years [4].

The wild cardoon has an important regional importance in Tunisia, as it is used in the traditional cooking especially in the north and centre of Tunisia for the preparation of “couscous” and other dishes. The edible parts of the plant are the fleshy stems, which are collected in late autumn–winter.

The cultivated cardoon (C. cardunculus var. altilis DC) is known by its fleshy stems and petioles; it possesses a regional importance in Italy, Spain and South of France [5] and it is propagated by seeds. Its cultivation is much less widespread than that of the globe artichoke; it remains of regional importance in the north of Africa and in Tunisia, where it is used in traditional dishes like the Tunisian or Algerian “couscous”. The edible parts of the plant are the fleshy stems, which are typically collected in late autumn–early winter.

The artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) is largely cultivated all around the world. In Tunisia, it is cultivated in the northern irrigated areas; this species valorizes efficiently heavy soils and sodium chloride water charged, occurring frequently in the low valley of Medjerda, where this culture is frequently cultivated. The edible parts of this plant in Tunisia are the heads, which are used in many traditional dishes. ‘Violet d’Hyères’ and ‘Blanc Oranais’ are the two most important cultivars in Tunisia [6].

C. cardunculus L. is a polyvalent plant with a wide range of potential applications used in the Mediterranean region for food, as a vegetable and as a substitute for rennet for milk coagulation. More recent applications are: the use of biomass for energy purposes as a solid biofuel or for the production of pulp or biodiesel [7]. This plant is used in several dishes, as soups and salads [8], their seeds could be used to extract food quality oil [9], and their flowers are widely employed in the making of cheeses [10,11]. The wild and cultivated forms of Ccardunculus are a source of biopharmaceuticals products [12,13]. The roots contains inulin which is known as an enhancer of the human intestinal flora, while the leaves are a source of antioxidant compounds that possess antibacterial activity [14].

The use of DNA markers is a technique well-suited to assess the genetic diversity within populations. The advantages of these markers are: the most of them do not show plasticity, they are unlikely to be similar because of convergent evolution, and can generate information in many different places [15]. There are two types of markers most widely used: fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) [16] and microsatellites (single sequence repeats [SSR]) [17]. Due to their codominant inheritance, these markers detects multiple alleles at a given locus, while AFLPs are dominant markers, and detect multiple loci distributed on the whole genome. Microsatellites or SSR are motifs from one to six bases repeated “n” times in the genome [18]; the index “n” may differ from one individual to another. They are found on the whole genome. They are highly polymorphic; the variation's number of repetitions was due to a phenomenon of slippage during DNA replication. We highlighted the microsatellites using PCR; their development is time-consuming for plant species for which there is little DNA sequence information in the public databases [19]. The SSR are codominant markers easy to manipulate [20], but their preparation is quite heavy because it is necessary to “enrich screen genomic library with a probe of the microsatellites, sequence the positive clones, synthesize oligonucleotides primers and testing the primer pairs in a sample of individuals” [21]. The microsatellites SSR can be developed also by analysing sequences present in the database, mostly from EST (Expressed Sequence Tag), the study of [22] exploited recently acquired EST sequence data to develop an extensive set of microsatellites markers. Thus, EST-based microsatellites provided a large set of de novo genetic markers, which show significant amounts of polymorphism both between and within C. cardunculus var. sylvestris, C. cardunculus var. altilis and C. cardunculus var. scolymus [22]. They are well-suited as assays for phylogenetic analysis and the construction of genetic maps in this species [22]. Some SSR dosage was developed recently for Ccardunculus [2,23,24]. Microsatellites quickly become the preferred markers in population genetics analysis due to their advantages especially for species conservation. The nucleotide sequence of a microsatellite consists of tandem repeat of trimers, dimers, or even monomers. It is numerous and well distributed over the genome. These sequences are characterized by an important polymorphism due to variation of the repetitions number according to the alleles [25].

Due to their high informativity and their better distribution in the genome, the microsatellites are ideal markers for the genes’ detection and the genetic diversity study of plant species.

The objective of this work is to study the genetic diversity in six wild cardoon populations and a cultivated one from semi-arid and wet regions of Tunisia using microsatellite markers.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Plant material

The plant material used in this study are small leaves of six wild cardoon populations collected from five semi-arid regions (Tiurif, Bahra, Zriba, Bouficha and Enfidha) and one wet region (Wad mliz) and one cultivated cardoon population collected from a wet region (Beja), all these regions are located in the north of Tunisia. From each site, we have collected 14 samples. We have chosen only these seven populations of Ccardunculus because this specie is more widespread in the northern part of Tunisia. Fig. 1 shows the geographical location of the studied populations in the bioclimatic map of Tunisia.

Fig. 1

The geographical location of the studied populations of Cynara cardunculus.

2.2 DNA extraction

The basic plant material for this work consists of 0.3 g of small leaf tissue of each population of Ccardunculus L. ground in liquid nitrogen, placed in 15 mL tubes and frozen at –80 °C. The protocol used for DNA extraction is that of [1].

2.3 Amplification of microsatellites using PCR

The amplification conditions are as follow: an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min followed by 33 successive cycles, each cycle consists of a succession of three phases: a denaturation phase at 94 °C for 30 s, an hybridization phase at the optimum temperature determined from 52 to 56 °C for 30 s according to the type of primer and an elongation phase at 72 °C for 45 s.

Finally, a last extension step at 72 °C for 10 min is programmed and a cooling phase at 4 °C. These cycling conditions are used as such [26]. Thus, the based optimization is made according to other parameters, which are: the concentration and the volume. The reaction volume used for each sample of 10 μL contained: 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 0.2 mM of dNTP, 70 mM of forward primer, 200 mM of reverse primer and 0.4 U of Taq 50 ng/μL DNA. All PCR reactions are performed in a thermal cycler 9700 (Applied Biosystems) and the detection of PCR products are carried out on an automated fragment analyzer CEQ 8800 (Beckman Coulter).

2.4 Amplified microsatellites loci

As part of this work, 23 microsatellites loci are used to characterize the genetic variability of Ccardunculus L. in Tunisia. These markers are chosen considering microsatellites selected in another research project [22]. The microsatellites markers used are: CyEM 138, CyEM 232, CyEM 118, CyEM 218, CyEM 291, CyEM 182, CyEM 253, CyEM 2, CyEM 42, CyEM 188, CyEM 112, CyEM 231, CyEM 109, CyEM 136, CyEM 144, CyEM 193, CyEM 210, CyEM 64, CyEM 174 and CyEM 111 [22], CELMS 14, CELMS 33 and CELMS 61 [27]. These microsatellites are amplified by PCR and its products are detected using an automated fragment analyzer CEQ 8800 (Beckman Coulter) that distinguishes the alleles of each studied locus.

2.5 Statistical analysis

The genetic diversity between the studied populations of Ccardunculus L. is analysed at two levels: intra- and interpopulation variability. The aim of this approach is to characterize, using a set of parameters, the variability between these populations and their genetic proximity. In this study, we used the Hardy–Weinberg method to test if a population is in equilibrium or no. It is based on the disparity of the observed genotypes number to the theoretical genotypes number. The analysis is performed using the software Popgene version 1.32 [28], and the dendrogram is constructed by the UPGMA approach [29] using the same software. In order to better understand the diversity between the seven studied populations, we used the software Genetix version 4.05.2 to build the AFC 3D (factor analysis of correspondence).

In order to describe the intrapopulation genetic diversity, we have calculated six parameters estimated for each locus which are: the average number of alleles locus (A), the rate of polymorphism (P), the average observed heterozygosity (HO), the average expected heterozygosity (HE), the average expected unbiased heterozygosity (Hnb) and the fixation index (FIS).

The average number of alleles per locus (A) reflects the richness of alleles in a population, it is calculated as follows: A=1/Ia, where “a” is the number of alleles at a locus and “l” the number.

The rate of polymorphism (P) is the percentage of polymorphic loci in the studied sample. In the present study, a locus is considered polymorphic if the most common allele has a frequency less or equal to 0.95, the rate of HO represents the proportion of the observed heterozygotes at a given locus, only for codominant markers [28], while the rate of HE is the expected proportion of heterozygotes; two estimates are given: the first is the heterozygosity of Nei [30] and the second is the unbiased heterozygosity estimated using the algorithm of Levene [31].

The fixation index measures the difference between the individuals found in the state of observed heterozygosity and those found in the state of expected heterozygosity, it is also called the deviation from panmixia and is calculated as described in the following formula: F = 1 − HO/HE.

In fact, a population of diploid individuals is balanced in Hardy–Weinberg if the association of two individuals to form gametes is random with respect to gametes genotypes. Therefore, the fixation index is the deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg structure; it ranges from −1 to +1 and allows knowing the heterozygote's deficiency in a population. F is positive when the population has a deficiency of heterozygote in relation with panmictic equilibrium test and F is negative otherwise.

In addition to the intrapopulation genetic diversity, we have also studied the interpopulation genetic diversity; for this reason, we used in this study three parameters: genetic distance, F statistics of Wright and gene flow.

The genetic distance between two samples is defined as the proportion of genetic elements, which they do not share. D = 1 only if the two samples do not have a genetic elements in common.

As part of this study, the genetic distances between the pairs of populations are calculated using the classical approach based on allele frequencies in each population by retaining the distance of Nei [29], the F statistics of Wright are estimates of FIT, FIS and FST for multiple groups or populations [32]; they measure the deviation of heterozygosity relative to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium at different levels: the FIS is the inbreeding coefficient; it measures the potential reduction of individuals’ heterozygosity inside their subpopulation, FST is called fixation index and corresponds to the reduction in subpopulations’ heterozygosity due to the differences in allele frequencies averages, while FIT is the reduction of heterozygosity between the individuals and the general theory population; in addition, the gene flow is the estimation of FST [33]; the estimation is made for groups or multiple populations.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Intrapopulation genetic diversity

In general, the distribution of alleles, which ranged from 1 for CyEM 111 and CyEM 182 to 15 for CyEM 42, is quite similar in most cases; the most common alleles are always the same. This is the case of the allele A (which varied from 102 bp for CyEM 182 to 369 bp for CyEM 218); this allele appears often and is the most abundant in the different loci in all studied populations.

The calculated allele frequencies for each locus and each population ranged from 0.0263 for various alleles in some populations to 1 for the allele C (187 bp) of CyEM 111 and the allele L (235 bp) of CyEM 182 for cultivated cardoon. The exclusive presence of the allele frequency “1” at the allele C (187 pb) of CyEM 111 and the allele L (235 pb) of CyEM 182 is noted only for the population of cultivated cardoon and not in the other wild cardoon populations. This result shows that the cultivated cardoon is very different genetically from the wild one.

Indeed, the allelic richness of a population is defined as the allele's number present at a given locus, and depends much on the sample size, considering that the chances of discovering a new allele increases when a new individual is observed.

In this work, the average number of alleles per locus ranged from 2.73 for the cultivated cardoon to 6.93 for Wad mliz; the cultivated form of Ccardunculus present the lower number of alleles per locus than the six wild cardoon populations, this result can be explained by the fact that the wild cardoon presents more genetic variability than the cultivated one.

In addition, we have found that all loci are polymorphic to 100% at the sill of 95% in the seven studied populations. This result indicates the effectiveness of microsatellites loci used for the analysis of populations genetic diversity of Ccardunculus L.

In fact, the rate of observed and expected heterozygosity is calculated for each locus and each population under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. In order to estimate the importance of genetic polymorphism, we have compared these two rates of heterozygosity.

Due to the multi locus of the total population, the unbiased expected heterozygosity (0.79) is higher than the observed heterozygosity (0.57). This result reflects a positive difference between the studied populations and suggests a heterozygosity deficit in the studied populations due to the low sampling realized (14 samples for each population) (Table 1). However, HO = 0.57 was less important than other values found in other studies of island wild cardoon populations from Italy [4] which indicate that the HO values are: 0.653, 0.740, 0.795, 0.650, 0.769, 0.666 and 0.720 for Bronte, Palazzolo, Roccella, Piano Tavola, Oristano, Nuoro and Sassari, respectively.

Table 1

Mean number of alleles and heterozygosity per locus in total population of Cynara cardunculus L.

Locus n NA HO Hnb HE
CyEM 138 96 23 0.7292 0.9253 0.9302
CyEM 232 96 8 0.6354 0.8375 0.8418
CyEM 118 96 6 0.5312 0.6648 0.6683
CyEM 218 96 11 0.6875 0.8762 0.8808
CyEM 291 96 8 0.5312 0.8008 0.8050
CyEM 182 96 11 0.3750 0.8531 0.8576
CyEM 253 96 15 0.7604 0.9030 0.9078
CELMS 33 96 12 0.5729 0.7110 0.7148
CyEM 2 96 6 0.4375 0.5627 0.5656
CyEM 42 96 21 0.6771 0.9160 0.9208
CyEM 188 96 7 0.4896 0.8123 0.8165
CyEM 112 96 11 0.5208 0.8217 0.8260
CyEM 231 96 7 0.6667 0.7788 0.7828
CyEM 109 96 6 0.5208 0.7585 0.7624
CyEM 136 96 12 0.5625 0.8177 0.8219
CELMS 14 96 13 0.7500 0.8656 0.8701
CyEM 144 96 6 0.4479 0.5836 0.5866
CyEM 193 96 10 0.5208 0.6577 0.6612
CyEM 210 96 10 0.5521 0.7683 0.7723
CyEM 64 96 12 0.6979 0.8823 0.8869
CyEM 174 96 7 0.3958 0.6766 0.6801
CELMS 61 96 13 0.5729 0.8891 0.8937
CyEM 111 96 8 0.5521 0.8264 0.8307
Mean 10.5652 0.5734 0.7908 0.7950

We notice that some loci are in significant gap according to the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; Table 2 shows the equilibrium test results calculated by the software Popgene. All loci are in disequilibrium in the studied populations of Ccardunculus with the exception of the locus CyEM 118 and CyEM 231 that verify the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in all individuals of the studied populations.

Table 2

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test.

Locus Populations Total
Bouficha Bahra Wad mliz Twirif Zriba Enfidha Cultivated cardoon
CyEM 138 ** **
***
**
***
CyEM 232 **
***
**
***
**
***
CyEM 118
CyEM 218 **
***
** **
***
CyEM 291 **
***
** **
***
CyEM 182 **
***
**
***
**
***
**
***
**
***
CyEM 253 **
***
**
***
**
***
**
***
CELMS 33 **
***
**
***
CyEM 2 ** ** **
CyEM 42 **
***
**
***
**
***
CyEM 188 ** **
***
**
***
**
***
CyEM 112 **
***
**
***
**
***
**
***
CyEM 231
CyEM 109 **
***
**
***
**
***
**
***
CyEM 136 **
***
** **
***
**
***
CELMS14 **
***
**
***
CyEM 144 ** **
***
**
***
CyEM 193 **
***
**
***
** **
***
**
***
CyEM 210 **
***
** **
***
CyEM 64 **
***
**
***
**
***
CyEM 174 **
***
**
***
CELMS 61 ** ** **
***
**
***
**
***
CyEM 111 **
***
** **
***

** : P < 0.05 (significant).

*** : P < 0.01 (highly significant).

In addition, we have also calculated the FIS (Table 3) of the studied populations which is the measure of the difference between the individuals found in the observed heterozygosity (HO) and those found in the HE. Five populations have a positive FIS more or less high; these are: Twirif, Bahra, Bouficha, Enfidha and Zriba. These positive indices reflect also a deficiency in heterozygosity which CyEM 111, CyEM 193, CyEM 232, CyEM 144, CyEM 109, CyEM 210, CyEM 182, CyEM 112, CyEM 218, CyEM 291, CyEM 188 and CyEM 136 are partially responsible because they are often higher than 0.35; the other two populations presenting a negative fixation index are the cultivated cardoon and Wad mliz. This result shows that these two populations were not significantly deviated from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.

Table 3

Values of the fixation index (FIS) of the studied populations.

Populations FIS
Twirif 0.085
Bahra 0.096
Wad mliz −0.012
Zriba 0.177
Bouficha 0.147
Enfidha 0.155
Cultivated cardoon −0.066

In the total populations, the loci shows an important excess of homozygotes (FIS = 0.33) for CyEM 210, CyEM 2, CyEM 109, CyEM 218, CyEM 64, CyEM 138, CyEM 182 and CyEM 174 and (FIS = 0.70) for CyEM 182. The excess of observed homozygosity or heterozygosity compared with the expected homozygosity or heterozygosity according to Hardy–Weinberg hypothesis is tested for each locus and each population.

Thus, it appears that some populations relating to some loci show significant excess of homozygotes according to the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Other populations have an excess in heterozygosity significantly different from the proportions of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and some populations have shown the panmictic equilibrium at some loci. The mean values of FIS: 0.085, 0.096, 0.147, 0.155 and 0.177 for Twirif, Bahra, Bouficha, Enfidha and Zriba, respectively, are all positive, suggesting a deficit in heterozygotes in these populations. The mean index of FIS for the overall studied populations is 0.273; this value indicates a relatively important deficit of heterozygotes.

3.2 Interpopulation genetic diversity

3.2.1 Fixation index or F statistics

The fixation indices are calculated for all loci. They ranged from −0.0078 for CELMS 33 to 0.4103 for CyEM 182 and the FIT index ranged from 0.0981 for the locus CyEM 231 to 0.5828 for CyEM 182. The mean value of FIT = 0.1062 indicates a heterozygotes deficit less important in the populations taken in isolation than in the total population (FIT = 0.2752). In fact, the values of FIT indicate an overall heterozygote deficit of 27.52% according to the seven studied populations. As for the genetic differentiation FST, it is relatively high for CyEM 182, CyEM 210 and CyEM 42. In contrast, FST shows low values for CELMS 14 and CyEM 2.

The mean differentiation between the studied populations is FST = 0.1891, which can be considered as a high value and indicates the genetic variation origin of Ccardunculus L. We recall that the total genetic diversity is the sum of intrapopulation and interpopulation genetic diversity. The value FST = 0.1891 determines that a majority (81.09%) of the total genetic variation is explained by the intrapopulation genetic diversity and 18.91% of this variability is attributed to the differences between the studied populations.

This level of genetic differentiation is similar to the levels cited in other studies of Asteraceae populations: 14.1% for the island wild cardoon populations from Italy [4] and 17.9% for the populations of Ligularia sibirica [34].

FST is calculated between the studied populations; the parameter of genetic differentiation – (FST = 0.09) between Twirif and Enfidha, (FST = 0.08) between Bouficha and Bahra, between Bouficha and Twirif, between Bahra and Twirif, between Bahra and Zriba and between Twirif and Zriba, (FST = 0.07) between Bouficha and Wad mliz, between Bahra and Enfidha, between Wad mliz and Twirif, between Wad mliz and Zriba and (FST = 0.06) between Bahra and Wad mliz, between Bouficha and Zriba, between Bouficha and Enfidha and between Wad mliz and Enfidha – reflects the lack of geographical and genetic structure between these populations that appear homogeneous. This neat reconciliation assumes an exchange of genes between these regions.

However, there is a distinction between the cultivated cardoon and the six wild cardoon populations – (FST = 0.24) between Twirif and cultivated cardoon and between Zriba and cultivated cardoon, (FST = 0.23) between Enfidha and cultivated cardoon and (FST = 0.22) between Bouficha and cultivated cardoon, between Bahra and cultivated cardoon and between Wad mliz and cultivated cardoon; this result can be explained by the differentiation of cultivated cardoon from the wild one from a molecular point of view.

3.2.2 Genetic distance and construction of dendrograms

The matrix of estimated distances between individuals of the studied populations is used for the construction of dendrograms. These distances ranged from 0.29 to 1.22 (Table 4), this result indicates a large genetic variability among the studied populations of Ccardunculus L. The null distance between two individuals suggests a similarity using the studied loci.

Table 4

Genetic distances matrix between the seven studied populations as per Nei's [29].

Populations Bouficha Bahra Wad mliz Twirif Zriba Enfidha Cultivated cardoon
Bouficha **** 0.6067 0.6071 0.5981 0.6707 0.6896 0.3669
Bahra 0.4996 **** 0.6755 0.5995 0.6198 0.6828 0.4029
Wad mliz 0.4991 0 **** 0.6326 0.5976 0.6622 0.3629
Twirif 0.5140 0.5117 0.4579 **** 0.5929 0.5577 0.2981
Zriba 0.3994 0.4783 0.5149 0.5227 **** 0.6078 0.2928
Enfidha 0.3717 0.3815 0.4121 0.5840 0.4979 **** 0.3623
Cultivated cardoon 1.0028 0.9091 1.0137 1.2103 1.2284 1.0154 ****

The examination of the studied population's dendrogram (Fig. 2) distinguishes five main groups. This distribution can be explained by the existence of a large common genetic basis among the studied populations despite their geographic and phenotypic divergence.

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic relationships between the seven Cynara populations.

In order to study the genetic diversity structure between the studied populations, the distance of Nei is estimated between the pairs of populations; the genetic distances matrix (Table 4) indicates a variation from 0.29 to 1.22 between the pairs of the seven populations. These values indicate that the studied populations exhibit a significant genetic variability; in addition, we find that the genetic distance between the cultivated cardoon and the six wild cardoon populations is greater than 1 in most cases; this result shows that the cultivated cardoon is very different from the wild one from a molecular point of view.

During the examination of the dendrogram (Fig. 2), we can notice that the population's combinations are in relation with the geographical proximity. We note that the cultivated cardoon branch form an isolated group, Bouficha and Enfidha branch form another isolated group and Bahra and Wad mliz form another group, in addition, we find that the branch of Zriba and that of Twirif form an isolated group from the other studied populations. The same results were found in the AFC 3D (Factorial analysis of correspondence) of the studied populations, in this analysis, the axis 1 shows 29.74% of the total variability, the axis 2 shows 18.59% of the total variability, while the axis 3 shows 16.88% of the total variability (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

AFC 3D of the studied populations of Cynara cardunculus using Genetix version 4.05.2.

3.2.3 Gene flow

The gene flow (Nm) between the pairs of populations represents relatively significant values: (3.52) between Bouficha and Enfidha and (3.49) between Bahra and Wad mliz, whereas, the gene flow is less important in other populations: (0.87) between Bahra and cultivated cardoon and between Wad mliz and cultivated cardoon, (0.84) between Bouficha and cultivated cardoon, (0.79) between Enfidha and cultivated cardoon, (0.76) between Twirif and cultivated cardoon and (0.75) between Zriba and cultivated cardoon. Indeed, these values reflect a sizable gene exchange between the studied populations and confirm those of distance and genetic differentiation. In fact, this gene flow exists only between the six wild cardoon populations and not between the cultivated cardoon and the wild one, considering that the cultivated form of Ccardunculus is free to inter-mate with the wild one for the reason that they are collected from the fields before the flowering time (we have used only seedlings in our study). The globe artichoke is also free to inter-mate with the wild cardoon because it is propagated vegetatively in Tunisia and not by seeds.

4 Conclusion

The presented results are only a small contribution to the characterization of Ccardunculus L. They also represent a gain for the implementation of a development program of this specie in Tunisia; in addition, this work could serve as a basis for more substantial programs of genetic diversity studies of different Ccardunculus L. populations in Tunisia. In general, this study allowed demonstrating a high genetic diversity level in Ccardunculus L. in Tunisia, mainly intrapopulation diversity (81.09%). The differentiation indices show that the studied populations share a large genetic basis despite the emergence of differences according to the region; in addition, our results show that the cultivated cardoon is very different from the wild one from a molecular point of view. Indeed, the populations of Ccardunculus L. seems threatened by the lack of management and conservation. So, the maintenance of an existing genetic variation within the specie is an important step in the plant genetic resources conservation. Finally, the kind of intervention which could be adopted to fight against genetic erosion of the Tunisian Ccardunculus L. germplasm is to select among Tunisian local populations of this specie the promising genotypes, their evaluation under different culture conditions and collection of cardoon seeds and their conservation in the Tunisian gene bank.

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.


Bibliographie

[1] G. Sonnante; A. De Paolis; V. Lattanzio; P. Perrino Genetic variation in wild and cultivated artichoke revealed by RAPD markers, Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., Volume 49 (2002), pp. 247-252

[2] A. Acquadro; E. Portis; D. Lee; P. Donini; S. Lanteri Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Cynara cardunculus L, Genome, Volume 48 (2005), pp. 217-225

[3] A. Rottenberg; D. Zohary; E. Nevo Isozyme relationships between cultivated artichoke and the wild relatives, Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., Volume 43 (1996), pp. 59-62

[4] E. Portis; A. Acquadro; C. Comino; G. Mauromicale; E. Saba; S. Lanteri Genetic structure of island populations of wild cardoon (Cynara cardunculus L. var. sylvestris [Lamk] Fiori) detected by AFLPs and SSRs, Plant Sci., Volume 169 (2005), pp. 199-210

[5] Dellacecca Cardo Cynara cardunculus L (V.V. Bianco; F. Pimpini, eds.), Orticoltura, Patron, Bologna, 1990, pp. 252-258 ([in Italian])

[6] B. Dridi, Un système intégré de micropropagation de l’artichaut (Cynara scolymus L.), thesis submitted to obtain the degree of Doctor (Ph.D) in Agricultural Sciences and Applied Biological, University of Gent (2003), pp. 22.

[7] J. Fernandez; M.D. Curt; P.L. Aguado Industrial applications of Cynara cardunculus L. for energy and other uses, Ind. Crop Prod., Volume 24 (2006), pp. 222-229

[8] J. Gominho; J. Fernandez; H. Pereira Cynara cardunculus L. A new fiber crop for pulp and paper production, Ind. Crop Prod., Volume 13 (2000), pp. 1-10

[9] E. Maccarone; B. Fallico; F. Fanella; G. Mauromicale; S.A. Raccuia; S. Foti Possible alternative utilization of Cynara spp. II. Chemical characterization of their grain oil, Ind. Crop Prod., Volume 10 (1999), pp. 229-237

[10] S.V. Silva; F.X. Malcata Studies pertaining to coagulant and proteolytic activities of plant proteases from Cynara cardunculus, Food Chem., Volume 89 (2005), pp. 19-26

[11] R.N. Barbagallo; M. Chisari; G. Spagna; A. Ierna; A. Patan-e; A. Occhipinti; G. Mauromicale Caseinolytic activity expression in flowers of Cynara cardunculus L, Acta Hortic., Volume 730 (2007), pp. 195-200

[12] J. Slanina; E. Taborska; P. Musil Determination of cynarine in the decoctions of the artichoke (Cynara cardunculus L.) by the HPLC method, Cesko-SloV Farm, Volume 42 (1993), pp. 265-268

[13] M.F. Wang; J.E. Simon; I.F. Aviles; K. He; Q.Y. Zheng; Y. Tadmor Analysis of antioxidative phenolic compounds in artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.), J. Agric. Food Chem., Volume 51 (2003), pp. 601-608

[14] V. Martino; N. Caffini; J.D. Philippson; A. Lappa; A. Tchernitchin; G. Ferrar et al. Identification and characterization of antimicrobial components in leaf extracts of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.), Acta Hortic., Volume 501 (1999), pp. 111-114

[15] E. Coart; X. .Vekemans; M.J.M. .Smulders; I. .Wagner; J. .Van Huylenbroeck; E. Van Bockstaele; I. Roldan-Ruiz Genetic variation in the endangered wild apple (Malus sylvestris [L.] Mill.) in Belgium as revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism and microsatellite markers, Mol. Ecol., Volume 12 (2003), pp. 845-857

[16] P. Vos; R. Hogers; M. Bleeker; M. Reijand; T. Van de Lee; M. Hornes; A.J. Fritjers Pot; J. .Paleman; M. Kuiper; M. Zabeau AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting, Nucl. Acids Res., Volume 23 (1995), pp. 4407-4414

[17] M. Morgante; M.A.M. Olivieri PCR-amplified microsatellites as markers in plant genetics, Plant J., Volume 3 (1993), pp. 175-182

[18] L. Zane; L. Bargelloni; T. Patarnello Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review, Mol. Ecol., Volume 11 (2002), pp. 1-16

[19] X.W. Wang; A. Kaga; N. Tomooka; D.A. Vaughan The development of SSR markers by a new method in plants and their application to gene flow studies in azuki bean [Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwi & Ohashi], Theor. Appl. Genet., Volume 109 (2004), pp. 352-360

[20] B. Najimi; S. El Jaafari; M. Jlibéne; J.M. Jacquemin Applications des marqueurs moléculaires dans l’amélioration du blé tendre pour la résistance aux maladies et aux insectes, Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., Volume 7 (2003) no. 1, pp. 17-35

[21] D. De Vienne, Les marqueurs moléculaires en génétique et biotechnologies végétales, INRA/CNED/AUPELF/UREF (1998) 31–43.

[22] D. Scaglione; A. Acquadro; E. Portis; C. Taylor; S. Lanteri; S. Knapp Ontology and diversity of transcript-associated microsatellites mined from a globe artichoke EST database, BMC Genomics, Volume 10 (2009), p. 454

[23] A. Acquadro; E. Portis; S. Lanteri Isolation of microsatellite loci in artichoke (Cynara cardunculus L. var. scolymus), Mol. Ecol. Notes, Volume 3 (2003), pp. 37-39

[24] A. Acquadro, E., Portis, E. Albertini, S. Lanteri, M-AFLP based protocol for microsatellite loci isolation in Cynara cardunculus L. (Asteraceae), Mol. Ecol. Notes (2005b), doi:10.1111/j. 1471-8286.2005.00897.x/full/.

[25] D. Boichard; P. Leroy; H. Leveziel; J.M. Elsen Utilisation des marqueurs moléculaires en génétique animale, INRA Prod. Anim., Volume 11 (1998), pp. 67-80

[26] G. Sonnante; A. Carluccio; A. De Paolis; D. Pignone Identification of artichoke SSR markers: molecular variation and patterns of diversity in genetically cohesive taxa and wild allies, Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., Volume 55 (2008), pp. 1029-1046

[27] A. Acquadro; S. Lanteri; D. Scaglione; P. Arens; B. Vosman; E. Portis Genetic mapping and annotation of genomic microsatellites isolated from globe artichoke, Theor. Appl. Genet., Volume 118 (2009), pp. 1573-1587

[28] F. Yeh et al. POPGENE, version 1.32. A Microsoft Windows based freeware for population genetic analysis, Edmonton, AB, Canada: university of Alberta, 1999

[29] M. Nei Genetic distance between populations, Am. Nat., Volume 106 (1972), pp. 283-292

[30] M. Nei Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, Volume 70 (1973), pp. 3321-3323

[31] H. Levene On a matching problem arising in genetics, Ann. Math Stat., Volume 20 (1949), pp. 91-94

[32] D.L. Hartl; A.G. Clark Principles of population genetics, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 1989

[33] M. Slatkin; N.H. Barton A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow, Evolution, Volume 43 (1989), pp. 1349-1368

[34] A. Smidova; Z. Munzbergova; I. Plackova Genetic diversity of a relict plant species, Ligularia sibirica (L.) Cass. (Asteraceae), Flora, Volume 206 (2011), pp. 151-157


Commentaires - Politique


Ces articles pourraient vous intéresser

Phenolic composition of Cynara cardunculus L. organs, and their biological activities

Hanen Falleh; Riadh Ksouri; Kamel Chaieb; ...

C. R. Biol (2008)


Investigations on potential Tunisian biomasses energetic valorization: thermogravimetric characterization and kinetic degradation analysis

Jemaa Mabrouki; Mohammed Ammar Abbassi; Besma Khiari; ...

C. R. Chim (2022)


SSRs transferability and genetic diversity of three allogamous ryegrass species

Zhi-Hui Guo; Kai-Xin Fu; Xin-Quan Zhang; ...

C. R. Biol (2016)