Outline
Comptes Rendus

Taxonomy/Taxinomie
Description of a new bat species of the tribe Scotonycterini (Chiroptera, Pteropodidae) from southwestern Cameroon
Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 337 (2014) no. 2, pp. 134-142.

Abstracts

The tribe Scotonycterini is currently composed of three fruit bat species of the family Pteropodidae (Mammalia, Chiroptera) characterized by white fur patches on the head, specifically around the nose and behind the eyes: Scotonycteris zenkeri, S. ophiodon and Casinycteris argynnis. Herein a new species is described, Casinycteris campomaanensis sp. nov., based on female specimen collected in 2007 near the village Nkoélon-Mvini close to the Campo-Ma’an National Park, southwestern Cameroon. It is readily distinguished from the three other species of Scotonycterini by its body size and craniodental characteristics. Molecular analyses based on the complete mitochondrial cytochrome b gene indicate that the new species is the sister-group to C. argynnis and that the holotype of S. ophiodon is more closely related to Casinycteris than to S. zenkeri, rendering the genus Scotonycteris paraphyletic. Based on these results, morphological characters within the tribe Scotonycterini were reassessed and a new classification is proposed, in which the new species and S. ophiodon are placed in the genus Casinycteris.

La tribu des Scotonycterini inclut actuellement trois espèces de chauves-souris frugivores de la famille Pteropodidae (Mammalia, Chiroptera), qui partagent la présence de taches blanches sur le pelage de la tête, en particulier au niveau du museau et au-dessus des yeux : Scotonycteris zenkeri, S. ophiodon et Casinycteris argynnis. Une nouvelle espèce, Casinycteris campomaanensis sp. nov., est décrite ici sur la base d’une femelle collectée en 2007 près du village de Nkoélon-Mvini, à proximité du parc national de Campo-Ma’an, dans le Sud-Ouest du Cameroun. Elle se distingue des trois autres espèces de Scotonycterini par sa taille corporelle et ses caractéristiques crânio-dentaires. Les analyses moléculaires reposant sur le gène mitochondrial complet du cytochrome b indiquent que la nouvelle espèce constitue le groupe-frère de C. argynnis et que l’holotype de S. ophiodon est plus proche de Casinycteris que de Szenkeri, rendant ainsi le genre Scotonycteris paraphylétique. Ces résultats ont permis, d’une part, de réinterpréter l’évolution des caractères morphologiques au sein des Scotonycterini et, d’autre part, de proposer une nouvelle classification, où la nouvelle espèce et S. ophiodon sont toutes deux placées dans le genre Casinycteris.

Metadata
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2013.12.006
Keywords: Cameroon, Casinycteris campomaanensis sp. nov., Fruit bat, Scotonycteris ophiodon, Taxonomy
Keywords: Cameroun, Casinycteris campomaanensis sp. nov., Chauve-souris frugivore, Scotonycteris ophiodon, Taxonomie

Alexandre Hassanin 1, 2

1 Muséum national d’histoire naturelle (MNHN), Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), UMR 7205 CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, case postale no 51, 55, rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France
2 Muséum national d’histoire naturelle (MNHN), UMS 2700 – Outils et méthodes de la systématique intégrative, case postale n° 26, 57, rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France
@article{CRBIOL_2014__337_2_134_0,
     author = {Alexandre Hassanin},
     title = {Description of a new bat species of the tribe {Scotonycterini} {(Chiroptera,} {Pteropodidae)} from southwestern {Cameroon}},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Biologies},
     pages = {134--142},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {337},
     number = {2},
     year = {2014},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crvi.2013.12.006},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Alexandre Hassanin
TI  - Description of a new bat species of the tribe Scotonycterini (Chiroptera, Pteropodidae) from southwestern Cameroon
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Biologies
PY  - 2014
SP  - 134
EP  - 142
VL  - 337
IS  - 2
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crvi.2013.12.006
LA  - en
ID  - CRBIOL_2014__337_2_134_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Alexandre Hassanin
%T Description of a new bat species of the tribe Scotonycterini (Chiroptera, Pteropodidae) from southwestern Cameroon
%J Comptes Rendus. Biologies
%D 2014
%P 134-142
%V 337
%N 2
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crvi.2013.12.006
%G en
%F CRBIOL_2014__337_2_134_0
Alexandre Hassanin. Description of a new bat species of the tribe Scotonycterini (Chiroptera, Pteropodidae) from southwestern Cameroon. Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 337 (2014) no. 2, pp. 134-142. doi : 10.1016/j.crvi.2013.12.006. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/biologies/articles/10.1016/j.crvi.2013.12.006/

Version originale du texte intégral

1 Introduction

The tribe Scotonycterini includes three species of fruit bats (Chiroptera, Pteropodidae) restricted to evergreen tropical rainforests of Africa and characterized by white fur patches on the nose and behind the eyes [1]: Scotonycteris zenkeri Matschie, 1894 (Zenker's fruit bat), Scotonycteris ophiodon Pohle, 1943 (Pohle's fruit bat), and Casinycteris argynnis Thomas, 1910 (short-palated fruit bat). The geographical distribution of Szenkeri overlaps with the two large blocks of African dense moist forests – the Upper Guinea Forest in west Africa and the Congo Basin Forest in central Africa (Fig. 1A; [2]). These two forest blocks are separated in west Africa by the Dahomey Gap, a savannah corridor that extends from central Ghana, through Togo, Benin, and western Nigeria [3]. The two other species within this tribe have less widespread distributions: S. ophiodon is also found in both west and central Africa (Fig. 1A; [4]), but is only known from 16 localities [5], which do not include the swamp forest around the Nigeria Delta or central and eastern portions of the Congo Basin; and C. argynnis is endemic to the Congo Basin Forest (Fig. 1A; [6]).

Fig. 1

A. (Colour online) Geographic distribution of the three species of the tribe Scotonycterini (modified from the maps provided by the IUCN [2,4,6]). B. Photograph of the holotype of Casinycteris campomaanensis sp. nov. (MNHN 2011-637) collected near the village of Nkoélon-Mvini (South Region, Cameroon).

Morphologically, the three species of Scotonycterini can be easily distinguished from each other based on two standard body size measurements, body mass (W) and forearm length (FA): S. zenkeri is the smallest species (W: 16–27 g; FA: 45.0–56.4 mm), S. ophiodon is the largest species (W: 65–95 g; FA: 74.6–87.6 mm), and C. argynnis is intermediate (W: 26–33 g; FA: 49.8–63.5 mm) [7]. There is sexual dimorphism in all of these species, with females being larger than males (on average W: 20% heavier; FA: 10% longer). A few discrete characters can also be used to differentiate the three species [1,7]. The wing membrane finger joints are brown in S. zenkeri, whereas they are yellowish in the two other species. In S. ophiodon, the canines have a second inner cusp and the ear tips are slightly pointed, whereas in the other two species the cusp is lacking and they have rounded ears. In C. argynnis, the postdental palate is markedly short, whereas in the two other species it extends posteriorly beyond the upper molars.

In November 2007, an adult female Scotonycterini was collected near the Nkoélon-Mvini village close to the Campo-Ma’an National Park, in the southwestern corner of Cameroon (Fig. 1A). At first glance, the general appearance of the animal was similar to that of C. argynnis, but its body mass was 49 g, which is intermediate between female C. argynnis (28–34 g) and S. ophiodon (75–88 g), and its FA was 73.2 mm, which is larger than female C. argynnis (54.4–63.5 mm), but slightly smaller than female S. ophiodon (75.3–87.6 mm) (Fig. 2A; data from Bergmans [7]). Later examinations revealed craniodental differences between the Nkoélon-Mvini village animal and the other members of the Scotonycterini. In addition, its mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequence differs significantly from that of the three other species of Scotonycterini. It is therefore described herein as new species.

Fig. 2

(Colour online) Differences between females of the four species of Scotonycterini based on morphological characters. The morphological data were extracted from Bergmans [7], in which geographical variation was analyzed for three species of Scotonycterini based on minimum and maximum values: Scotonycteris zenkeri (blue circles), S. ophiodon (green circles), and Casinycteris argynnis (yellow circles). The red circle corresponds to the holotype of C. campomaanensis sp. nov. collected near the village of Nkoélon-Mvini (MNHN 2011-637). A. Forearm length (FA, measured in mm; abscissa) as compared to body mass (W, taken in g; ordinate). B. Palatal length (PL) as a percentage of greatest skull length (GSL) (abscissa) as compared to zygomatic width (ZW) as percentage of GSL (ordinate).

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Field survey

The field survey was conducted in the Campo-Ma’an rain forest located in the South Region of Cameroon. Bats were captured with Ecotone mist nets (Poland) around the village of Nkoélon-Mvini (02°23.831′ N, 10°02.691′ E, 117 m; Fig. 1A) between 18 and 25 November 2007. Bats were measured, photographed and, for members of the family Pteropodidae, species were identified using the dichotomous key of Bergmans [1]. The unidentified specimen described below was collected in the same immediate zone as five other fruit bat species: Eidolon helvum (Kerr, 1792), Epomops franqueti (Tomes, 1860), Megaloglossus woermanni Pagenstecher, 1885, Myonycteris torquata (Dobson, 1878), and Scotonycteris zenkeri. Reference specimens from this survey were deposited in the Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, Paris (MNHN) and other material used in this study is housed in the Zoologisches Museum Berlin (ZMB).

2.2 Morphological measurements

The body mass (W) of captured bats was measured using a PESOLA Micro Line 100 g or a PESOLA Medio Line 300 g. The following external measurements were taken on recently euthanized specimens using a digital calliper to the nearest 0.1 mm: FA, the forearm length (from the elbow to the wrist with both joints folded); EAR, ear length (from the base of the ear to the distal tip of the pinna); HF, hind foot length (from the heel to the tip of the longest toe, including the claw); TIB, tibia length (from the knee to the ankle); 2DM, 3DM, 4DM and 5DM, which correspond to the lengths of 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th metacarpals taken from the wrist to the end of the respective metacarpals; 1D1P, 1D2P, 2D1P, 2D2P, 3D1P, 3D2P, 4D1P, 4D2P, 5D1P, and 5D2P, which correspond to the lengths of the first and second phalanges of the respective 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th digits.

Two-dimensional images of the cranium and mandible were taken with a digital microscope in dorsal, lateral and ventral views using a ruler marked off in millimetres. The photographs were used under ImageJ 1.46r [8] to measure craniodental characters to the nearest 0.01 mm for comparisons with the data provided by Bergmans [7] for the three species of Scotonycterini. Abbreviations and definitions for craniodental measurements include BCH, braincase height (from the base of the auditory bullae to the highest part of the skull); BCW, braincase width (greatest width of the braincase); C1–C1, greatest width measured across the outer borders of the upper canines; C1–C1, greatest width measured across the outer borders of the lower canines; C1–M1, maxillary tooth row length (from the anterior edge of the upper canine to the posterior edge of the upper molar); C1–M2, length of mandibular toothrow (from the anterior edge of the canine to the posterior edge of the 2nd lower molar); CBL, condylobasal length (from the distal edge of the occipital condyles to the anterior edge of the incisors); GSL, greatest skull length (from the posterior edge of the skull to the anterior edge of the incisors); IOW: interorbital width (least width of the interorbital constriction); M1–M1, greatest width measured across the outer edges of the upper molars; M2–M2, greatest width measured across the outer edges of the last lower molars; ML, mandible length (from the outermost part of the symphysis to the most posterior part of the articular condyle); PL, palatal length (from the anterior palatal emargination to the midpoint of posterior palatal emargination); POW, postorbital width (least width of the postorbital constriction); ZW, zygomatic width (greatest width of the skull across the zygomatic arches). All toothrow measurements were taken from an alveolar position. Two percentages were also calculated to allow comparisons with the data provided by Bergmans (1990) – PL × 100/GSL and ZW × 100/GSL.

2.3 Molecular analyses

A pectoral muscle sample of the odd specimen from near Nkoélon-Mvini (MNHN 2011-637) was preserved in 95% ethanol. Total genomic DNA was extracted using QIAGEN DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocol with the final volume of 100 μL eluted DNA in AE buffer. The mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene was amplified and sequenced with the following set of oligonucleotide primers: 5′-GAA AAA YCA CCG TTG TAY TTC AAC TA-3′ (CB-GLU-CH2) and 5′-CCC TTY TCT GGT TTA CAA GAC C-3′ (CB-LTHR-CH). The quality of 5′ and 3′ ends of the cytb gene was improved using the two following sets of primers published in Hassanin et al. [9]: U102/L402 and U162/L482.

A small portion of skin was sampled from the holotype of S. ophiodon (ZMB 50001). Since this specimen was preserved in alcohol during more than 100 years (from 1899 to 2013), DNA degradation took place and it was not possible to amplify long PCR fragments (> 300–400 nt). Therefore, seven sets of primers were used to amplify and sequence overlapping fragments of the cytb gene:

  • • CB-GLU-CH2 and 5′-CAT ATC CTA TRA AGG CTG TTG C-3′ (CB-L372-EM);
  • • 5′-CAG GAY TAT TCC TRG CAA TAC A-3′ (CB-U162-EM) and L402;
  • • 5′-CT ACA YGC YAA CGG AGC ATC-3′ (CB-U264-SC) and 5′-CC AAT ATA GGG RAT AGC TGA TAG-3′ (CB-L447-SC);
  • • 5′-CCA TGA GGC CAA ATA TCA TT-3′ (CB-U420-SC) and 5′-GGA TTA TRT CTR YGT CTG ATG-3′ (CB-L633-SC);
  • • 5′-GAC AAA GCY ACC YTA ACA CG-3′ (CBF2-U531-SC) and 5′-GRA TRG CGT ATG CAA ATA GGA-3′ (CB-L820-SC);
  • • 5′-GAC CTA CTA GGA GAC CCA GA-3′ (CB-U762-SC) and 5′-CAG GTT AGT GTR AGA AGG TC-3′ (CB-L990-SC);
  • • 5′-CAA RCT YGG AGG AGT VCT AGC-3′ (CB-U879-SC) and CB-LTHR-CH.

The polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were carried out in a volume of 20 μL containing 3 μL of PCR buffer 10X with MgCl2, 2 μL of dNTPs (6.6 mM), 1 μL of each of two primers (10 μM) and 0.1 μL of Taq polymerase (2.5 U, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The PCRs were run using the C1000 Touch thermal cycler (BIO-RAD) as follows: 4 min at 94 °C; the denaturation/annealing/elongation process was set with five cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 60 s at 60 °C, and 60 s at 72 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 60 s at 50 °C, and 60 s at 72 °C. Final elongation followed for 7 min at 72 °C. PCR products were purified using ExoSAP Kit (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) and then sequenced in both directions using an automated DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems 3100). These two last steps were performed at the Centre national de séquençage (Genoscope), Évry, France. Sequences were edited and assembled using Sequencher 5.1 (Gene Codes Corporation).

The cytb sequences newly generated were compared to those available in the EMBL/Genbank/DDBJ nucleotide database for the family Pteropodidae. The Bayesian approach was used to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships. The three outgroup species used to root the pteropodid tree, i.e., Artibeus jamaicensis, Hipposideros armiger and Megaderma lyra, were chosen on the basis of previous molecular studies [10,11]. DNA sequences were aligned on Se-Al v2.0a11 [12]. The cytb dataset represents a total alignment of 1,140 nucleotides and 76 taxa. The best-fitting model of sequence evolution was selected under jModelTest 2.1.4 [13] using the Akaike information criterion. Bayesian analyses were then conducted using the selected GTR + I + G model on MrBayes v3.2.1 [14]. The posterior probabilities (PP) were calculated using four independent Markov chains run for 10 000 000 Metropolis-coupled MCMC generations, with tree sampling every 1000 generations, and a burn-in of 25%. Mean pairwise distances were calculated with PAUP version 4b10 [15] using Kimura's two-parameter (K2P) model.

3 Results

3.1 Systematic description

Casinycteris campomaanensis sp. nov.

Holotype: MNHN 2011-637 (field number: C07–41), adult female, in alcohol, skull removed, collected on 21 November 2007 by Alexandre Hassanin. Body mass = 49 g. External measurements (in mm) of the holotype include: FA = 73.2, EAR = 22.3, HF = 15.0, TIB = 30.6, 1D1P = 12.3, 1D2P = 17.5, 2DM = 37.0, 2D1P = 9.2, 2D2P = 5.5, 3DM = 54.6, 3D1P = 34.8, 3D2P = 45.0, 4DM = 52.7, 4D1P = 27.6, 4D2P = 28.0, 5DM = 55.1, 5D1P = 24.7, and 5D2P = 26.0. Skull measurements include: BCH = 13.26, BCW = 15.42, C1–C1 = 6.71, C1–C1 = 4.31, C1–M1 = 10.34, C1–M2 = 10.37, CBL = 32.11, GSL = 32.26, IOW = 6.47, M1–M1 = 12.19, M2–M2 = 12.16, ML = 23.67, PL = 14.76, and ZW = 23.16. The sequence of the mitochondrial cytb gene has been deposited in the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ nucleotide databases with accession number KJ145797.

Type locality: Village of Nkoélon-Mvini, Campo-Ma’an area, South Region, Cameroon, 02°23.831’ N, 10°02.691’ E, 117 m above sea level.

Etymology: The specific epithet refers to the Campo-Ma’an area, where the holotype was collected. I suggest ‘Campo-Ma’an fruit bat’ as the English common name and ‘Casinyctère de Campo-Ma’an’ as the French common name.

Diagnosis: A medium-sized fruit bat of the tribe Scotonycterini with a forearm length of 73.2 mm, body mass of 49 g, and a GSL of 32.26 mm. The PL represents 45.75% of the GSL (Fig. 2B). The general dorsal fur coloration of the living animal is rusty brown, with the ventrum paler, and several white markings on the head, including a white dorsal spot on the rostrum, a white chevron emerging from the outer corner of the eyes, a broad white band around lips, and a rather indistinct white tuft at the anterior base of the ear. The soft palate is composed of two series of transverse ridges (Fig. 3): the first series includes five thick, prominent and undivided interdental ridges, which are generally medially arched anteriorly; the second series contains seven thin, irregular and serrate postdental ridges with the two last ridges medially divided. In occlusal view, the first lower premolars are smaller than the incisors (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3

(Colour online) Palatal ridges of the holotype of Casinycteris campomaanensis sp. nov. (MNHN 2011-637; photograph taken by Alexandre Hassanin). Abbreviations: C = canine, I = incisor, M = molar and P = premolar.

Fig. 4

(Colour online) Skull of the holotype of Casinycteris campomaanensis sp. nov. (left column, MNHN 2011-637; photographs taken by Alexandre Hassanin) compared with the holotype of Scotonycteris ophiodon (right column, ZMB 50001; photographs taken by Carola Radke).

Description: The dorsal pelage is dense, soft and woolly. The general coloration is rusty brown, with hairs being three-coloured: dark brown basally, pale in the medially and rusty brown proximally. The ventrum pelage is shorter and paler than the dorsum, with the throat, breast and belly being whitish. Flanks are brown. The head has a complex pattern: the pelage is brown with several white markings, including on the lips and cheeks, a patch on the nose, a chevron emerging from the outer corner of the eyes, and a rather indistinct tuft at the anterior base of the brown ears. The rostrum skin coloration for the most part is greenish yellow, with the exception of the nostrils, which are with a distinct reddish colour. Upper and lower eyelids are also greenish yellow.

The wing membranes are brown with contrasting yellow finger joints. The fifth metacarpal (5DM = 55.1) slightly exceeds the length of the third and fourth metacarpals (3DM = 54.6; 4DM = 52.7), while the second metacarpal is shorter (2DM = 37.0). The first phalanx of the third digit (3D1P = 34.8) is longer than that of the fourth and fifth digits (4D1P = 27.6; 5D1P = 24.7), while that of the second digit is shorter (2D1P = 9.2). The second phalanx of the third digit (3D2P = 45.0) is longer than that of the fourth and fifth digits (4D2P = 28; 5D2P = 26.0), while that of the second digit is shorter (2D2P = 5.5). The plagiopatagium is attached to the first toe. There is no visible tail.

The skull is robustly built (Fig. 4). It has a GSL of 32.26 mm and a CBL of 32.1 mm. The zygomatic width is relatively broad (72% of GLS) and the zygomatic arches are abruptly expanded. The braincase is rounded (BCH = 13.26; BCW = 15.42). The rostrum is short and broad. The bony palate is arched medially, with a deep groove along the median palatine suture. A postdental palatum is present, tapering backwards, and ending with a long posterior spine.

As in other species of Scotonycterini, there are 28 teeth with the following dental formula: I1 I2 C1 P3 P4 M1/I1 I2 C1 P1 P3 P4 M1 M2 (Fig. 4). The maxillary tooth rows diverge antero-posteriorly (C1–C1 = 6.71; M1–M1 = 12.19), as do the mandibular tooth rows (C1–C1 = 4.31; M2–M2 = 12.16). The upper canines are conspicuously longer than other teeth, curve slightly backwards and have a faint vertical groove on the antero-medial surface. There is a pronounced diastema between C1 and P3. In lateral view, P3 extends beyond P4, and P4 is longer than M1. In occlusal view, upper premolars and molars appear roundish, and all have a secondary inner cusp. Lower canines are less developed than the upper canines but have a small secondary inner cusp. Lower first premolars are notably reduced in size and smaller than the incisors. In lateral view, P3 extends beyond P4, P4 is longer than M1, and M1 is longer than M2. In occlusal view, all lower cheek teeth (except the small P1) appear bifurcated with two distinct cusps on the inner and outer surfaces of each tooth.

Habitat:Casinycteris campomaanensis sp. nov. was collected in an area with low undulating hills and plains, ranging between sea level and 500 m, which characterizes the zone around the village of Nkoélon-Mvini. The study area is bordered to the west by the Atlantic Ocean, to the east by mountainous reliefs that reach up to 1100 m, and to the south by the Ntem River. The local natural habitat belongs to the Atlantic Equatorial coastal forests, an ecoregion characterized by exceptionally high levels of species richness and endemism [16]. The study area has a typical equatorial climate, with two dry seasons (November-March and July to mid-August) and two wet seasons (April–June and mid-August to October). In the Campo-Ma’an area, mean monthly temperatures are consistently around 25 °C, and mean annual rainfall is higher in the western part (2,800 mm in Campo) than in the eastern part (1,670 mm in Ma’an) [17]. The local habitat types change from mangrove or coastal forest in the western zone, through the endemic lowland evergreen forest dominated by Caesalpinioideae (around Nkoélon-Mvini), to the submontane forest on central hilltops and mixed evergreen and semi-deciduous forests in the drier eastern zone [17].

3.2 Molecular phylogeny of the family Pteropodidae

The Bayesian tree inferred from the analysis of 76 cytb gene sequences is presented in Appendix 1, the subtree of Fig. 5 focusing on the subfamily Epomophorinae (see below). The family Pteropodidae was found to be monophyletic (PP = 1), but the most basal relationships are not stable (PP < 0.5) (Appendix 1), suggesting that the different lineages diverged from each other in a relatively short period. The results of Fig. 5 show that the tribe Scotonycterini is monophyletic (PP = 1) and belongs to a large clade corresponding to the subfamily Epomophorinae sensu lato (PP = 0.94), which comprises the tribes Epomophorini (PP = 1; genera Epomophorus, Epomops, Hypsignathus, Micropteropus and Nanonycteris), Eonycterini (PP = 1; genus Eonycteris), Myonycterini (PP = 0.43; genera Myonycteris and Megaloglossus), Rousettini (PP = 1; genus Rousettus), and Stenonycterini (containing only Stenonycteris lanosus). Within the tribe Scotonycterini, Casinycteris argynnis and C. campomaanensis are sister species (PP = 1). The genus Scotonycteris is found to be paraphyletic, as the holotype of S. ophiodon (ZMB 50001) is grouped with the two species of Casinycteris (PP = 1), whereas S. zenkeri appears as an early offshoot.

Fig. 5

(Colour online) Molecular phylogeny of the subfamily Epomophorinae as inferred from mitochondrial sequences of the complete cytochrome b gene (1140 nucleotides). In this study, the cytochrome b gene was sequenced for the holotypes of Casinycteris campomaanensis sp. nov. (MNHN 2011-637) and Scotonycteris ophiodon (ZMB 50001) (accession numbers KJ145797 and KJ145798). All other sequences were extracted from the EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ nucleotide database. The accession number of each sequence is indicated after the species name, followed by the bibliographic reference [11,22–25]. The asterisk is used for unpublished sequences. The tree was reconstructed using Bayesian inferences. The values at the branches represent posterior probabilities (see Section Materials and methods for details).

Pairwise nucleotide distances, as estimated with the K2P model, indicate that the four species of Scotonycterini have divergent cytb sequences: 4.4% between C. campomaanensis and C. argynnis; 8.4% between C. campomaanensis and S. ophiodon; 14.7% between C. campomaanensis and S. zenkeri; 7.7% between C. argynnis and S. ophiodon; 13.7% between C. argynnis and S. zenkeri; and 14.4% between S. ophiodon and S. zenkeri.

4 Discussion

The cytb gene phylogeny (Fig. 5) suggests that the classification of the tribe Scotonycterini needs revision, specifically with the paraphyletic nature of the genus Scotonycteris. To rectify this situation, it is recommended that S. ophiodon should be placed in Casinycteris, containing C. argynnis and Ccampomaanensis, resulting in Scotonycteris being monospecific with S. zenkeri. These taxonomic changes are also corroborated by morphological characters (see below).

In all species of Scotonycterini, the head pelage is rusty brown with white fur patches on the nose and behind the eyes. Three species, C. campomaanensis, C. argynnis and S. ophiodon, have greenish yellow skin on the snout and eyelids, and yellow finger joints contrasting with the brown wings. On the basis of its colour pattern, S. ophiodon differs from S. zenkeri, whereas it shares similarities with the two species of Casinycteris. Overlying these morphological characteristics on the molecular tree topology of the family Pteropodidae indicate that these colour features are synapomorphies.

As shown in Fig. 2A, the differences in body size, as revealed by comparison between FA and body mass, separate females of the four species of the tribe Scotonycterini. Scotonycteris zenkeri differs from other Scotonycterini by its smaller body size. On the basis of body mass, C. campomaanensis occupies an intermediary position between C. argynnis and S. ophiodon. Regarding FA, C. campomaanensis is similar to the smallest specimens of S. ophiodon. The intraspecific variation in body size appears more important in S. ophiodon than in S. zenkeri or C. argynnis (Fig. 2A). As described by Bergmans [7], S. ophiodon may consist of several different morphological lineages. For this reason, morphological and molecular comparisons were made between the holotypes of S. ophiodon (ZMB 50001) and C. campomaanensis (MNHN 2011-637). Indeed, both are adult females possessing forearms of almost equal length (75 and 73.2 mm, respectively). In addition, the holotype of S. ophiodon was collected in 1899 at Bipindi, a town about 100 km from the type locality of C. campomaanensis. Both morphological and molecular data show notable differences between the two holotypes, confirming that they belong to distinct species. As shown in Fig. 4, the skull morphology of S. ophiodon is very different from that of C. campomaanensis, with the former having a less rounded braincase, more elongated rostrum, and less pronounced zygomatic arches. The cytb gene of these two species differs by more than 8.4%, further lending support to their distinctiveness.

In parallel to the cytb data, skull morphology of Ccampomaanensis is similar to C. argynnis. Both species share a domed braincase. In proportion to the GSL, the WZ of Ccampomaanensis falls within the range of measurements presented by Bergmans [7] for specimens of Cargynnis (71.8 and 70.5–75.3%, respectively; Fig. 2B). The zygomatic arches are abruptly expanded in both species. The teeth have similar size and shape, but the first lower premolars are smaller than the lower incisors in C. campomaanensis. Another noticeable difference concerns the bony palate. As illustrated in Andersen [18] and Happold [19], Cargynnis exhibits the unique peculiarity of having practically no postdental palate. Although reduced in comparison to Sophiodon and Szenkeri, the postdental palate of Ccampomaanensis extends well beyond the upper molars (Fig. 4) and measures 4.12 mm, which represents 27.9% of the total palatal length. For comparison, the postdental palate of the S. ophiodon holotype represents 46.3% of the total palatal length, and that of a Cameroon specimen of Szenkeri (MNHN 2011-682) represents 35.4%.

Differences in the soft palate morphology is a common method for species identification of pteropodids [1,18], as is the case for the four species of Scotonycterini. The soft palate of Ccampomaanensis has two series of palatal ridges: the first includes five thick, prominent and undivided interdental ridges and the second contains seven thin, irregular and serrate postdental ridges (Fig. 3). In contrast, the soft palate of C. argynnis has three or four thick interdental ridges, followed by 13–16 crowded, irregular, thin and serrate postdental ridges [7] and that of S. ophiodon has six thick undivided interdental ridges followed by 10–13 narrow serrated postdental ridges, some divided some complete and others incomplete, with irregular connections between the ridges [20]. In S. zenkeri, the soft palate is composed of four thick interdental ridges, the first three undivided and the fourth sometimes medially divided, and 6–9 thin, serrated and irregular ridges [21].

5 New classification

Tribe Scotonycterini Bergmans, 1997: Beaufortia 47:69.

Scotonycteris Matschie, 1894: Sitzb. Ges. Naturf. Fr. Berlin, p. 200.

  • Scotonycteris zenkeri Matschie, 1894: Sitzb. Ges. Naturf. Fr. Berlin, p. 202.
  • (type locality: Yaoundé, Cameroon).

Casinycteris Thomas, 1910: Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, 6:111.

  • Casinycteris argynnis Thomas, 1910: Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, 6:111.
  • (type locality: Bitye, Cameroon).
  • Casinycteris campomaanensis Hassanin, 2014, new species.
  • (type locality: Nkoélon-Mvini, Cameroon).
  • Casinycteris ophiodon(Pohle, 1943): Sitzb. Ges. Naturf. Fr. Berlin 1942: p. 78 [publ. 1943].
  • (type locality: Bipindi, Cameroon).

6 Conclusion

The current geographic ranges of the four recognized Scotonycterini species (Fig. 1A) include rainforests of southern Cameroon, which would indicate that this area has played an important role in the diversification of the tribe. The analysis presented herein has shown that the characters used to define Casinycteris campomaanensis have been important to better understand the evolution of the tribe Scotonycterini. In the classification presented herein, the genus Casinycteris is diagnosed by several external features, such as the greenish yellow skin on the snout and eyelids, and the yellowish finger joints. Casinycteris campomaanensis and C. argynnis share a massive and broad skull with a rounded braincase and pronounced zygomatic arches. The most striking differences between these two species are their body size, their soft palate morphology, and the extreme reduction of the postdental palate in C. argynnis.

Disclosure of interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest concerning this article.

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to the Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) in Yaoundé, Gilles Etoga (WWF), Elomo Molo, Flobert Njiokou and Luther Tchakep for permission to carry out fieldwork and to export specimens. Fieldwork was supported by grants from the PPF ‘Etat et structure phylogénétique de la biodiversité actuelle et fossile’. I thank the following individuals who helped with the collecting of fruit bats in Cameroon: Jérôme Fuchs, Elysée Ganago, Innocent Medjo, Henri Nzonang and Anne Ropiquet. I also thank Nora Lange, Carola Radke, Lisa Kluckert and Frieder Mayer at the Museum für Naturkunde (Berlin, Germany), who sent a tissue sample and images of the Scotonycteris ophiodon holotype. I also acknowledge Steven M. Goodman for his helpful comments on the manuscript. Laboratory work was supported by the MNHN, CNRS and ATM ‘PPF taxonomie moléculaire, DNA Barcode et gestion durable des collections’, and ‘Consortium national de recherche en génomique’, which is part of agreement No. 2005/67 between the Genoscope and the MNHN on the projects ‘SpeedID’ and ‘Bibliothèque du Vivant’.


References

[1] W. Bergmans Taxonomy and biogeography of African fruit bats (Mammalia, Megachiroptera). 5. The genera Lissonycteris Anderson, 1912, Myonycteris Matschie, 1899 and Megaloglossus Pagenstecher, 1885; general remarks and conclusions; annex: key to all species, Beaufortia, Volume 47 (1997), pp. 11-90

[2] S. Mickleburgh; A.M. Hutson; W. Bergmans; J. Fahr Scotonycteris zenkeri , 2008 (Available: http://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 21 July 2013)

[3] U. Salzmann; P. Hoelzmann The Dahomey gap: an abrupt climatically induced rain forest fragmentation in West Africa during the late Holocene, The Holocene, Volume 15 (2005), pp. 190-199

[4] S. Mickleburgh; A.M. Hutson; W. Bergmans; J. Fahr; J. Juste Scotonycteris ophiodon , 2010 (Available: http://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 21 July 2013)

[5] ACR African Chiroptera Report 2012 AfricanBats, Pretoria, Volume i-xvii (2012), pp. 1-5902

[6] S. Mickleburgh; A.M. Hutson; W. Bergmans Casinycteris argynnis , 2008 (Available: http://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 21 July 2013)

[7] W. Bergmans Taxonomy and biogeography of African fruit bats (Mammalia, Megachiroptera), 3. The genera Scotonycteris, Matschie, 1894, Casinycteris Thomas, 1910, Pteropus Brisson, 1762, and Eidolon Rafininesque, 1815, Beaufortia, Volume 40 (1990), pp. 111-177

[8] W.S. Rasband ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, 2012 (Available: imagej.nih.gov/ij/)

[9] A. Hassanin; F. Delsuc; A. Ropiquet; C. Hammer; B. Jansen van Vuuren; C. Matthee; M. Ruiz-Garcia; F. Catzeflis; V. Areskoug; T.T. Nguyen; A. Couloux Pattern and timing of diversification of Cetartiodactyla (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria), as revealed by a comprehensive analysis of mitochondrial genomes, C. R. Biologies, Volume 335 (2012), pp. 32-50

[10] E.C. Teeling; M.S. Springer; O. Madsen; P. Bates; S.J. O’Brien; W.J. Murphy A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record, Science, Volume 307 (2005), pp. 580-584

[11] F.C. Almeida; N.P. Giannini; R. DeSalle; N.B. Simmons Evolutionary relationships of the Old World fruit bats (Chiroptera, Pteropodidae): another star phylogeny?, BMC Evol. Biol., Volume 11 (2011), p. 281

[12] A. Rambaut Sequence Alignment Editor Version 2. 0 alpha 11, 2002 (Available: http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/)

[13] D. Darriba; G.L. Taboada; R. Doallo; D. Posada jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing, Nat. Methods, Volume 9 (2012), p. 772

[14] F. Ronquist; M. Teslenko; P. van der Mark; D.L. Ayres; A. Darling; S. Hohna; B. Larget; L. Liu; M.A. Suchard; J.P. Huelsenbeck MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space, Syst. Biol., Volume 61 (2012), pp. 539-542

[15] D.L. Swofford PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2003

[16] W. Fund Atlantic Equatorial coastal forests, 2012 (Available: http://www.eoearth.org/article/150276)

[17] M.G.P. Tchouto; J.J.F.E. de Wilde; W.F. de Boer; L.J.G. van der Maesen; A.M. Cleef Bio-indicator species and Central African rain forest refuges in the Campo-Ma’an area, Cameroon. Syst. Biodivers, Volume 7 (2009), pp. 21-31

[18] K. Andersen Catalogue of the Chiroptera in the collection of the British Museum, Megachiroptera, vol. 1, Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London, 1912 (ci+ 854 p)

[19] M. Happold Casinycteris argynnis short-palated fruit bat (M. Happold; D.C.D. Happold; J. Kingdon, eds.), Mammals of Africa, Vol. IV: hedgehogs, shrews and bats, Bloomsbury, London, 2013, pp. 230-231

[20] J. Fahr Scotonycteris ophiodon Pohle's fruit bat (M. Happold; D.C.D. Happold; J. Kingdon, eds.), Mammals of Africa, Vol. IV: hedgehogs, shrews and bats, Bloomsbury, London, 2013, pp. 295-297

[21] J. Fahr Scotonycteris zenkeri Zenker's fruit bat (M. Happold; D.C.D. Happold; J. Kingdon, eds.), Mammals of Africa, Vol. IV: hedgehogs, shrews and bats, Bloomsbury, London, 2013, pp. 297-299

[22] S.T. Bastian; K. Tanaka; R.V.P. Anunciado; N.G. Natural; A.C. Sumalde; T. Namikawa Phylogenetic relationships among megachiropteran species from the two major islands of the Philippines, deduced from DNA sequences of the cytochrome b gene, Can, J. Zool., Volume 79 (2001), pp. 1671-1677

[23] N. Nesi; E. Nakouné; C. Cruaud; A. Hassanin DNA barcoding of African fruit bats (Mammalia, Pteropodidae). The mitochondrial genome does not provide a reliable discrimination between Epomophorus gambianus and Micropteropus pusillus, C. R. Biologies, Volume 334 (2011), pp. 544-554

[24] N. Nesi; B. Kadjo; X. Pourrut; E. Leroy; C. Pongombo Shongo; C. Cruaud; A. Hassanin Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the tribe Myonycterini (Mammalia, Pteropodidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear markers, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., Volume 66 (2013), pp. 126-137

[25] N.P. Giannini; F.C. Almeida; N.B. Simmons; R. Desalle Phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic harpy fruit bat, Harpyionycteris (Mammalia: Chiroptera: Pteropodidae), Am. Mus. Novit., Volume 3533 (2006), pp. 1-12


Comments - Policy