Seismic fragility curves presenting some probability of failure or of a damage state exceedance versus seismic intensity can be established by engineering judgment, empirical or numerical approaches. This paper focuses on the latter issue. In recent studies, three popular methods based on numerical simulations, comprising scaled seismic intensity, maximum likelihood estimation and probabilistic seismic demand/capacity models, have been studied and compared. The results obtained show that the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method is in general better than other ones. However, previous publications also indicated the dependence of the MLE method on the ground excitation input. The objective of this paper is thus to propose a novel method improving the existing MLE one. Improvements are based on probabilistic ground motion information, which is taken into account in the proposed procedure. The validity of this new approach is verified by analytical tests and numerical examples.
Accepted:
Published online:
Cong-Thuat Dang 1; Thien-Phu Le 2; Pascal Ray 3
@article{CRMECA_2017__345_10_678_0, author = {Cong-Thuat Dang and Thien-Phu Le and Pascal Ray}, title = {A novel method based on maximum likelihood estimation for the construction of seismic fragility curves using numerical simulations}, journal = {Comptes Rendus. M\'ecanique}, pages = {678--689}, publisher = {Elsevier}, volume = {345}, number = {10}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1016/j.crme.2017.06.011}, language = {en}, }
TY - JOUR AU - Cong-Thuat Dang AU - Thien-Phu Le AU - Pascal Ray TI - A novel method based on maximum likelihood estimation for the construction of seismic fragility curves using numerical simulations JO - Comptes Rendus. Mécanique PY - 2017 SP - 678 EP - 689 VL - 345 IS - 10 PB - Elsevier DO - 10.1016/j.crme.2017.06.011 LA - en ID - CRMECA_2017__345_10_678_0 ER -
%0 Journal Article %A Cong-Thuat Dang %A Thien-Phu Le %A Pascal Ray %T A novel method based on maximum likelihood estimation for the construction of seismic fragility curves using numerical simulations %J Comptes Rendus. Mécanique %D 2017 %P 678-689 %V 345 %N 10 %I Elsevier %R 10.1016/j.crme.2017.06.011 %G en %F CRMECA_2017__345_10_678_0
Cong-Thuat Dang; Thien-Phu Le; Pascal Ray. A novel method based on maximum likelihood estimation for the construction of seismic fragility curves using numerical simulations. Comptes Rendus. Mécanique, Volume 345 (2017) no. 10, pp. 678-689. doi : 10.1016/j.crme.2017.06.011. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/mecanique/articles/10.1016/j.crme.2017.06.011/
[1] Validation studies of seismic PRAs, Nucl. Eng. Des., Volume 123 (1990), pp. 189-196
[2] Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant, Nucl. Eng. Des., Volume 59 (1980) no. 2, pp. 315-338
[3] Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings, J. Struct. Eng., Volume 111 (1985) no. 4, pp. 740-757
[4] Earthquake risk assessment of building structures, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., Volume 74 (2001) no. 3, pp. 251-262
[5] Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Volume 30 (2001) no. 12, pp. 1839-1856
[6] A simplified method of constructing fragility curves for highway bridges, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Volume 32 (2003) no. 10, pp. 1603-1626
[7] Development of fragility curves of bridges retrofitted by column jacketing, Probab. Eng. Mech., Volume 19 (2004) no. 1–2, pp. 105-112
[8] Effect of isolation on fragility curves of highway bridges based on simplified approach, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., Volume 27 (2007), pp. 414-426
[9] Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Volume 37 (2008) no. 8, pp. 1157-1174
[10] Fragility curves of typical as-built highway bridges in Eastern Canada, Eng. Struct., Volume 40 (2012), pp. 107-118
[11] Temporal evolution of seismic fragility curves for concrete box-girder bridges in California, Eng. Struct., Volume 97 (2015), pp. 1-12
[12] Seismic fragility assessment of a tall reinforced concrete chimney, Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., Volume 24 (2015), pp. 440-460
[13] Seismic fragility of threaded tee-joint connections in piping systems, Int. J. Press. Vessels Piping, Volume 132–133 (2015), pp. 106-118
[14] Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., Volume 35 (2012), pp. 1-12
[15] Analytical seismic fragility functions for highway and railway embankments and cuts, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Volume 44 (2015), pp. 1863-1879
[16] A comparative study of seismic fragility estimates using different numerical methods, 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013
[17] Seismic fragility analysis of a typical Indian PHWR containment: comparison of fragility models, Struct. Saf., Volume 58 (2016), pp. 11-19
[18] Statistical procedures for developing earthquake damage fragility curves, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Volume 44 (2015), pp. 1373-1389
[19] To scale or not to scale seismic ground-acceleration records, J. Eng. Mech., Volume 137 (2010) no. 4, p. 284
[20] Méthodes de construction des courbes de fragilité sismique par simulations numériques, Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont II, 2014 (in French), PhD thesis
[21] A comparative study of construction methods for seismic fragility curves using numerical simulations, Mech. Ind., Volume 17 (2016) no. 602
[22] Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method, Pure Appl. Geophys., Volume 160 ( March 2003 ) no. 3, pp. 635-676
[23] Numerical computation of fragility curves for NPP equipment, Nucl. Eng. Des., Volume 240 (2010) no. 6, pp. 1614-1621
[24] Influence of the number of dynamic analyses on the accuracy of structural response estimates, Earthq. Spectra, Volume 31 (2015) no. 1, pp. 97-113 | DOI
[25] Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development, J. Eng. Mech., Volume 126 (2000) no. 12, pp. 1287-1295
[26] Statistical analysis of fragility curves, J. Eng. Mech., Volume 126 (2000) no. 12, pp. 1224-1231
[27] Fragility curves of concrete bridges retrofitted by column jacketing, Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., Volume 1 (2002) no. 2, pp. 195-205
[28] D.M. Boore, SMSIM Fortran programs for simulating ground motions from earthquakes, U.S. Geological Survey, 2005.
[29] MATLAB, version 7.9.0529 (R2009b), The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, 2009.
[30] Site amplifications for generic rock sites, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., Volume 87 (1977), pp. 327-341
[31] Seismic fragility analysis: application to simple linear and nonlinear systems, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Volume 36 (2007), pp. 1885-1900
Cited by Sources:
Comments - Policy