Plan
Comptes Rendus
no. 6-7

Selective glycerol transesterification over mesoporous basic catalysts
Joël Barrault1  ; Sébastien Bancquart1 ; Yannick Pouilloux1
1 Laboratoire de catalyse en chimie organique, UMR CNRS 6503, ESIP, 40, av. du Recteur-Pineau, 86022 Poitiers cedex, France
Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 7 (2004) no. 6-7, pp. 593-599.

Résumés

The preparation of monoglycerides from fatty methyl esters and glycerol can be carried out in the presence of acid or basic catalysts. Moreover, the use of porous and basic solid catalysts could induce a shape selectivity modifying the monoglyceride selectivity. Lauric (C12), myristic (C14) and stearic (C18) acid methyl esters were used in the reaction with several MCM-41 magnesium-containing catalysts. Over an Mg-MCM-41 catalyst (interreticular distance d100 of 3.4 nm), glycerol monolaurate was obtained with selectivity and yield of about 80%.

La préparation de monoglycérides à partir d'esters méthyliques d'acides gras et de glycérol peut être effectuée en présence de catalyseurs acides ou basiques. De plus, l'utilisation de catalyseurs solides poreux et basiques pourrait induire une sélectivité de forme, modifiant la sélectivité en monoglycérides. Les laurate (C12), myristate (C14) et stéarate (C18) de méthyle ont été utilisés dans cette réaction avec des catalyseurs de type MCM-41 contenant du magnésium. Une sélectivité et un rendement proches de 80% en monolaurate de glycérol ont été obtenus en utilisant un catalyseur de type Mg-MCM-41, de distance interréticulaire d100 égale à 3,4 nm.

Métadonnées
Reçu le :
Révisé le :
Accepté le :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.1016/j.crci.2003.12.006
Keywords: Glycerol transesterification, Monoglyceride, Magnesium oxide, MCM-41, Heterogeneous catalysis
Mots-clés : Transestérification du glycérol, Monoglycéride, Oxyde de magnésium, MCM-41, Catalyse hétérogène

Joël Barrault 1 ; Sébastien Bancquart 1 ; Yannick Pouilloux 1

1 Laboratoire de catalyse en chimie organique, UMR CNRS 6503, ESIP, 40, av. du Recteur-Pineau, 86022 Poitiers cedex, France 
@article{CRCHIM_2004__7_6-7_593_0,
     author = {Jo\"el Barrault and S\'ebastien Bancquart and Yannick Pouilloux},
     title = {Selective glycerol transesterification over mesoporous basic catalysts},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Chimie},
     pages = {593--599},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {7},
     number = {6-7},
     year = {2004},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crci.2003.12.006},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Joël Barrault
AU  - Sébastien Bancquart
AU  - Yannick Pouilloux
TI  - Selective glycerol transesterification over mesoporous basic catalysts
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Chimie
PY  - 2004
SP  - 593
EP  - 599
VL  - 7
IS  - 6-7
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crci.2003.12.006
LA  - en
ID  - CRCHIM_2004__7_6-7_593_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Joël Barrault
%A Sébastien Bancquart
%A Yannick Pouilloux
%T Selective glycerol transesterification over mesoporous basic catalysts
%J Comptes Rendus. Chimie
%D 2004
%P 593-599
%V 7
%N 6-7
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crci.2003.12.006
%G en
%F CRCHIM_2004__7_6-7_593_0
Joël Barrault; Sébastien Bancquart; Yannick Pouilloux. Selective glycerol transesterification over mesoporous basic catalysts. Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 7 (2004) no. 6-7, pp. 593-599. doi : 10.1016/j.crci.2003.12.006. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/chimie/articles/10.1016/j.crci.2003.12.006/

Version originale du texte intégral

Le texte intégral ci-dessous peut contenir quelques erreurs de conversion par rapport à la version officielle de l'article publié.

1 Introduction

Numerous products may be produced by using raw materials such as vegetable oils. The renewability of the raw materials and the specific properties of these compounds are of growing interest for the industry [1].

The main reactions used first in oleochemistry were the hydrolysis or the methanolysis of triglycerides leading to glycerol and fatty acids or fatty methyl esters.

However, as these reactions also lead to the formation of glycerol, we have to find valuable applications for this side-product. The glycerol transformation into glycerol monoesters has significant applications in food, pharmaceutical, cosmetics or in detergent chemistry [2].

In a previous paper [3], we have shown that basic solids such as magnesium or cerium oxide could be used as efficient catalysts for this reaction. In varying the preparation method of these oxides, we were able to increase the activity so that the reaction rate was similar to that obtained in the presence of homogeneous catalysts. However, the monoglycerides selectivity was rather similar and a distribution of mono/di/tri glycerides close to 50%/40%/10% was observed.

In order to increase the monoglycerides selectivity, we suggested a dispersion of active oxides at the surface of an MCM-41 type mesoporous structure.

MCM-41 are silica or silico-alumina characterized by a regular hexagonal arrangement of cylindrical pores. The pore diameter is higher than in the case of zeolites (typically 3 nm or more) with a specific surface area of more than 1000 m2 g–1 [4,5]. Moreover, several works gave a strong indication of a quite significant thermal stability [6].

Several attempts were already done to obtain monoglycerides in using mesoporous catalysts. For example, Jacobs et al. used –SO3H groups grafted over MCM-41 to catalyse glycerol esterification [7]. This method was recently improved by grafting alkyl and sulfonates groups in order to tune the hydrophilicity of the catalyst [8,9]. However, that processes involved acid catalysts that are well known to induce glycerol dehydration and thus side-products generation. Brunel et al. used MCM-41 functionalised with amines to perform glycidol esterification. As that reagent has only one hydroxyl function, monoglycerides, which are the only products that can be formed during esterification, are obtained with a high yield [10].

In this paper, several acid methyl esters [lauric (dodecanoic, C11H23CO2CH3), myristic (tetradecanoic, C13H27CO2CH3) and stearic (octadecanoic, C17H35CO2CH3) acid methyl esters] were used in the glycerol transesterification reaction over several magnesium containing MCM-41 and the influence of some structural properties of the solids over the shape selectivity will be discussed.

2 Experimental

2.1 Synthesis of the catalyst

2.1.1 Synthesis of the MCM-41 support

This synthesis is the result of several works done in the laboratory [11,12]. A mixture of 1.47 g NaOH (37 mmol) and 13.04 g hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (9.1 mmol) in 200 ml water was heated at 40 °C in order to dissolve the surfactant. For silico-alumina MCM-41, 2.43 g Al(NO3)3˙9 H2O (8 mmol) were added. A little amount of antifoaming agent (Antifoam A, Sigma) was also added in order to improve the synthesis. The pH was stabilized at 10.5 with nitric acid (1 M), and 32.04 g of a 30% solution of Na2Si3O7 (40 mmol) were slowly added, while maintaining the pH to 10.5. The resulting gel was heated in a sealed Teflon reactor during 16 h at 100 °C without stirring. The content was then filtrated, dried and finally calcinated at 550 °C (after a temperature increase of 1 °C min–1) during 16 h. The support is called AlMCM-41 if containing alumina or MCM-41 without alumina.

2.1.2 Synthesis of the Mg-containing catalyst

The method is given for Si/Mg = 4, and for another Mg stoichiometry, the content of precursors must be adjusted.

A mixture containing 3 g of MCM-41 freshly calcinated, 2.96 g Mg(CH3CO2)2˙4 H2O and 50 g MeOH was stirred at room temperature during 2 h. The solvent was then evaporated. The solid was then calcinated at 450 °C (after a temperature increase of 1 °C min–1) during 16 h.

These solids exhibit a specific surface area of about 800 m2 g–1 and are characterized by an hexagonal array of cylindrical pores, as shown by X-ray diffraction and Transmission Electronic Microscopy (Figs. 1 and 2 ).

Fig. 1

XRD of Mg-AlMCM-41.

Fig. 2

TEM of Mg-AlMCM-41.

The solids obtained are called Mg-AlMCM-41 or Mg-MCM-41, whether they contain alumina or not.

2.2 Catalytic test

2.2.1 Without preliminary impregnation of the ester

In a 100-ml three-neck flask, the glycerol and the methyl ester were mixed and heated to 220 °C under stirring (500 rpm) without solvent and under nitrogen atmosphere. When the temperature reached 220 °C, the catalyst was added, which corresponded to the starting time of the reaction. The amounts of reactants are given in Table 1.

Table 1

Amount of reactants for the preparation of glycerol esters over mesoporous solids

Gly/esterm C12 (g)m C14 (g)m C18 (g)m catalyst (g)m glycerol (g)
[mol gly/mol ester]
19.911.214.00.54.5
37.58.4610.380.5510

2.2.2 With preliminary impregnation of the ester

In the same flask and experimental conditions, the methyl ester and the catalyst were mixed. After 2 h, the glycerol was added, which corresponded to the starting time of the reaction. The amounts of reactants are also given in Table 1.

2.3 Analysis of the products

The products were analysed with a Varian 3300 GPC equipped with a FID detector, an on-column injector and a BPX5 (SGE) column. Before analysis, the products are silylated to prevent their degradation according to the method described by Sahasrabuhde [13].

The reagent conversion to mono-, di-, and triglycerides is given by the following equation:

Molarconversion(%)=Smono/fmono+2Sdi/fdi+3Stri/ftriSmono/fmono+2Sdi/fdi+3Stri/ftri+Sms/fms×100
where Smono, Sdi, Stri, and Sms are the respective areas of the peaks corresponding to monoglyceride, diglyceride, triglyceride and methyl stearate (when ms is the ester reagent), and fmono, fdi, ftri and fms their respective scaling factors.

The selectivities to monoglycerides, diglycerides and triglycerides are given by the following equations:

Monoglyceridesselectivity(%)=Smono/fmonoSmono/fmono+2Sdi/fdi+3Stri/ftri×100
Diglyceridesselectivity(%)=2Sdi/fdiSmono/fmono+2Sdi/fdi+3Stri/ftri×100
Triglyceridesselectivity(%)=3Stri/ftriSmono/fmono+2Sdi/fdi+3Stri/ftri×100

3 Results

3.1 Reactivity of glycerol with various methyl esters over Mg-AlMCM-41 type catalysts

The reaction of lauric (C12), myristic (C14) and stearic (C18) acid methyl esters with glycerol in the presence of magnesium-containing silico-aluminate Mg-AlMCM-41 (glycerol / methyl ester ratio equal to 1 or 3) were performed without or with the pre-impregnation of the methyl ester.

3.1.1 Without methyl ester pre-impregnation

The results are completely different from that obtained with homogeneous catalysts [2] for which a monoglyceride selectivity of 40% was obtained at a conversion of 80% with a glycerol/methyl ester ratio of 1. In this study, the monoglyceride selectivity seems to be very low (respectively 13, 8 and 1%) at a conversion of 80%. In fact, this catalyst mainly gives glycerol diesters, which could be due to the strong hydrophilicity of the catalyst surface. Glycerol was strongly adsorbed and filled in the pores of the MCM-41 structure, whereas the hydrophobic methyl ester was mainly outside the pores where the reaction occurred. As the MCM-41 pore volume is important (about 1 cm3 g–1), a significant amount of glycerol is unavailable and then the apparent glycerol/methyl ester ratio is far less than 1. Indeed, if we assume a pore volume of 1.2 cm3 g–1, a glycerol density of 1.216, a quick calculation gives a ‘loss’ of glycerol of about 18%.

3.1.2 With methyl ester pre-impregnation

In order to confirm such hypothesis, we did the same experiments with a preliminary impregnation of the methyl ester and the results shown in Table 2 are totally different. Indeed, from the two shortest methyl esters (C12 and C14), the monoglycerides selectivity is higher than that obtained with homogeneous catalysts, which clearly suggests a strong adsorption of glycerol.

Table 2

Transesterification of glycerol over Mg-AlMCM-41 after a preliminary ester impregnation

EsterGl/esterTime to 50% (h)aSelectivity at 50%bTime to 80% (h)aSelectivity at 80%bInitial activity (mmol h–1 g–1)
C1212654452.17
C14176013550.87
C181142826150.64
C1232803702.18
C14387510680.94
C18377010400.55

By doing first an impregnation of the catalyst with the methyl ester, the surface coverage of the catalyst with the ester was increased. At the beginning of the reaction, the glycerol, which is more labile and far more hydrophilic than the methyl esters, migrated into the pores where the reaction took place with the methyl esters. When the glycerol fully replaced the methyl ester in the pores, the reaction ending rate and the selectivity were similar to that obtained in the previous case.

The comparison of the results obtained with an excess of glycerol (Tables 2 and 3) indicated as expected an increase of glycerol monoesters selectivity, particularly with methyl dodecanoate or tetradecanoate. It was a first difference suggesting that the porous structure was more or less without effect when methyl octadecanoate was the reagent instead of ‘shortest’ esters. The reaction rates also increased when a glycerol excess was used in a normal experiment (Table 3). On the other hand, there was no change when the catalyst was pre-impregnated with the methyl ester, which was a strong indication of a low coverage of the catalyst surface with the methyl ester.

Table 3

Catalytic transesterification of glycerol over Mg-AlMCM-41 without preliminary impregnation of the ester

EsterGly/esterTime to 50% (h)aSelectivity at 50%bTime to 80% (h)aSelectivity at 80%bInitial activity (mmol h–1 g–1)
C121114520130.54
C1411917.53380.44
C1811810.54010.31
C1232753702.12
C14396514620.92
C183105513500.54

a Time needed to reach a 50% (or 80%) methyl ester conversion.

b Monoglycerides selectivity at 50% (or 80%) methyl ester conversion.

3.2 Mg-MCM-41 type catalysts

In order to improve the monoglyceride selectivity, less hydrophilic supports like pure silica MCM-41 were synthesized. The Mg-containing pure silica Mg-MCM-41 was then prepared and dehydrated (700 °C, 16 h at reduced pressure) in order to transform surface Si–OH groups into more hydrophobic Si–O–Si groups. Then the catalytic reaction was performed with methyl octadodecanoate in the presence of both catalysts and the results were compared to that of Mg-AlMCM41.

An increase in both selectivity and activity with a decrease in hydrophilicity was observed (Fig. 3 ), the most important changes being consecutive to the absence of alumina (the hydroxyls groups eliminated from dehydration of the solid seems out of interest for the adsorption and/or the reaction). The glycerol is less adsorbed over the surface compared to the methyl ester and the selectivity remains more important than that observed with Mg-AlMCM-41 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Transesterification of glycerol with methyl octadocanoate (gly/C18 = 1) in the presence of Mg-MCM-41 and Mg-AlMCM41 catalysts.

3.3 Pore-size effect

The results presented in the previous tables and figures indicated that the highest selectivities to glycerol monoesters are obtained either with the lauric or the myristic acid methyl ester. Such selectivity modifications could be due to changes in the hydrophobicity of the catalyst or/and of the hydrocarbon chain length of the ester. Indeed, the hydrophilicity of the methyl ester decreases as the chain length increases, so that a decrease in the monoglycerides selectivity with the chain length of the methyl ester should be expected. In Tables 2 and 3, such variation is observed, but mainly with the C18-ester.

In order to check the effect of the pore size of the catalysts, Mg-MCM41 materials with a smaller pore size were synthesized in using smaller surfactants such as tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide (C14H29N(CH3)3Br) and dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (C12H25N(CH3)3Br) instead of the hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (C16H33N(CH3)3Br). The interreticular distance d100 of the mesophases varied from 3.4 to 4.1 nm and the surface area was higher than 1000 m2 g–1 (Table 4).

Table 4

d100 of the ‘smaller pore size’ mesophases

Surfactant usedC12C14C16
d100 (nm)3.433.654.12

These catalysts were tested in the glycerol transesterification with the methyl laurate, in the following experimental conditions; a temperature of 220 °C and a ratio glycerol/ester of 2 (more representative of real conditions).

It appears (Fig. 4 ) that the decrease in the pore size did not change the initial activity. A sharper increase of the conversion was only observed over the catalyst with the largest pores after 3 h of reaction, which could be the result of an increasing effect of the diffusion processes with the diminution of the pores size. Indeed, as the pores aperture was reduced, molecular diffusion increases while Knudsen diffusion is also more important. However, if the monoglyceride selectivities obtained with ‘C14 and C16 catalysts’ were very similar, the selectivity obtained in the presence of ‘C12 catalysts’ was higher. This result clearly shows that the pore size reduction has a greater impact over the molecular diffusion control inside the pores of the catalyst. Decreasing the pore size avoids polyesterification of glycerol, so that selectivity and yield to monoesters of 75% are obtained even if the ratio glycerol/methylester is much lower than in the previous cases (Tables 2 and 3).

Fig. 4

Glycerol transesterification with methyl laurate over of ‘smaller pore size’ mesoporous Mg-MCM41 catalysts. T = 220 °C, glycerol/ester = 2.

At this stage, it must be also added that the activity and the selectivity to monoesterification are not so important if the mesoporous structure of the catalyst is not as well defined and organized as above. Indeed, if the preparation procedure is modified so as to obtain a more amorphous solid with a larger pore size distribution (even centred around the same mean value of 3.5 nm), there appears an increase in both diesters and triesters formation. Then besides the hydrophilicity effect, there is also a strong influence of the pore size of the catalyst over the selectivity.

4 Conclusion

This study clearly shows that porous solids such as MCM-41 promoted with magnesium species can be efficient catalysts for clean synthesis processes, particularly when the synthesis of the porous material and the experimental conditions are finely tuned to the reagents. Here glycerol monoesters were synthesized with a yield up to 80%, which is quite higher than the 40% monoglycerides obtained with homogeneous catalysts. In our knowledge, it is the first time that such a shape selectivity is observed with mesoporous catalysts for such reactions.

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the Stearinerie Dubois and ADEME–AGRICE for fruitful discussions and financial support.

Bibliographie

[1] U. Biermann; W. Friedt; S. Lang; W. Luhs; G. Machmuller; J.O. Metzger; M.R. Klass; H.J. Schafer; M.P. Schneider Angew. Chem., 105 (2000), p. 22064

[2] M.M. Rieger Cosmetics Toiletries, 105 (1990), p. 51

[3] S. Bancquart; C. Vanhove; Y. Pouilloux; J. Barrault Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 218 (2001), p. 1

[4] C.T. Kresge; M.E. Leonowicz; W.J. Roth; J.C. Vartuli; J.S. Beck Nature, 359 (1992), p. 710

[5] J.S. Beck; J.C. Vartuli; W.J. Roth; M.E. Leonowicz; C.T. Kresge; K.D. Schmitt; C.T.-W. Chu; D.H. Olson; E.W. Sheppard; S.B. McCullen; J.B. Higgins; J.L. Schlenker J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 (1992), p. 10834

[6] A. Corma; A. Martinez; V. Martinezsoria; J.B. Monton J. Catal., 153 (1995) no. 1, p. 25

[7] W.M. Van Rhijn; D.E. De Vos; B.F. Sels; W.D. Bossaert; P.A. Jacobs J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. (1998), p. 317

[8] I. Díaz; C. Márquez-Alvarez; F. Mohino; J. Pérez-Pariente; E. Sastre J. Catal., 193 (2000) no. 2, p. 283

[9] I. Díaz; C. Márquez-Alvarez; F. Mohino; J. Pérez-Pariente; E. Sastre J. Catal., 193 (2000) no. 2, p. 295

[10] A. Cauvel; G. Renard; D. Brunel J. Org. Chem., 62 (1997), p. 749

[11] J.-M. Clacens PhD thesis, University of Poitiers, France, 1999

[12] S. Bancquart PhD thesis, University of Poitiers, France, 2002

[13] M.R. Sahasrabudhe JAOCS, 44 (1957), p. 376

Cité par

  • Mariana S. Alvarez Serafini; Gabriela M. Tonetto Synthesis of Glycerides of Fatty Acids by Inorganic Solid Catalysts: A Review, ChemBioEng Reviews, Volume 9 (2022) no. 1, p. 110 | DOI:10.1002/cben.202100027
  • Ahmad Zuhairi Abdullah; Natasha Ghazali; Peng Yong Hoo; Nor Irwin Basir Selective glycerol esterification to monolaurate over ZrO2/MCM-41 catalysts prepared using impregnation and precipitation methods, Chemical Engineering Communications, Volume 209 (2022) no. 5, p. 607 | DOI:10.1080/00986445.2021.1881778
  • Veli Şimşek Investigation of Catalytic Sustainability of Silica-Based Mesoporous Acidic Catalysts and Ion-Exchange Resins in Methyl Acetate Synthesis and Characterizations of Synthesized Catalysts, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 44 (2019) no. 6, p. 5301 | DOI:10.1007/s13369-018-3570-y
  • Simsek Veli; Avci Pinar Characterization and Catalytic Performance of Modified SBA-16 in Liquid Phase Reaction, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, Volume 16 (2018) no. 8 | DOI:10.1515/ijcre-2017-0246
  • Mohd Hizami Mohd Yusoff; Ahmad Zuhairi Abdullah Effects of zirconia loading in sulfated zirconia/SBA-15 on esterification of palmitic acid with glycerol, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Volume 35 (2018) no. 2, p. 383 | DOI:10.1007/s11814-017-0306-8
  • Jiayan Wang; Shiyou Xing; Yanqin Huang; Pei Fan; Junying Fu; Gaixiu Yang; Lingmei Yang; Pengmei Lv Highly stable gasified straw slag as a novel solid base catalyst for the effective synthesis of biodiesel: Characteristics and performance, Applied Energy, Volume 190 (2017), p. 703 | DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.004
  • Jiayan Wang; Lingmei Yang; Wen Luo; Gaixiu Yang; Changlin Miao; Junying Fu; Shiyou Xing; Pei Fan; Pengmei Lv; Zhongming Wang Sustainable biodiesel production via transesterification by using recyclable Ca2MgSi2O7 catalyst, Fuel, Volume 196 (2017), p. 306 | DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.007
  • Samira Bagheri; Nurhidayatullaili Muhd Julkapli; Wageeh Abdulhadi Yehya Dabdawb; Negar Mansouri Biodiesel ‐Derived Raw Glycerol to Value‐Added Products: Catalytic Conversion Approach, Handbook of Composites from Renewable Materials (2017), p. 309 | DOI:10.1002/9781119441632.ch52
  • Veli Simsek; Levent Degirmenci; Kırali Murtezaoglu Esterification of Lauric Acid with Glycerol in the Presence of STA/MCM-41 Catalysts, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, Volume 15 (2017) no. 2 | DOI:10.1515/ijcre-2015-0176
  • Daniela B. Hirata; Tiago L. Albuquerque; Nazzoly Rueda; Jose M. Sánchez-Montero; Eduardo Garcia-Verdugo; Raul Porcar; Roberto Fernandez-Lafuente Advantages of Heterofunctional Octyl Supports: Production of 1,2-Dibutyrin by Specific and Selective Hydrolysis of Tributyrin Catalyzed by Immobilized Lipases, ChemistrySelect, Volume 1 (2016) no. 12, p. 3259 | DOI:10.1002/slct.201600274
  • Veli Simsek; Levent Degirmenci; Kırali Murtezaoglu Synthesis of a silicotungstic acid SBA-15 catalyst for selective monoglyceride production, Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, Volume 117 (2016) no. 2, p. 773 | DOI:10.1007/s11144-015-0953-x
  • Nuchanart Siri-nguan; Chawalit Ngamcharussrivichai Alkoxide-intercalated Mg–Al layered double hydroxides as selective catalysts for the synthesis of monoglycerides, Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, Volume 119 (2016) no. 1, p. 273 | DOI:10.1007/s11144-016-1018-5
  • Päivi Mäki-Arvela; Anastasia Tkacheva; Inkar Dosmagambetova; Yann Chapelliere; Imane Hachemi; Narendra Kumar; Atte Aho; Dmitry Yu Murzin Thermal and Catalytic Amidation of Stearic Acid with Ethanolamine for Production of Pharmaceuticals and Surfactants, Topics in Catalysis, Volume 59 (2016) no. 13-14, p. 1151 | DOI:10.1007/s11244-016-0636-5
  • Bouhadjar Boukoussa; Fatiha Sebih; Rachida Hamacha; Salima Bellahouel; Aicha Derdour; Abdelkader Bengueddach Regioselective acylation of methyl-α-d-glucopyranoside with different acylating agents catalysed by micro/mesoporous materials, Research on Chemical Intermediates, Volume 41 (2015) no. 4, p. 2221 | DOI:10.1007/s11164-013-1340-8
  • Nanjing Zhong; Ling‐Zhi Cheong; Xuebing Xu Strategies to obtain high content of monoacylglycerols, European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, Volume 116 (2014) no. 2, p. 97 | DOI:10.1002/ejlt.201300336
  • Cong Li; Xiaolan Luo; Tao Li; Xinjie Tong; Yebo Li Polyurethane foams based on crude glycerol-derived biopolyols: One-pot preparation of biopolyols with branched fatty acid ester chains and its effects on foam formation and properties, Polymer, Volume 55 (2014) no. 25, p. 6529 | DOI:10.1016/j.polymer.2014.10.043
  • Lu Li; Kejing Quan; Junming Xu; Fusheng Liu; Shiwei Liu; Shitao Yu; Congxia Xie; Baoquan Zhang; Xiaoping Ge Mesoporous molecular sieves K2O/Ba(Ca or Mg)-MCM-41 with base sites as heterogeneous catalysts for the production of liquid hydrocarbon fuel from catalytic cracking of rubber seed oil, Green Chemistry, Volume 15 (2013) no. 9, p. 2573 | DOI:10.1039/c3gc40796a
  • C.A. Ferretti; S. Fuente; R. Ferullo; N. Castellani; C.R. Apesteguía; J.I. Di Cosimo Monoglyceride synthesis by glycerolysis of methyl oleate on MgO: Catalytic and DFT study of the active site, Applied Catalysis A: General, Volume 413-414 (2012), p. 322 | DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2011.11.025
  • Yulia Monakhova; Pierre Agulhon; Françoise Quignard; Nathalie Tanchoux; Didier Tichit New mixed lanthanum- and alkaline-earth cation-containing basic catalysts obtained by an alginate route, Catalysis Today, Volume 189 (2012) no. 1, p. 28 | DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2012.03.072
  • Karen Wilson; Adam F. Lee; Jean-Philippe Dacquin Heterogeneous Catalysts for Converting Renewable Feedstocks to Fuels and Chemicals, Catalysis for Alternative Energy Generation (2012), p. 263 | DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-0344-9_7
  • S. Bellahouel; E. Belhadj; H. Sekkiou; R. Hamacha; N. Kambouche; A. Derdour; A. Bengueddach Acylation of sugar amides over Algerian bentonite and mcm-41 materials, Arabian Journal of Chemistry, Volume 4 (2011) no. 3, p. 355 | DOI:10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.06.060
  • Andreina Acosta; Marco Filice; Gloria Fernandez-Lorente; Jose M. Palomo; Jose M. Guisan Kinetically controlled synthesis of monoglyceryl esters from chiral and prochiral acids methyl esters catalyzed by immobilized Rhizomucor miehei lipase, Bioresource Technology, Volume 102 (2011) no. 2, p. 507 | DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.095
  • V.K. Díez; C.A. Ferretti; P.A. Torresi; C.R. Apesteguía; J.I. Di Cosimo Effect of MgO activation conditions on its catalytic properties for base-catalyzed reactions, Catalysis Today, Volume 173 (2011) no. 1, p. 21 | DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2011.02.060
  • Ahmad Zuhairi Abdullah; Tri Yogo Wibowo; Ridzuan Zakaria Effect of tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide on the activity of LiOH-intercalated montmorillonite catalyst in the transesterification of methyl laurate with glycerol, Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 167 (2011) no. 1, p. 328 | DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2010.12.078
  • T.Y. Wibowo; A.Z. Abdullah; R. Zakaria Effect of Calcination Temperature and Tmaoh on Catalytic Activity of Basic Clay, Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 11 (2011) no. 21, p. 3619 | DOI:10.3923/jas.2011.3619.3624
  • Jan C.J. Bart; Natale Palmeri; Stefano Cavallaro Biodiesel catalysis, Biodiesel Science and Technology (2010), p. 322 | DOI:10.1533/9781845697761.322
  • Jan C.J. Bart; Natale Palmeri; Stefano Cavallaro Valorisation of the glycerol by-product from biodiesel production, Biodiesel Science and Technology (2010), p. 571 | DOI:10.1533/9781845697761.571
  • Dinesh Kumar; Amjad Ali Nanocrystalline Lithium Ion Impregnated Calcium Oxide As Heterogeneous Catalyst for Transesterification of High Moisture Containing Cotton Seed Oil, Energy Fuels, Volume 24 (2010) no. 3, p. 2091 | DOI:10.1021/ef901318s
  • Jorge N Beltramini; Chun-Hui (Clayton) Zhou Catalytic Conversion of Glycerol to Valuable Commodity Chemicals, Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass to Liquid Fuels and Chemicals (2010), p. 435 | DOI:10.1039/9781849732260-00435
  • Dae-Won Lee; Young-Moo Park; Kwan-Young Lee Heterogeneous Base Catalysts for Transesterification in Biodiesel Synthesis, Catalysis Surveys from Asia, Volume 13 (2009) no. 2, p. 63 | DOI:10.1007/s10563-009-9068-6
  • Cristián A. Ferretti; Roberto N. Olcese; Carlos R. Apesteguía; J. Isabel Di Cosimo Heterogeneously-Catalyzed Glycerolysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters: Reaction Parameter Optimization, Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research, Volume 48 (2009) no. 23, p. 10387 | DOI:10.1021/ie9004783
  • Xunhua Mo; Edgar Lotero; Changqing Lu; Yijun Liu; James G. Goodwin A Novel Sulfonated Carbon Composite Solid Acid Catalyst for Biodiesel Synthesis, Catalysis Letters, Volume 123 (2008) no. 1-2, p. 1 | DOI:10.1007/s10562-008-9456-y
  • Chun-Hui (Clayton) Zhou; Jorge N. Beltramini; Yong-Xian Fan; G. Q. (Max) Lu Chemoselective catalytic conversion of glycerol as a biorenewable source to valuable commodity chemicals, Chem. Soc. Rev., Volume 37 (2008) no. 3, p. 527 | DOI:10.1039/b707343g
  • François Jérôme; Yannick Pouilloux; Joël Barrault Rational Design of Solid Catalysts for the Selective Use of Glycerol as a Natural Organic Building Block, ChemSusChem, Volume 1 (2008) no. 7, p. 586 | DOI:10.1002/cssc.200800069
  • Yuguo Zheng; Xiaolong Chen; Yinchu Shen Commodity Chemicals Derived from Glycerol, an Important Biorefinery Feedstock, Chemical Reviews, Volume 108 (2008) no. 12 | DOI:10.1021/cr068216s
  • Joel Barrault; François Jerome Design of new solid catalysts for the selective conversion of glycerol, European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, Volume 110 (2008) no. 9, p. 825 | DOI:10.1002/ejlt.200800061
  • Yijun Liu; Edgar Lotero; James G. Goodwin; Xunhua Mo Transesterification of poultry fat with methanol using Mg–Al hydrotalcite derived catalysts, Applied Catalysis A: General, Volume 331 (2007), p. 138 | DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2007.07.038
  • Päivi Mäki‐Arvela; Bjarne Holmbom; Tapio Salmi; Dmitry Yu. Murzin Recent Progress in Synthesis of Fine and Specialty Chemicals from Wood and Other Biomass by Heterogeneous Catalytic Processes, Catalysis Reviews, Volume 49 (2007) no. 3, p. 197 | DOI:10.1080/01614940701313127
  • Avelino Corma; Sara Iborra; Alexandra Velty Chemical Routes for the Transformation of Biomass into Chemicals, Chemical Reviews, Volume 107 (2007) no. 6, p. 2411 | DOI:10.1021/cr050989d
  • Ghizlane Kharchafi; François Jérôme; Jean-Paul Douliez; Joël Barrault Facile and regioselective mono- or diesterification of glycerol derivatives over recyclable phosphazene organocatalyst, Green Chem., Volume 8 (2006) no. 8, p. 710 | DOI:10.1039/b603091b
  • Gladys H. P. Cho; S. K. Yeong; T. L. Ooi; C. H. Chuah Glycerol esters from the reaction of glycerol with dicarboxylic acid esters, Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, Volume 9 (2006) no. 2, p. 147 | DOI:10.1007/s11743-006-0384-9
  • Ghizlane Kharchafi; François Jérôme; Isabelle Adam; Yannick Pouilloux; Joël Barrault Design of well balanced hydrophilic–lipophilic catalytic surfaces for the direct and selective monoesterification of various polyols, New Journal of Chemistry, Volume 29 (2005) no. 7, p. 928 | DOI:10.1039/b418509a

Cité par 42 documents. Sources : Crossref

Commentaires - Politique

Ces articles pourraient vous intéresser

A new generation of ecocatalysts®—from Invasive Alien Species to sustainable and biosourced glyceryl fatty esters

Arthur Lasbleiz; Franck Pelissier; Jean-Hugues Renault; ...

(2024)

Critical fluid technology for the processing of lipid-related natural products

Jerry W. King

(2004)

Control of fatty acid and glycerol release in adipose tissue lipolysis

Dominique Langin

(2006)