Outline
Comptes Rendus

On the influence of the nature of the iron(III) salt catalyst precursor for the preparation of sodium amide
Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 14 (2011) no. 5, pp. 434-436.

Abstract

Our recent experiments, for the formation of sodium amide from liquid ammonia and sodium metal, revealed the necessity to employ Fe(NO3)3•9H2O as the catalyst precursor, and not FeCl3. In the presence of FeCl3, we observed several times the ignition of the mixture during the hydrolysis, and the desired product was not obtained.

Metadata
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:
DOI: 10.1016/j.crci.2010.11.008
Keywords: Iron, Catalysis, Sodium amide

Nicolas Galy 1; Henri Doucet 2; Maurice Santelli 1

1 Laboratoire chimie Provence, UMR 6264, faculté des sciences de St-Jérôme, université d’Aix-Marseille, avenue Escadrille-Normandie-Niemen, 13397 Marseille cedex 20, France
2 Institut sciences chimiques de Rennes, UMR 6226, université de Rennes 1 « catalyse et organométalliques », campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes, France
@article{CRCHIM_2011__14_5_434_0,
     author = {Nicolas Galy and Henri Doucet and Maurice Santelli},
     title = {On the influence of the nature of the {iron(III)} salt catalyst precursor for the preparation of sodium amide},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Chimie},
     pages = {434--436},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {14},
     number = {5},
     year = {2011},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crci.2010.11.008},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Nicolas Galy
AU  - Henri Doucet
AU  - Maurice Santelli
TI  - On the influence of the nature of the iron(III) salt catalyst precursor for the preparation of sodium amide
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Chimie
PY  - 2011
SP  - 434
EP  - 436
VL  - 14
IS  - 5
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crci.2010.11.008
LA  - en
ID  - CRCHIM_2011__14_5_434_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Nicolas Galy
%A Henri Doucet
%A Maurice Santelli
%T On the influence of the nature of the iron(III) salt catalyst precursor for the preparation of sodium amide
%J Comptes Rendus. Chimie
%D 2011
%P 434-436
%V 14
%N 5
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crci.2010.11.008
%G en
%F CRCHIM_2011__14_5_434_0
Nicolas Galy; Henri Doucet; Maurice Santelli. On the influence of the nature of the iron(III) salt catalyst precursor for the preparation of sodium amide. Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 14 (2011) no. 5, pp. 434-436. doi : 10.1016/j.crci.2010.11.008. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/chimie/articles/10.1016/j.crci.2010.11.008/

Version originale du texte intégral

1 Introduction

Our strategy for the synthesis of unnatural steroids involves the preparation of the benzocyclobutene 2 from phenylpropiononitrile 1 according to the Mukaiyama procedure [1]. For this cyclization reaction, a large excess of sodium amide (CAS number: 7782-92-5) is employed. We generally prepare this sodium amide in situ, by the addition at −33 °C of pieces of sodium to liquid ammonia (2.5 L for each mol of sodium) containing ∼0.6 mmol (2.5 g) of coarsely powdered Fe(NO3)3•9H2O for each mol of sodium [2]; and then phenylpropiononitrile 1 was added. After addition of diethyl ether, the ammonia was allowed to evaporate, and solid ammonium chloride was added. Then, classical work-up gave rise to 2 in 60% yield (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1

2 Results

During 10 years, we performed many successful experiments according to the Mukaiyama protocol and using undistilled ammonia from a commercial cylinder [3]. But, recently, instead of using iron(III) nitrate as the catalyst precursor, we employed anhydrous FeCl3 in the same amount. However, when this iron catalyst was employed, the hydrolysis appeared to be a very dangerous step. During the course of the hydrolysis, we observed several times the ignition of the mixture. Moreover, after usual work-up, the products 3 [4] and 4 [5] (Scheme 1) corresponding to a drastic reduction of 1 were obtained, and the formation of 2 was not observed. Clearly, in the presence of iron trichloride, sodium amide has not been formed and we have only, in the reaction mixture, the sodium metal dissolved in the liquid ammonia. The catalysis mechanism is uncertain, but appears to involve the rapid reduction of iron(III) to very finely divided metallic iron, which is probably the actual catalytic agent. Without catalyst, the sodium amide is formed very slowly [6]. Some old preparations describe the passing of dry ammonia gas over the molten sodium [7].

The first catalyst used for the preparation of sodium amide by addition of sodium in liquid ammonia, was divided platinum [8]. The use of iron salts, and specially iron(III) nitrate has been described for the first time in 1934 [9]. Since these reports, many preparative methods recommend the use of hydrated ferric nitrate, in particular in the various synthetic methods described in Organic Syntheses [2] or Org. Proc. Res. Dev [10]. However, for some reports including patents [11], and other procedures described in Organic Synthesis [12], it is recommended to use anhydrous ferric chloride [13]. Even a recent encyclopedia such as e-EROS indicated “preparative method: combination of ammonia, small quantities of an iron(III) salt and sodium…” [14]. In a very detailed study concerning the Birch reaction, industrial investigators showed that the ferric chloride catalyzes efficiently the reaction between sodium and alcohols in liquid ammonia [15]. Iron is a well-known transition metal playing an important role as catalyst in organic syntheses [16].

In summary, the nature of the iron salt has a huge influence on the reaction for the formation of sodium amide from liquid ammonia and sodium metal. Fe(NO3)3•9H2O led to the desired sodium amide in good yield; whereas, the use of FeCl3 appears to be dangerous and to give unexpected products.

3 Experimental Section

1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 solutions at 300, and 75 MHz, respectively. Chemical shift are reported in parts per million relative to CDCl3 (signals for residual CHCl3 in the CDCl3: 7.24 for 1H NMR and 77.16 (central) for 13C NMR). Carbon-proton couplings were determined by DEPT sequence experiments.

A 6 L three-neck flask equipped with a 6 cm egg-shaped magnetic bar, an acetone-dry ice reflux condenser, a pressure-equalizing addition funnel was charged with 4.5 L of liquid ammonia. One piece of sodium and then Fe(NO3)3•9H2O (500 mg) were added. When the solution turns from blue to gray, the remaining pieces of sodium (50 g, 2.18 mol) were gradually added with vigourous stirring. Then, the phenylpropiononitrile 1 (96 g, 0.40 mol) was slowly added and the stirring was continued during one night without reflux condenser. Then, diethyl ether (2 L) and ammonium chloride (400 g) were added and the mixture was allowed to stand until the ice on the outside of the flask was entirely melted. The mixture was cautiously poured on ice, stirred and, after usual work-up, the organic layer was dried using MgSO4. The crude product was then chromatographed on silica gel (petroleum ether/diethyl ether, 85/15) to give 2 [1] (38.2 g, 60%) as pale yellow crystals: mp 87 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3), δ 3.45 (1H, dd, J= 14.1, 2.3 Hz), 3.59 (1H, dd, J= 14.1, 5.5 Hz), 3.76 (3H, s), 4.14 (1H, dd, J= 5.5, 2.3 Hz), 6.69 (1H, d, J= 2.1 Hz), 6.82 (1H, dd, J= 8.3, 2.1 Hz), 7.09 (1H, d, J= 8.3 Hz); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3), δ 28.0 (d), 35.6 (t), 55.5 (q), 108.8 (d), 115.2 (d), 120.0 (s), 123.8 (d), 130.4 (s), 143.7 (s), 161.1 (s).

When the anhydrous FeCl3 salt was employed, when the mixture was pourred on ice, the presence of some pyrophoric compounds result in the repeated ignition of the mixture. After hydrolysis, the crude product was chromatographed on silica gel to give 3-ethylanisole 3 (CAS number: 10568-38-4) (16%) and 3-ethylphenol 4 (CAS number: 620-17-7) (9%). 3-Ethylanisole 3: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3), δ 7.22–6.76 (m, 4H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 2.65 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3), δ 159.8 (s), 146.0 (s), 129.4 (d), 120.4 (d), 113.8 (d), 110.9 (d), 55.2 (q), 29.0 (t), 15.6 (q). 3-Ethylphenol 4: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3), δ 7.15–6.7 (m, 4H), 5.25 (s, 1H), 2.60 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.22 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3), δ 155.5 (s), 146.4 (s), 129.6 (d), 120.7 (d), 115.0 (d), 112.7 (d), 28.8 (t); 15.5 (q).


References

[1] T. Kametani; H. Nemoto; H. Ishikawa; K. Shiroyama; K. Fukumoto; T. Kametani; Y. Kato; T. Honda; K. Fukumoto; J.A. Skorcz; F.E. Kaminski Org. Synth, 98 (1976), p. 3378

[2] K.W. Greenlee; A.L. Henne; M.J. Schlatter; E.M. Hancock; A.C. Cope; C.R. Hauser; J.T. Adams; R. Levine; K.N. Campbell; B.K. Campbell; S. Wawzonek; E.M. Smolin; E.R.H. Jones; G. Eglinton; M.C. Whiting; E.R.H. Jones; G. Eglinton; M.C. Whiting; B.L. Shaw; W.R. Brasen; C.R. Hauser; P.J. Ashworth; G.H. Mansfield; M.C. Whiting; C.R. Hauser; W.R. Dunnavant; J.F. Bunnett; B.F. Hrutfiord; S.M. Williamson; C.R. Hauser; W.R. Dunnavant; K.T. Potts; J.E. Saxton; J.C. Kauer; M. Brown; E.M. Kaiser; W.G. Kenyon; C.R. Hauser; K.G. Hampton; T.M. Harris; C.R. Hauser; W.S. Murphy; P.J. Hamrick; C.R. Hauser; K.G. Hampton; T.M. Harris; C.R. Hauser; P.E. Peterson; M. Dunham; M.S. Newman; W.M. Stalick Org. Synth, 23 (1946), p. 128 (Collect. Vol. III, 223 Collect. Vol. III, 219 Collect. Vol. III, 291 Collect. Vol. IV, 763 Collect. Vol. IV, 387 Collect. Vol. IV, 755 Collect. Vol. IV, 404 Collect. Vol. IV, 585 Collect. Vol. IV, 128 Collect. Vol. IV 962 Collect. Vol. V, 12 Collect. Vol. V, 526 Collect. Vol. V, 769 Collect. Vol. V, 1043 Collect. Vol. V, 559 Collect. Vol. V, 848 Collect. Vol. V, 523)

[3] S. Wilmouth; H. Pellissier; M. Santelli; S. Wilmouth; L. Toupet; H. Pellissier; M. Santelli; P.Y. Michellys; P. Maurin; L. Toupet; H. Pellissier; M. Santelli; D. Moraleda; M. Giorgi; M. Santelli Tetrahedron, 54 (1998), p. 10079

[4] M.C. Wang; T.Y. Luh J. Org. Chem, 57 (1992), p. 2178

[5] R.B. Bates; T.J. Siahaan J. Org. Chem, 51 (1986), p. 1432

[6] A. Joannis; A. Joannis C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 109 (1889), p. 900

[7] J.M. McGee; F.W. Bergstrom Org. Synth, 43 (1921), p. 586 (Collect. Vol. 3, 778)

[8] J.L. Gay-Lussac; L.J. Thenard; F.W. Bergstrom; W.C. Fernelius; F.W. Bergstrom; W.C. Fernelius; R. Levine; W.C. Fernelius Recherches physico-chimiques, Chem. Rev, Volume I (1811), p. 354

[9] T.H. Vaughan; R.R. Vogt; J.A. Nieuwland J. Am. Chem. Soc, 56 (1934), pp. 2120-2122

[10] R. Varala; S.R. Adapa Org. Proc. Res. Dev, 9 (2005), pp. 853-856

[11] C.O. Miller; R.O. Roberts Chem. Abstr., 33 (1939), p. 55458

[12] N.A. Khan; N.A. Khan; F.E. Deatherage; J.B. Brown; D.L. Boger; C.E. Brotherton; G.I. Georg; P.A. Magriotis; J.T. Brown Org. Synth., 32 (1952), pp. 104V-40 (Coll. Vol. IV, p. 969 Coll. Vol. IV, p. 851 Collect. Vol. IX, 656)

[13] P.W. Rabideau; D.L. Huser; M.D. Carr; L.H. Gan; I.J. Reid Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans, 48 (1983), p. 4266

[14] J.L. Belletire; R.J. Rauh e-EROS Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis, John Wiley and Sons (2001)

[15] H.L. Dryden; G.M. Webber; R.R. Burtner; J.A. Cella J. Am. Chem. Soc, 26 (1961), p. 3237

[16] A. Fürstner; A. Sarhan; C. Bolm; E.B. Bauer; S. Enthaler; K. Junge; M. Beller; A. Correa; O. Garcia Mancheno; C. Bolm; D. Diaz Diaz; P.O. Miranda; J.I. Padron; V.S. Martin Recent uses of iron(III) chloride in organic chemistry, Curr. Org. Chem., Volume 48 (2009), p. 1364


Comments - Policy