d-Xylose-based surfactants: Synthesis, characterization and molecular modeling studies

Nadia Klai; Chahra Bidjou-Haiour; Sandrine Bouquillon

doi:10.1016/j.crci.2014.11.007

d-Xylose-based surfactants: Synthesis, characterization and molecular modeling studies

Nadia Klai ^1,² ; Chahra Bidjou-Haiour ² ; Sandrine Bouquillon ³

¹ Département de biologie, faculté des sciences, université Mohamed-Boudiaf, 28000 M'sila, Algeria
² LOMOP, groupe « synthèse organique et modélisation », faculté des sciences, université Badji-Mokhtar, BP 12, El-Hadjar, 23000 Annaba, Algeria
³ Institut de chimie moléculaire de Reims, UMR CNRS 7312, université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, boîte no 44, BP 1039, 51687 Reims, France

Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 18 (2015) no. 6, pp. 599-606.

Résumé

Pentose-derived surfactants were easily synthesized and fully characterized through classical analytical methods. The interfacial behaviors revealed the importance of both the length of the hydrophobic chain and the nature of the anomeric form. Finally, the spatial conformation of four xylosides was obtained by molecular modeling with software Hyperchem^® 4 using the semi-empirical method PM3, which demonstrated the role of hydrophobic interactions in the stability of the compounds.

Métadonnées

Reçu le : 2014-09-19
Accepté le : 2014-11-17
Publié le : 2015-04-14

DOI : 10.1016/j.crci.2014.11.007

Mots clés : Pentoses, Surfactants, Interfacial properties, Molecular modeling

Affiliations des auteurs :

Nadia Klai ^{1, 2} ; Chahra Bidjou-Haiour ² ; Sandrine Bouquillon ³

¹ Département de biologie, faculté des sciences, université Mohamed-Boudiaf, 28000 M'sila, Algeria
² LOMOP, groupe « synthèse organique et modélisation », faculté des sciences, université Badji-Mokhtar, BP 12, El-Hadjar, 23000 Annaba, Algeria
³ Institut de chimie moléculaire de Reims, UMR CNRS 7312, université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, boîte no 44, BP 1039, 51687 Reims, France

@article{CRCHIM_2015__18_6_599_0,
     author = {Nadia Klai and Chahra Bidjou-Haiour and Sandrine Bouquillon},
     title = {d-Xylose-based surfactants: {Synthesis,} characterization and molecular modeling studies},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Chimie},
     pages = {599--606},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {18},
     number = {6},
     year = {2015},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crci.2014.11.007},
     language = {en},
}

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Nadia Klai
AU  - Chahra Bidjou-Haiour
AU  - Sandrine Bouquillon
TI  - d-Xylose-based surfactants: Synthesis, characterization and molecular modeling studies
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Chimie
PY  - 2015
SP  - 599
EP  - 606
VL  - 18
IS  - 6
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crci.2014.11.007
LA  - en
ID  - CRCHIM_2015__18_6_599_0
ER  -

%0 Journal Article
%A Nadia Klai
%A Chahra Bidjou-Haiour
%A Sandrine Bouquillon
%T d-Xylose-based surfactants: Synthesis, characterization and molecular modeling studies
%J Comptes Rendus. Chimie
%D 2015
%P 599-606
%V 18
%N 6
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crci.2014.11.007
%G en
%F CRCHIM_2015__18_6_599_0

Nadia Klai; Chahra Bidjou-Haiour; Sandrine Bouquillon. d-Xylose-based surfactants: Synthesis, characterization and molecular modeling studies. Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 18 (2015) no. 6, pp. 599-606. doi : 10.1016/j.crci.2014.11.007. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/chimie/articles/10.1016/j.crci.2014.11.007/

Version originale du texte intégral

1 Introduction

Developing solvents with less impact on the environment is currently a great concern. This aspect is identified as one of the 12 principles of green chemistry as defined by P.T. Anastas and J.C. Warner [1]. Although numerous studies are dedicated to this pursuit, the number of “green” solvents available today on the market is limited, and the search for alternative solvents remains a major challenge, notably in domains such as fine chemistry or catalysis. Recently, catalysis by transition metals in aqueous medium has been the object of increasing interest [2,3] because reactions in aqueous media are considerably safer, non-toxic, environmentally friendly and inexpensive. Since then, water has been introduced into numerous reactions of organic or organometallic synthesis. However, the lack of solubility of reagents and/or catalysts limits its use in organic synthesis. The use of transfer agents or surfactants, which are key compounds to the organized molecular systems can partially overcome these difficulties, while improving the catalytic activity [4]. Concerning hydrogenation processes, for example, the Rh-catalyzed hydrogenation of unsaturated substrates was one of the first widely described studies [5–7].

For several years, we have been concerned with the synthesis of surfactants from renewable resources [8–10]. We have already obtained pentosides with an octadienyl chain from the Pd-catalyzed telomerization of butadiene with pentoses [8] and prepared xylosides containing only one terminal double bond [9a-e] by classical glycosylation. These xylosides were then transformed into bolaamphiphilic surfactants by metathesis reactions [10]. Within this framework, we will describe how biobased alkylpentosides can be easily synthesized from d-xylose and their resulting interfacial properties. Molecular modeling was performed on four xylosides to understand the forces involved in the stability of the compounds.

2 Experimental

2.1 Materials and methods

2.1.1 Synthesis

2.1.1.1 General procedure for the glycosylation

In a three-necked flask equipped with a reflux condensor, d-xylose (1 equiv) was dissolved under argon atmosphere in anhydrous THF. The alcohol (2 equiv) was then added and the resulting mixture was stirred at 80 °C. The PTSA (0.6 equiv) was then added in three portions (0.2 equiv each hour). After 48 or 72 h of reaction, the mixture was neutralized by adding a 0.5 M methanolic solution of MeONa, and the products were purified by flash chromatography (eluting mixture CH₂Cl₂/MeOH 9:1).

Hexyl-α,β-d-xylopyranoside (1)

This compound was obtained as a yellow paste following the general procedure previously described with d-xylose (4 g, 0.026 mol) in 150 mL of THF, hexanol (6.46 mL, 2 equiv) and PTSA (3.08 g, 0.6 equiv). Yield: 37%, α/β: 3/7, Rf: 0.54 (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH, 9:1).

IR (KBr): 3378, 2929, 2865, 1463, 1377, 1272, 1242, 1152, 1115, 1045, 726. ¹H NMR (CD₃OD, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.91 (t, 6H, J = 5 Hz, H_6′α, H_6′β), 1.33 (m, 12H, H_5′α,H_5′β, H_4′α, H_4′β, H_3′α, H_3′β), 1.60–1.63 (m, 4H, H_2′α, H_2′β), 3.18–3.81(m, 14H, H_1′α, H_1′β, H_5α, H_5β, H_2α, H_2β, H_4α, H_4β, H_3α, H_3β), 4.18 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H_1β), 4.69 (d, 1H, J = 3.5 Hz, H_1α), 4.87 (s, 6H, 6OH). ¹³C NMR (CD₃OD, 62.9 MHz): δ (ppm) = 14.9 (C_6′), 24.1 (C_5′α), 25.3 (C_5′β), 27.2 (C_4′α), 27.5 (C_4′β), 31.0 (C_3′α), 31.2 (C_3′β), 33.2 (C_2′α), 33.3 (C_2′β), 63.4 (C_5α), 67.4 (C_5β), 69.7 (C_1′α), 71.3 (C_1′β), 71.7 (C_4α), 72.0 (C_4β), 74.0 (C_2α), 75.4 (C_2β), 75.6 (C_3α), 78.3 (C_3β), 100.8 (C_1α), 105.5 (C1_β). Anal calcd for C₁₁H₂₂O₅: C, 56.39; H, 9.46. Found: C, 56.11; H, 9.46.

Octyl-α,β-d-xylopyranoside (2)

This compound was obtained as a yellow paste following the general procedure previously described with d-xylose (4 g, 0.026 mol) in 150 mL of THF, octanol (8.50 mL, 2 equiv) and PTSA (3.08 g, 0.6 equiv). Yield: 31%, α/β: 4/6, Rf: 0.67 (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH, 9:1).

IR (KBr): 3381, 2926, 2857, 1463, 1378, 1271, 1242, 1151, 1115, 1044, 722. ¹H NMR (CD₃OD, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.87 (t, 6H, J = 7.5 Hz, H_8′α, H_8′β), 1.31 (m, 20H, H_7′α, H_7′β, H_6′α, H_6′β, H_5′α, H_5′β, H_4′α, H_4′β, H_3′α, H_3′β,), 1.58–1.63 (m, 4H, H_2′α, H_2′β), 3.18–3.82 (m, 14H, H_1′α, H_1′β, H_5α, H_5β, H_2α, H_2β, H_4α, H_4β, H_3α, H_3β), 4.18 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H_1β), 4.71 (d, 1H, J = 3.75 Hz, H_1α), 4.87 (s, 6H, 6 OH). ¹³C NMR (CD₃OD, 62.9 MHz): δ (ppm) = 14.9 (C_8′), 24.2 (C_7′), 27.5 (C_6′), 27.8 (C_5′), 30.9 (C_4′), 31.2 (C_3′), 33.5 (C_2′), 63.4 (C_5α), 67.3 (C_5β), 69.7 (C_1′α), 71.3 (C_1′β), 71.6 (C_4α), 71.9 (C_4β), 74.0 (C_2α), 75.3 (C_2β), 75.6 (C_3α), 78.3 (C_3β), 100.8 (C_1α), 105.5 (C_1β). Anal calcd for C₁₃H₂₆O₅, ½ H₂O: C, 57.54; H, 10.03. Found: C, 57.71; H, 10.

Decyl-α,β-d-xylopyranoside (3)

This compound was obtained as a white paste following the general procedure previously described with d-xylose (5 g, 0.033 mol) in 188 mL of THF, decanol (13.18 mL, 2 equiv) and PTSA (3.762 g, 0.6 equiv). Yield: 25%, α/β: 4/6, Rf: 0.66 (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH, 9:1).

IR (KBr): 3362, 2920, 2853, 1466, 1376, 1246, 1144, 1114, 1045, 720. ¹H NMR (CD₃OD, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.88 (t, 6H, J = 5 Hz, H_10′α, H_10′β), 1.25 (m, 28H, H_9′α, H_9′β, H_8′α, H_8′β, H_7′α, H_7′β, H_6′α, H_6′β, H_5′α, H_5′β, H_4′α, H_4′β, H_3′α, H_3′β,), 1.57–1.59 (m, 4H, H_2′α, H_2′β), 3.14–3.49 (m, 14H, H_1′α, H_1′β, H_5α, H_5β, H_2α, H_2β, H_4α, H_4β, H_3α, H_3β), 4.14 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H_1β), 4.64 (d, 1H, J = 3.75 Hz, H_1α), 4.81(s, 6H, 6OH). ¹³C NMR (CD₃OD, 62.9 MHz): δ (ppm) = 14.9 (C_10′), 24.2 (C_9′), 27.5 (C_8′), 27.8 (C_7′), 30.9, 31.0, 31.1, 31.2 (C_6′α, C_6′β, C_5′α, C_5′β, C_4′α, C_4′β, C_3′α, C_3′β,), 33.5 (C_2′), 63.4 (C_5α), 67.3 (C_5β), 69.7 (C_1′α), 71,3 (C_1′β), 71.6 (C_4α), 71,9 (C_4β), 74.0 (C_2α), 75,3 (C_2β), 75.6 (C_3α), 78.3 (C_3β), 100.8 (C_1α), 105.5 (C_1β). Anal calcd for C₁₅H₃₀O₅, ¼ H₂O: C, 61.09; H, 10.42. Found: C, 61.26; H, 10.44.

Dodecyl-α,β-d-xylopyranoside (4)

This compound was obtained as a white powder following the general procedure previously described with d-xylose (8 g, 0.053 mol) in 350 mL of THF, dodecanol (23.66 mL, 2 equiv) and PTSA (6.02 g, 0.6 equiv). Yield: 40%, α/β: 7/3, Rf: 0.62 (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH, 9:1).

IR (KBr): 3382, 2919, 2852, 1470, 1376, 1246, 1144, 1114, 1044, 719. ¹H NMR (CD₃OD, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.88 (t, 6H, J = 7.5 Hz, H_12′α, H_12′β), 1.27 (m, 36H, H_11′, H_10′ H9’, H_8′, H_7′, H_6′, H_5′, H_4′, H_3′), 1.57–1.62 (m, 4H, H_2′α, H_2′β), 3.13–3.78 (m, 14H, H_1′α, H_1′β, H_5α, H_5β, H_2α, H_2β, H_4α, H_4β, H_3α, H_3β), 4.16 (d, 1H, J = 7,5 Hz, H_1β), 4.67 (d, 1H, J = 3,75 Hz, H_1α), 4.87 (s, 6H, 6OH). ¹³C NMR (CD₃OD, 62.9 MHz): 14.3 (C_12′), 23.6 (C_11′), 27.2 (C_10′), 27.9 (C_9′), 30.3, 30.4, 30.5, 30.6 (C_8′, C_7′, C_6′, C_5′, C_4′,C_3′), 32.9 (C_2′), 62.9 (C_5α), 66.8 (C_5β), 69.1 (C_1′α), 70.7 (C_1′β), 71.0 (C_4α), 71.4 (C_4β), 73.5 (C_2α), 74.8 (C_2β), 75.0 (C_3α), 77.7 (C_3β), 100.2 (C_1α), 104.9 (C_1β). Anal calcd for C₁₇H₃₃O_5: C, 64.12; H, 10.76. Found: C, 64.11; H, 10.87.

Octadecyl-α,β-d-xylopyranoside (5)

This compound was obtained as a yellow powder following the general procedure previously described with d-xylose (8 g, 0.053 mol) in 350 mL of THF, octadecanol (28.67 mL, 2 equiv) and PTSA (10.02 g, 0.6 equiv). Yield: 23%, α/β: 7/3, Rf: 0.57 (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH, 9:1).

IR (KBr): 3380, 2918, 2851, 1470, 1376, 1248, 1144, 1114, 1044, 719. ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.99 (m, 6H, H_18′α, H_18′β), 1.37(m, 60H, H_17′, H_16′, H_15′, H_14′, H_13′, H_12′, H_11′, H_10′ H_9′, H_8′, H_7′, H_6′, H_5′, H_4′, H_3′), 1.63–1.65 (m, 4H, H_2′α, H_2′β), 3.00–3.82 (m, 14H, H_1′α, H_1′β, H_5α, H_5β, H_2α, H_2β, H_4α, H_4β, H_3α, H_3β), 4.18 (d, 1H, J = 7,5 Hz, H_1β), 4.54 (d, 1H, J = 3.75 Hz, H_1α), 4.94 (s, 6H, 6OH). ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 62.9 MHz): 14.3 (C_18′), 23.6 (C_17′), 25.9 (C_16′), 27.9 (C_15′), 30. 3, 30.4, 30.5, 30.6 (C_14′, C_13′, C_12′, C_11′C_10′, C_9′, C_8′, C_7′, C_6′, C_5′, C_4′, C_3′), 31,7 (C_2′), 62.3 (C_5α), 66.0 (C_5β), 67.5 (C_1′α), 68.9 (C_1′β), 69.9 (C_4α), 70.4 (C_4β), 72.3 (C_2α), 73.6 (C_2β), 73.7 (C_3α), 77.0 (C_3β), 99.3 (C_1α), 104.0 (C_1β). Anal calcd for C₂₃H₄₆O₅: C, 68.61; H, 11.52. Found: C, 68.62; H, 11.70.

2.1.1.2 General procedure for the acetylation of pentosides

The previously synthesized pentosides (1–5) were acetylated in the presence of acetic anhydride (12 equiv) and sodium acetate (1 equiv) for 24 to 72 h at 50 °C under stirring. The reaction was followed by TLC. Diethylether (50 mL) was added to the resulting mixture and three washings (3 × 50 mL) with a Na₂CO₃ saturated solution were carried out until a neutral pH was reached. The organic phase was then dried with MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was then purified by flash chromatography (silica gel, eluting mixture petroleum ether/AcOEt 8:2).

Dodecyl -2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (4β′)

This compound was obtained as a white powder following the general procedure previously described with dodecyl-α,β-d-xylopyranoside (6.57 g, 0.02 mol) in 26.4 mL of acetic anhydride (12 equiv) and AcONa (2.584 g, 1 equiv) (reaction time: 24 h). Yield: 24%, Rf: 0.64 (petroleum ether/AcOEt, 8:2).

¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.82 (t, 3H, J = 2.5 Hz, H_12′), 1.19 (m, 18H, H_3′, H_4′, H_5′, H_6′, H_7′ H_8′, H_9′, H_10′, H_11′), 1.49 (m, 2H, H_2′), 1.97–1.99 (s, 9H, 3 CH₃CO), 3.29–3.43 (m, 2H, H_1′), 3.74 (dt, 1H, J = 5 Hz, J = 2.5 Hz, H_5a), 4.06 (dd, 1H, J = 5 Hz, J = 2.5 Hz, H_5eq), 4.40 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H_1β), 4.84–4.87 (m, 2H, H₂, H₄), 5.09 (t, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz, H₃). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 62.9 MHz): 14.5 (C_12′), 21.2 (3 C, CH₃CO), 23.1 (C_11′), 26.3 (C_10′), 30.1, 30.0 29.8 (C_3′, C_4′, C_5‘, C_6′, C_7′, C_8′, C_9′), 32.3 (C_2′), 62.4 (C₅), 69.4 (C_1′), 70.2 (C₄), 71.3 (C₂), 71.9 (C₃), 101.1 (C1_β), 168.1, 168.0, 167.3 (3CH₃CO). Anal calcd for C₂₃H₄₀O_8: C, 62.14; H, 9.07. Found: C, 62.21; H, 9.12.

Dodecyl-2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-α-d-xylopyranoside (4α′)

This compound was obtained as a colorless oil following the general procedure previously described with dodecyl-α,β-d-xylopyranoside (6.57 g, 0.02 mol) in 26.4 mL of acetic anhydride (12 equiv) and AcONa (2.584 g, 1 equiv) (reaction time: 24 h). Yield: 58%, Rf: 0.87 (petroleum ether/AcOEt, 8:2).

¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.79 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz, H_12′), 1.18 (m, 18H, H_3′, H_4′, H_5′, H_6′, H_7′ H_8′, H_9′, H_10′, H_11′), 1.48–1.51 (m, 2H, H_2′), 1.94–1.96 (s, 9H, 3 CH₃CO), 3.28–3.32 (m, 1H, H_1’a), 3.53–3.66 (m, 2H, H_1’b, H_5a), 4.01–4.06 (m, 1H, H_5eq), 4.70(dd, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, H₂), 4.87–4.80 (m, 2H, H_1α, H₄), 5.38 (t, 1H, J = 10 Hz, H₃). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 62.9 MHz): 13.4 (C_12′), 22.6 (3 CH₃CO), 23.0 (C_11′), 26.2 (C_10′), 29.3, 29.5, 29.6 (C_9′, C_8′, C_7‘, C_6′, C_5′, C_4′, C_3′), 31.9 (C_2′), 61.9 (C₅), 68.1 (C_1′), 70.3 (C₄), 72.3 (C₂), 73.9 (C₃), 99.1 (C_1α), 170.6, 170.4, 170.6 (3 CH₃CO). Anal calcd for C₂₃H₄₀O_8: C, 62.14; H, 9.07. Found: C, 62.14; H, 9.23.

Octadecyl-2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (5β′)

This compound was obtained as a white powder following the general procedure previously described with octadodecyl-α,β-d-xylopyranoside (3.102 g, 7,57 mmol) in 17 mL of acetic anhydride (12 equiv) and AcONa (1.029 g, 1 equiv) (reaction time: 24 h). Yield: 15%, Rf: 0.57 (petroleum ether/AcOEt, 8:2).

IR (KBr): 2918, 2850, 1756, 1470, 1375, 1226, 1144, 1079, 723. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.81(t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz, H_18′), 1.18 (m, 30H, H_3′, H_4′, H_5′, H_6′, H_7′ H_8′, H_9′, H_10′, H_11′, H_12′ H_13′ H_14′ H_15′, H_16′, H_17′), 1.49 (m, 2H, H_2′), 1.97–2.03 (s, 9H, 3CH₃CO), 3.29–3.40 (m, 2H, H_1′), 3.73–3.76 (m, 1H, H_5a), 4.05 (dd, 1H, J_4–5eq = J_5a-5eq = 5 Hz, H_5eq), 4.40 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H_1β), 4.84–4.89 (m, 2H, H₂, H₄), 5.09 (t, 1H, J = 10 Hz, H₃). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 62.9 MHz): 13.4 (C_18′), 20.0 (3 CH₃CO), 21.9 (C_17‘), 25.2 (C_16‘), 30.1, 30.0 29.9 (C_15′, C_14′, C_13‘, C_12′, C_11′, C_10′, C_9′, C_8′, C_7′, C_6′, C_5′, C_4′, C_3′), 31.2 (C_2′), 61.3 (C₅), 68.2 (C_1′), 68.9 (C₄), 70.1 (C₂), 70.8 (C₃), 99.9 (C_1β), 167.9, 169.1, 169.4 (3 CH₃CO). Anal calcd for C₂₉H₅₂O_8: C, 65.88; H, 9.91. Found: C, 65.19; H, 9.88.

Octadecyl-2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-α-d-xylopyranoside (5α′)

This compound was obtained as a white powder following the general procedure previously described with octadodecyl-α,β-d-xylopyranoside (3.102 g, 7,57 mmol) in 17 mL of acetic anhydride (12 equiv) and AcONa (1.029 g, 1 equiv) (reaction time: 24 h). Yield: 50%, Rf: 0.67 (petroleum ether/AcOEt, 8:2).

IR (KBr): 2920, 2851, 1739, 1470, 1376, 1234, 1141, 1045, 721. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.82 (t, 3H, J = 5 Hz, H_18′), 1.19 (m, 30H, H_3′, H_4′, H_5′, H_6′, H_7′ H_8′, H_9′, H_10′, H_11′, H_12′ H_13′ H_14′ H_15′, H_16′, H_17′), 1.49–1.52 (m, 2H, H_2′), 1.96–1.99 (s, 9H, 3CH₃CO), 3.29–3.33 (m, 1H, H_1’a), 3.55–3.73 (m, 2H, H_5a, H_1’b), 4.01–4.06 (m, 1H, H_5eq), 4.72 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, H₂), 4.91–4.93 (m, 2H, H_1α, H₄), 5.41 (t, 1H, J = 10 Hz, H₃). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃, 62.9 MHz): 14.5 (C_18′), 21.09 (3 CH₃CO), 21.1 (C_17‘), 23.0 (C_16‘), 29.3, 29.5 29.6 (C_15′, C_14′, C_13‘, C_12′, C_11′, C_10′, C_9′, C_8,’ C_7′, C_6′, C_5′, C_4′, C_3′), 32.33 (C_2′), 58.6 (C₅), 68.9 (C_1′), 69.9 (C₄), 70.1 (C₂), 71.6 (C₃), 95.9 (C_1α), 170.3, 170.4, 170.6 (3 CH₃CO). Anal calcd for C₂₉H₅₂O_8: C, 65.88; H, 9.91. Found: C, 64.32; H, 10.05.

2.1.1.3 General procedure for the deacetylation of acetylated pure anomeric pentosides

Each of the previously synthesized pentosides was deacetylated in the presence of MeONa in MeOH. In a Schlenk tube under argon atmosphere, the peracetylated pentoside was dissolved in a mixture of CH₂Cl₂/MeOH (1/1); the sodium methylate (6 equiv, 2 equiv per OH group) was then added. The evolution of the reaction was followed by TLC until completion; an ion-exchange resin was added to neutralize the excess of sodium methylate. The resulting mixture was then filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure.

Dodecyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (4β)

This compound was obtained as a white powder following the general procedure previously described with dodecyl-2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (2.044 g, 4.93 mmol) in 30 mL of CH₂Cl₂/MeOH (1/1) and MeONa (1.599 g, 6 equiv) (reaction time: 24 h). Yield: 96%, Rf: 0.62 (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH, 9:1).

IR (KBr): 3358, 2919, 2852, 1456, 1378, 1142, 1114, 1045, 722. ¹H NMR (CD₃OD, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.89 (t, 3H, J = 5 Hz, H_12′), 1.28 (m, 18H, H_11′, H_10′ H_9′, H_8′, H_7′, H_6′, H_5′, H_4′, H_3′), 1.61 (quint, 2H, J = 10 Hz, H_2′), 3.14–3.17 (m, 3H, H₂, H_5a, H₃), 3.45–3.53 (m, 2H, H₄, H_1a), 3.77–3.86 (m, 2H, H_1b, H_5eq), 4.17 (d, 1H, J = 7, 5 Hz, H_1β), 4.87 (s, 3H, 3 OH). ¹³C NMR (CD₃OD, 62.9 MHz): 15.5 (C_12′), 24.8 (C_11′), 28.1 (C_10′), 31.5, 31.6, 31.78, 31.9, 33.1 (C_9′, C_8′, C_7′, C_6′, C_5′, C_4′,C_3′), 34.1 (C_2′), 67.9 (C₅), 71.9 (C_1′), 72.3 (C₄), 75.9 (C₂), 78.9 (C₃), 106.1 (C_1β). Anal calcd for C₁₇H₃₄O_5: C, 64.12; H, 10.76. Found: C, 64.37; H, 10.98.

Dodecyl-α-d-xylopyranoside (4α)

This compound was obtained as a white solid following the general procedure previously described with dodecyl-2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-α-d-xylopyranoside (4.979 g, 12.02 mmol) in 30 mL of CH₂Cl₂/MeOH (1/1) and MeONa (3.896 g, 6 equiv) (reaction time: 24 h). Yield: 78%, Rf: 0.60 (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH, 9:1).

IR (KBr): 3391, 2918, 2852, 1472, 1372, 1142, 1111, 1043, 718. ¹H NMR (CD₃OD, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.85 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz H_12′), 1.20 (m, 18H, H_11′, H_10′ H₉,, H_8′, H_7′, H_6′, H_5′, H_4′, H_3′), 1.51–1.54 (m, 2H, H_2′), 3.20–3.71 (m, 7H, H_1′, H_5a, H_5eq, H₄, H₂, H₃), 4.61 (d, 1H, J = 2. 5 Hz, H_1α), 4.97 (s, 3H, 3 OH). ¹³C NMR (CD₃OD, 62.9 MHz): 13.4 (C_12′), 22.6 (C_11′), 23.1 (C_10′), 26.2, 29.3, 29.5, 29.6 (C_9′, C_8′, C_7′, C_6′, C_5′, C_4′,C_3′), 31.9 (C_2′), 61.9 (C₅), 68.1 (C_1′), 70.3 (C₄), 72.3 (C₂), 73.9 (C₃), 99.1 (C_1α). Anal calcd for C₁₇H₃₄O_5: C, 64.12; H, 10.76. Found: C, 64.50; H, 10.99.

Octadecyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (5β)

This compound was obtained as a white solid following the general procedure previously described with octadecyl-2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-xylopyranoside (0.622 g, 1.17 mmol) in 18 mL of CH₂Cl₂/MeOH (1/1) and MeONa (0.381 g, 6 equiv) (reaction time: 24 h). Yield: 83%, Rf: 0.56 (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH, 9:1).

IR (KBr): 3344, 2918, 2850, 1464, 1377, 1181, 1116, 1047, 723. ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.84 (t, 3H, J = 7, 5 Hz, H_18′), 1.22 (m, 30H, H_17′, H_16′, H_15′, H_14′, H_13′, H_12′, H_11′, H_10′ H_9′ H_8′, H_7′, H_6′, H_5′, H_4′, H_3′), 1.47 (m, 2H, H_2′), 2.95–3.18 (m, 3H, H₂, H_5a, H₃), 3.30–3.60 (m, 2H, H₄, H_1a), 3.62–3.68 (m, 2H, H_1b, H_5eq), 4.04 (d, 1H, J = 7, 5 Hz, H_1β), 4.94 (s, 3H, 3 OH). ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 62.9 MHz): 13.3 (C_18′), 21.4 (C_17′), 24.9 (C_16′), 28.0, 28.2, 28.4, 28.7 (C_15′, C_14′, C_13′, C_12′, C_11′, C_10′, C_9′, C_8′, C_7′, C_6′, C_5′, C_4′,C_3′), 30.6 (C_2′), 65.01 (C₅), 67.9 (C_1′), 68.9 (C₄), 72.6 (C₂), 75.9 (C₃), 102.9 (C_1β). Anal calcd for C₂₃H₄₆O_5: C, 68.61; H, 11.52. Found: C, 68.82; H, 11.77.

Octadecyl-α-d-xylopyranoside (5α)

This compound was obtained as a white solid following the general procedure previously described with octadecyl-2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-α-d-xylopyranoside (1.956 g, 3.73 mmol) in 18 mL of CH₂Cl₂/MeOH (1/1) and MeONa (1.198 g, 6 equiv) (reaction time: 24 h). Yield: 44%, Rf: 0.59 (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH, 9:1).

IR (KBr): 3388, 2917, 2851, 1473, 1377, 1144, 1112, 1043, 717. ¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆, 250 MHz): δ (ppm) = 0.80 (m, 3H, H_18′), 1.21 (m, 30H, H_17′, H_16′, H_15′, H_14′, H_13′, H_12′, H_11′, H_10′ H_9′, H_8′, H_7′, H_6′, H_5′, H_4′, H_3′), 1.51–1.54 (m, 2H, H_2′), 3.20–3.71 (m, 7H, H_1′, H_5a, H_5eq, H₄, H₂,H₃), 4.61 (d, 1H, J = 2. 5 Hz, H_1α), 4.97 (s, 3H, 3 OH). ¹³C NMR (DMSO-d₆, 62.9 MHz): 14.3 (C_18′), 22.5 (C_17′), 26.1 (C_16′), 29.1, 29.3, 29.5, 29.6 (C_15′, C_14′, C_13′, C_12′, C_11′, C_10′, C_9′, C_8′, C_7′, C_6′, C_5′, C_4′,C_3′), 31.7 (C_2′), 62.3 (C₅), 67.5 (C_1′), 70.4 (C₄), 72.3 (C₂), 73.7 (C₃), 99.4 (C_1α). Anal calcd for C₂₃H₄₆O₅: C, 68.61; H, 11.52. Found: C, 69.10; H, 11.68.

2.1.2 Surface tension measurement

2.1.2.1 Wilhelmy's method

Surface tension was measured at a constant temperature (298 K) by means of an automatic tensiometer K100-KRUSS using the Wilhelmy plate method. A mother solution of surfactants (concentration 10⁻¹ mol·L⁻¹ in 20 mL of ultrapure water) was prepared and then diluted to obtain a range of surfactant solutions with concentrations from 10⁻² to 10⁻⁵ mol·L⁻¹.

2.1.2.2 Method of the hanging drop

The superficial tension of solutions of decreasing surfactant concentrations were measured using the IT concept Tracker drop tensiometer by carefully measuring the superficial tension of water between two sets of measurements to ensure the cleanliness of the syringe. These experiments were carried out at 298 K by analyzing the profile of a drop of a surfactant solution in a tank under a water-saturated atmosphere. All measures were taken when the superficial tension was stabilized.

3 Results and discussion

Glycosylation of d-xylose was performed with hexanol, octanol, decanol, dodecanol and octadecanol using p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) as an acidic catalyst following the previously described methods (Scheme 1) [9b,11].

The yields were moderate; at high temperature under thermodynamic control, major pyranic forms were obtained. Concerning the ratio α/β, β anomers prevailed for C6–10 derivatives as described by Schmidt for the O-alkylation of protected sugars in the presence of a Li-base [12] (Table 1, entries 1–3). With the alcohols C12 and C18, the ratio α/β was reversed and the presence of a major α-xyloside can be explained by the high hydrophobic character of the medium (Table 1, entries 4 and 5).

Entry	Alcohol	Xyloside	Time (h)	Ratio (α/β)^c	Yield (%)
1^a	Hexanol (C6)	1	48	3/7	37
2^a	Octanol (C8)	2	48	4/6	31
3^a	Decanol (C10)	3	48	4/6	25
4^a	Dodecanol (C12)	4	48	7/3	40
5^a	Octadecanol (C18)	5^b	72	6/4	23

^a ^bd-Xylose (1 equiv), alcohol (2 equiv), PTSA (0.6 equiv) in a large excess of THF, 80 °C.

^c Determined by ¹H NMR (integration of anomeric protons).

Then, α and β anomers of 1–5 were obtained in pure forms by O-deacetylation of the corresponding acetylated α- and β-xylosides, previously prepared and separated by flash chromatography.

The surface tension characteristics of the xylosides pentosides in pure anomeric forms or in mixtures are reported in Table 2.

Entry	Compound	CMC (mmol·L⁻¹)	CMC (mg·L⁻¹)	γ (mN·m⁻¹)	Γ (mol·m⁻²)	A (Å²)
1		4.91	1150	26	3.2	52.4
2		3.63 [13]	953 [13]	27 [13]	–	–
3		4.40 [15]	1616[15]	30 [15]	3.4 [15]	43.7 [15]
4		1.04 [13]	301 [13]	27 [13]	–	–
5		0.21 [15]	62	39 [15]	4.1 [15]	37.6 [15]
6		0.021	6.7	49	4.7	35.1
7		0.013 [15]	4.1 [15]	47.6 [15]	5.1	32.3
8		3.7. 10⁻⁵	1.5	55	5.9	27.9
9		4.9. 10⁻⁵	1.973	51	6.5	25.4

Surface tension, CMC and the area of compounds 2 and 3 have already been reported in the literature [13] and have shown their potential as powerful environmentally friendly surfactants complying with biorefinery guidelines [14] (Table 2, entries 2–5). These values were confirmed by the work of Matsumura et al. where the interfacial properties of dodecylpentosides 4 (especially the β form) were also described [15] (Table 2, entries 6 and 7). This last study demonstrated that alkyl β-d-xylobiosides have the best physicochemical properties as surface-active agents and that in addition β anomers exhibited a greater surface activity than the corresponding α anomers.

Our results concerning xyloside 1 showed a good surface tension, but a high CMC due to the high solubility of this pentoside in water. On the contrary, for pentoside 5, surface tension is high for a very tiny solubility in water. The values of CMC, γ and A are in accordance with the reported results concerning the xylosides 2–4.

To complete this study, molecular modeling with Hyperchem^® 4 software and the semi-empirical method PM 3 were used to determine the spatial conformation of xylosides (Fig. 1). The strength field MESSRS⁺ was used and the conformations were determined under vacuum.

Fig. 1
(Color online.) Molecular modeling for xylosides 4β, **4′β**, 5β and **5′β**.

According to the results (Table 3), the β xylosides are consistently more stable than the α ones. This observation is in agreement with the study of Gorin concerning the stability of methylglycopyranosides [16]. Increasing the length of the hydrophobic chain from 12 to 18 carbons leads to decreased energy and consequently to better stability due to the hydrophobic effect.

d-Xylosides	Energy (kcal·mol⁻¹)	ΔE (kcal·mol⁻¹)
4α	–276.66	1.840
4β	–278.50
5α	–309.29	1.838
5β	–311.13
4α′	–386.81	3.378
4β′	–390.19
5α′	–419.44	7.533
5β′	–426.97

Furthermore, the compound 5β′ that presents the lowest value of energy is the most stable. We also noticed the formation of hydrogen bonds for β anomers 4β and 5β. These bonds are neither present for α anomers nor for acetylated compounds 4′ and 5′. As the acetylated compound 5β′ is the most stable, we can conclude that its stability is governed by the hydrophobic interactions.

4 Conclusion

d-Xylose derived surfactants were easily synthesized and fully characterized through classical analytical methods. Specific methods such as Wilhelmy's method or the hanging-drop method allowed their interfacial properties to be determined. The molecular modeling studies revealed that the β xylosides are consistently more stable than the α ones and that xylosides containing a long carbon chain are more stable. This stability can be attributed to the importance of hydrophobic interactions.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from Reims Champagne-Ardenne University, the CPER 2007–2013 framework (Pentoraffinerie program), and the FEDER is gratefully acknowledged.

Bibliographie

[1] P.T. Anastas; J.C. Warner, Oxford University Press, New York (1998), p. 30

[2] B. Cornils; W. Herrmann Aqueous-phase organometallic catalysis, Wiley, New York, 1998

[3] Y.R. Butler; A.G. Coney Chem. Rev., 110 (2010), p. 6302

[4] A. Cassez; N. Kania; S. Fourmentin; E. Monflier; A. Ponchel Catal. Commun., 9 (2008), p. 1346

[5] J.S. Milano-Brusco; R. Schomaker Catal. Lett., 133 (2009), p. 273

[6] M. Schwarze; J.S. Milano-Brusco; V. Strempel; T. Hamerla; S. Wille; C. Fischer; W. Baumann; W. Arlt; R. Schomacke RSC Adv., 1 (2011), p. 474

[7] W. Weiwei; L. Zhiming; M. Wenbo Catal. Commun., 11 (2010), p. 480

[8] J. Muzart; F. Hénin; B. Estrine; S. Bouquillon; B. Estrine; S. Bouquillon; F. Hénin; J. Muzart; B. Estrine; S. Bouquillon; F. Hénin; J. Muzart; B. Estrine; C. Damez; S. Bouquillon; F. Hénin; J. Muzart J. Mol. Catal., 7 (2001), p. 2914

[9] C. Hadad; C. Damez; S. Bouquillon; B. Estrine; F. Hénin; J. Muzart; I. Pezron; L. Komunjer; C. Damez; S. Bouquillon; D. Harakat; F. Hénin; J. Muzart; I. Pezron; L. Komunjer; S. Pradeau; I. Pezron; L. Komunjer; S. Bouquillon; S. Bouquillon; J. Muzart; C. Pinel; F. Rataboul; S. Bouquillon C. R. Chimie, 341 (2006), p. 1938

[10] M. Deleu; C. Damez; S. Gatard; K. Nott; M. Paquot; S. Bouquillon; M. Deleu; S. Gatard; E. Payen; L. Lins; K. Nott; C. Flore; R. Thomas; M. Paquot; S. Bouquillon; S. Gatard; M.N. Nasir; M. Deleu; N. Klai; V. Legrand; S. Bouquillon; M.N. Nasir; V. Legrand; S. Gatard; S. Bouquillon; K. Nott; L. Lins; M. Deleu MATEC Web of Conferences, 35 (2011), p. 2258 | DOI

[11] E. Fischer; C.S. Nevin; R.G. Short; J.E. Davis; J.C. Letton; X. Song; Y. Cui; J. Guo Xandai Huagong, 26 (1893), p. 2400 US Patent 3375243 19680326, Appl. US 67-622476 19670313, 1967 Eur. Pat. Appl., Appl. EP 84-303874 19840608, Prior. US 83-504647 19830615, 1984 Chem. Abstr. 132 (1999) 310016

[12] R.R. Schmidt Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 25 (1986), p. 212

[13] M. Ochs; M. Muzard; R. Plantier-Royon; B. Estrine; C. Rémond; F. Bouxin; S. Marinkovic; J. Le Bras; B. Estrine Carbohydr. Res., 13 (2011), p. 2380

[14] B. Kamm; M. Kamm; M. Schmidt; T. Hirth; M. Schulze Biorefinery systems – an overview (B. Kamm; P.R. Gruber; M. Kamm, eds.), Biorefineries – industrial processes and products, VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2006

[15] S. Matsumura; S. Ando; K. Toshima; K. Kawada J. Jpn. Oil Chem. Soc., 47 (1998), p. 247

[16] P.A.J. Gorin Can. J. Chem., 38 (1960), p. 641

Commentaires - Politique