[Théories de champ moyen et noyaux exotiques]
Après une présentation générale des théories de champ moyen, on s'attache plus spécifiquement à l'étude de quelques applications originales dans le domaine des noyaux exotiques. Les principales hypothèses de ces modèles sont discutées vis-à-vis des conditions extrêmes de ce nouveau champ d'application. Quelques perspectives sont suggérées ouvrant la voie de développements théoriques futurs indispensables à ce domaine de noyaux très loin de la stabilité.
A general description of mean field theories is made in view of their use for the description of static and dynamical properties of exotic nuclei. Some pertinent examples of new physics appearing far from stability are presented such as quenching of shell effects around the neutron drip line as well as the effect of the continuum in Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov formalism when the Fermi energy goes to zero. We also focus on the effective forces adjusted to investigate nuclear medium in these particular extreme conditions. Some perspectives of new theoretical developments are suggested in order to guarantee the reliability of future predictions in this new field of physics.
Mot clés : Champ moyen, Hartree–Fock, Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov, Coordonnée génératrice
Karim Bennaceur 1 ; Paul Bonche 2 ; Jacques Meyer 1
@article{CRPHYS_2003__4_4-5_555_0, author = {Karim Bennaceur and Paul Bonche and Jacques Meyer}, title = {Mean field theories and exotic nuclei}, journal = {Comptes Rendus. Physique}, pages = {555--570}, publisher = {Elsevier}, volume = {4}, number = {4-5}, year = {2003}, doi = {10.1016/S1631-0705(03)00060-4}, language = {en}, }
Karim Bennaceur; Paul Bonche; Jacques Meyer. Mean field theories and exotic nuclei. Comptes Rendus. Physique, Volume 4 (2003) no. 4-5, pp. 555-570. doi : 10.1016/S1631-0705(03)00060-4. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/physique/articles/10.1016/S1631-0705(03)00060-4/
[1] P. Ring, contribution to this volume
[2] Nucl. Phys. A, 693 (2001), p. 1 (Special issue on Radioactive Nuclear Beams dedicated to the memory of Jerry D. Garrett)
[3] The Nuclear Many-Body Problem, Spinger-Verlag, Berlin, 1980
[4] Z. Phys. A, 289 (1978), p. 103
[5] Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 28 (1978), p. 523
[6] Nucl. Phys. A, 443 (1985), p. 39
[7] Nucl. Phys. A, 500 (1989), p. 308
[8] Phys. Rev. C, 27 (1983), p. 2317
[9] Phys. Rev. Lett., 62 (1989), p. 2452
[10] Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 40 (1990), p. 439
[11] Phys. Rep., 215 (1992), p. 101
[12] Nucl. Phys. A, 621 (1997), p. 706
[13] Nucl. Phys. A, 588 (1995), p. 597
[14] Phys. Rep., 149 (1987), p. 207
[15] Nuclear Physics of Hot Dense Matter, NATO Adv. Study Inst. Supernovae, Les Houches, France, 1990
[16] Rev. Mod. Phys., 54 (1982), p. 913
[17] Phys. Rep., 261 (1995), p. 125
[18] Nuclear Methods and the Nuclear Equation of State, Int. Review of Nuclear Physics, 9, World Scientific, Singapore, 1999
[19] Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 14 (1985), p. 125
[20] Phys. Rev. C, 1 (1970), p. 1260
[21] Nucl. Phys. A, 168 (1971), p. 273
[22] Phys. Rev. C, 46 (1992), p. 1741
[23] Nucl. Phys. A, 162 (1971), p. 385
[24] Phys. Rev. C, 21 (1980), p. 1568
[25] Nucl. Phys. A, 502 (1989), p. 85c
[26] Nucl. Phys., 1 (1956), p. 1043
[27] Phys. Rev. C, 3 (1972), p. 626
[28] Nucl. Phys. A, 238 (1975), p. 29
[29] Nucl. Phys. A, 386 (1982), p. 79
[30] Nucl. Phys. A, 422 (1984), p. 103
[31] Nucl. Phys. A, 627 (1997), p. 710
[32] Phys. Rev. C, 49 (1994), p. 1402
[33] Phys. Rev. C, 5 (1972), p. 1472
[34] Adv. Nucl. Phys., Vol. 19 (J.W. Negele; M. Vogt, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1989
[35] Phys. Rev., 108 (1957), p. 1175
[36] Z. Phys., 12 (1960), p. 425
[37] Phys. Rev. C, 41 (1990), p. 341
[38] Eur. Phys. J. A, 11 (2001), p. 393
[39] Z. Phys. A, 53 (1996), p. 740
[40] Phys. Rev. C, 53 (1996), p. 2809
[41] Phys. Rev. C, 60 (1999), p. 034308
[42] Nucl. Phys. A, 315 (1979), p. 353
[43] Nucl. Phys. A, 14 (1976), p. 1935
[44] 3rd Int. Conf. on Exotic Nuclei and Atomic Masses, ENAM 2001, Hameenlinna, Finlande, 2001, Eur. Phys. J. A, Volume 15 (2002), p. 21
[45] Nucl. Phys. A, 383 (1996), p. 19
[46] Phys. Rev., 89 (1953), p. 1102
[47] Nucl. Phys. A, 510 (1990), p. 466
[48] Rev. Mod. Phys., 11 (2001), p. 393
[49] Nucl. Phys. A, 561 (1993), p. 367
[50] arXiv
|[51] Soviet J. Nucl. Phys., 45 (1987), p. 783
[52] Nucl. Phys. A, 389 (1996), p. 211
[53] Phys. Lett. B, 407 (1997), p. 103
[54] Int. Conf. Nuclear Structure '98, Gatlinburg, USA, 1998 | arXiv
[55] Phys. Rev. Lett., 32, 2001, p. 2441 | arXiv
[56] Nucl. Phys. A, 46 (2001), p. 135
[57] Comptes-Rendus de la Qubec Intersections Conference, Phys. Rev. C, Volume 46 (1992), p. 1825 | arXiv
[58] R. Michaels, P.A. Souder, G.M. Urciuoli, Spokesmen, Proposal to Jefferson Laboratory
[59] Phys. Rev. C, 48 (1993), p. 1648
[60] Phys. Rev. C, 65 (2002), p. 044306
[61] Ann. Phys. France, 17 (1992), p. 11
[62] Nucl. Phys. A, 693 (2001), p. 116
[63] et al. Phys. Rev. C, 333 (1994), p. 320
[64] F. Leblanc, private communication, 2002
Cité par Sources :
Commentaires - Politique