Outline
Comptes Rendus

Plant biology and pathology / Biologie et pathologie végétales
Evaluation of genetic variability of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in northwestern Morocco by ISSR and RAPD markers
Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 330 (2007) no. 11, pp. 789-797.

Abstracts

The study of the genetic variability of the Moroccan landraces of sorghum constitutes a necessary step that can be exploited in the programs of improvement and valorisation of this marginalized species. The aim of this investigation is to evaluate the variability of sorghum populations and to establish their phylogenetic relations using RAPD and ISSR markers. Sampling was taken in 33 fields of northern regions where this species is most cultivated. Individual plants (398) were collected in 13, 11, 5, and 4 fields of Larache, Tangier, Chefchaouen, and Tetouan, respectively. Thirty-eight RAPD primers and four ISSR primers were used. The percentage of polymorphic fragments revealed with ISSR (98%) is higher than the one revealed with RAPD (85%). The level of the variability obtained through the two techniques is very high. Nevertheless, ISSR markers revealed more diversity than RAPD (0.995±0.006 against 0.946±0.031). The classification based on Jaccard's similarity index distinguished the totality of fields. Data analysis revealed a genetic structure that is closely related to the micro-geographical repartition of the different fields.

L'étude de la variabilité génétique des variétés-populations de sorgho grain marocain constitue une étape nécessaire à exploiter dans les programmes d'amélioration et de valorisation de cette céréale marginalisée. L'objectif de cette étude est d'évaluer la variabilité des populations de sorgho et d'établir leurs relations phylogénétiques via les marqueurs RAPD et ISSR. L'échantillonnage a été réalisé dans 33 champs au niveau de la région nord du Maroc, où cette espèce est largement cultivée. Il concerne 398 individus collectés respectivement dans 13, 11, 5 et 4 champs de Larache, Tanger, Chefchaouen et Tétouan. Trente-huit amorces RAPD et quatre amorces ISSR ont été utilisées. Le pourcentage de polymorphisme révélé avec ISSR (98%) est supérieur à celui révélé avec RAPD (85%). Le niveau de diversité obtenu par les deux techniques est élevé. Néanmoins, l'ISSR a montré plus de diversité que le RAPD (0,995±0,006, contre 0,946±0,031). La classification selon l'indice de similarité de Jaccard a permis la distinction de la totalité des champs étudiés. L'analyse des données a révélé une structure génétique qui est étroitement liée à la répartition micro-géographique des différents champs.

Metadata
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.08.005
Keywords: Sorghum bicolor L. Moench, Moroccan landraces, Genetic variability, RAPD, ISSR
Mot clés : Sorghum bicolor L. Moench, Variétés-populations, Variabilité génétique, RAPD, ISSR

Leila Medraoui 1; Mohammed Ater 2; Ouafae Benlhabib 3; Driss Msikine 4; Abdelkarim Filali-Maltouf 1

1 Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed-V–Agdal University, avenue Ibn-Batouta, BP 1014, 1000 Rabat, Morocco
2 Laboratory of Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Tétouan, Morocco
3 Unity of Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology, Agronomic and Veterinary Institute Hassan-II, Rabat, Morocco
4 Office of Agricultural Enhancement of Loukous (ORMVAL), Morocco
@article{CRBIOL_2007__330_11_789_0,
     author = {Leila Medraoui and Mohammed Ater and Ouafae Benlhabib and Driss Msikine and Abdelkarim Filali-Maltouf},
     title = {Evaluation of genetic variability of sorghum {(\protect\emph{Sorghum} bicolor} {L.} {Moench)} in northwestern {Morocco} by {ISSR} and {RAPD} markers},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Biologies},
     pages = {789--797},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {330},
     number = {11},
     year = {2007},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crvi.2007.08.005},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Leila Medraoui
AU  - Mohammed Ater
AU  - Ouafae Benlhabib
AU  - Driss Msikine
AU  - Abdelkarim Filali-Maltouf
TI  - Evaluation of genetic variability of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in northwestern Morocco by ISSR and RAPD markers
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Biologies
PY  - 2007
SP  - 789
EP  - 797
VL  - 330
IS  - 11
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.08.005
LA  - en
ID  - CRBIOL_2007__330_11_789_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Leila Medraoui
%A Mohammed Ater
%A Ouafae Benlhabib
%A Driss Msikine
%A Abdelkarim Filali-Maltouf
%T Evaluation of genetic variability of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in northwestern Morocco by ISSR and RAPD markers
%J Comptes Rendus. Biologies
%D 2007
%P 789-797
%V 330
%N 11
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.08.005
%G en
%F CRBIOL_2007__330_11_789_0
Leila Medraoui; Mohammed Ater; Ouafae Benlhabib; Driss Msikine; Abdelkarim Filali-Maltouf. Evaluation of genetic variability of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in northwestern Morocco by ISSR and RAPD markers. Comptes Rendus. Biologies, Volume 330 (2007) no. 11, pp. 789-797. doi : 10.1016/j.crvi.2007.08.005. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/biologies/articles/10.1016/j.crvi.2007.08.005/

Version originale du texte intégral

1 Introduction

The sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) is one of the major cultivated cereals in the world.

It has been domesticated for approximately 3000 years before J.-C. in the Ethiopian regions of Africa [1–3]. The cultivated sorghum is subdivided into five races (guinea, kafir, durra, bicolor, and caudatum) and ten inter-races hybrids [4,5]. The sorghum is largely cultivated in Africa, where it is mostly the first human food. In fact, this spring cereal is known for its ability to survive the severe environmental conditions [6] and for the nutritious value of its grains (71% of starch, 10% of proteins, and 3% of lipids), which is similar to the case of the other cereals, justifying its importance in the arid and semi-arid regions. However, the production rates in Africa still remain weak compared to the rates of improved lineages grown in the USA with high yields (3 to 5 t/ha), because cultivated sorghums in Africa consist of local varieties with low yields (0.5 to 0.7 t/ha) [7]. The improvement of the productivity of this species constitutes a priority to overcome the demographic explosion of the African population [7].

The sorghum was introduced into Morocco with Islamisation, approximately ten centuries ago, and it was extended to the occidental Mediterranean area by the Arabs [8]. Moroccan sorghum is essentially represented by the durra race [9], which is related for its expansion toward Asia and Mediterranean to the history of Islamisation [2,10].

In Morocco, sorghum is considered a minor cereal and cultivated on 29,000 ha, corresponding to 0.3% of the Moroccan arable surface [9]. Nowadays, this species is a culture regularly practiced in the northwestern regions of Morocco at altitudes of 20 to 800 m. In these regions, sorghum constitutes one of the most important cereals by the extent of its surfaces in comparison to corn, and by its food-producing character [9]. The Moroccan production fluctuates around 6 q/ha and never exceeds 9 q/ha [9]. These low yields are assigned to the traditional agricultural techniques based on old methods, lands parcelled out, and to the use of non-improved seeds. These seeds were not exchanged between regions, and they generate the local value of the ‘ecotype’ [9]. Thus, the knowledge of the genetic structure of these ecotypes is important, since these are populations of weak dimensions and in progressive regression. The phenotypic selection exerted by farmers has engendered landraces or locally adapted varieties. This selection has begun with the introduction of sorghum in Morocco and carried on about 900 to 1000 generations. Landraces are characterized by morphological differences (panicle, grain, awn, colour ...) that have been confirmed by several studies. A high degree of morphological variation among landraces, which were assigned to the race durra, bicolor and their intermediates, was noted [9]. Morphological characters and allozymes could account for 63% and 20%, respectively, of the variability between fields [11]. Morphological and enzymatic markers have been typically used to study the genetic variation of sorghum cultivars (e.g., [10–15]). Molecular markers constitute preferential tools to assess the genetic diversity and the phylogenetic relationships in sorghum; several studies have used the following analytical methods: RFLP markers [16–18], mitochondrial DNA markers [19], RAPD markers [20], and microsatellites markers [21,22].

In this investigation, we analyzed DNA bulks using RAPD and ISSR markers, which have never been used on the Moroccan sorghum. This approach allows us to get more genetic information on the studied populations. Our objective was to evaluate the genetic variability of northwestern fields, and to estimate the level of the variation between the studied regions. The obtained data were compared to those obtained with other markers (morphological traits, allozymes, and SSR) in the same regions.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Plant materials

Seed samples were directly collected within fields (in situ sampling varying from 6 to 17 individuals) in four regions of northwestern Morocco: Larache, Tangier, Chefchaouen, and Tetouan (Fig. 1). Table 1 shows the plant material used for this study (accessions Lb1 to Teb5) and its geographical origin by region.

Fig. 1

Geographical location of the studied sorghum cultivation regions in northwestern Morocco.

Table 1

Accessions list and geographical origin of the Sorghum plant samples

Accession (field) Province Region Locality Number of individuals per field
Lb1 Larache R1 Oulad ben Lahcen 12
Lb2 Naaimiine 12
Lb3 Boujediane 10
Lb4 Maâizate 10
Lb5 R2 Oulad Soltan 12
Lb6 Arrbaâ Ayacha 10
Lb7 Douar hjrat el Garni 10
Lb8 Douar Ain Mouloud 10
Lb9 Mghazlienne 10
Lb10 J'miaât 1 11
Lb11 J'miaât 2 11
Lb12 R3 Luxus 12
Lb13 Khmis sahel/Arrihiyine 13
Tab1 Tanger R4 Douar oulad larbi/Boutil 13
Tab2 Takrii 11
Tab3 M'nazla 11
Tab4 R5 Had Bghaghaz Dar chaoui 10
Tab5 R6 Route Tanger-Tetouan1 10
Tab6 Route Tanger-Tetouan2 10
Tab7 Zaînate 15
Tab8 R7 Route Asilah-Tanger 4
Tab9 Forêt diplomatique 16
Tab10 Melloussa douar el Mekhfi 10
Tab11 Douar Ain Homra 12
Chb1 Chefchaouen R8 Ouad laou 19
Chb2 R9 Talembote 6
Chb3 R10 Taghzoute 15
Chb4 R11 Dardara1 16
Chb5 Dardara2 17
Teb2 Tetouan R12 Beni Maaden 11
Teb3 Douar Lhbar 13
Teb4 R13 Khemis Anjra 17
Teb5 R14 Beni Harchin 12

2.2 DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from a bulk of a totality of individuals for each field (population) as described by [23], with major modifications. Three grams of fresh leaves, stored at −80 °C, were ground in liquid nitrogen, mixed with 10 ml of CTAB extraction buffer [Tris 0.22 M pH 8.0, EDTA 0.22 M, Sorbitol 0.14 M, NaCl 0.8 M, N-laurylsarcosine 1% (w/v), CTAB 1.5% (w/v), and β-mercaptoethanol 1% (v/v), incubated at 55 °C for 1 h, and then cooled on ice and mixed with 5 ml of a phenol/chloroform/isoamylic alcohol (v/v, 25/24/1) mixture. The tube was centrifuged at 10,000g for 5 min and the supernatant transferred into a new tube. The DNA was precipitated by cool isopropanol, washed with 75% ethanol, treated by the RNAse A and then by proteinase K before being reprocessed again to the phenol/chloroform/isoamylic alcohol mixture, and reprecipitated with NaCl and absolute ethanol. Centrifugation was performed at 10,000g. The pellet was dried, resuspended in TE buffer [Tris-HCl 10 mM; EDTA 0.1 mM, pH 8.0]. DNA concentration and quality were determined through 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis in 1X TBE buffer [Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.89 M; voric acid 0.89 M; EDTA 25 mM, pH 8.0] [24] with ethidium bromide staining, and by spectrophotometric measurements at 260 and 280 nm.

2.3 DNA amplification by RAPD and ISSR

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was run according to the modified protocol of [25] for RAPD and of [26] for ISSR, in a final volume of 25 μl containing 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3 (at 25 °C), 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM aliquots of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP (Promega), 0.2 μM RAPD primer or 4 μM ISSR primer, 100 ng of genomic DNA, and 1 unit of Ampli Taq DNA polymerase (Roche). The amplifications were performed on a GenAmp thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) for RAPD following the program: at 95 °C for 5 min, 45 cycles (1 min at 95 °C, at 35 °C for 1 min, at 72 °C for 2 min) and final elongation of 6 min at 72 °C, and for ISSR: at 94 °C for 7 min, 32 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 45 °C, 2 min at 72 °C, and final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. A total of 81 (10 bp) random primers (AD02, AK01-04, AM01-05, AN01-04, B10, C01-07, D01-05, E01-05, F01-05, G01-05, H01-05, I01-05, AF01-05, M01, R01-03, S01-08, T01-08, U02-03, U09 et Y15) (Operon Technologies, Almeda, CA, USA) were used in RAPD, and 4 primers F01: (CA)6AT, F02: (CA)6GC, F03: (CA)6AG and F04: (AGC)4T from (Operon Technologies) were used in ISSR. RAPD and ISSR amplification products were analysed by electrophoresis onto 1.2% and 2.8% agarose gels, respectively, run in 1XTBE and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide and illumination with UV light.

2.4 Data analysis

The parameter ‘polymorphism information content’ (PIC) was calculated according to reference [27]: PICij=n(1Pij2)/(n1), where n is the sample size, and Pij is the frequency of the ith pattern revealed by the RAPD or ISSR primer j summed across all patterns revealed by the primer j.

The electrophoretic gel images were processed with the aid of the Gel Compar II software (version 2.5; Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium). Using the same program, RAPD and ISSR bands were scored as 0 for absence and 1 for presence in each field. Jaccard distances [28], based on similarity index, were calculated, dendrograms were generated using Ward algorithm [29] and multidimensional scaling (MDS) was configured to facilitate the graphical visualization of the relationship between the formed groups [30].

3 Results

3.1 RAPD analysis

The number of polymorphic fragments per profile varied per primer from 11 (OPU2) to 27 (OPI2), and ranged from 138 to 3992 bp (Table 2). The minimum size difference between any of the two polymorphic products generated by a primer was approximately 20 bp. Overall, 812 (85%) polymorphic fragments were generated, and 140 (15%) fragments were common to all accessions studied. Among polymorphic fragments, 25 unique markers were detected (3%): six fragments were specific for Tangier fields (AF-2, 1559 bp; E-3, 804 bp; H-3, 966 bp; T-1, 1742 bp; T-6, 762 bp and T-6, 656 bp), three for Larache fields (AM-2, 1054 bp; T-1, 489 bp and T-6, 1566 bp), four for Tetouan fields (C-6, 823 bp; R-1, 761 bp; S-7, 234 bp and S-7, 138 bp) and twelve for Chefchaouen fields (D-3, 381 bp; H-5, 2208 bp; I-2, 2459 bp; I-2, 2008 bp; R-1, 1905 bp; R-2, 2321 bp; R-2, 1998 bp; S- 6, 2795 bp; S-7, 1540 bp; T-4, 2829 bp; T-4, 2004 bp and T-6, 1672 bp). The diversity (D) values varied from 0.86 to 0.97, with an average of 0.946±0.031 (Table 2). In addition, high heterogeneity among fields was observed (Fig. 2). The genetic distances calculated from these data, and represented in a dendrogram, allow the probable relationships among the fields to be evaluated (Fig. 3). Six principal clusters were obtained. The first cluster was composed by two sub-groups: the first regrouped three fields of Larache and the second contained two fields of Tetouan and one field of Larache. The second cluster comprised two sub-groups: the first contained two fields of Larache, one field of Chefchaouen, and one of Tetouan. The second sub-group was represented by two fields of Chefchaouen. The third cluster included four fields of Larache. The fourth cluster was represented by three fields of Tangier, one of Larache, and one of Tetouan. The fifth one was composed by two sub-groups: the first one regrouped two fields of Larache and two fields of Chefchaouen, whereas the second sub-group comprised three fields of Tangier. Five fields of Tangier were found in the sixth cluster.

Table 2

RAPD and ISSR markers information and diversity in 33 sorghum fields

Primer Molecular weight range, bp Total number of markers Number of markers
M P D
RAPD OPAF2 476–3535 20 3 17 0.9200
OPAF3 300–2455 22 3 19 0.8674
OPAF4 395–3269 18 2 16 0.9438
OPAK4 234–2420 25 4 21 0.9627
OPAM1 341–2010 20 3 17 0.8785
OPAM2 212–1624 18 2 16 0.8741
OPAM4 304–2451 27 5 22 0.8996
OPAN3 355–2939 29 4 25 0.9730
OPB10 491–1851 16 3 13 0.8985
OPC1 194–1733 25 4 21 0.9526
OPC3 185–2232 31 5 26 0.9790
OPC6 541–3369 24 3 21 0.9021
OPD1 361–2304 30 4 26 0.9731
OPD3 381–2361 23 3 20 0.9524
OPD5 327–2523 28 5 23 0.9635
OPE1 361–3255 21 2 19 0.9569
OPE3 309–2323 27 4 23 0.9577
OPE4 494–2014 18 3 15 0.9276
OPF1 185–3104 25 4 21 0.9402
OPF3 419–3174 25 5 20 0.9525
OPF4 212–2951 24 2 22 0.9671
OPF5 333–3520 24 4 20 0.9329
OPG2 182–1920 26 3 23 0.9449
OPG3 447–3992 29 4 25 0.9618
OPH3 411–2100 26 3 23 0.9714
OPH5 241–2208 29 4 25 0.9767
OPI2 267–2752 33 6 27 0.9768
OPI3 189–2421 30 4 26 0.9629
OPR1 330–3100 28 5 23 0.9658
OPR2 358–2600 28 4 24 0.9633
OPS6 342–2795 23 3 20 0.9451
OPS7 138–1847 29 4 25 0.9717
OPT1 199–2380 28 3 25 0.9726
OPT4 195–2829 31 5 26 0.9744
OPT5 300–3293 28 3 25 0.9708
OPT6 415–2638 24 3 21 0.9518
OPU2 583–1940 15 4 11 0.9190
OPU3 233–1639 25 5 20 0.9539
Total 952 140 812 0 . 946 ± 0 . 031
Polymorphism percentage 85%
ISSR (CA)6AT 314–2562 36 1 35 0.9855
(CA)6GC 183–1931 44 0 44 0.9989
(CA)6AG 122–2317 50 1 49 0.9984
(AGC)4T 160–1638 47 2 45 0.9964
Total 177 4 173 0 . 995 ± 0 . 006
Polymorphism percentage 98%
Fig. 2

Example of an RAPD polymorphism obtained with the OPAN3 primer through TBE-agarose gel electrophoresis. M: 100-bp ladders; 1–5: Lb1, Lb3, Lb6, Lb8, and Lb10; 6–10: Tab1, Tab4, Tab6, Tab9, and Tab11; 11–14: Chb1, Chb2, Chb3, and Chb5; 15–18: Teb2, Teb3, Teb4, and Teb5.

Fig. 3

Dendrogram obtained with Jaccard's similarity coefficients using RAPD data of 33 fields of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench (Lb1–13; Tab1–11; Chb1–5; Teb2–5). The tree was constructed using the Ward algorithm.

The spatial configuration of multidimensional scaling elaborated based on RAPD data allowed the distribution of the fields on three sectors according to the X-, Y-, and Z-axes to be established.

The (A) sector contained eight fields of Tangier and two fields of Larache, the (B) sector grouped six fields of Larache, three fields of Tangier, and two fields of Tetouan, and the (C) sector was represented by the entirety of Chefchaouen fields, five fields of Larache, and two fields of Tetouan (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Scatter diagram of the MDS analysis of Moroccan sorghum accessions based on RAPD data.

3.2 ISSR analysis

The number of polymorphic fragments was important for the four primers, with an average of 43 bands, and ranged in size from 122 to 2562 bp (Table 2). The minimum size difference between any two polymorphic products generated by a primer was approximately 10 bp. Generally, 173 (98%) polymorphic fragments were generated, and 6 (2%) fragments were common to all accessions. Among polymorphic fragments, four different classes of markers were distinguished: (1) markers that were found in the four studied regions – Tangier, Larache, Chefchaouen and Tetouan (39%) –; (2) markers that were common only between the fields of Larache and some fields of Tangier (33%); (3) markers that were common between both fields of Tetouan and Chefchaouen and some fields of Tangier (10%); (4) a class of 31 unique markers (18%). Fourteen fragments were specific to the Larache fields (F-1, 715 bp; 534 bp; 320 bp; F-2, 715 bp; 534 bp; 183 bp; F-3, 1459 bp; 675 bp; 568 bp; 217 bp; 174 bp; 167 bp; F-4, 1638 bp; 161 bp), 13 to the Tangier fields (F-1, 2562 bp; 1170 bp; 919 bp; 359 bp; F-2, 1458 bp; 1369 bp; 989 bp; 376 bp; 330 bp; F-3, 2317 bp; 209 bp; F-4, 1638 bp; 161 bp), two to the Chefchaouen fields (F-1, 631 bp and F-4, 209 bp), and two to the Tetouan fields (F-3, 141 bp and F-4, 466 bp). The diversity (D) values varied from 0.98 and 0.99, with an average of 0.99±0.006. High heterogeneity among fields was observed and each field was distinguished (Fig. 5). The genetic distances were calculated from the obtained data, allowing the probable relationships among the fields to be evaluated (Fig. 6). Two principal clusters were obtained. The first cluster was composed of two sub-groups: the first one regrouped eight fields of Larache and two fields of Tangier, whereas the second sub-group was divided into two parts, the first regrouping four fields of Tangier and the second five fields of Larache associated with one field of Tangier. The second cluster was composed by two sub-groups; the first one was divided into three parts: the first part included three fields of Chefchaouen, the second part contained three fields of Tetouan, and the third part regrouped two fields of Chefchaouen and one field of Tetouan; the second sub-group was represented by four fields of Tangier.

Fig. 5

Example of an ISSR polymorphism obtained with the F1 primer through TBE-agarose gel electrophoresis. M: 100-bp DNA ladders; 1–5: Lb1, Lb3, Lb6, Lb8, and Lb10; 6–10: Tab1, Tab4, Tab6, Tab9, and Tab11; 11–14: Chb1, Chb2, Chb3, and Chb5; 15–18: Teb2, Teb3, Teb4, and Teb5; M2: 50-bp DNA ladders.

Fig. 6

Dendrogram obtained with Jaccard's similarity coefficients using ISSR data of 33 fields of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench (Lb1–13; Tab1–11; Chb1–5; Teb2–5). The tree was constructed using the Ward algorithm.

The distribution of fields by MDS based on ISSR data determined three sectors according to the X-, Y-, and Z-axes. The (A′) sector contained nine fields of Larache and five fields of Tangier, the (B′) sector grouped five fields of Tetouan, two fields of Tangier and one field of Chefchaouen, and the (C′) sector was represented by four fields of Chefchaouen, four fields of Larache, and four fields of Tangier (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7

Scatter diagram of the MDS analysis of Moroccan sorghum accessions based on ISSR data.

4 Discussion

DNA analysis using RAPD and ISSR markers on seed bulks was a useful tool to assess the genetic diversity of the Moroccan populations of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench. A great number of bands were obtained with each primer and for the two types of markers. The totality of RAPD and ISSR primers were highly informative, PIC values were close to 1 [27]. The variability level between the different fields revealed by both RAPD and ISSR is very important. Our results are in keeping with the works of Djè et al. [11], who showed a large proportion of morphological variability between fields, while allozymes and microsatellites revealed more intra-field than inter-field variability [21].

Additional region-specific polymorphic fragments were found in this study using the RAPD and ISSR techniques. RAPD revealed 13 specific markers for Larache, 6 for Tangier, 4 for Tetouan and 12 for Chefchaouen. ISSR revealed 14 specific markers for Larache, 13 for Tangier, 2 for Tetouan, and 2 for Chefchaouen. These results suppose the probable presence of specific genomic zones that are common to the totality of the studied populations belonging to the same region. These methods revealed more diversity than the use of morphological traits, allozymes, or microsatellites previously used to distinguish between regions [9,19]. The specificity of the ISSR allowed us to divide studied fields into two groups according to two classes of markers: the first ones are common to the fields belonging to the west of Tangier and all fields of Larache, and the second ones are common to the fields belonging to the east of Tangier and to all fields of Tetouan and Chefchaouen. These data show that there exists an influence of the micro-geographical distribution of sorghum fields on the structuring of their variability, while Djè et al. [11] have also demonstrated that there was no correlation between geographical distances and micro-geographical and allozymic data. Our results confirm those found by Djè et al. [12], who showed that quantitative characters, in contrast to qualitative traits, are influenced by location, topography, and soil fertility.

Compared to RAPD, the clustering and multidimensional scaling obtained by ISSR groups more clearly defines fields according to their geographic distribution. The flexible reproduction system of the Moroccan sorghum combining autogamy and allogamy supposes genes flow between fields to be in favour of a similarity between nearby fields and therefore between fields belonging to the same region [31]. Our results are confirmed by data obtained with the morphological analysis carried out by Kadiri and Ater [9], who found that Moroccan sorghum would belong to two cultivars of the race durra, durra, and cernuum, which occupied two domains of distribution that are geographically different. The first domain is internal and the second domain is coastal external of the Rifian chain. Moreover, the first field of Larache (lb1, Ouled ben Lahcen) was isolated in both ISSR and RAPD clustering. This can be explained by the introduction of seeds of American cultivars during trials [9].

The local seeds of the sorghum constitute veritable populations qualified as ecotypes that have resulted from a long process of selection carried out by the farmer in order to choose adapted plants. The polymorphism was important; therefore, each population represents a conservation entity and constitutes an important reserve of genes to be used for the improvement of this cereal. These ecotypes have very interesting potentialities for their hardiness and their capacity to give constant yields despite the environmental conditions. Thus, all efforts to evaluate this potential would be important and urgent.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Moroccan Ministry of the National Education, Scientific and Technical Research, PROTARS II-P52/03 (2002–2006), and was also helped by the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC). We are especially grateful to Sir A. Belkeziz, and thankful to Dr. A. Sasson for his encouragements, assistance, and counsels. We thank Laila Sbabou for her assistance and for reviewing the manuscript.


References

[1] E. Acheampong, N.M. Anishetty, J.T. Williams, A world survey of sorghum and millets germplasm. International Board for plant genetic resources, first decade of service, 1974–1984, PBPGR Rome, Italy, 1984

[2] H. Doggett Sorghum, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1988 (p. 11)

[3] J.M.J. De Wet; J.R. Harlan The origin and domestication of Sorghum bicolor, Econ. Bot., Volume 25 (1971) no. 1, pp. 128-135

[4] J.R. Harlan; J.M.J. De Wet A simplified classification of cultivated sorghum, Crop Sci., Volume 12 (1972), pp. 172-176

[5] L.R. House A Guide to Sorghum Breeding, International Cereals Research Institute for the Semiarid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India, 1985

[6] B.A. Mounder Importance of sorghum on a global scale (G. Ejeta; E.T. Mertz; L. Rooney; R. Scaffert; J. Yohe, eds.), Proc. Int. Conf. on Sorghum Nutritional Quality, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 1990, pp. 8-16

[7] Anonymous Steps toward food security, Population Reports series M, Populations Information program, The John Hopkins University School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, 1997, pp. 16-20

[8] F. Aubaille-Sallenave L'agriculture musulmane aux premiers temps de la conquête. Apports et emprunts, J. Agric. Tradit. Bot. Appl., Volume 31 (1984) no. 3–4, pp. 245-256

[9] M. Kadiri, M. Ater, Diversité des variétés « locales » du sorgho grain (Sorghum bicolor Moench L.) au nord-ouest du Maroc. Rapport du symposium sur les ressources phylogénétiques et développement durable, Actes éditions, Rabat, Maroc, 1997, pp. 203–218

[10] A.M. Watson Agricultural Innovation in the Early Islamic World. The Diffusion of Crops and Framing Techniques, Cambridge University Press, 1983 (260 p.)

[11] Y. Djè; M. Ater; C. Lefèbvre; X. Vekemans Patterns of morphological and allozyme variation in sorghum landraces of north-western Morocco, Genet. Res. Crop. Evol., Volume 45 (1998), pp. 541-548

[12] Y. Djè; M. Heuertz; M. Ater; C. Lefèbvre; X. Vekemans Évaluation de la diversité morphologique des variétés traditionnelles de sorgho du Nord-Ouest du Maroc, Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., Volume 11 (2007) no. 1, pp. 39-46

[13] W.C. Morden; J. Doebley; K.F. Schertz Allozyme variation in old world races of Sorghum bicolor (Poaceae), Am. J. Bot., Volume 76 (1989), pp. 245-255

[14] P. Ollitrault; M. Arnaud; J. Chantereau Polymorphisme enzymatique des sorghos. II. Organisation génétique des sorghos cultivés, Agron. Trop., Volume 44 (1989) no. 3, pp. 211-222

[15] P.R. Aldrich; J. Doebley; K.F. Schertz; A. Stec Patterns of allozyme variation in cultivated and wild Sorghum bicolor, Theor. Appl. Genet., Volume 85 (1992), pp. 451-460

[16] P.R. Aldrich; J. Doebley Restriction fragment variation in the nuclear and chloroplast genomes of cultivated and wild Sorghum bicolor, Theor. Appl. Genet., Volume 85 (1992), pp. 293-302

[17] Y.X. Cui; F.W. Xu; C.W. Magill; K.F. Schertz; G.E. Hart RFLP-based assay of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench genetic diversity, Theor. Appl. Genet., Volume 90 (1995), pp. 787-796

[18] M. Deu; D. Gonzales-de-Leon; J.-C. Glaszmann; I. Degremont; C. Lanaud; P. Hamon RFLP diversity in cultivated sorghum in relation to racial differentiation, Theor. Appl. Genet., Volume 88 (1994), pp. 838-844

[19] M. Deu; P. Hamon; J. Chantereau; P. Dufour; A. D'hont; C. Lanaud Mitochondrial DNA diversity in wild and cultivated sorghum, Genome, Volume 38 (1995), pp. 635-645

[20] A. Menkir; P. Goldsbrough; G. Ejeta RAPD based assessment of genetic diversity in cultivated races of sorghum, Crop Sci., Volume 37 (1997), pp. 564-569

[21] Y. Djè; D. Forcioli; M. Ater; C. Lefèbvre; X. Vekemans Assessing population genetic structure of sorghum landraces from North-western Morocco using allozyme and microsatellite markers, Theor. Appl. Genet., Volume 99 (1999), pp. 157-163

[22] Y. Djè; M. Heuertz; C. Lefèbvre; X. Vekemans Assessment of genetic diversity within and among germplasm accessions in cultivated sorghum using microsatellite markers, Theor. Appl. Genet., Volume 100 (2000), pp. 918-925

[23] R. Bernatzky; S.D. Tanksley Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences, Genetics, Volume 112 (1986), pp. 887-898

[24] J. Sambrook; E.F. Fritsch; T. Maniatis Molecular Cloning – A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1989

[25] J.G.K. Williams; A.R. Kubilek; K.J. Livak; J.A. Rafalski; S.V. Tingey DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers, Nucleic Acids Res., Volume 18 (1990), pp. 6531-6535

[26] E. Zietkiewicz; A. Rafalski; D. Labuda Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification, Genomics, Volume 20 (1994), pp. 176-183

[27] D.R. Botstein; R.L. White; M. Skolnick; R.W. Davis Construction of a genetic map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms, Am. J. Hum. Genet., Volume 32 (1980), pp. 314-332

[28] G. Besnard; A. Tagmount; P. Baradat; A. Vigouroux; A. Bervillé Molecular approach of genetic affinities between wild and ornamental Platanus, Euphytica, Volume 126 (2002), pp. 401-414

[29] J.H. Ward Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., Volume 58 (1963), pp. 236-244

[30] W.S. Torgerson Multidimensional scaling: theory and method, Psychometrika, Volume 17 (1952), pp. 401-419

[31] Y. Djè; M. Heuertz; M. Ater; C. Lefèbvre; X. Vekemans In situ estimation of outcrossing rate in sorghum landraces using microsatellite markers, Theor. Appl. Genet., Volume 138 (2004), pp. 205-212


Comments - Policy