Comptes Rendus

Preparation and characterization of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 heteropolysalts. Application to adipic acid green synthesis from cyclohexanone oxidation with hydrogen peroxide
Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 22 (2019) no. 4, pp. 327-336.


H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 heteropolysalts (x + y ≤ 3/2 and x, y: 0–1.5) were prepared by a cationic exchange method based on barium sulfate precipitation. Structural and textural properties of salts were examined by several physicochemical techniques such as infrared, scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray, and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopies, X-ray diffraction diffraction, and thermogravimetric analysis, and their catalytic properties were evaluated in the cyclohexanone oxidation using hydrogen peroxide (30%). The reaction products, adipic, glutaric, succinic, hexanoic, 6-hydroxyhexanoic, 7,7-dimethoxy, and heptanoic acids and 1,1-dimethoxy octane were identified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis. Only adipic, glutaric, and succinic acids were quantified by chromatography (high-performance liquid chromatography), the other products were noted X. Adipic acid (AA) is the major product for all systems. The effects of molar ratios of catalyst/reactant and cyclohexanol/cyclohexanone, heteropolysalt composition, and reaction duration on AA yield were investigated. The stability of the catalytic system was also examined. H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 catalysts were found to be efficient for the cyclohexanone oxidation with conversions >95%. Among them, H1Mn0.25Co0.75 exhibits the highest AA yield (75%).

Supplementary Materials:
Supplementary material for this article is supplied as a separate file:

Les hétéropolysels H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 (x + y ≤3/2 et x, y: 0–1,5) ont été préparés par une méthode d'échange cationique basée sur la précipitation du sulfate de baryum. Les propriétés structurales et texturales des sels ont été examinées par plusieurs techniques physico-chimiques telles que les spectroscopies IR, MEB/EDX et RMN 31P, la diffraction des rayons X et l'analyse TG. Leurs propriétés catalytiques ont été évaluées dans l'oxydation de la cyclohexanone en utilisant le peroxyde d'hydrogène (30%). Les produits de la réaction, acides adipique, glutarique, succinique, hexanoïque, 6-hydroxyhexanoïque, 7,7-diméthoxy, heptanoïque et 1,1-diméthoxy octane, ont été identifiés par analyse GC-MS. Seuls les acides adipique, glutarique et succinique ont été quantifiés par chromatographie (HPLC), les autres produits ont été notés X. L'acide adipique (AA) est le principal produit de la réaction. Les effets des rapports molaires catalyseur/réactif et cyclohexanol/cyclohexanone, de la composition du sel et du temps de réaction sur le rendement en AA ont été étudiés. La stabilité du système catalytique a également été examinée. Les catalyseurs H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 se sont révélés être efficaces pour l'oxydation de la cyclohexanone avec des conversions >95%. Parmi eux, H1Mn0.25Co0.75 conduit au rendement le plus élevé en AA (75%).

Compléments :
Des compléments sont fournis pour cet article dans le fichier séparé :

Published online:
DOI: 10.1016/j.crci.2019.01.003
Keywords: Cobalt- and manganese-substituted Keggin mixed salt, Cyclohexanone oxidation, Hydrogen peroxide, Adipic acid
Mot clés : Cobalt, Phosphomolybdates de manganèse, Oxydation de la cyclohexanone, Peroxyde d'hydrogène, Acide adipique

Sihem Mouanni 1; Tassadit Mazari 1, 2; Dahbia Amitouche 1, 2; Sihem Benadji 1; Leila Dermeche 1, 2; Catherine Roch-Marchal 3; Chérifa Rabia 1

1 Laboratoire de chimie du gaz naturel, Faculté de chimie, USTHB, BP32, El-Alia, 16111 Bab-Ezzouar, Alger, Algeria
2 Laboratoire de chimie appliquée et de génie chimique, Université Mouloud-Mammeri (UMMTO), Tizi-Ouzou, Algeria
3 ILV–UMR 8180 CNRS, Bâtiment Lavoisier, Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 45, avenue des États-Unis, 78035 Versailles cedex, France
     author = {Sihem Mouanni and Tassadit Mazari and Dahbia Amitouche and Sihem Benadji and Leila Dermeche and Catherine Roch-Marchal and Ch\'erifa Rabia},
     title = {Preparation and characterization of {H\protect\textsubscript{3\ensuremath{-}2(\protect\emph{x}+\protect\emph{y})}Mn\protect\textsubscript{\protect\emph{x}}Co\protect\textsubscript{\protect\emph{y}}PMo\protect\textsubscript{12}O\protect\textsubscript{40}} heteropolysalts. {Application} to adipic acid green synthesis from cyclohexanone oxidation with hydrogen peroxide},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Chimie},
     pages = {327--336},
     publisher = {Elsevier},
     volume = {22},
     number = {4},
     year = {2019},
     doi = {10.1016/j.crci.2019.01.003},
     language = {en},
AU  - Sihem Mouanni
AU  - Tassadit Mazari
AU  - Dahbia Amitouche
AU  - Sihem Benadji
AU  - Leila Dermeche
AU  - Catherine Roch-Marchal
AU  - Chérifa Rabia
TI  - Preparation and characterization of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 heteropolysalts. Application to adipic acid green synthesis from cyclohexanone oxidation with hydrogen peroxide
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Chimie
PY  - 2019
SP  - 327
EP  - 336
VL  - 22
IS  - 4
PB  - Elsevier
DO  - 10.1016/j.crci.2019.01.003
LA  - en
ID  - CRCHIM_2019__22_4_327_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Sihem Mouanni
%A Tassadit Mazari
%A Dahbia Amitouche
%A Sihem Benadji
%A Leila Dermeche
%A Catherine Roch-Marchal
%A Chérifa Rabia
%T Preparation and characterization of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 heteropolysalts. Application to adipic acid green synthesis from cyclohexanone oxidation with hydrogen peroxide
%J Comptes Rendus. Chimie
%D 2019
%P 327-336
%V 22
%N 4
%I Elsevier
%R 10.1016/j.crci.2019.01.003
%G en
%F CRCHIM_2019__22_4_327_0
Sihem Mouanni; Tassadit Mazari; Dahbia Amitouche; Sihem Benadji; Leila Dermeche; Catherine Roch-Marchal; Chérifa Rabia. Preparation and characterization of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 heteropolysalts. Application to adipic acid green synthesis from cyclohexanone oxidation with hydrogen peroxide. Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 22 (2019) no. 4, pp. 327-336. doi : 10.1016/j.crci.2019.01.003. https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/chimie/articles/10.1016/j.crci.2019.01.003/

Version originale du texte intégral

1 Introduction

One of the major drawbacks in the actual adipic acid (AA) production process is the N2O emission [1–3]. It is one of the ozone depleting agents with a strong greenhouse effect and a very long residence time in the atmosphere, thus leading to serious environmental problems [4,5].

AA is an important raw material for nylon-6,6 production [6,7] and other compounds as synthetic fibers and fine chemicals [1]. It is usually produced via the oxidation of a mixture of cyclohexanone and cyclohexanol (KA oil) in the presence of an excess of HNO3 (40–60%) using CuII/NH4VO3 as a catalyst [1,5]. The HNO3 reduction causes inevitably the release of nitrous oxides (N2O, NO, and NO2), which are harmful gases. Others powerful oxidants as Na2Cr2O7, NaClO, MnO2, KMnO4 are cited in the literature [8–14], but they are noxious too. Therefore, the development of a process that would belong to the “green chemistry” domain is more than necessary. So, several studies have focused on the search for benign oxidants for environment as H2O2, O2, and air. Among them, hydrogen peroxide is the most used, easier to handle, and moreover, its reduction leads only to water. It was used for KA oil production from cyclohexane oxidation using transition metal based catalysts as Cu/Cr2O3 [15], CoFe2O4 [16], Co3O4 [17], Ce1−xMnxO2 [18], Cu/Co/AC [19], WO3/V2O5 [20], HMS [21], MCM-48 [22], Cu/Cr2O3, AlPO-5 modified with rare earth elements [23,24], and A-HMS (A = Ce, Ti, Co, Al, Cr, V, and Zr) [21] and MnAlPO [25]. It was found that the most effective systems for cyclohexane oxidation are those based on Mn and Co elements [26,27].

Furthermore, polyoxometalates (POMs) have received great attention in the catalysis field because of their multifunctional properties. They were extensively studied for various reactions as olefin epoxidation [28], organosilane oxidation [29], organic pollutant photo-oxidative degradation [30], oxidation of alcohols [31–33], cyclohexane [34,35], and cyclohexanol/cyclohexanone [36–40]. In this last case, the examined catalytic systems are MxPMo12O40 (M = Fe, Ni, Co and x = 1 or 1.5) [36], H3−2xNixPMo12O40 and (NH4)3−2xNixPMo12O40 [37], (NH4)xAyPMo12O40 (An+ = Sb3+, Bi3+, or Sn2+) [38], H3−2xCoxPMo12O40 (x: 0–1.5) [39], and α2-K6P2Mo5W13O62, α-K6P2Mo6W12O62, and α1-K7P2Mo5VW12O62 [40]. They showed high activities and led to high AA yields. Seventy percent of AA yield was attained with α-K6P2Mo6W12O62 from the mixture of ol/one oxidation.

On the basis of the literature highlighting the efficiency of Mn- and Co-based catalysts for the oxidation of cyclohexane, in this study, we propose to introduce these two elements as counterion of [PMo12O40]3−. So, a series of POMs of formula H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40, noted H3−2(x+y)MnxCoy (x + y ≤ 3/2 and x, y: 0–1.5) were prepared, characterized by several physicochemical techniques (infrared [IR], scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray [SEM/EDX], and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance [NMR] spectroscopies, X-ray diffraction [XRD] diffraction, and thermogravimetric analysis [TGA]) and used as catalysts for the oxidation of cyclohexanone using hydrogen peroxide (30%) as an oxidant. The reaction products, AA, glutaric acid (GA), succinic acid (SA), hexanoic, 6-hydroxyhexanoic, 7,7-dimethoxy, and heptanoic acids and 1,1-dimethoxy octane were identified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis. Only AA, GA, and SA were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), the other products were noted X. The effects of POMs' counterion nature, molar ratios of catalyst/-one and cyclohexanone/cyclohexanol, and reaction time on the reaction product distribution were investigated. The used catalysts were analyzed by 31P NMR. H1Mn0.25Co0.75PMo12O40 catalytic stability was examined in five consecutive cycles.

2 Experimental section

2.1 Material synthesis

H3PMo12O40 heteropolyacid (noted H3PMo12) was prepared according to the classical method described by Tsigdinos [41]. H3−2(x+y)MnxCoy mixed heteropolysalts were synthesized by a two-step cationic exchange [36,37,39] under the stochiometric conditions (x, y: 0–1.5). The first step consists of an exchange of protons of H3PMo12 by Ba2+ ions according to Eq. (1). In the second step, Mn2+ and Co2+ ions replace those of Ba2+ that precipitates as BaSO4, according to Eq. (2). Ba(OH)2 was gradually dissolved in an aqueous solution of H3PMo12O40, 4.8 × 10−2 M, to avoid a sharp increase in pH that will lead to the decomposition of Keggin anion. The pH must be maintained at <2. Then, both Mn and Co sulfates, according to the fixed stoichiometric coefficients, were added to the previous solution. The Ba2+ ions precipitate as BaSO4. The H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 soluble salts were separated from BaSO4 by filtration and dried at 50 °C and the mixed salts recovered as a powder.

H3PMo12O40 + (x + y)  Ba(OH)2 → H3−2(x+y)Ba(x+y) PMo12O40 + 2(x + y)  H2O(1)
H3−2(x+y)Ba(x+y)PMo12O40 + x  MnSO4 + y  CoSO4 → H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 + BaSO4(2)

2.2 Characterization

The composition and the weight percentages of P, Mo, Co, and Mn in the samples were measured with EDX microanalysis (SEM/EDX) using a HITACHI S3400 N tungsten filament microscope, equipped with an X-ray microanalysis system. Before starting the process of analysis, the samples were covered with carbon to improve their conductivity. Following this procedure the metal content could be estimated within an experimental error of ±0.5%. SEM images were recorded using an ESEM xL30 microscope.

Thermal analysis was performed between room temperature and 600 °C, under airflow with a heating rate of 5 °C/min using a TGA 2050 apparatus.

IR spectroscopy (1200–400 cm−1) was performed using a Nicolet 6700 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (CsI), including an attenuated total reflectance (ATR) module with a diamond crystal.

XRD patterns were recorded at room temperature in the 2θ range between 2° and 60° with a Siemens D5000 diffractometer using copper anticathode Cu Kα (λ = 1.5418 Å) at 40 kV and 40 mA. The indexing of the diffraction lines and phase identification were performed using the EVA software including a high score database.

Solid-phase 31P NMR spectroscopy was carried out at room temperature using a BioSpin GmbH, Bruker spectrometer, equipped with a probe of 3.2 mm in diameter (double mode). Eighty-five percent H3PO4 was used as an external reference.

2.3 Catalytic reaction

The cyclohexanone oxidation was carried out under reflux at 90 °C according to the literature [42]. The reaction principle is to oxidize the reactant by POM catalyst. A POM color change from yellow to green or to blue-green (characteristic color of MoV) was observed. Then, 0.5 ml of hydrogen peroxide (30%) was added to restore the oxidant state (VI) of Mo characterized by yellow color. This sequence is repeated after each color change until there is no more change of color. Depending on the nature of the catalytic system, the added volume of H2O2 can vary between 5 and 12 ml. The reaction end, indicating that the reactant was totally consumed, is observed, when the POM catalyst is no longer reduced. It is noteworthy that up to 90 °C, hydrogen peroxide may be decomposed. The preliminary tests showed that the AA formation did not take place when the reaction mixture is constituted either of substrate and catalyst only, or substrate, catalyst, and hydrogen peroxide simultaneously or in the absence of catalyst.

The homogeneous reaction mixture was analyzed by HPLC and GC–MS. HPLC was connected to a quaternary pump and a UV–vis detector (210 nm). HPLC (YL9100 HPLC) analysis was carried out on a Tracer Excel 120 ODSB-C18 phase (25 cm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size) using a 30% methanol in 5 mM of ammonium acetate buffer (pH 3.3) at 30 °C with a flow rate of 1 ml/min. GC–MS analysis was carried out using a GC–MS (GC 6890 plus, MSD5973, Hewlett Packard-5MS) with HP-INNOWAX column  (30 m × 0.25 mm). The mass analysis is of quadripole type (150 °C). Purified helium was used as the carrier gas with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The injector temperature and injector volume were 250 °C and 0.2 μl. The split ratio was 20:1. The ionization source (electronic impact) temperature was kept at 230 °C and that of the interface at 280 °C.

Before catalytic test, hydrogen peroxide concentration was verified by potassium permanganate titration.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Characterization results

The heteropolysalt chemical composition determined by SEM/EDX analysis is reported in Table 1. The stochiometric coefficients adjusted considering 12 Mo atoms per Keggin unit were found in good agreement with desired stoichiometries for the transition metal atom number (Mn and/or Co). These results show a good correlation between the experimental formula, deduced from SEM/EDX analysis, and theoretical one confirming thus the feasibility of the cationic exchange method used in this study.

Table 1

Elemental analysis of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoy heteropolysalts obtained by SEM/EDX analysis.

Table 1
H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyComposition (Wt %)Molar ratio
H1Mn0.25Co0.757.6084.951.805.651.07 (1)0.25 (0.25)0.79 (0.75)
H1Mn0.75Co0.257.1784.925.732.161.01 (1)0.80 (0.75)0.30 (0.25)
H0Mn0.75Co0.757.7481.835.325.111.13 (1)0.78 (0.75)0.74 (0.75)
H0Mn1.50Co0.006.9181.7511.33/1.01 (1)1.66 (1.50)/

TGA curves of the samples (not represented here) show different mass losses. The first loss of ca. 9–12% was observed in the temperature range 50–180 °C, corresponding to the departure of 8–13 hydration water molecules. The second one of ca. 1–3% observed in the range 180–380 °C was attributed to the departure of constitution water molecules that results from the combination of protons with oxygen atoms of Keggin anion. Above 400 °C, the POM decomposition to P2O5, MoO3, MnO, and CoO occurred. TGA results are reported in Table 2. A good correlation between experimental and theoretical formulas was observed, confirming also the reliability of the cationic exchange synthesis method.

Table 2

Thermal analysis results of H3−2(x+y) MnxCoy solids.

Table 2
Theoretical formulaTGA deduced formulaHydration water molecules
H0.00(Mn Co)1.50H0.06(Mn Co)1.4712
H1.00(Mn Co)1.00H0.96(Mn Co)1.0211
H1.00(Mn Co)1.00H0.94(Mn Co)1.0315

The XRD patterns registered for H1Mn0.25Co0,75 and H1Mn0.75Co0,25 with (x + y) = 1 (Fig. 1) are similar to that of H3PMo12 acid that crystallizes in a triclinic system [43].

Fig. 1

XRD patterns of H3−2(x + y)MnxCoy solids.

In the absence of proton (x + y = 1.5), H0Mn0Co1.5, H0Mn0.75Co0.75, and H0Mn1.5Co0 crystallize in a quadratic system (high score database) [44].

The Fourier transform infrared data of POMs, presented in Table 3, show the characteristic vibration frequencies of phosphorus–oxygen and metal–oxygen bonds of Keggin anion in the spectral range 1100–600 cm−1 [45]. Asymmetric stretching phosphorus–oxygen bond, vas P–Oa, was observed at 1060 cm−1 and those of metal–oxygen, vas Mo–Od, vas Mo–Ob–Mo, and vas Mo–Oc–Mo, at 962–955, 895–879, and 791–785 cm−1 respectively. For x + y =1.5, the vibration frequency values of salts are close to those obtained with H3PMo12 acid, whereas for x + y = 1 (H1Mn0.25Co0.75 and H1Mn0.75Co0.25) a small shoulder at around 978 cm−1 was observed on MoOd vibration bond. This latter is very sensitive to the Keggin anion symmetry because of its high charge density induced by the presence of both cobalt and manganese ions.

Table 3

IR vibration wave numbers (cm−1) of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoy.

Table 3
H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyv (P–Oa)v (MOb)v (M–Ob–M)v (M–Oc–M)
0.250.751060962 (980)a879791
0.750.251060958 (978)a879787

a Shoulder.

It is known that 31P NMR analysis is very sensitive to the local chemical environment and surrounding symmetry of phosphorus atom in the Keggin unit. Solid-state 31P NMR data (Table 4) of H1Mn0.25Co0.75, H1Mn0.75Co0.25PMo12, H0Mn0.75Co0.75, and H0Mn1.5Co0 salts show chemical shifts at −4.33, −4.50, −4.30, and −4.16 ppm, respectively, values close to that of H3PMo12 (−4.4 ppm), suggesting the same phosphorus atom environment, evidencing thus the purity of samples. The small difference in the chemical shift is because of the proton substitution degree of H3PMo12 by Mn and/or Co.

Table 4

31P NMR data of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoy compounds.

Table 4
POMδ (ppm)

The SEM images show that the POM morphology is sensitive to its chemical composition (Fig. 2). H3PMo12 shows a very porous texture whereas H0Mn0Co1.5, H1Mn0.25Co0.75, and H0Mn0.75Co0.75 show a compact texture constituted of aggregates of irregular particle sizes and for H0Mn1.5Co0, an assembly of small groups of crystals separated by voids leading to a nonhomogeneous texture.

Fig. 2

SEM images of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoy.

3.2 Catalytic performances of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoy

The catalytic properties of Keggin-type mixed salts, H3−2(x+y)MnxCoy, were examined in the liquid-phase oxidation of cyclohexanone (-one) and of mixture of cyclohexanone and cyclohexanol (-ol/-one) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (30%) at 90 °C.

The GC–MS analysis obtained with H1Mn0.25Co0.75 are given as an example and results are presented in Table 5. The results show, in addition to the formation of AA and GA, that of following acids: hexanoic, 6-hydroxyhexanoic, and 7,7-dimethoxy heptanoic acids and 1,1-dimethoxy octane. The presence of both 6-hydroxyhexanoic and hexanoic acids was already observed for the Baeyer–Villiger oxidation of cyclohexanone [46,47]. It is noted that SA was observed with other systems. In this study, onlyAA, SA, and GA were quantified by HPLC, the other products were noted X.

Table 5

Results of GC–MS analysis obtained in the presence of H1Mn0.25Co0.75.

Table 5
Retention time (min)Product nameFormulaMolar mass (g/mol)
06.78Hexanoic acidC6H12O2116
07.966-Hydroxyhexanoic acidC6H12O3132
08.43AA (by removal of two methyl groups)C6H10O4146
08.947,7-Dimethoxyheptanoic acidC9H18O4190
09.18AA (by removal of a single methyl group)C6H10O4146
09.40Thiohexanoic acid, s-butyl esterC10H20OS188

3.2.1 Cyclohexanone oxidation

To optimize the reaction conditions, H3PMo12 was used as a catalyst for the oxidation of cyclohexanone. The obtained results are the following: a catalyst/-one molar ratio of 0.47 × 10−3 corresponding to a catalyst mass of 0.03 g and substrate amount of 30 mmol, a reaction time of 20 h, and an agitation rate of 1000 rpm.

In this study, the effects of POM counterion nature, molar ratios of catalyst/-one and cyclohexanone/cyclohexanol, and reaction duration on the reaction product distribution were examined. Effect of POM counterion nature

As shown in Table 6, the catalytic systems are very active with 96–100% of cyclohexanone conversion. AA and X are the major reaction products observed with selectivities varying between 41-66% and 29–51%, respectively. GA was obtained with selectivities inferior to 10%. Except for H1Mn0.75Co0.25 system, the introduction of both Mn and Co favors the AA formation, evidencing the positive effect of the partial substitution of H3PMo12 protons by these elements. Thus, AA yields are of 56–64% against 46% for H3PMo12. Among substituted systems, H1Mn0.25Co0.75 is the best catalyst, with an AA yield reaching 64%.

Table 6

Effect of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoy composition on cyclohexanone oxidation conversion and reaction product selectivities (yields).

Table 6
POMConversion (%)Selectivities (yields) (%)X
H3PMo1210046 (46)3 (3)0 (0)51 (51)
H0Mn0.75Co0.759658 (56)9 (9)0 (0)33 (31)
H1Mn0.25Co0.759766 (64)5 (5)0 (0)29 (28)
H1Mn0.75Co0.259841 (40)8 (8)0 (0)51 (50)
H2Mn0.25Co0.2510058 (58)7 (7)0 (0)35 (35) Effect of catalyst/-one molar ratio

The effect of catalyst/-one molar ratio was performed with H1Mn0.25Co0.75, the most efficient catalyst. The cyclohexanone conversion and reaction product selectivities are reported in Fig. 3. Regardless the value of catalyst/-one molar ratio, the cyclohexanone conversion is total, thus confirming the high activity of catalyst. A catalyst/-one molar ratio of 2.84 × 10−3 leads to the highest AA selectivity (77%) and to the lowest X selectivity (20%). With catalyst/-one molar ratios superior to 2.84 × 10−3, AA selectivity gradually decreases from 77% to 38% whereas that of X increases from 20% to 47%. The highest SA selectivity (20%) was obtained with a catalyst/n-one molar ratio of 4.26 × 10−3 whereas GA was practically not observed.

Fig. 3

Cyclohexanone conversion and reaction product selectivities as a function of catalyst/-one molar ratio. Catalyst, H1Mn0.25Co0.75; Treact, 90 °C; agitation rate, 1000 rpm; and reaction time, 20 h. Effect of reaction time

Fig. 4 shows the reaction time effect on the cyclohexanone conversion and reaction product selectivities in the presence of H1Mn0.25Co0.75 catalyst. Each time reaction corresponds to a catalytic test. With a time reaction of 10 h, the cyclohexanone conversion attains more than 95%. The distribution of reaction products is sensitive to the reaction duration. Thus, in 10 h of reaction, X selectivity reached the maximum (71%) and that of AA the minimum (27%). Although within 20 h, the selectivity of AA attains the maximum (77%) and that of X the minimum (22%). Within 25 h of reaction, AA and X selectivities are of 52% and 35%, respectively. From these results, it can be concluded that in 20 h of reaction some X products could act as intermediates for AA formation and within 25 h of the reaction, AA could decompose and thus favor the formation of some compounds X. The HPLC chromatogram (Fig. 5) shows the distribution of the reaction products after 20 h of reaction. The formation of both GA and SA varies little with the duration of the reaction. A reaction time of 20 h, necessary to obtain the highest AA yield, has already been reported in our previous work [36–40] as well as by other authors [46,47].

Fig. 4

Cyclohexanone conversion and reaction product selectivities as a function of reaction time. Catalyst, H1Mn0.25Co0.75; Treact, 90 °C; agitation rate, 1000 rpm; and catalyst/-one molar ratio, 2.83 × 10−3.

Fig. 5

HPLC chromatogram of obtained mixture in the presence of H1Mn0,25Co0,75. Catalyst, H1Mn0.25Co0.75; Treact, 90 °C; catalyst/-one molar ratio of 2.84 × 10−3; agitation rate, 1000 rpm, reaction time, 20 h.

3.2.2 Cyclohexanone/cyclohexanol mixture oxidation

In the case of cyclohexanone/cyclohexanol mixture oxidation, only AA recovered by crystallization was considered. The reaction was examined over H1Mn0.25Co0.75 with a catalyst/(ol + one) molar ratio of 2.84 × 10−3. The catalytic results (Fig. 6) show a gradual decrease in AA yield from 75% to 0% when the percentage of added alcohol increases from 0 to 100. Similar results are already reported [48–53]. The oxidation of alcohol took place (a color change in catalyst was observed) but the AA formation was not observed. The negative effect of the alcohol addition can be attributed to the formation of hydrogen bond between the CO group of the ketone and the hydrogen of COH group of the cyclohexanol, which makes difficult the oxidation of cyclohexanone. Therefore, alcohol inhibits the AA formation.

Fig. 6

AA yield as a function of the composition of mixture -one/-ol. Catalyst, H1Mn0.25Co0.75; Treact, 90 °C; agitation rate, 1000 rpm; catalyst/-one molar ratio, 2.83 × 10−3.

The series H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 showed its efficiency in the oxidation of cyclohexanone, exhibiting high catalytic performances that can be explained by their dissolution in the reaction medium, thus making all of the catalytic sites more accessible to the substrate. The efficiency of cobalt- and manganese-based catalysts was already reported by other authors for the oxidation of cyclohexane by molecular oxygen. This efficiency was attributed to the existence of redox couples, MnIV/MnIII and CoIII/CoII [54]. Molybdenum-based POMs are also known for their high oxidative power associated with the high oxidation state of the molybdenum (MoVI) [55–58]. In the presence of elements as CoII, SnII, and SbIII, the polyanion, [PMo12O40]3−, can easily be reduced, thus leading to partial reduced POM with coexistence of several elements with different oxidation states as in our case H3−2(MnIV/MnII)x(CoIII/CoII)yP(MoVI/MoV)12O40. This was obtained during its preparation confirmed by its blue color. Partial reduced POMs are known as “heteropoly-blue”. This aspect can facilitate the electron transfer during the oxidation of cyclohexanone.

Among the tested systems, the best catalytic performance was obtained by the formulation, H1Mn0.25Co0.75, that exhibited an AA yield of 75%, which was higher than those obtained with Keggin and Dawson series [36–40] and lower than those obtained from the oxidation of cyclohexane and cyclohexene (80–90%) [59–62]. Its effectiveness may be related to the presence of the proton that can accelerate the cyclohexanone molecule activation through a ketonic–enolic tautomer equilibrium, thus leading to the 2-hydroxy cyclohexanone formation in a first step [63]. In a second step, the system consisting of several redox couples, MnIV/MnII, CoIII/CoII, and MoVI in MoV, formed from a partial reduction of MoVI to MoV during the catalyst preparation would lead to several different peroxo species, after the addition of hydrogen peroxide. These peroxo species, in turn, could oxidize and provide oxygen atoms to the reaction intermediates, leading to the final products., among which AA.

3.2.3 Catalyst stability

To examine the H1Mn0.25Co0.75 catalyst stability, five cycles of oxidation reaction were performed. After the first cycle that lasted 20 h, the AA was recovered after cold crystallization and then 30 mmol of cyclohexanone was added to the filtrate and the oxidation reaction was renewed under the same experimental conditions. Fig. 7 shows that the AA yield gradually decreases from 61% to 0%. It can be suggested that this yield decrease is due to following parameters: (1) the salt acidity decreases after each reduction of H2O2, oxidant needing the presence of the protons, and (2) the reaction medium comes more diluted resulting from the H2O2 reduction to water.

Fig. 7

AA yield variation as a function of cycle number. Catalyst, H1Mn0.25Co0.75; Treact, 90 °C; catalyst/-one molar ratio, 2.84 × 10−3; agitation rate, 1000 rpm; reaction time, 20 h.

3.2.4 Characterization of the used catalyst

The used catalysts were analyzed by 31P NMR after 20 h of reaction. Table 7 shows that they exhibit several peaks evidencing phosphorus-based species formation. The chemical shifts were observed at −3.14 and −5.5 ppm for H3PMo12, −3.75 and −6.89 ppm for H0Mn0.75Co0.75, and −3.76, −6.19, −6.84, and −12.94 ppm for H1Mn0.25Co0.75. These values are different from that of the oxidized specie, [PMo12O40]3− (−4.30 to −4.40 ppm). It was reported that in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, the POM was broken down into several species identified by 31P NMR as peroxo species. In the case of the H3PW12O40, the species are {PO4[WO(O2)2]4}3− and {PO4[WO(O2)2]2}2− [64–68]. From these observations, it can be assumed that the peroxo-POM species could be the active species for the formation of carboxylic acids.

Table 7

Results of 31P NMR analysis of different POMs before and after cyclohexanone oxidation.

Table 7
POMδ (ppm) before reactionδ(ppm) after reaction

3.2.5 Oxidation reaction pathways

For the cyclohexanone oxidation process in the presence of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoy catalysts, several steps were evidenced: (1) oxidation of the substrate confirmed by a color change of catalyst from yellow, characteristic color of MoVI species (POMox) to blue, characteristic color of MoV species (POMred), involving a Mars and Van Krevelen type mechanism in which the oxygen atoms of the crystalline lattice participate in the oxidation process (Eq. 3); (2) oxidation of POMred to POMox by H2O2 (a color change from blue to yellow) with simultaneously the peroxo-POM formation as revealed by 31P NMR analysis (Eq. 4), and (3) the peroxo-POM species can react with some products from Eq. 3 that could be the intermediates to form the carboxylic acids whose AA (Eq. 5). By analogy with the explanation of Eq. 3 (Mars and Van Krevelen mechanism), the peroxo-ions (O22−) of the peroxo-POM would intervene in the oxidation. It was also reported that the peroxo-POM was considered as an electrophilic agent, which would produce an electrophilic attack on the oxygen atom of the intermediate specie, generating then the corresponding carboxylic acid as observed in the case of sulfide oxidation by H2O2 on POMs [69].

Cyclohexanone + POMox → POMred + products + intermediates(3)
H2O2 + POMred → peroxo-POMox(4)
Peroxo-POMox + intermediate species → reaction products + POMox(5)

4 Conclusions

In this study, a series of Keggin-type POMs of formula H3−2(x+y)MnxCoyPMo12O40 was prepared, characterized, and tested in homogeneous oxidation reactions of cyclohexanone and cyclohexanol/cyclohexanone mixture using H2O2 as an oxidant.

Physicochemical analysis has confirmed the formulation of H3−2(x+y) MnxCoy with x + y = 3/2 and x, y: 0–1.5, thus demonstrating the feasibility of the used cationic exchange method.

The catalytic results showed that all studied systems are very active in the cyclohexanone oxidation (conversions >95%) that leads to several products as AA, GA, SA, hexanoic, 6-hydroxyhexanoic, and 7,7-dimethoxy, and heptanoic acids and 1,1-dimethoxy octane, identified by GC–MS. Among reaction products (AA, GA, and SA) quantified by HPLC, AA is the major product for following reaction conditions: a catalyst/substrate molar ratio of 2.84 × 10−3 and 20 h of reaction. With a composition of H1Mn0.25Co0.75, the AA yield attains the maximum (75%). The peroxo-POM species could be the active species for the formation of carboxylic acids from products coming from the first step, substrate oxidation by POM.

The use of H3−2(x+y)MnxCoy as catalysts, hydrogen peroxide as an oxidant without addition of a solvent, leads to clean and efficient process that may be an alternative to that using the harmful, toxic, and corrosive nitric acid.


[1] S. Van de Vyver; Y. Román-Leshkov Catal. Sci. Technol., 31 (2013), pp. 1465-1479

[2] Y. Wu; C. Cordier; E. Berrier; N. Nuns; C. Dujardin; P. Granger Appl. Catal. B Environ., 140–141 (2013), pp. 151-163

[3] D. Pietrogiacomi; M.C. Campa; L.R. Carbone; S. Tuti; M. Occhiuzzi Appl. Catal. B Environ., 187 (2016), pp. 218-227

[4] A.V. Leont'ev; O.A. Fomicheva; M.V. Proskurnina; N.S. Zefirov Russ. Chem. Rev., 70 (2001), pp. 91-104

[5] J. Pérez-Ramıırez; F. Kapteijn; K. Schöffel; J.A. Moulijn Appl. Catal. B Environ., 44 (2003), pp. 117-151

[6] S. Ghosh; S.S. Acharyya; S. Adak; L.N. Sivakumar- Konathala; T.S.R. Bal Green Chem., 16 (2014), pp. 2826-2834

[7] S.S. Acharyya; S. Ghosh; R. Bal Green Chem., 17 (2015), pp. 3490-3499

[8] B.M. Trost; I. Fleming Comprehensive Organic Synthesis (S.V. Ley, ed.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991, p. 251

[9] J.R. Holum Org. Chem., 26 (1961), p. 4814

[10] J.C. Collins; W.W. Hess; F.J. Frank Tetrahedron Lett., 9 (1968), p. 3363

[11] E.J. Corey; J.W. Suggs Tetrahedron Lett., 16 (1975), p. 2647

[12] R.J. Highet; W.C. Wildman J. Am. Chem. Soc., 77 (1955), p. 4399

[13] D.G. Lee; U.A. Spitzer Org. Chem., 35 (1970), p. 3589

[14] R.V. Stevens; K.T. Chapman; H.N. Weller Org. Chem., 45 (1980), p. 2030

[15] B. Sarkar; P. Prajapati; R. Tiwari; R. Tiwari; S. Ghosh; S.S. Acharyya; C. Pendem; R.K. Singha; L.N.S. Konathala; J. Kumar; T. Sasaki; R. Bal Green Chem., 14 (2012), pp. 2600-2606

[16] J.H. Tong; L.L. Bo; Z. Li; Z.Q. Lei; C.G. Xia Mol. Catal. A Chem., 73 (2009), pp. 58-63

[17] P.R. Makgwane; S.S. Ray Catal. Commun., 54 (2014), pp. 118-123

[18] L.P. Zhou; J. Xu; H. Miao; F. Wang; X.Q. Li Appl. Catal. A, 292 (2005), pp. 223-228

[19] A. Selvamani; M. Selvaraj; M. Gurulakshmi; R. Ramya; K. Shanthi; J. Nanosci Nanotechnology, 14 (2014), pp. 2864-2870

[20] M. Zabihi; F. Khorasheh; J. Shayegan RSC Adv., 5 (2015), pp. 5107-5122

[21] J. Li; Y. Shi; L. Xu; G.Z. Lu Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49 (2010), pp. 5392-5399

[22] Y. Fu; W.C. Zhan; Y. Guo; Y.Q. Wang; X.H. Liu; Y. Guo; Y.S. Wang; G.Z. Lu Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 214 (2015), pp. 101-107

[23] R. Zhao; Y.Q. Wang; Y.L. Guo; Y. Guo; X.H. Liu; Z.G. Zhang; Y.S. Wang; W.C. Zhan; G.Z. Lu Green Chem., 8 (2006), pp. 459-466

[24] J. Li; X. Li; Y. Shi; D.S. Mao; G.Z. Lu Catal. Lett., 137 (2010), pp. 180-189

[25] L.P. Zhou; J. Xu; H. Miao; X.Q. Li; F. Wang Catal. Lett., 99 (2005), pp. 231-234

[26] T. Iwahama; K. Syojyo; S. Sakaguchi; Y. Ishii Org. Process Res. Dev., 2 (1998), pp. 255-260

[27] M. Wu; W. Zhan; Y. Guo; Y. Guo; Y. Wang; L. Wang; G. Lu Appl. Catal. A Gen., 523 (2016), pp. 97-106

[28] R. Ishimoto; K. Kamata; N. Mizuno Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 121 (2009), p. 9062

[29] K. Kamata; M. Kotani; K. Yamaguchi; S. Hikichi; N. Mizuno Chem. Eur., 13 (2007), p. 639

[30] A. Troupis; T.M. Triantis; E. Gkika; A. Hiskia; E. Papaconstantinou Appl. Catal. B Environ., 86 (2009), pp. 98-107

[31] D. Sloboda-Rozner; P.L. Alsters; R. Neumann J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125 (2003), p. 5280

[32] J. Wang; L. Yan; G. Li; X. Wang; Y. Ding; J. Suo Tetrahedron Lett., 46 (2005), p. 7023

[33] S. Pathan; A. Patel Appl. Catal. A, 459 (2013), p. 59

[34] F.M. Menger; C. Lee Org. Chem., 44 (1979), p. 3446

[35] M.M.Q. Simoes; C.M.M. Conceiao; J.A.F. Gamelas; P.M.D.N. Domínguez; A.M.V. Cavaleiro; J.A.S. Cavaleiro; A.J.V. Ferrer-Correira; R.A.W. Johnstone Mol. Catal. A Chem., 144 (1999), pp. 461-468

[36] T. Mazari; S. Benadji; A. Tahar; L. Dermeche; C. Rabia Mater. Sci. Eng. B., 3 (2013), pp. 146-152

[37] A. Tahar; S. Benadji; T. Mazari; L. Dermeche; C. Marchal-Roch; C. Rabia Catal. Lett., 145 (2015), pp. 569-575

[38] L. Mouheb; L. Dermeche; T. Mazari; S. Benadji; N. Essayem; C. Rabia Catal. Lett., 148 (2018) no. 2, pp. 612-620

[39] S. Benadji; T. Mazari; L. Dermeche; N. Salhi; E. Cadot; C. Rabia Catal. Lett., 143 (2013), pp. 749-755

[40] M. Moudjahed; L. Dermeche; S. Benadji; T. Mazari; C. Rabia Mol. Catal. A Chem., 414 (2016), pp. 72-77

[41] G.A. Tsigdinos Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 13 (1974), pp. 267-274

[42] K. Nomiya; M. Miwa; Y. Sugaya Polyhedron, 3 (1984), pp. 607-610

[43] H. Copaux Ann. Chim., 17 (1909), p. 217

[44] L.M. Rodriguez-Albelo; G. Rousseau; P. Mialane; J. Marrot; C. Mellot-Draznieks; A.R. Ruiz-Salvador; S. Li; R. Liu; G. Zhang; B. Keita; A. Dolbecq Dalton Trans., 41 (2012), pp. 9989-9999

[45] C. Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff; M. Fournier; R. Franck; R. Thouvenot Mol. Struct., 114 (1984), p. 49

[46] F. Cavani; K. Raabova; F. Bigi; C. Quarantelli Chem. Eur., 16 (2010), pp. 12962-12969

[47] Y. Usui; K. Sato Green Chem., 5 (2003), pp. 373-375

[48] A.F. Lindsay Chem. Eng. Sci., 8 (1954), pp. 78-93

[49] A. Castellan; J.C.J. Bart; S. Cavallaro Catal. Today, 9 (1991), p. 255

[50] A. Castellan; J.C.J. Bart; S. Cavallaro Catal. Today, 9 (1991), p. 285

[51] A. Castellan; J.C.J. Bart; S. Cavallaro Catal. Today, 9 (1991), p. 301

[52] F. Kapteijn; J. Rodriguez-Mirasol; J.A. Moulijn Appl. Catal. B Environ., 9 (1996), p. 25

[53] S.A. Chavan; D. Srinivas; P. Ratnasamy J. Catal., 39 (2002), p. 39

[54] M. Wu; W. Zhan; Y. Guo; Y. Guo; Y. Wang; L. Wang; G. Lu Catalysts, 7 (2017), p. 155

[55] C. Marchal-Roch; N. Laronze; N. Guillou; A. Tézé; G. Hervé Appl. Catal. A, 203 (2000), pp. 143-150

[56] C. Marchal-Roch; N. Laronze; N. Guillou; A. Tézé; G. Hervé Appl. Catal. A, 199 (2000), pp. 33-44

[57] T. Mazari; C. Marchal-Roch; S. Hocine; N. Salhi; C. Rabia J. Nat. Gas Chem., 19 (2010), pp. 54-60

[58] F. Jing; B. Katryniok; F. Dumeignil; E. Bordes-Richard; S. Paul J. Catal., 309 (2014), pp. 121-135

[59] P. Blach; Z. Böstrom; S. Franceschi-Messant; A. Lattes; E. Perez; I. Rico-Lattes Tetrahedron Lett., 66 (2010), pp. 7124-7128

[60] I. Quesada-Penate; G. Lesage; P. Cognet; M. Poux Chem. Eng. J., 202 (2012), pp. 357-364

[61] J. Alcaniz-Monge; G. Trautwein; A. Garcia-Garcia Mol. Catal. A Chem., 394 (2014), pp. 211-216

[62] M. Shang; T. Noël; Q. Wang; Y. Su; K. Miyabayashi; V. Hessel; S. Hasebe Chem. Eng. J., 260 (2015), pp. 454-462

[63] D. Amitouche; M. Haouas; T. Mazari; S. Mouanni; R. Canioni; C. Rabia; E. Cadot; C. Marchal-Roch Appl Catal. A, 561 (2018), pp. 104-116

[64] P. Mars; D.W. Van-Krevelen; C.N. Satterfield Chem. Eng. Sci., Heterogeneous Catalysis in Practice, 3, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1954, pp. 41-59

[65] L. Salles; C. Aubry; R. Thouvenot; F. Robert; C. Doremieux-Morin; G. Chottard; H. Ledon; Y. Jeanin; P. Bregault Inorg. Chem., 33 (1994), pp. 871-878

[66] D.C. Ducan; C. Chamber; E. Hecht; C.L. Hill J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117 (1995), pp. 681-691

[67] L.I. Kuznetsova; N.I. Kuznetsova; R.I. Maksimovskaya; G.I. Aleshina; O.S. Koscheeva; U.V. Utkin Catal. Lett., 141 (2011) no. 10, p. 1442

[68] L.Y. Mengs; S.R. Zhai; Z.C. Sun; F. Zhang; Z.Y. Xiao; Q.D. An Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 204 (2015), p. 123

[69] R. Frenzel; Á.G. Sathicq; M.N. Blanco; G.P. Romanelli; L.R. Pizzio Mol. Catal. A Chem., 403 (2015), pp. 27-36

Comments - Policy