Plan
Comptes Rendus

Mise au point
Self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers for biomedical applications
[Dendrimères supramoléculaires auto-assemblés pour des applications biomédicales]
Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 29 (2026), pp. 321-347

Cet article fait partie du numéro thématique [en cours] Dendrimères : un point sur leurs propriétés coordonné par : Anne-Marie Caminade.  

Résumé graphique

Résumés

Supramolecular dendrimers formed through the self-assembly of amphiphilic dendritic building blocks have emerged as powerful nanoplatforms that combine dendritic architectural features with dynamic adaptability. In contrast to conventional covalent dendrimers, self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers are readily accessible, structurally tunable, and capable of forming functional nanomicelles with large internal voids and multifunctional surfaces, enabling efficient drug and nucleic acid delivery as well as advanced biomedical imaging. This short Account summarizes our decade-long dedication to engineering self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers for biomedical applications, with a particular emphasis on molecular engineering that governs self-assembly, pharmaceutical agent loading and release, biodistribution, and biomedical performance. Collectively, our studies establish self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers as versatile and programmable platforms for next-generation nanomedicine.

Les dendrimères supramoléculaires formés par l’auto-assemblage de briques dendritiques amphiphiles ont émergé comme des nanoplateformes puissantes combinant les caractéristiques architecturales des dendrimères avec une adaptabilité dynamique. Le concept de dendrimère auto-assemblé repose sur l’organisation spontanée d’unités dendritiques conçues pour interagir par des forces non covalentes, conduisant à la formation de nano-objets dendritiques. Contrairement aux dendrimères covalents conventionnels, ces systèmes auto-assemblés sont facilement accessibles, structurellement modulables et capables de former des nanomicelles fonctionnelles présentant de larges cavités internes ainsi que des surfaces multifonctionnelles. Cette organisation permet un chargement efficace et contrôlé d’agents thérapeutiques ou d’acides nucléiques, tout en intégrant des fonctionnalités dédiées à l’imagerie biomédicale avancée. Ce court compte rendu présente une décennie de travaux de notre équipe consacrés à l’ingénierie de dendrimères supramoléculaires auto-assemblés pour des applications biomédicales. Une attention particulière est portée aux paramètres de conception moléculaire qui gouvernent l’auto-assemblage, le chargement et la libération des agents pharmaceutiques, la biodistribution et les performances biomédicales. Dans leur ensemble, ces études établissent les dendrimères supramoléculaires auto-assemblés comme des plateformes polyvalentes et programmables, ouvrant des perspectives prometteuses pour le développement de nanomédicaments de nouvelle génération.

Métadonnées
Reçu le :
Révisé le :
Accepté le :
Publié le :
DOI : 10.5802/crchim.451
Keywords: Amphiphilic dendrimer, Nanovector, Drug delivery, Nucleic acid delivery, Biomedical imaging agent
Mots-clés : Dendrimère amphiphile, Nanovecteur, Délivrance de médicaments, Transport d’acides nucléiques, Agent d’imagerie biomédicale
Note : Article soumis sur invitation

Abdechakour Elkihel  1   ; Jing Wu  1   ; Ling Peng  1

1 Aix Marseille University, CNRS, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Nanoscience de Marseille (CINaM), UMR 7325, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, 13288 Marseille, France
Licence : CC-BY 4.0
Droits d'auteur : Les auteurs conservent leurs droits
Abdechakour Elkihel; Jing Wu; Ling Peng. Self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers for biomedical applications. Comptes Rendus. Chimie, Volume 29 (2026), pp. 321-347. doi: 10.5802/crchim.451
@article{CRCHIM_2026__29_G1_321_0,
     author = {Abdechakour Elkihel and Jing Wu and Ling Peng},
     title = {Self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers for biomedical applications},
     journal = {Comptes Rendus. Chimie},
     pages = {321--347},
     year = {2026},
     publisher = {Acad\'emie des sciences, Paris},
     volume = {29},
     doi = {10.5802/crchim.451},
     language = {en},
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Abdechakour Elkihel
AU  - Jing Wu
AU  - Ling Peng
TI  - Self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers for biomedical applications
JO  - Comptes Rendus. Chimie
PY  - 2026
SP  - 321
EP  - 347
VL  - 29
PB  - Académie des sciences, Paris
DO  - 10.5802/crchim.451
LA  - en
ID  - CRCHIM_2026__29_G1_321_0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Abdechakour Elkihel
%A Jing Wu
%A Ling Peng
%T Self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers for biomedical applications
%J Comptes Rendus. Chimie
%D 2026
%P 321-347
%V 29
%I Académie des sciences, Paris
%R 10.5802/crchim.451
%G en
%F CRCHIM_2026__29_G1_321_0

Version originale du texte intégral (Proposez une traduction )

Le texte intégral ci-dessous peut contenir quelques erreurs de conversion par rapport à la version officielle de l'article publié.

1. Introduction

Dendrimers are a unique class of structurally well-defined synthetic molecules with precisely controlled architectures [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. They consist of three distinct structural components: (1) a central core from which the dendrimer emanates; (2) repetitive branching units that enable growth into geometrically organized radial layers, referred to as generations; and (3) numerous terminal functional groups on the periphery (Figure 1) [6]. The dendritic architecture, together with their precisely controlled structures, distinguishes dendrimers from other synthetic macromolecules and polymers. As a result, dendrimers exhibit unique multivalent cooperativity confined within a small and well-defined three-dimensional space, leading to distinct functional properties. Consequently, dendrimers are attractive precision materials for a wide range of applications, including sensors, devices, catalysis, diagnostics, therapeutics, and delivery systems, spanning areas from environmental protection and energy production to human health [3, 4, 7, 8].

Figure 1.

Schematic illustration of a conventional covalent dendrimer, which is composed of three structural components: core (orange), branching units (blue) and terminals (pink). Starting from the core, increasing branching generates dendrimers with increasing generations G1, G2, G3, etc. Adapted with permission from [6] (copyright 2018 Science China Press and Springer Nature).

Dendrimer synthesis is inherently unique and technically demanding. Usually, dendrimers are constructed through stepwise synthesis, which can be achieved using either the divergent strategy from a central core to the periphery, or the convergent strategy from the periphery toward a central core, or the combination of both strategies, a hybrid divergent–convergent approach, also known as the double-stage convergent strategy [1].

Recently, we have pioneered the concept of supramolecular dendrimer construction via the self-assembly of small amphiphilic dendritic building blocks through non-covalent interactions (Figure 2) [9, 10, 11]. This approach relies on the spontaneous organization of small amphiphilic dendritic building blocks into large, non-covalent supramolecular dendrimers. In contrast to conventional covalent dendrimer synthesis, self-assembly into supramolecular dendrimers is readily achieved through reversible, yet highly specific and controllable interactions, requiring significantly reduced synthetic effort. This strategy enables a simplified and cost-effective route to dendrimers with entirely new and tunable properties [10, 11].

Figure 2.

Schematic illustration of a self-assembling supramolecular dendrimer constructed using a small amphiphilic dendrimer. Adapted with permission from [9] (copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim).

Importantly, the self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers can mimic covalent dendrimers not only in terms of their radial dendritic architecture emanating from a central core, but also in their suitability for biomedical applications [11]. In particular, the self-assembled supramolecular dendrimers are modular and adaptive for drug delivery (Figure 3). Notably, the dendritic structure of the amphiphilic building units enables the formation of large internal void spaces within the assembled supramolecular dendrimers for physical encapsulation of pharmaceutical agents, while the abundant surface functionalities allow both physical and chemical conjugation of biologically active entities for diverse biomedical applications.

Figure 3.

Schematic illustration of self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers as delivery vehicles for pharmaceutical agents in biomedical applications. Reproduced from [11], licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

In this short Account, we provide a brief overview of our efforts over the past decade to develop self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers for biomedical applications in drug delivery, bioimaging and gene therapy (Figure 3) by highlighting representative studies. We will then outline future perspectives in this emerging field.

2. Drug delivery

Drug delivery aims to deliver the therapeutic agent to the desired site, at the correct dose, and for an optimal duration, thereby maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects [12, 13]. Supramolecular dendrimers formed through the self-assembly of small amphiphilic dendritic building blocks offer distinct advantages for this purpose. In particular, these supramolecular systems possess large internal void spaces within their cores, hence enable efficient encapsulation of drug molecules at high loading capacities, outperforming lipid- or polymer-based drug delivery systems [11].

In our very first study, we explored the use of amphiphilic dendrimer 1 (Figure 4A) to construct a supramolecular dendrimer nanosystem for the delivery of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) [14]. The spacious internal cavities of the resulting supramolecular dendrimers enabled stable DOX encapsulation (Figure 4B) with high drug-loading efficiency of up to 40%. The drug-loaded dendrimer nanomicelles DOX/1@, though small in size (12 nm), were bigger than the empty dendrimer nanomicelles 1@ (Figure 4B). This size expansion upon drug encapsulation can be ascribed to the accommodation of drug molecules within the micellar core. Following systemic administration, DOX-loaded nanomicelles preferentially accumulated in tumors (Figure 4C) via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and were internalized by cancer cells predominantly through macropinocytosis (Figure 4D). This uptake pathway enhanced intracellular drug enrichment while circumventing efflux-mediated drug resistance (Figure 4D). Consequently, the supramolecular dendrimer formulation significantly improved the therapeutic efficacy of DOX, overcame doxorubicin resistance in multiple cancer models—including drug-resistant breast tumors—and substantially reduced the systemic toxicity associated with free DOX. This work pioneered supramolecular dendrimers as a promising platform for anticancer drug delivery.

Figure 4.

(A) Chemical structure of amphiphilic dendrimer 1. (B) Anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) encapsulated within the nanomicelles formed by 1, and (C) accumulated in tumor. (D) Schematic illustration of cellular uptake of the DOX/1@ nanoparticles via macropinocytosis, overcoming efflux pump-mediated drug resistance. Adapted with from [14], licensed under CC BY 4.0.

Despite the high drug-loading capacity, the nanomicelles formed by dendrimer 1 exhibited relatively slow drug release, with only approximately 40% of the encapsulated DOX released after 72 h [14]. This behavior can be ascribed to the presence of two long alkyl chains in dendrimer 1, which promote the formation of highly stable and compact nanomicelles that impede effective drug release. To address this limitation, we studied amphiphilic dendrimer 2 (Figure 5A), which contains a single alkyl chain and was expected to form less compact and stable assemblies based on its hydrophilicity–hydrophobicity balance [15]. Indeed, nanomicelles derived from 2 displayed substantially improved release profiles, with nearly 80% drug release after 72 h [15], while maintaining high drug-loading efficiencies (29–39%) and excellent encapsulation efficiencies (85–99%) for multiple anticancer agents, including doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and rapamycin [16]. Most importantly, we discovered that nanomicelles formed by 2 were able to hijack tumor-secreted extracellular vesicles (EVs) in vivo, enabling intercellular drug delivery and deep tumor penetration (Figure 5B) [16]. EVs are endogenous vesicles secreted by cells and play key roles in intercellular communication while retaining the characteristics of their parental cells [17]. In tumors, EVs are often overproduced [18]. By exploiting this intrinsic and dynamic transport network, dendrimer-based nanomicelles achieved efficient penetration into deep tumor tissue, overcame tumor heterogeneity, and enhanced anticancer effect [16].

Figure 5.

(A) Chemical structure of amphiphilic dendrimer 2. (B) Schematic illustration of the anticancer drug encapsulated within the nanomicelle formed by 2, administrated via intravenous injection to tumor-xenograft mouse, accumulated within tumor via EPR effect, and delivered intercellularly via hijacking of extracellular vesicles (EVs) generated in situ by cancer cells for deep penetration into tumor tissue, achieving effective treatment while overcoming tumor heterogeneity and dynamic evolution. Reproduced from [16], licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Further investigation revealed a drawback of 2-based nanodrug formulation: although it exhibited favorable drug release under acidic conditions (pH 5.0), mimicking the tumor microenvironment and endosomes, it also showed appreciable drug leakage (∼30%) at physiological pH (7.4), raising concerns about premature release during systemic circulation [15]. To mitigate this issue, we designed fluorinated dendrimer 3 (Figure 6A), which preserved high drug-loading capacity and acid-triggered release while reducing drug leakage at pH 7.4 to below 10% (Figure 6B) [15]. In vivo studies demonstrated that DOX-loaded nanomicelles derived from 3 were markedly more effective at suppressing tumor growth in patient-derived xenograft models [15]. These findings underscore the importance of molecular-level dendrimer engineering in tuning drug encapsulation and release profiles.

Figure 6.

(A) Chemical structure of fluorinated amphiphilic dendrimer 3. (B) Time- and pH-dependent drug release profile of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) from the nanodrug formed by 3 (DOX/3@) at pH 7.4 and pH 5.0, respectively. Adapted from [15], licensed under CC BY 4.0.

We also extended supramolecular dendrimers for drug delivery to address cardiotoxicity associated with hERG channel binding, a major cause of drug attrition and market withdrawal [19, 20]. In a proof-of-concept study, self-assembling dendrimer nanosystems formed from dendrimers 2, 4, and 5 (Figure 7) were used to formulate three structurally distinct drugs: the anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX), the antimalarial drug chloroquine (CQ), and the NUPR1 inhibitor ZZW115, respectively [21]. Encapsulation within dendrimer nanomicelles reduced hERG binding affinities by three- to eight-fold relative to the free drugs (Figure 7B), translating into the elimination of the related toxicity in animal models. Additionally, these formulations prolonged systemic circulation, enhanced accumulation at disease sites, and improved therapeutic efficacy against both malaria infection and tumor burden [21]. This study illustrates the potential of dendrimer-based nanodrug formulation to mitigate hERG-related cardiotoxicity while simultaneously enhancing drug performance.

Figure 7.

(A) Chemical structures of amphiphilic dendrimers 4 and 5. (B) Dendrimer nanodrug formulation reduced hERG binding affinities compared to the free drugs. Adapted from [21], licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0.

We further extended our design framework to bipolar(bola)-amphiphilic dendrimer 6 (Figure 8) capable of ROS (reactive oxygen species)–responsive delivery because of the presence of the thioacetal functionality [22]. Dendrimer 6 was employed to encapsulate the anticancer drug imatinib (IM) to target CD117 (c-Kit) [23], a key mediator of ovarian cancer stem cells (CSCs), for the treatment of metastatic ovarian cancer (Figure 8). The resulting formulation achieved significantly enhanced CSC targeting compared to free IM, leading to robust inhibition of cancer cell survival, stemness, and metastatic potential in metastatic and drug-resistant ovarian cancer models. Moreover, encapsulated IM exhibited synergistic anticancer activity when combined with the first-line chemotherapeutic agent cisplatin in patient-derived xenograft models, without observable adverse effects. Collectively, these findings established IM delivered by 6 as a versatile platform that potentiates imatinib for targeted and effective treatment of metastatic ovarian cancer, representing a meaningful advance toward addressing this unmet clinical need.

Figure 8.

(A) Chemical structure of bola-amphiphilic dendrimer 6. (B) Nanodrug formulation formed by imatinib (IM) with 6 (IM/6@) for targeting cancer stem cells in metastatic and drug-resistant ovarian cancer models. Reproduced from [23], licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Beyond physical encapsulation, chemical conjugation of drug molecules to amphiphilic dendrimer terminals offers an alternative strategy for controlled drug delivery. In a pilot study, a prodrug of gemcitabine was covalently conjugated to the amphiphilic dendrimer surface (7 and 8, Figure 9) via click chemistry to enhance metabolic stability of gemcitabine while achieving high drug loading (40%) [24]. Although the higher-generation dendrimer 8 was insoluble in water, the lower-generation dendrimer 7 self-assembled into nanomicelles that were readily internalized by cells via endocytosis, bypassing nucleoside transporter–mediated uptake and thereby overcoming gemcitabine resistance. In addition, these nanomicelles exhibited pH- and enzyme-responsive drug release, resulting in enhanced anticancer efficacy and reduced systemic toxicity [24].

Figure 9.

Chemical structures of amphiphilic dendrimers 7 and 8.

In another study, a nucleoside anticancer candidate was appended to dendrimer terminals through biodegradable ester linkages (9 and 10, Figure 10) to enable esterase-triggered drug release [25]. Notably, higher-generation dendrimer 10 released the active molecule significantly more slowly than lower-generation dendrimer 9, reflecting increased steric hindrance that limited enzymatic access to the ester bonds for effective action. Although such “negative” dendritic effects may appear disadvantageous, they can be strategically exploited to achieve generation-dependent and temporally controlled drug release.

Figure 10.

Chemical structures of amphiphilic dendrimers 9 and 10.

We further developed bola-amphiphilic dendrimers 11 and 12 (Figure 11), bearing glucose and mannose terminals, respectively [26, 27]. They were designed to target astrocytes and microglia—two major glial cell populations essential for the maintenance of brain homeostasis. Dysfunction of these glial cells is implicated in a wide range of central nervous system (CNS) disorders [28, 29]. Although targeting astrocytes and microglia, or modulating their activity, represents an attractive therapeutic strategy, it remains challenging because of the restrictive nature of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and the scarcity of cell-specific targeting platforms. We demonstrated that both 11 and 12 efficiently reached the brain following intranasal administration, which bypassed the BBB [26]. More importantly, the glucose-functionalized dendrimer 11 selectively targeted astrocytes, whereas the mannose-functionalized dendrimer 12 preferentially accumulated in microglia [26]. Collectively, these findings underscore the potential of glycodendrimers as precision targeting platforms in the brain and highlight their promise for the treatment of CNS diseases.

Figure 11.

Chemical structures of bola-amphiphilic dendrimers 11 and 12.

Together, these studies not only establish supramolecular dendrimers as tunable drug delivery platforms, but also highlight a set of design rules for engineering effective self-assembling dendrimer-based drug delivery systems. First, amphiphilicity-driven self-assembly of dendritic entities creates internal voids that enable high drug-loading capacity. Second, the number and chemistry of hydrophobic chains dictate stability of the nanoassemblies and therefore control drug release kinetics, where overly stable assemblies hinder release and less compact structures promote payload liberation. Third, subtle structural modifications—such as fluorination or generation tuning—provide powerful means to suppress premature drug leakage under physiological conditions while preserving responsive release in diseased microenvironments. Fourth, supramolecular adaptability enables biological “hijacking” mechanisms, such as extracellular vesicle–mediated intercellular transport, to enhance deep tissue penetration and overcome tumor heterogeneity. Finally, dendrimer generation and linkage chemistry can be exploited to achieve enzyme- and pH-responsive, generation-dependent drug release, offering controlled and tunable release. Collectively, these studies highlight self-assembling dendrimers as programmable nanocarriers enabling therapeutic performance via engineering and interplay between molecular design, self-assembly, and biological context.

3. Biomedical imaging and theranostics

Biomedical imaging plays an important role in disease diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment planning [30, 31]. Advances in nanotechnology have created new opportunities to improve imaging performance by enabling high local concentrations of imaging agents, integration of multiple different imaging reporters within a single probe for multimodal imaging, and the development of theranostic systems that unify diagnosis and therapy [32, 33]. In addition, nanoscale imaging agents can exploit the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect to achieve passive targeting, thereby further improving imaging specificity and clinical relevance [34, 35].

Among various noninvasive imaging modalities, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used in the clinic, because of its relatively low cost, femtomolar sensitivity, quantitative capability, and unlimited tissue penetration depth [30]. We designed amphiphilic dendrimer 13 (Figure 12A) to construct self-assembling dendrimer nanomicelles as the nanoprobe for SPECT imaging [36]. Dendrimer 13 bears multiple SPECT-reporting units at its periphery, based on the chelation of [111In]In3+ by 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA), a gold-standard chelator for indium and other clinically relevant radionuclides. This dendrimer spontaneously assembled into uniform nanomicelles that accumulated efficiently in tumors via the EPR effect, enabling effective SPECT imaging (Figure 12B).

Figure 12.

(A) Chemical structure of amphiphilic dendrimer 13. (B) Schematic illustration of the self-assembling dendrimer 13 as the nanoprobe (13@) for tumor detection using SPECT imaging. Arrow indicates tumor location. Adapted from [36], licensed under CC BY 3.0.

It should be mentioned that notable liver uptake was also observed when using 13 for SPECT imaging (Figure 12B) [36]. To address this concern, we developed amphiphilic dendrimer 14 (Figure 13A), in which DOTA was replaced by the smaller macrocyclic chelator 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) for [111In]In3+ chelation [37]. NOTA forms neutral and kinetically more stable complexes with small metal ions such as In3+ or Ga3+, owing to its reduced ring size and improved geometric match [38, 39]. Importantly, 14 formed supramolecular nanostructures with size and morphology comparable to those of 13, but exhibited a markedly different surface charge and considerably improved biodistribution profile, characterized by substantially reduced hepatic uptake and enhanced tumor-to-background contrast (Figure 13B) [37]. These results demonstrate how subtle molecular-level modifications can profoundly influence the in vivo biodistribution, highlighting the importance of chelator and surface chemistry in governing biological fate of imaging nanoprobes.

Figure 13.

(A) Chemical structure of amphiphilic dendrimer 14. (B) Comparison of the SPECT/CT images of tumors obtained with the imaging probes 13@ and 14@ formed by the self-assembling of 13 and 14, respectively. Arrows indicate tumor locations. Adapted with permission from [37] (copyright 2020 Wiley-VCH GmbH).

We also explored the self-assembling dendrimer nanoprobes for positron emission tomography (PET), which offers higher sensitivity and spatial resolution than SPECT [30]. Amphiphilic dendrimer 15 (Figure 14A) was established as a PET nanoprobe using [68Ga]Ga3+ as the radionuclide and NOTA as the chelator [40]. The excellent thermodynamic stability and kinetic inertness of the Ga3+–NOTA complex, combined with dendrimer multivalency and EPR-mediated tumor accumulation, enabled PET imaging with sensitivity and specificity that surpassed the clinical gold reference [18F]FDG (2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose) for tumor imaging (Figure 14B). Notably, this dendrimer nanoprobe allowed detection of tumors that were not discernible using [18F]FDG (Figure 14B), underscoring the advantages of this dendrimer nanoprobe for oncological imaging.

Figure 14.

(A) Chemical structure of amphiphilic dendrimer 15. (B) Comparison of the PET images of tumors obtained with the clinical reference [18F]FDG and the nanoprobe 15@ formed by self-assembling of 15. Arrows indicate tumor locations. Reproduced from [40], licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

We further engineered self-assembling dendrimer nanosystems for multimodal imaging, which can combine complementary strengths of different imaging modalities while overcoming their limitation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent spatial resolution but suffers from relatively low sensitivity [41, 42], while near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging offers high sensitivity and resolution but limited tissue penetration [43, 44]. Integrating these modalities within a single nanosystem can provide synergistic benefits. To this end, we developed amphiphilic dendrimer 16 as a multimodal platform that combines 1H-MRI and NIRF imaging (Figure 15) [45]. Dendrimer 16 bears multiple Gd3+-based MRI contrast units at its terminals (Figure 15A) and self-assembles into uniform nanomicelles with high relaxivity and a favorable safety profile. Moreover, these nanomicelles were efficiently cleared from the liver within 24 h while selectively accumulating in tumors via the EPR effect, resulting in high tumor specificity and minimal off-target accumulation. In vivo MRI studies revealed up to a two-fold enhancement in tumor contrast relative to surrounding muscle tissue. Further encapsulation of the NIRF dye DiR within the hydrophobic core yielded a bimodal MR/NIRF imaging agent that achieved effective MRI at Gd3+ doses as low as one-tenth of the standard clinical dose, while simultaneously providing strong fluorescence enhancement. This dose-sparing capability highlights the potential of dendrimer-based multimodal probes for safer and more precise imaging.

Figure 15.

(A) Chemical structure of amphiphilic dendrimer 16. (B) Schematic illustration of the self-assembling dendrimer nanosystems based on 16 as probes for 1H-MRI and 1H-MRI/NIRF multimodal imaging. (C) 1H-MRI and (D) NIRF imaging of tumors. Circles indicate tumor locations. Adapted from [45], licensed under CC BY 4.0.

Although 1H-MRI is widely used clinically, its contrast is often limited by high background signals from endogenous water. To overcome this intrinsic limitation, fluorine magnetic resonance imaging (19F-MRI) is a promising technique, which offers background-free imaging thanks to the absence of fluorine in biological tissues [46, 47]. We therefore designed a fluorinated amphiphilic dendrimer 17 (Figure 16A) in which charged groups were strategically positioned near the fluorinated moieties at the dendrimer periphery [48]. This design prevented fluorine aggregation while maintaining high fluorine content, optimal molecular mobility, and excellent aqueous solubility. The resulting supramolecular dendrimer nanoassemblies exhibited favorable relaxation properties and enabled sensitive and specific 19F-MRI. Importantly, the modular architecture allowed pharmaceutical agents to be encapsulated within the nanomicellar core without compromising the 19F-MRI signal generated by the fluorinate entities at the periphery. Leveraging this feature, we co-encapsulated the NIRF dye DiR and the anticancer drug paclitaxel (PTX) to create a multimodal 19F-MRI/NIRF theranostic system (Figure 16B). This platform enabled simultaneous tumor visualization using multiple imaging modalities (1H-MRI, 19F-MRI, and NIRF) and effective therapy in a pancreatic cancer patient-derived xenograft model.

Figure 16.

(A) Chemical structure of amphiphilic dendrimer 17. (B) Schematic illustration of the self-assembling dendrimer nanosytems based on 17 as probes for 19F-MRI and 19F-MRI/NIRF multimodal imaging as well as for 19F-MRI/NIRF/paclitaxel as theranostics. (C) 19F-MRI (red) superimposed on 1H-MRI (white) of tumor. Circles indicate tumor locations. (D) NIRF imaging (red) of tumor. (E) Inhibition of tumor growth upon treatment of the theranostics (PTX/16@). Reproduced from [48], licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Altogether, our studies demonstrate how self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers can be rationally engineered as versatile platforms for advanced biomedical imaging. By integrating multiple imaging reporters within amphiphilic dendrimers, these dendrimer-based nanoprobes achieve high sensitivity, and enhanced tumor specificity through the EPR effect, enabling high-performance PET imaging that outperformed the clinical standard [18F]FDG. Systematic molecular design—particularly chelator selection and surface chemistry—proved critical in governing in vivo behavior, as exemplified by the marked improvement in biodistribution achieved by replacing DOTA with NOTA. Beyond single-modality imaging, the self-assembling dendrimers enabled multimodal MRI/NIRF- and MRI-based theranostic systems that combine anatomical resolution, sensitivity, and therapeutic capability within a single nanosystem. Collectively, these studies establish supramolecular dendrimers as adaptable and high-performance platforms for bioimaging and theranostics.

4. Nucleic acid delivery

Nucleic acid therapeutics have emerged as a powerful drug modality that treats disease by directly modulating gene expression [49, 50]. They offer unique access to address conventionally “undruggable” targets, rapid responses to emerging pathogens, and new opportunities for precision medicine. However, nucleic acid therapeutics suffer from poor bioavailability and low stability arising from their intrinsic polyanionic character and labile ester linkages. Effective delivery systems are therefore essential to protect nucleic acids from degradation, promote cellular uptake, facilitate endosomal escape, and achieve targeted and safe therapeutic action.

Cationic and ionizable dendrimers have attracted considerable attention for nucleic acid delivery because of their well-defined architectures and capacity to electrostatically complex polyanionic nucleic acids [3, 51, 52]. We previously developed a family of structurally flexible PAMAM dendrimers 18 (Figure 17) featuring an extended triethanolamine (TEA) core, which proved effective for the delivery of diverse nucleic acid cargos—including small interfering RNA (siRNA), small activating RNA (saRNA), microRNA (miRNA), and DNA—in both in vitro and in vivo settings [53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64]. Notably, a fifth-generation dendrimer enabled efficient delivery of saRNA targeting C/EBPα for the treatment of liver cancer [56], leading to the first clinical trial of saRNA-based gene therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and other malignancies [65, 66].

Figure 17.

Chemical structure of the TEA-core PAMAM dendrimer 18. For the sake of clarity, only the dendrimer of generation 3 is presented.

Building on this foundation, amphiphilic dendrimer 2 (Figure 5) was the very first amphiphilic dendrimer that we investigated for its self-assembly with the aim of nucleic acid delivery (Figure 18A). This dendrimer spontaneously formed supramolecular nanomicelles in water that efficiently complexed with siRNA and protected it from enzymatic degradation [9]. This enabled effective siRNA delivery and robust gene silencing by integrating the key advantages of lipid and polymer vectors, namely membrane fusion–mediated cellular uptake and endosomal escape associated with lipid vectors, together with the proton sponge–mediated endosomal release characteristic of polymer vectors (Figure 18B) [51]. In contrast, the corresponding hydrophilic dendron 19 (Figure 18C) or hydrophobic alkyl chain components alone were inactive; neither was the dendrimer 20 (Figure 18C) bearing a hydrophilic chain without amphiphilicity. These findings established amphiphilicity and self-assembly as key for amphiphilic dendrimers in nucleic acid delivery. Systematic modulation of the hydrophobic chain length in dendrimer 2 revealed a narrow structural window for delivery activity: a shorter alkyl chain prevented the formation of stable assemblies required for effective delivery, whereas a longer chain produced overly stable assemblies with strong siRNA binding, thereby hindering siRNA release and abolishing delivery capacity [9]. This highlights the critical role of hydrophilic–hydrophobic balance in controlling supramolecular assembly of amphiphilic dendrimers in nucleic acid delivery. In addition, this dendrimer not only integrated favorable features of lipid and polymer vectors, but also incorporated EPR-based passive tumor-targeting properties.

Figure 18.

(A) Schematic illustration of self-assembling dendrimer vector for siRNA delivery and gene silencing. (B) Schematic illustration of amphiphilic dendrimer for siRNA delivery via combination of the delivery feature of lipid and polymer vectors. (C) Chemical structures of dendrimers 19 and 20. Adapted with permission from [9] (copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH GmbH) and [51] (copyright 2022 ShanghaiTech University and American Chemical Society).

Further structural refinements were introduced to improve biocompatibility and delivery efficiency of dendrimer 2. Substitution of the terminal primary amines in dendrimer 2 with tertiary amines afforded dendrimer 4 (Figure 4), which retained siRNA delivery efficacy while substantially reducing cytotoxicity [67]. Interestingly, both dendrimer 2 and dendrimer 4 also acted as permeabilizers of the bacterial envelope and assisted in the internalization of oligonucleotide mimics for antibacterial activity, yet without any notable toxicity [68]. This finding demonstrated that amphiphilic dendrimers effectively assisted oligonucleotide mimics in killing bacteria, highlighting their potential as a novel strategy against antimicrobial-resistant pathogens.

Inspired by arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) [69], we elaborated dendrimer 21 (Figure 19A) bearing arginine residues at the terminals with the view to mimicking the cell penetration feature of CPPs for enhanced cellular uptake [70]. Consistent with the design strategy, dendrimer 21 outperformed dendrimer 2 in cellular uptake of siRNA (Figure 19B/C) as well as in siRNA delivery for gene silencing (Figure 19D), underscoring the importance of terminal functionality in governing biological interactions and nucleic acid delivery efficiency.

Figure 19.

(A) Chemical structure of amphiphilic dendrimer 21. (B) Confocal image and (C) quantification of cellular uptake of the Cy3-labeled siRNA delivered by dendrimer 21 in comparison to that by 2. Adapted with permission from [70] (copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry).

We also developed poly(aminoester) (PAE) dendrimers [71, 72, 73] as biodegradable platforms for nucleic acid delivery. These dendrimers integrate hydrolysable ester linkages with ionizable amine functionalities, enabling efficient complexation of nucleic acids through electrostatic interactions at physiological pH, while facilitating cargo release via dendrimer degradation in acidic/basic or enzyme-rich environment. Amphiphilic PAE dendrimer 22 (Figure 20), consisting of a second-generation PAE dendron appended with a long alkyl chain, exhibited effective siRNA delivery, whereas its PAMAM analogue 23 showed negligible activity [74]. These results highlight that biodegradable amphiphilic dendrimers can further improve delivery efficiency. Additional studies revealed a pronounced generation-dependent hydrolytic degradation behavior: the higher-generation dendrimer 25 (Figure 20) underwent rapid degradation, whereas the lower-generation analogue 24 (Figure 20) degraded substantially more slowly [75]. This trend can be attributed to the dendritic architecture, in which increasing generation generates steric congestion that destabilizes the ester linkages and enhances their susceptibility to hydrolysis. This “dendritic effect” and generation-dependent degradation can be exploited as a tunable strategy for generation-dependent delivery.

Figure 20.

Chemical structures of amphiphilic dendrimers 22, 23, 24 and 25.

Subsequent investigations on amphiphilic dendrimer 1 revealed its excellent delivery performance not only in siRNA-mediated gene silencing but also in saRNA-induced gene activation (Figure 21A), surpassing commercially available vectors in both in vitro and in vivo models [76, 77, 78, 79, 80]. A recent study further demonstrated its capacity to deliver both single-stranded and double-stranded oligonucleotides to mitochondria, which are particularly challenging due to the presence of dual mitochondrial membranes [81]. Most strikingly, dendrimer 1 also enabled efficient siRNA delivery to primary immune cells such as primary T cells, primary natural killer cells, and primary macrophages and microglia (Figure 21B–I) [76, 78, 79]. It should be mentioned that primary immune cells are typically refractory to nonviral transfection agents and require electroporation for nucleic acid delivery. Therefore, dendrimer 1 constitutes a promising vector for nucleic acid delivery either in functional investigations on immune cells or in translational studies on immune therapies.

Figure 21.

(A) Schematic illustration of the amphiphilic dendrimer 1 for the delivery of siRNA to cytosol for gene silencing and saRNA to nucleus for gene activation. Effective 1-mediated siRNA delivery and gene silencing achieved in (B,C) primary T cells, (D,E) primary natural killer cells, (F,G) primary macrophages, and (H,I) primary microglia. Adapted with permission from [76] (copyright 2021 Springer Nature).

Moreover, dendrimer 1 functioned as a delivery platform for targeted siRNA transport, which could be realized through either physical or chemical conjugation with targeting moieties (Figure 22). In one representative approach, the positively charged siRNA/1@ complexes were decorated with a negatively charged peptide bearing targeting warheads via electrostatic interactions (Figure 22A) [82]. This strategy enabled selective siRNA delivery to cancer cells, resulting in enhanced therapeutic efficacy (Figure 22B). Alternatively, chemical conjugation of the siRNA/1@ complexes with an anti–PD-L1 antibody (Figure 22C) not only conferred cancer cell–specific delivery but also simultaneously blocked the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint interaction [83]. This dual functionality triggered immune activation in conjunction with siRNA-mediated anticancer activity, thereby affording synergistic therapeutic effects (Figure 22D). Collectively, these straightforward and modular strategies markedly improved delivery specificity and therapeutic outcomes while enabling dose reduction and minimizing associated off-target toxicity [82, 83, 84].

Figure 22.

(A) Schematic illustration of targeted siRNA delivery via electrostatic decoration of positively charged siRNA/1@ complexes with negatively charged, warhead-bearing targeting peptides. (B) Resulting enhancement of anticancer activity relative to the nontargeted counterpart. (C) Schematic illustration of antibody-mediated targeting achieved through chemical conjugation of siRNA/1@ complexes with an anti–PD-L1 antibody. (D) Corresponding enhancement of anticancer activity. Adapted from [82], licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0, and [83], licensed under CC BY 4.0.

Remarkably the bola-amphiphilic dendrimers 6 and 27 are capable of selective and ROS-responsive delivery of DNA and siRNA (Figure 23) [22, 85]. Specifically, the second-generation dendrimer 6 preferentially delivered siRNA, whereas the third-generation analogue 27 excelled in DNA delivery. Systematic studies of cargo binding, cellular uptake, endosomal escape, and in vivo behavior revealed that size matching between dendrimer and nucleic acid cargo governs both nucleic acid loading and release via cooperative multivalent interactions, enabling adaptive and cargo-selective delivery [85]. In addition, these bola-amphiphilic dendrimers incorporated the thioacetal functionality for redox-responsive cargo release. As a result, they achieved tumor- and cancer cell–specific delivery of siRNA and DNA therapeutics via combined EPR effect and ROS-responsive delivery, leading to effective treatment in diverse cancer models, including aggressive and metastatic tumors, and outperforming existing delivery systems. The insights gained from this study provide a foundation for the rational design of tailor-made dendrimer platforms for cargo-selective delivery, advancing the development of nucleic acid therapeutics in precision medicine.

Figure 23.

(A) Chemical structures of bola-amphiphilic dendrimers 26, 6, and 27. (B) Schematic illustration of cargo-selective delivery via matching nucleic acid size and dendrimer generation. Reproduced from [85], licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Interestingly, dendrimer 6 was also able to co-deliver nucleic acid therapeutics and anticancer drug for synergistic action in cancer chemo-immunotherapy [86]. Specifically, a combined anticancer drug DOX and siRNA formulation targeting CD47—an antiphagocytic “don’t eat me” signal—was elaborated. The co-delivery system was constructed by encapsulating DOX within the hydrophobic interior of the dendrimer nanoassemblies, while electrostatically complexing the negatively charged siRNA onto the positively charged dendrimer surface. This dual-cargo platform effectively downregulated CD47 expression, thereby attenuating antiphagocytic signaling, while simultaneously inducing DOX-mediated immunogenic cell death and activating antitumor immune responses. As a result, the system exhibited potent antitumor efficacy arising from the coordinated actions of DOX and siCD47, highlighting its promise as a strategy for synergistic cancer chemo-immunotherapy.

All these studies have established amphiphilic dendrimers as a versatile and programmable class of nonviral vectors for nucleic acid delivery. By systematically tuning dendrimer amphiphilicity, terminal functionality, generation, and supramolecular self-assembly, we investigated the factors governing nucleic acid complexation, cellular uptake, cargo release, and biological activity. Amphiphilicity-driven self-assembly was shown to be essential for effective siRNA delivery, with an optimal hydrophilic–hydrophobic balance required to form assemblies that are sufficiently stable for transport yet labile enough to enable intracellular cargo release. Terminal group engineering further improved biocompatibility and cellular internalization. Extension to bipolar-amphiphilic dendrimers revealed how dendrimer generation and size matching with nucleic acid cargos can be exploited to achieve adaptive and cargo-selective delivery of siRNA versus DNA, resulting in effective and tumor-specific therapeutic outcomes. Recently, Percec and coworkers have elaborated ionizable amphiphilic Janus dendrimer (IAJD) systems for mRNA delivery, which exhibited high delivery performance and organ-selective delivery [87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93], hence opening new avenues for more versatile and translatable mRNA therapeutics. Collectively, these findings define a rational engineering framework for amphiphilic dendrimer–mediated nucleic acid delivery.

5. Conclusion and perspectives

This short Account highlights our decade-long efforts in establishing self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers as modular and adaptable nanoplatforms for biomedical applications, including drug and nucleic acid delivery, advanced biomedical imaging and theranostics, etc. Amphiphilicity-driven self-assembly enables the formation of dendritic nanoassemblies with high drug loading capacity, controllable release kinetics, and tunable biological interactions. Through systematic modulation of dendrimer amphiphilicity, generation, surface chemistry, and degradable linkage, these systems were shown to overcome key barriers such as drug resistance, off-target toxicity, suboptimal biodistribution, and inefficient intracellular delivery. Importantly, subtle molecular-level modifications—such as hydrophobic chain engineering, fluorination, chelator selection, or terminal group functionalization—were found to exert profound effects on drug loading and release, cell uptake and endosome escape, in vivo biodistribution, toxicity and therapeutic efficacy, underscoring the sensitivity of supramolecular dendrimers to rational design. Taken together, the ability of self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers to precisely regulate cargo loading and release, biological interactions, and in vivo fate underpins their broad utility across drug and nucleic acid delivery alongside biomedical imaging and theranostics.

Beyond functioning as drug delivery vehicles, self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers can themselves serve as active therapeutic agents [94, 95, 96, 97]. For example, dendrimers 2 and 4 displayed pronounced antibacterial activity [95, 96, 97]. Dendrimer 2 exhibited broad-spectrum efficacy against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, as well as drug-resistant strains and bacterial biofilms [95, 97]. In contrast, dendrimer 4 demonstrated selective yet potent activity toward multiple Gram-negative bacteria via targeting the bacterial membrane [95, 96]. Meanwhile, dendrimers bearing guanidinium or carboxylate terminal groups did not exhibit any appreciable antibacterial activity [95], underscoring the critical role of dendrimer structure and surface functionality in determining biological performance. This provides valuable design principles for the development of innovative antibacterial candidates.

In addition to amphiphilic PAMAM dendrimers developed in our group, numerous studies based on amphiphilic polyether or glycerol dendrimers [98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105], phosphorus dendrimers [106, 107], carbosilane dendrimers [108, 109], or glycodendrimers [110, 111, 112], have been reported by other groups for creating self-assembling dendrimer nanosystems. All these studies have supported the concept of synthesizing supramolecular dendrimers via self-assembling as modular and adaptive nanosystems in biomedicine.

Looking forward, self-assembling dendrimers offer a powerful and flexible platform for next-generation precision medicine. Future developments will benefit from deeper integration of molecular design with biological insight, enabling dendrimers that respond to disease-specific microenvironments, biological transport pathways, and intracellular triggers. The convergence of therapeutic delivery, imaging, and targeting within a single supramolecular scaffold offers opportunities for truly integrated theranostic systems with improved efficacy and safety for precision medicine. As understanding of supramolecular chemistry continues to advance, supramolecular dendrimers are expected to play an increasingly important role in the rational design of multifunctional nanomedicines.

Acknowledgements

We thank all former and current group members as well as collaborators for their outstanding contributions to the studies presented in this Account. We acknowledge financial support from the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, the French National Research Agency for funding of the Era-Net EURONANOMED projects “DENANORNA”, “Target4Cancer”, “NANOGLIO”, “TARBRAINFEC”, “NAN-4-TUM”, “NanoGUN”, “antineuropatho”, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe research and innovation projects “SAFE-N-MEDTECH” (no. 814607) and “HIT-GLIO” (no. 101136835), the EU MSCA ITN projects “OLIGOMED” (no. 956070) and “ON-TRACT” (no. 101227456), CNRS and Aix-Marseille Université.

Declaration of interests

The authors do not work for, advise, own shares in, or receive funds from any organization that could benefit from this article, and have declared no affiliations other than their research organization.


Bibliographie

[1] M. Malkoch; S. G. Gallego Dendrimer Chemistry: Synthetic Approaches Towards Complex Architectures, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2020 | DOI

[2] V. Percec The 40th anniversary of covalent dendrimers, Chem, Volume 11 (2025) no. 12, 102870 | DOI

[3] Q. Ni; J. Wu; C. Galanakou; C.-C. Zhang; D. A. Tomalia; L. Peng Dendrimer engineering to overcome delivery challenges of nucleic acids, Nat. Rev. Bioeng., Volume 3 (2025) no. 10, pp. 806-807 | DOI

[4] D. A. Tomalia Dendrimers, dendrons, and the dendritic state: reflection on the last decade with expected new roles in pharma, medicine, and the life sciences, Pharmaceutics, Volume 16 (2024) no. 12, 1530 | DOI

[5] D. A. Tomalia; A. M. Naylor; W. A. Goddard III Starburst dendrimers: molecular-level control of size, shape, surface chemistry, topology, and flexibility from atoms to macroscopic matter, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., Volume 29 (1990) no. 2, pp. 138-175 | DOI

[6] L. Ding; Z. Lyu; D. Dhumal; C.-L. Kao; M. Bernard; L. Peng Dendrimer-based magnetic resonance imaging agents for brain cancer, Sci. China Mater., Volume 61 (2018) no. 11, pp. 1420-1443 | DOI

[7] D. Astruc; F. Chardac Dendritic catalysts and dendrimers in catalysis, Chem. Rev., Volume 101 (2001) no. 9, pp. 2991-3024 | DOI

[8] A.-M. Caminade Inorganic dendrimers: recent advances for catalysis, nanomaterials, and nanomedicine, Chem. Soc. Rev., Volume 45 (2016) no. 19, pp. 5174-5186 | DOI

[9] C. Chen; P. Posocco; X. Liu; Q. Cheng; E. Laurini; J. Zhou; C. Liu; Y. Wang; J. Tang; V. D. Col; T. Yu; S. Giorgio; M. Fermeglia; F. Qu; Z. Liang; J. J. Rossi; M. Liu; P. Rocchi; S. Pricl; L. Peng Mastering dendrimer self-assembly for efficient siRNA delivery: from conceptual design to in vivo efficient gene silencing, Small, Volume 12 (2016) no. 27, pp. 3667-3676 | DOI

[10] Z. Lyu; L. Ding; A. Y.-T. Huang; C.-L. Kao; L. Peng Poly(amidoamine) dendrimers: covalent and supramolecular synthesis, Mater. Today Chem., Volume 13 (2019), pp. 34-48 | DOI

[11] Z. Lyu; L. Ding; A. Tintaru; L. Peng Self-assembling supramolecular dendrimers for biomedical applications: lessons learned from poly(amidoamine) dendrimers, Acc. Chem. Res., Volume 53 (2020) no. 12, pp. 2936-2949 | DOI

[12] J. Gao; J. M. Karp; R. Langer; N. Joshi The future of drug delivery, Chem. Mater., Volume 35 (2023) no. 2, pp. 359-363 | DOI

[13] A. M. Vargason; A. C. Anselmo; S. Mitragotri The evolution of commercial drug delivery technologies, Nat. Biomed. Eng., Volume 5 (2021) no. 9, pp. 951-967 | DOI

[14] T. Wei; C. Chen; J. Liu; C. Liu; P. Posocco; X. Liu; Q. Cheng; S. Huo; Z. Liang; M. Fermeglia; S. Pricl; X.-J. Liang; P. Rocchi; L. Peng Anticancer drug nanomicelles formed by self-assembling amphiphilic dendrimer to combat cancer drug resistance, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 112 (2015) no. 10, pp. 2978-2983 | DOI

[15] J. Liu; C. Chen; T. Wei; O. Gayet; C. Loncle; L. Borge; N. Dusetti; X. Ma; D. Marson; E. Laurini; S. Pricl; Z. Gu; J. Iovanna; L. Peng; X.-J. Liang Dendrimeric nanosystem consistently circumvents heterogeneous drug response and resistance in pancreatic cancer, Exploration, Volume 1 (2021) no. 1, pp. 21-34 | DOI

[16] Y. Jiang; Z. Lyu; B. Ralahy; J. Liu; T. Roussel; L. Ding; J. Tang; A. Kosta; S. Giorgio; R. Tomasini; X.-J. Liang; N. Dusetti; J. Iovanna; L. Peng Dendrimer nanosystems for adaptive tumor-assisted drug delivery via extracellular vesicle hijacking, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 120 (2023) no. 7, e2215308120 | DOI

[17] G. van Niel; G. D’Angelo; G. Raposo Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., Volume 19 (2018) no. 4, pp. 213-228 | DOI

[18] R. Xu; A. Rai; M. Chen; W. Suwakulsiri; D. W. Greening; R. J. Simpson Extracellular vesicles in cancer — implications for future improvements in cancer care, Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., Volume 15 (2018) no. 10, pp. 617-638 | DOI

[19] J. Herrmann Adverse cardiac effects of cancer therapies: cardiotoxicity and arrhythmia, Nat. Rev. Cardiol., Volume 17 (2020) no. 8, pp. 474-502 | DOI

[20] S. Kalyaanamoorthy; K. H. Barakat Development of safe drugs: the hERG challenge, Med. Res. Rev., Volume 38 (2018) no. 2, pp. 525-555 | DOI

[21] X. Liu; D. Dhumal; P. Santofimia-Castaño; J. Liu; M. Casanova; A. C. Garcia-Muñoz; T.-A. Perles-Barbacaru; A. Elkihel; W. Zhang; T. Roussel; C. Galanakou; J. Wu; E. Zerva; N. Dusetti; Y. Xia; X.-J. Liang; A. Viola; J. L. Iovanna; L. Peng Self-assembling dendrimer nanodrug formulations for decreased hERG-related toxicity and enhanced therapeutic efficacy, Sci. Adv., Volume 11 (2025) no. 26, eadu9948 | DOI

[22] X. Liu; Y. Wang; C. Chen; A. Tintaru; Y. Cao; J. Liu; F. Ziarelli; J. Tang; H. Guo; R. Rosas; S. Giorgio; L. Charles; P. Rocchi; L. Peng A fluorinated bola-amphiphilic dendrimer for on-demand delivery of siRNA, via specific response to reactive oxygen species, Adv. Funct. Mater., Volume 26 (2016) no. 47, pp. 8594-8603 | DOI

[23] Z. Shi; M. Artemenko; W. Yu; M. Zhang; C. Yi; P. Chen; S. Lin; Z. Bian; B. Lian; F. Meng; J. Chen; T. Roussel; Y. Li; K. K. L. Chan; P. P. C. Ip; H.-C. Lai; S. K. Y. To; X. Liu; L. Peng; A. S. T. Wong Bola-amphiphilic dendrimer enhances imatinib to target metastatic ovarian cancer via β-catenin-HRP2 signaling axis, ACS Appl. Mater. Interf., Volume 17 (2025) no. 2, pp. 2884-2898 | DOI

[24] M. Cong; G. Xu; S. Yang; J. Zhang; W. Zhang; D. Dhumal; E. Laurini; K. Zhang; Y. Xia; S. Pricl; L. Peng; W. Zhao A self-assembling prodrug nanosystem to enhance metabolic stability and anticancer activity of gemcitabine, Chin. Chem. Lett., Volume 33 (2022) no. 5, pp. 2481-2485 | DOI

[25] Z. Zhou; M. Cong; M. Li; A. Tintaru; J. Li; J. Yao; Y. Xia; L. Peng Negative dendritic effect on enzymatic hydrolysis of dendrimer conjugates, Chem. Commun., Volume 54 (2018) no. 47, pp. 5956-5959 | DOI

[26] Z. Bian; W. Zhang; S. Garofalo; D. Dhumal; J. Zheng; T. Roussel; E. Laurini; C. Galanakou; C. Lauro; M. Maresca; Y. Xia; D. Zhu; S. Pricl; X. Liu; C. Limatola; L. Peng Bola-amphiphilic glycodendrimers for targeting glial cells in the brain, Nanoscale, Volume 17 (2025) no. 48, pp. 27869-27880 | DOI

[27] W. Zhang; D. Dhumal; X. Zhu; B. Ralahy; A. Ellert-Miklaszewska; J. Wu; E. Laurini; Y.-W. Yao; C.-L. Kao; J. L. Iovanna; S. Pricl; B. Kaminska; Y. Xia; L. Peng Bola-amphiphilic glycodendrimers: new carbohydrate-mimicking scaffolds to target carbohydrate-binding proteins, Chem. – Eur. J., Volume 28 (2022) no. 58, e202201400 | DOI

[28] A. N. Brandebura; A. Paumier; T. S. Onur; N. J. Allen Astrocyte contribution to dysfunction, risk and progression in neurodegenerative disorders, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., Volume 24 (2023) no. 1, pp. 23-39 | DOI

[29] M. Colonna; O. Butovsky Microglia function in the central nervous system during health and neurodegeneration, Annu. Rev. Immunol., Volume 35 (2017), pp. 441-468 | DOI

[30] M. L. James; S. S. Gambhir A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications, Physiol. Rev., Volume 92 (2012) no. 2, pp. 897-965 | DOI

[31] Imaging more of the body, Nat. Biomed. Eng., Volume 6 (2022), pp. 495-496 | DOI

[32] B. R. Smith; S. S. Gambhir Nanomaterials for in vivo imaging, Chem. Rev., Volume 117 (2017) no. 3, pp. 901-986 | DOI

[33] P. J. Gawne; M. Ferreira; M. Papaluca; J. Grimm; P. Decuzzi New opportunities and old challenges in the clinical translation of nanotheranostics, Nat. Rev. Mater., Volume 8 (2023) no. 12, pp. 783-798 | DOI

[34] B. Wang; S. Hu; Y. Teng; J. Chen; H. Wang; Y. Xu; K. Wang; J. Xu; Y. Cheng; X. Gao Current advance of nanotechnology in diagnosis and treatment for malignant tumors, Signal Transduct. Target. Ther., Volume 9 (2024) no. 1, 200 | DOI

[35] H. Chen; W. Zhang; G. Zhu; J. Xie; X. Chen Rethinking cancer nanotheranostics, Nat. Rev. Mater., Volume 2 (2017) no. 7, 17024 | DOI

[36] L. Ding; Z. Lyu; A. Tintaru; E. Laurini; D. Marson; B. Louis; A. Bouhlel; L. Balasse; S. Fernandez; P. Garrigue; E. Mas; S. Giorgio; S. Pricl; B. Guillet; L. Peng A self-assembling amphiphilic dendrimer nanotracer for SPECT imaging, Chem. Commun., Volume 56 (2020) no. 2, pp. 301-304 | DOI

[37] L. Ding; Z. Lyu; B. Louis; A. Tintaru; E. Laurini; D. Marson; M. Zhang; W. Shao; Y. Jiang; A. Bouhlel; L. Balasse; P. Garrigue; E. Mas; S. Giorgio; J. Iovanna; Y. Huang; S. Pricl; B. Guillet; L. Peng Surface charge of supramolecular nanosystems for in vivo biodistribution: a MicroSPECT/CT imaging study, Small, Volume 16 (2020) no. 37, 2003290 | DOI

[38] T. I. Kostelnik; C. Orvig Radioactive main group and rare earth metals for imaging and therapy, Chem. Rev., Volume 119 (2019) no. 2, pp. 902-956 | DOI

[39] E. W. Price; C. Orvig Matching chelators to radiometals for radiopharmaceuticals, Chem. Soc. Rev., Volume 43 (2014) no. 1, pp. 260-290 | DOI

[40] P. Garrigue; J. Tang; L. Ding; A. Bouhlel; A. Tintaru; E. Laurini; Y. Huang; Z. Lyu; M. Zhang; S. Fernandez; L. Balasse; W. Lan; E. Mas; D. Marson; Y. Weng; X. Liu; S. Giorgio; J. Iovanna; S. Pricl; B. Guillet; L. Peng Self-assembling supramolecular dendrimer nanosystem for PET imaging of tumors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 115 (2018) no. 45, pp. 11454-11459 | DOI

[41] M. G. Harisinghani; A. O’Shea; R. Weissleder Advances in clinical MRI technology, Sci. Transl. Med., Volume 11 (2019) no. 523, eaba2591 | DOI

[42] E. Terreno; D. D. Castelli; A. Viale; S. Aime Challenges for molecular magnetic resonance imaging, Chem. Rev., Volume 110 (2010) no. 5, pp. 3019-3042 | DOI

[43] K. Wang; Y. Du; Z. Zhang; K. He; Z. Cheng; L. Yin; D. Dong; C. Li; W. Li; Z. Hu; Chong Zhang; H. Hui; C. Chi; J. Tian Fluorescence image-guided tumour surgery, Nat. Rev. Bioeng., Volume 1 (2023) no. 3, pp. 161-179 | DOI

[44] G. Hong; A. L. Antaris; H. Dai Near-infrared fluorophores for biomedical imaging, Nat. Biomed. Eng., Volume 1 (2017) no. 1, 0010 | DOI

[45] L. Ding; Z. Lyu; T.-A. Perles-Barbacaru; A. Y.-T. Huang; B. Lian; Y. Jiang; T. Roussel; C. Galanakou; S. Giorgio; C.-L. Kao; X. Liu; J. Iovanna; M. Bernard; A. Viola; L. Peng Modular self-assembling dendrimer nanosystems for magnetic resonance and multimodality imaging of tumors, Adv. Mater., Volume 36 (2024) no. 7, 2308262 | DOI

[46] I. Tirotta; V. Dichiarante; C. Pigliacelli; G. Cavallo; G. Terraneo; F. B. Bombelli; P. Metrangolo; G. Resnati 19F magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): from design of materials to clinical applications, Chem. Rev., Volume 115 (2015) no. 2, pp. 1106-1129 | DOI

[47] D. Janasik; T. Krawczyk 19F MRI probes for multimodal imaging, Chem. – Eur. J., Volume 28 (2022) no. 5, e202102556 | DOI

[48] Z. Lyu; B. Ralahy; T.-A. Perles-Barbacaru; L. Ding; Y. Jiang; B. Lian; T. Roussel; X. Liu; C. Galanakou; E. Laurini; A. Tintaru; S. Giorgio; S. Pricl; X. Liu; M. Bernard; J. Iovanna; A. Viola; L. Peng Self-assembling dendrimer nanosystems for specific fluorine magnetic resonance imaging and effective theranostic treatment of tumors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 121 (2024) no. 25, e2322403121 | DOI

[49] X. Sun; S. Setrerrahmane; C. Li; J. Hu; H. Xu Nucleic acid drugs: recent progress and future perspectives, Signal Transduct. Target. Ther., Volume 9 (2024) no. 1, 316 | DOI

[50] J. A. Kulkarni; D. Witzigmann; S. B. Thomson; S. Chen; B. R. Leavitt; P. R. Cullis; R. van der Meel The current landscape of nucleic acid therapeutics, Nat. Nanotechnol., Volume 16 (2021) no. 6, pp. 630-643 | DOI

[51] J. Chen; D. Zhu; X. Liu; L. Peng Amphiphilic dendrimer vectors for RNA delivery: state-of-the-art and future perspective, Acc. Mater. Res., Volume 3 (2022) no. 5, pp. 484-497 | DOI

[52] X. Liu; P. Rocchi; L. Peng Dendrimers as non-viral vectors for siRNA delivery, New J. Chem., Volume 36 (2012) no. 2, pp. 256-263 | DOI

[53] J. Zhou; J. Wu; N. Hafdi; J.-P. Behr; P. Erbacher; L. Peng PAMAM dendrimers for efficient siRNA delivery and potent gene silencing, Chem. Commun. (2006) no. 22, pp. 2362-2364 | DOI

[54] X. Liu; J. Wu; M. Yammine; J. Zhou; P. Posocco; S. Viel; C. Liu; F. Ziarelli; M. Fermeglia; S. Pricl; G. Victorero; C. Nguyen; P. Erbacher; J.-P. Behr; L. Peng Structurally flexible triethanolamine core PAMAM dendrimers are effective nanovectors for DNA transfection in vitro and in vivo to the mouse thymus, Bioconjug. Chem., Volume 22 (2011) no. 12, pp. 2461-2473 | DOI

[55] J. Zhou; C. P. Neff; X. Liu; J. Zhang; H. Li; D. D. Smith; P. Swiderski; T. Aboellail; Y. Huang; Q. Du; Z. Liang; L. Peng; R. Akkina; J. J. Rossi Systemic administration of combinatorial dsiRNAs via nanoparticles efficiently suppresses HIV-1 infection in humanized mice, Mol. Ther., Volume 19 (2011) no. 12, pp. 2228-2238 | DOI

[56] V. Reebye; P. Sætrom; P. J. Mintz; K.-W. Huang; P. Swiderski; L. Peng; C. Liu; X. Liu; S. Lindkær-Jensen; D. Zacharoulis; N. Kostomitsopoulos; N. Kasahara; J. P. Nicholls; L. R. Jiao; M. Pai; D. R. Spalding; M. Mizandari; T. Chikovani; M. M. Emara; A. Haoudi; D. A. Tomalia; J. J. Rossi; N. A. Habib Novel RNA oligonucleotide improves liver function and inhibits liver carcinogenesis in vivo, Hepatology, Volume 59 (2014) no. 1, pp. 216-227 | DOI

[57] J. Ma; S. Kala; S. Yung; T. M. Chan; Y. Cao; Y. Jiang; X. Liu; S. Giorgio; L. Peng; A. S. T. Wong Blocking stemness and metastatic properties of ovarian cancer cells by targeting p70S6K with dendrimer nanovector-based siRNA delivery, Mol. Ther., Volume 26 (2018) no. 1, pp. 70-83 | DOI

[58] X.-x. Liu; P. Rocchi; F.-q. Qu; S.-q. Zheng; Z.-c. Liang; M. Gleave; J. Iovanna; L. Peng PAMAM dendrimers mediate siRNA delivery to target Hsp27 and produce potent antiproliferative effects on prostate cancer cells, ChemMedChem, Volume 4 (2009) no. 8, pp. 1302-1310 | DOI

[59] M.-F. Lang; S. Yang; C. Zhao; G. Sun; K. Murai; X. Wu; J. Wang; H. Gao; C. E. Brown; X. Liu; J. Zhou; L. Peng; J. J. Rossi; Y. Shi Genome-wide profiling identified a set of miRNAs that are differentially expressed in glioblastoma stem cells and normal neural stem cells, PLoS One, Volume 7 (2012) no. 4, e36248 | DOI

[60] X. Liu; C. Liu; E. Laurini; P. Posocco; S. Pricl; F. Qu; P. Rocchi; L. Peng Efficient delivery of sticky siRNA and potent gene silencing in a prostate cancer model using a generation 5 triethanolamine-core PAMAM dendrimer, Mol. Pharm., Volume 9 (2012) no. 3, pp. 470-481 | DOI

[61] P. Posocco; X. Liu; E. Laurini; D. Marson; C. Chen; C. Liu; M. Fermeglia; P. Rocchi; S. Pricl; L. Peng Impact of siRNA overhangs for dendrimer-mediated siRNA delivery and gene silencing, Mol. Pharm., Volume 10 (2013) no. 8, pp. 3262-3273 | DOI

[62] X. Liu; C. Liu; C. Chen; M. Bentobji; F. A. Cheillan; J. T. Piana; F. Qu; P. Rocchi; L. Peng Targeted Delivery of dicer-substrate siRNAs using a dual targeting peptide decorated dendrimer delivery system, Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med., Volume 10 (2014) no. 8, pp. 1627-1636 | DOI

[63] C. Liu; X. Liu; P. Rocchi; F. Qu; J. L. Iovanna; L. Peng Arginine-terminated generation 4 PAMAM dendrimer as an effective nanovector for functional siRNA delivery in vitro and in vivo, Bioconjug. Chem., Volume 25 (2014) no. 3, pp. 521-532 | DOI

[64] Q. Cui; S. Yang; P. Ye; E. Tian; G. Sun; J. Zhou; G. Sun; X. Liu; C. Chen; K. Murai; C. Zhao; K. T. Azizian; L. Yang; C. Warden; X. Wu; M. D’Apuzzo; C. Brown; B. Badie; L. Peng; A. D. Riggs; J. J. Rossi; Y. Shi Downregulation of TLX induces TET3 expression and inhibits glioblastoma stem cell self-renewal and tumorigenesis, Nat. Commun., Volume 7 (2016) no. 1, 10637 | DOI

[65] D. Sarker; R. Plummer; T. Meyer; M. H. Sodergren; B. Basu; C. E. Chee; K.-W. Huang; D. H. Palmer; Y. T. Ma; T. R. J. Evans; D. R. C. Spalding; M. Pai; R. Sharma; D. J. Pinato; J. Spicer; S. Hunter; V. Kwatra; J. P. Nicholls; D. Collin; R. Nutbrown; H. Glenny; S. Fairbairn; V. Reebye; J. Voutila; S. Dorman; P. Andrikakou; P. Lloyd; S. Felstead; J. Vasara; R. Habib; C. Wood; P. Saetrom; H. E. Huber; D. C. Blakey; J. J. Rossi; N. Habib MTL-CEBPA, a small activating RNA therapeutic upregulating C/EBP-α, in patients with advanced liver cancer: a first-in-human, multicenter, open-label, phase I trial, Clin. Cancer Res., Volume 26 (2020) no. 15, pp. 3936-3946 | DOI

[66] R. Plummer; M. H. Sodergren; R. Hodgson; B. M. Ryan; N. Raulf; J. P. Nicholls; V. Reebye; J. Voutila; L. Sinigaglia; T. Meyer; D. J. Pinato; D. Sarker; B. Basu; S. Blagden; N. Cook; T. R. J. Evans; J. Yachnin; C. E. Chee; D. Li; A. El-Khoueiry; M. Diab; K.-W. Huang; M. Pai; D. Spalding; T. Talbot; M. S. Noel; B. Keenan; D. Mahalingam; M.-S. Song; M. Grosso; D. Arnaud; A. Auguste; D. Zacharoulis; J. Storkholm; I. McNeish; R. Habib; J. J. Rossi; N. A. Habib TIMEPOINT, a phase 1 study combining MTL-CEBPA with pembrolizumab, supports the immunomodulatory effect of MTL-CEBPA in solid tumors, Cell Rep. Med., Volume 6 (2025) no. 4, 102041 | DOI

[67] D. Dhumal; W. Lan; L. Ding; Y. Jiang; Z. Lyu; E. Laurini; D. Marson; A. Tintaru; N. Dusetti; S. Giorgio; J. L. Iovanna; S. Pricl; L. Peng An ionizable supramolecular dendrimer nanosystem for effective siRNA delivery with a favorable safety profile, Nano Res., Volume 14 (2021) no. 7, pp. 2247-2254 | DOI

[68] M. Gomes; I. Resende; Y. Zamoshchak; D. Araújo; J. Castro; D. Dhumal; L. Peng; R. S. Santos; N. F. Azevedo Amphiphilic dendrimer-assisted delivery of antisense nucleic acid mimics against E. coli, J. Control. Release, Volume 384 (2025), 113850 | DOI

[69] A. Gori; G. Lodigiani; S. G. Colombarolli; G. Bergamaschi; A. Vitali Cell penetrating peptides: classification, mechanisms, methods of study, and applications, ChemMedChem, Volume 18 (2023) no. 17, e202300236 | DOI

[70] X. Liu; C. Liu; J. Zhou; C. Chen; F. Qu; J. J. Rossi; P. Rocchi; L. Peng Promoting siRNA delivery via enhanced cellular uptake using an arginine-decorated amphiphilic dendrimer, Nanoscale, Volume 7 (2015) no. 9, pp. 3867-3875 | DOI

[71] C. Bouillon; A. Tintaru; V. Monnier; L. Charles; G. Quéléver; L. Peng Synthesis of poly(amino)ester dendrimers via active cyanomethyl ester intermediates, J. Org. Chem., Volume 75 (2010) no. 24, pp. 8685-8688 | DOI

[72] P. Moreno; G. Quéléver; L. Peng Synthesis of poly(aminoester) dendrimers via ‘click’ chemistry in combination with the divergent and convergent strategies, Tetrahedron Lett., Volume 56 (2015) no. 26, pp. 4043-4046 | DOI

[73] Y. Wang; G. Quelever; L. Peng The seemingly trivial yet challenging synthesis of poly(aminoester) dendrimers, Curr. Med. Chem., Volume 19 (2012) no. 29, pp. 5011-5028 | DOI

[74] C. Ma; D. Zhu; W. Lin; Y. Li; Y. Huang; H. Zhu; M. Ye; Y. Wang; L. Peng; X. Liu A biodegradable amphiphilic poly(aminoester) dendrimer for safe and effective siRNA delivery, Chem. Commun., Volume 58 (2022) no. 26, pp. 4168-4171 | DOI

[75] Y. Ma; J. Zheng; D. Zhu; X. Lin; D. Yang; A. M. Mei; C. Ma; H. Dong; L. Peng; X. Liu Amphiphilic poly(aminoester) dendrimers: click reaction-enabled synthesis, structure-governed self-assembling and degradation, Chem. Commun., Volume 62 (2026) no. 34, pp. 8657-8660 | DOI

[76] J. Chen; A. Ellert-Miklaszewska; S. Garofalo; A. K. Dey; J. Tang; Y. Jiang; F. Clément; P. N. Marche; X. Liu; B. Kaminska; A. Santoni; C. Limatola; J. J. Rossi; J. Zhou; L. Peng Synthesis and use of an amphiphilic dendrimer for siRNA delivery into primary immune cells, Nat. Protoc., Volume 16 (2021) no. 1, pp. 327-351 | DOI

[77] Y. Xiong; R. Ke; Q. Zhang; W. Lan; W. Yuan; K. N. I. Chan; T. Roussel; Y. Jiang; J. Wu; S. Liu; A. S. T. Wong; J. S. Shim; X. Zhang; R. Xie; N. Dusetti; J. Iovanna; N. Habib; L. Peng; L. T. O. Lee Small activating RNA modulation of the G protein-coupled receptor for cancer treatment, Adv. Sci., Volume 9 (2022) no. 26, 2200562 | DOI

[78] A. Ellert-Miklaszewska; N. Ochocka; M. Maleszewska; L. Ding; E. Laurini; Y. Jiang; A.-J. Roura; S. Giorgio; B. Gielniewski; S. Pricl; L. Peng; B. Kaminska Efficient and innocuous delivery of small interfering RNA to microglia using an amphiphilic dendrimer nanovector, Nanomed, Volume 14 (2019) no. 18, pp. 2441-2459 | DOI

[79] S. Garofalo; G. Cocozza; A. Porzia; M. Inghilleri; M. Raspa; F. Scavizzi; E. Aronica; G. Bernardini; L. Peng; R. M. Ransohoff; A. Santoni; C. Limatola Natural killer cells modulate motor neuron-immune cell cross talk in models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Nat. Commun., Volume 11 (2020) no. 1, 1773 | DOI

[80] F. Marrocco; G. Cocozza; F. Antonangeli; R. Khan; G. Pietropaolo; A. Elkihel; G. Favaretto; X. Lin; R. Mancinelli; L. M. Busdraghi; A. Reccagni; G. Scarno; G. Sciumè; M. Laffranchi; L. Peng; V. Iebba; S. Sozzani; G. D’Alessandro; C. Limatola Muribaculum intestinale negatively impacts glioma growth in mice through the toll-like receptor 2, Gut Microbes, Volume 18 (2026) no. 1, 2623349 | DOI

[81] J. McHale; V. Bazzani; A. Elkihel; J. Wu; L. Peng; C. Vascotto Quantitative analysis of oligonucleotide delivery into isolated mitochondria: a proof-of-concept method, BioTechniques, Volume 78 (2026) no. 1–12, pp. 1-11 | DOI

[82] Y. Dong; T. Yu; L. Ding; E. Laurini; Y. Huang; M. Zhang; Y. Weng; S. Lin; P. Chen; D. Marson; Y. Jiang; S. Giorgio; S. Pricl; X. Liu; P. Rocchi; L. Peng A dual targeting dendrimer-mediated siRNA delivery system for effective gene silencing in cancer therapy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Volume 140 (2018) no. 47, pp. 16264-16274 | DOI

[83] P. Zhang; Z. Li; W. Cao; J. Tang; Y. Xia; L. Peng; J. Ma A PD-L1 antibody-conjugated PAMAM dendrimer nanosystem for simultaneously inhibiting glycolysis and promoting immune response in fighting breast cancer, Adv. Mater., Volume 35 (2023) no. 41, 2305215 | DOI

[84] J. Jozefiaková; A. Kulkarni; D. Dhumal; Á. Kevély; E. Nováková; K. Koči; L. Peng; J. Koči; M. Bhide Nanobody conjugated with dendrimer nanoparticles effectively neutralizes tick-borne encephalitis virus, Sci. Rep., Volume 15 (2025) no. 1, 35482 | DOI

[85] J. Chen; D. Zhu; B. Lian; K. Shi; P. Chen; Y. Li; W. Lin; L. Ding; Q. Long; Y. Wang; E. Laurini; W. Lan; Y. Li; A. Tintaru; C. Ju; C. Zhang; S. Pricl; J. Iovanna; X. Liu; L. Peng Cargo-selective and adaptive delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics by bola-amphiphilic dendrimers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 120 (2023) no. 21, e2220787120 | DOI

[86] B. Lian; D. Zhu; P. Chen; Z. Wang; F. Meng; R. Yan; N. A. Pyataev; X. Liu Synergic cancer chemo-immunotherapy comprising combined doxorubicin and siRNA targeting CD47 co-delivered by a bola-amphiphilic dendrimer, Biomater. Sci., Volume 14 (2026) no. 10, pp. 2649-2662 | DOI

[87] D. Zhang; E. N. Atochina-Vasserman; D. S. Maurya; N. Huang; Q. Xiao; N. Ona; M. Liu; H. Shahnawaz; H. Ni; K. Kim; M. M. Billingsley; D. J. Pochan; M. J. Mitchell; D. Weissman; V. Percec One-component multifunctional sequence-defined ionizable amphiphilic Janus dendrimer delivery systems for mRNA, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Volume 143 (2021) no. 31, pp. 12315-12327 | DOI

[88] D. Zhang; E. N. Atochina-Vasserman; D. S. Maurya; M. Liu; Q. Xiao; J. Lu; G. Lauri; N. Ona; E. K. Reagan; H. Ni; D. Weissman; V. Percec Targeted delivery of mRNA with one-component ionizable amphiphilic Janus dendrimers, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Volume 143 (2021) no. 43, pp. 17975-17982 | DOI

[89] D. Zhang; E. N. Atochina-Vasserman; J. Lu; D. S. Maurya; Q. Xiao; M. Liu; J. Adamson; N. Ona; E. K. Reagan; H. Ni; D. Weissman; V. Percec The unexpected importance of the primary structure of the hydrophobic part of one-component ionizable amphiphilic Janus dendrimers in targeted mRNA delivery activity, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Volume 144 (2022) no. 11, pp. 4746-4753 | DOI

[90] J. Lu; E. N. Atochina-Vasserman; D. S. Maurya; D. Sahoo; N. Ona; E. K. Reagan; H. Ni; D. Weissman; V. Percec Targeted and equally distributed delivery of mRNA to organs with pentaerythritol-based one-component ionizable amphiphilic Janus dendrimers, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Volume 145 (2023) no. 34, pp. 18760-18766 | DOI

[91] M. Arshad; E. N. Atochina-Vasserman; D. S. Maurya; J. Lu; N. Ona; J. A. Vasserman; B. C. McWilliams; H. Ni; S. Berkihiser; W.-J. Park; D. Weissman; V. Percec Harnessing the electron-withdrawing inductive effect of one-component ionizable amphiphilic Janus dendrimers unveils cation–π interactions and their important roles to targeted mRNA delivery, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Volume 147 (2025) no. 25, pp. 21347-21356 | DOI

[92] D. Sahoo; E. N. Atochina-Vasserman; D. S. Maurya; M. Arshad; S. S. Chenna; N. Ona; J. A. Vasserman; H. Ni; D. Weissman; V. Percec The constitutional isomerism of one-component ionizable amphiphilic Janus dendrimers orchestrates the total and targeted activities of mRNA delivery, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Volume 146 (2024) no. 6, pp. 3627-3634 | DOI

[93] J. A. Meshanni; E. R. Stevenson; D. Zhang; R. Sun; N. A. Ona; E. K. Reagan; E. Abramova; C.-J. Guo; M. Wilkinson; I. Baboo; Y. Yang; L. Pan; D. S. Maurya; V. Percec; Y. Li; A. Gow; D. Weissman; E. N. Atochina-Vasserman Targeted delivery of TGF-β mRNA to murine lung parenchyma using one-component ionizable amphiphilic Janus dendrimers, Nat. Commun., Volume 16 (2025) no. 1, 1806 | DOI

[94] C. Galanakou; D. Dhumal; L. Peng Amphiphilic dendrimers against antibiotic resistance: light at the end of the tunnel?, Biomater. Sci., Volume 11 (2023) no. 10, pp. 3379-3393 | DOI

[95] D. Dhumal; B. Maron; E. Malach; Z. Lyu; L. Ding; D. Marson; E. Laurini; A. Tintaru; B. Ralahy; S. Giorgio; S. Pricl; Z. Hayouka; L. Peng Dynamic self-assembling supramolecular dendrimer nanosystems as potent antibacterial candidates against drug-resistant bacteria and biofilms, Nanoscale, Volume 14 (2022) no. 26, pp. 9286-9296 | DOI

[96] N. Zhang; D. Dhumal; S. H. Kuo; S. Q. Lew; P. D. Patil; R. Taher; S. Vaidya; C. Galanakou; A. Elkihel; M. W. Oh; S. Y. Chong; D. Marson; J. Zheng; O. Rouvinski; W. O. Abolarin; S. Pricl; G. W. Lau; L. T. O. Lee; L. Peng Targeting the phosphatidylglycerol lipid: an amphiphilic dendrimer as a promising antibacterial candidate, Sci. Adv., Volume 10 (2024) no. 39, eadn8117 | DOI

[97] N. King; D. Dhumal; S. Q. Lew; S. H. Kuo; C. Galanakou; M. W. Oh; S. Y. Chong; N. Zhang; L. T. O. Lee; Z. Hayouka; L. Peng; G. W. Lau Amphiphilic dendrimer as potent antibacterial against drug-resistant bacteria in mouse models of human infectious diseases, ACS Infect. Dis., Volume 10 (2024) no. 2, pp. 453-466 | DOI

[98] D. Zhang; Q. Xiao; M. Rahimzadeh; M. Liu; C. Rodriguez-Emmenegger; Y. Miyazaki; W. Shinoda; V. Percec Self-assembly of glycerol-amphiphilic Janus dendrimers amplifies and indicates principles for the selection of stereochemistry by biological membranes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Volume 145 (2023) no. 7, pp. 4311-4323 | DOI

[99] P. Bristow; K. Schantz; Z. Moosbrugger; K. Martin; H. Liebenberg; S. Steimle; Q. Xiao; V. Percec; S. E. Wilner Aptamer-targeted dendrimersomes assembled from azido-modified Janus dendrimers “clicked” to DNA, Biomacromolecules, Volume 25 (2024) no. 3, pp. 1541-1549 | DOI

[100] S. Malhotra; H. Bauer; A. Tschiche; A. M. Staedtler; A. Mohr; M. Calderón; V. S. Parmar; L. Hoeke; S. Sharbati; R. Einspanier; R. Haag Glycine-terminated dendritic amphiphiles for nonviral gene delivery, Biomacromolecules, Volume 13 (2012) no. 10, pp. 3087-3098 | DOI

[101] A. Tschiche; A. M. Staedtler; S. Malhotra; H. Bauer; C. Böttcher; S. Sharbati; M. Calderón; M. Koch; T. M. Zollner; A. Barnard; D. K. Smith; R. Einspanier; N. Schmidt; R. Haag Polyglycerol-based amphiphilic dendrons as potential siRNA carriers for in vivo applications, J. Mater. Chem. B, Volume 2 (2014) no. 15, pp. 2153-2167 | DOI

[102] N. Hanheiser; Y. Jiang; C. Zoister; M. Dimde; K. Achazi; C. Nie; Y. Li; R. Haag; A. K. Singh Modular synthesis of dendritic oligo-glycerol cationic surfactants for enhanced antibacterial efficacy, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., Volume 64 (2025) no. 22, e202425069 | DOI

[103] B.-K. Cho; A. Jain; S. Mahajan; H. Ow; S. M. Gruner; U. Wiesner Nanohybrids from liquid crystalline extended amphiphilic dendrimers, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Volume 126 (2004) no. 13, pp. 4070-4071 | DOI

[104] B.-K. Cho; A. Jain; S. M. Gruner; U. Wiesner Mesophase structure-mechanical and ionic transport correlations in extended amphiphilic dendrons, Science, Volume 305 (2004) no. 5690, pp. 1598-1601 | DOI

[105] B.-K. Cho; A. Jain; S. M. Gruner; U. Wiesner Generation dependent mesophase behavior in extended amphiphilic dendrons in the shape of macromolecular dumbbells, Chem. Commun. (2005) no. 16, pp. 2143-2145 | DOI

[106] L. Chen; L. Cao; M. Zhan; J. Li; D. Wang; R. Laurent; S. Mignani; A.-M. Caminade; J.-P. Majoral; X. Shi Engineered stable bioactive per se amphiphilic phosphorus dendron nanomicelles as a highly efficient drug delivery system to take down breast cancer in vivo, Biomacromolecules, Volume 23 (2022) no. 7, pp. 2827-2837 | DOI

[107] M. Zhan; J. Qiu; Y. Fan; L. Chen; Y. Guo; Z. Wang; J. Li; J.-P. Majoral; X. Shi Phosphorous dendron micelles as a nanomedicine platform for cooperative tumor chemoimmunotherapy via synergistic modulation of immune cells, Adv. Mater., Volume 35 (2023) no. 3, 2208277 | DOI

[108] C. E. Gutierrez-Ulloa; M. Y. Buyanova; E. K. Apartsin; A. G. Venyaminova; F. J. de la Mata; M. Valiente; R. Gómez Amphiphilic carbosilane dendrons as a novel synthetic platform toward micelle formation, Org. Biomol. Chem., Volume 15 (2017) no. 35, pp. 7352-7364 | DOI

[109] D. Wrobel; A. Edr; E. Zemanova; T. Strašák; A. Semeradtova; J. Maly The influence of amphiphilic carbosilane dendrons on lipid model membranes, Chem. Phys. Lipids, Volume 255 (2023), 105314 | DOI

[110] V. Percec; P. Leowanawat; H.-J. Sun; O. Kulikov; C. D. Nusbaum; T. M. Tran; A. Bertin; D. A. Wilson; M. Peterca; S. Zhang; N. P. Kamat; K. Vargo; D. Moock; E. D. Johnston; D. A. Hammer; D. J. Pochan; Y. Chen; Y. M. Chabre; T. C. Shiao; M. Bergeron-Brlek; S. André; R. Roy; H.-J. Gabius; P. A. Heiney Modular synthesis of amphiphilic Janus glycodendrimers and their self-assembly into glycodendrimersomes and other complex architectures with bioactivity to biomedically relevant lectins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Volume 135 (2013) no. 24, pp. 9055-9077 | DOI

[111] S. Zhang; Q. Xiao; S. E. Sherman; A. Muncan; A. D. M. Ramos Vicente; Z. Wang; D. A. Hammer; D. Williams; Y. Chen; D. J. Pochan; S. Vértesy; S. André; M. L. Klein; H.-J. Gabius; V. Percec Glycodendrimersomes from sequence-defined Janus glycodendrimers reveal high activity and sensor capacity for the agglutination by natural variants of human lectins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Volume 137 (2015) no. 41, pp. 13334-13344 | DOI

[112] Q. Xiao; M. Delbianco; S. E. Sherman; A. M. Reveron Perez; P. Bharate; A. Pardo-Vargas; C. Rodriguez-Emmenegger; N. Y. Kostina; K. Rahimi; D. Söder; M. Möller; M. L. Klein; P. H. Seeberger; V. Percec Nanovesicles displaying functional linear and branched oligomannose self-assembled from sequence-defined Janus glycodendrimers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Volume 117 (2020) no. 22, pp. 11931-11939 | DOI


Commentaires - Politique